Healon5 tamponade of corneal perforation during transplantation surgery

Use of viscoelastic substance in ophthalmic surgery - focus on sodium hyaluronate

Among viscoelastic substances, sodium hyaluronate has become the most popular for intraocular surgeries since the introduction of Healon^® (sodium hyaluronate 1%, 4 × 10⁶ daltons) in 1979. This review focuses on the recent development of a new generation of sodium hyaluronate agents with new rheologic properties and the relevant new techniques used in cataract, glaucoma, corneal, and vitreoretinal surgeries. The introduction of sodium hyaluronate agents with different rheologic properties has improved the safety and reliability of intraocular surgeries. Although there have been numerous studies reporting the effectiveness of viscoelastic substances in intraocular surgeries, rigorous validation by multi-center randomized control trials is lacking in many cases. At present, no single viscoelastic agent is most suitable to all of the various intraocular surgical techniques. Therefore, ophthalmologic surgeons should keep up with recent developments of viscoelastic agents and relevant surgical techniques for better patient care.

Intraoperative Healon5 injection into blebs for small conjunctival breaks created during trabeculectomy

Leakage from a conjunctival break created during trabeculectomy may cause serious complications such as shallow anterior chamber, hypotony, and a flat bleb in the early postoperative period. Therefore, careful handling of the conjunctiva with a nontoothed forceps is essential. However, thin conjunctiva is susceptible to mechanical injury and is difficult to repair with suturing, especially when the point of leakage is close to the scleral flap. In 3 consecutive cases in which a small break in the thin conjunctiva adjacent to the scleral flap was created during trabeculectomy, sodium hyaluronate 2.3% (Healon5) was intraoperatively injected into the bleb. The break was successfully closed with an intraoperative injection of Healon5 into the bleb. This procedure appears to be a simple, safe, and effective method for closure of a small conjunctival break.

Removal times for a dispersive and a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device correlated with intraocular lens material

PURPOSE

To investigate the removal times of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) with different intraocular lens (IOL) designs and materials.

SETTING

Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, and Heidelberg IOL & Refractive Surgery Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

METHODS

In a standardized laboratory setup, the Miyake-Apple posterior view video technique was used to evaluate OVD removal from capsular bags in human autopsy eyes implanted with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone, and acrylic IOLs. The cohesive OVD ProVisc (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) and the dispersive OVD Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0% and chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) were stained with fluorescein for better visualization. The open-sky preparation and an Alcon Series 20000 Legacy phaco machine with a flow rate of 25 mL/min and a vacuum setting of +500 mm Hg (maximum irrigation/aspiration) were used. The time needed for complete removal of the cohesive and dispersive OVDs with each IOL type was measured and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean removal times for both OVDs were as follows: Alcon MZ60BD PMMA IOL-25.0 seconds +/- 3.7 (SD) (Viscoat), 15.9 +/- 6.9 seconds (ProVisc); Alcon AcrySof MA60BM IOL-35.5 +/- 10.0 seconds (Viscoat), 25.6 +/- 4.7 seconds (ProVisc); Chiron/Bausch & Lomb C1043 silicone IOL-46.5 +/- 10.5 seconds (Viscoat), 17.3 +/- 2.1 seconds (ProVisc); AMO SI-30 silicone IOL-33.5 +/- 3.1 seconds (Viscoat), 15.3 +/- 6.3 seconds (ProVisc); and Pharmacia 912 silicone IOL-18.3 +/- 5.8 seconds (Viscoat), 19.8 +/- 4.3 seconds (ProVisc).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in OVD removal times were detected. The removal time for the cohesive OVD correlated with the IOL material. Overall, the time needed for complete removal was significantly longer for the dispersive OVD than for the cohesive OVD.

Removal times and techniques of a viscoadaptive ophthalmic viscosurgical device

PURPOSE

To analyze removal techniques for Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%).

SETTING

Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, and Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.

METHODS

In a standardized laboratory setup, the Miyake-Apple posterior view video technique in human autopsy eyes was used to evaluate removal of an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) from capsular bags implanted with poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs). Healon5 was stained with fluorescein for better visualization. Open-sky preparation and an Alcon Legacy Series 20000 phaco machine with a flow rate of 25 mL/minute and a vacuum setting of +500 mm Hg (maximum irrigation/aspiration [I/A]) were used. With Technique 1, the I/A tip was placed on the center of the IOL and maximum aspiration was applied. With Technique 2 (modified rock 'n roll technique), the I/A tip was moved in quick circular movements on top of the IOL to break the OVD chains and facilitate aspiration.

RESULTS

With Technique 1, the mean removal time was 59.0 seconds +/- 23.1 (SD) and with Technique 2, 23.6 +/- 10.3 seconds (P =.004). The removal time of Healon5 correlated with the IOL material. With Technique 2, removal was fastest with silicone IOLs (13.5 +/- 2.1 seconds) followed by PMMA IOLs (17.5 +/- 2.1 seconds). With acrylic IOLs, remnants of the OVD trapped behind the IOL optic resulted in a longer removal time of 34.1 +/- 1.2 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

Healon5 was completely removed from the capsular bag with the modified rock 'n roll technique. With acrylic IOLs, remnants can be trapped behind the optic and may be overlooked with an unstained OVD. Aspiration behind the optic is recommended with this IOL type.