Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia

Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare objective refractive errors and keratometry measurements obtained using the Nidek OPD-Scan II aberrometer/topographer and Topcon KR 8900 autorefractokeratometer.

METHODS

The right eye medical records of 176 patients aged 18-35 years who were admitted to our clinic as refractive surgery candidates were tested for refractive status and keratometry measurements with a Nidek OPD-Scan II aberrometer/topographer and a standard table-top autorefractokeratometer (Topcon KR 8900) before and after the induction of cycloplegia. Patients who had undergone any eye surgery and had hereditary, ectatic, or acquired corneal pathology were excluded. Refractive data were compared as spheres, cylinders, spherical equivalents, and power vectors before and after the induction of cycloplegia. Flat and steep keratometry (K1-K2) readings were recorded in diopters (D) and axis degrees, respectively, for each eye.

RESULTS

The spherical, cylindrical, spherical equivalence, J0-J45 vector values and K1-K2 readings (D, axis) between the two devices were statistically significant before and after the induction of cycloplegia (p<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis identified mean differences (95%CI of limits of agreement) of 0.77 (-0,57 to 2,11) in sphere, 0.74 (-0,54 to 2,01) in spherical equivalent, -0,07 (-0,41 to 0,26) in J0 vector, 0,06 (-0,31 to 0,43) in J45 vector, -0,16 (-0,66 to 0,33) in K1, -0,23 (-0,79 to 0,33) in K2 values before induction of cycloplegia.

CONCLUSION

The refractive and keratometry results of the Nidek OPD Scan II system and Topcon KR 8900 standard table-top autorefractokeratometer are not interchangeable in healthy adult population before and after induction of cycloplegia.

[Changes in the wavefront and peripheral defocus profile after excimer laser and orthokeratology corneal reshaping in myopia]

PURPOSE

This study compares the trends of changes in corneal asphericity, corneal and total aberrations and peripheral refraction in myopic eyes after excimer laser and orthokeratology correction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Aberrometry (OPD-Scan III; Nidek, Japan) was performed in 63 patients (126 eyes) with moderate and high myopia before and after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK; 88 eyes, group 1) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; 38 eyes, group 2). Peripheral refraction (Grand Seiko AutoRef/Keratometer) at 15° and 30° from the center of the fovea was observed in 12 patients of group 1 and in 18 patients with a background of orthokeratology correction (group 3).

RESULTS

Corneal asphericity factor Q transitioned to positive values after PRK and Femto-LASIK. Corneal aberrations: root mean square higher order aberration (RMS HOA) increased in both groups, Tilt 1 increased in group 1 and became negative in group 2, Tilt 2 increased in group 2 and went negative in group 1. Trefoil 6 did not change in group 1 and decreased in group 2. Coma 7 and 8 increased synchronously in both groups. Spherical aberrations (SA) increased in group 1, and went negative in group 2. Total aberrations changed to a lower degree, and these changes were not synchronous with the corneal ones; RMS HOA decreased in group 1 (while corneal RMS increased significantly), and in the PRK group it increased, but much less than the corneal. Total SA increased in group 1 and did not change in group 2. Peripheral myopic defocus formed in all cases, after Femto-LASIK the maximum was in the zone of 30º, after orthokeratology lenses - in the zone of 15º.

CONCLUSION

Using excimer laser and orthokeratology to reshape the cornea in full accordance with its different profiles have different effects on the wavefront and peripheral refraction of the eye. The internal optics of the eye partially compensates corneal aberrations induced by the excimer laser.

Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors

BACKGROUND

Refractive errors (conditions in which the eye fails to focus objects accurately on the retina due to defects in the refractive system), are the most common cause of visual impairment. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are low-order aberrations, usually corrected with spectacles, contact lenses, or conventional refractive surgery. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) can be quantified with wavefront aberration instruments and corrected using wavefront-guided or wavefront-optimized laser surgery. Wavefront-guided ablations are based on preoperative measurements of HOAs; wavefront-optimized ablations are designed to minimize induction of new HOAs while preserving naturally occurring aberrations. Two wavefront procedures are expected to produce better visual acuity than conventional procedures.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare effectiveness and safety of wavefront procedures, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) versus corresponding conventional procedures, for correcting refractive errors in adults for postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, residual refractive errors, and residual HOAs. The secondary objective was to compare two wavefront procedures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2019, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS); the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the search was 6 August 2019. We imposed no restrictions by language or year of publication. We used the Science Citation Index (September 2013) and searched the reference lists of included trials to identify additional relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing either wavefront modified with conventional refractive surgery or wavefront-optimized with wavefront-guided refractive surgery in participants aged ⪰ 18 years with refractive errors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 33 RCTs conducted in Asia, Europe and United States, totaling 1499 participants (2797 eyes). Participants had refractive errors ranging from high myopia to low hyperopia. Studies reported at least one of the following review-specific outcomes based on proportions of eyes: with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, without loss of one or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction, with HOAs and adverse events. Study characteristics and risk of bias Participants were mostly women, mean age 29 and 53 years, and without previous refractive surgery, ocular pathology or systemic comorbidity. We could not judge risks of bias for most domains of most studies. Most studies in which both eyes of a participant were analyzed failed to account for correlations between two eyes in the analysis and reporting of outcomes. Findings For the primary comparison between wavefront (PRK or LASIK or LASEK) and corresponding conventional procedures, 12-month outcome data were available from only one study of PRK with 70 participants. No evidence of more favorable outcomes of wavefront PRK on proportion of eyes: with UCVA of 20/20 or better (risk ratio [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.24); without loss of one or more lines of BSCVA (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.09); within ± 0.5 D of target refraction (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24); and mean spherical equivalent (mean difference [MD] 0.04, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.18). The evidence for each effect estimate was of low certainty. No study reported HOAs at 12 months. At six months, the findings of two to eight studies showed that overall effect estimates and estimates by subgroup of PRK or LASIK or LASEK were consistent with those for PRK at 12 month, and suggest no difference in all outcomes. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was low. For the comparison between wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided procedures at 12 months, the overall effect estimates for proportion of eyes: with UCVA of 20/20 or better (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02; 5 studies, 618 participants); without loss of one or more lines of BSCVA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.02; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 622 participants); within ± 0.5 diopters of target refraction (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; I² = 33%; 4 studies, 480 participants) and mean HOAs (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07; I² = 41%; 5 studies, 622 participants) showed no evidence of a difference between the two groups. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, we did not calculate an overall effect estimate for mean spherical equivalent at 12 months, but point estimates consistently suggested no difference between wavefront-optimized PRK versus wavefront-guided PRK. However, wavefront-optimized LASIK compared with wavefront-guided LASIK may improve mean spherical equivalent (MD -0.14 D, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.09; 4 studies, 472 participants). All effect estimates were of low certainty of evidence. At six months, the results were consistent with those at 12 months based on two to six studies. The findings suggest no difference between two wavefront procedures for any of the outcomes assessed, except for the subgroup of wavefront-optimized LASIK which showed probable improvement in mean spherical equivalent (MD -0.12 D, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.05; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 280 participants; low certainty of evidence) relative to wavefront-guided LASIK. We found a single study comparing wavefront-guided LASIK versus wavefront-guided PRK at six and 12 months. At both time points, effect estimates consistently supported no difference between two procedures. The certain of evidence was very low for all estimates. Adverse events Significant visual loss or optical side effects that were reported were similar between groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that at 12 months and six months postoperatively, there was no important difference between wavefront versus conventional refractive surgery or between wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided surgery in the clinical outcomes analyzed. The low certainty of the cumulative evidence reported to date suggests that further randomized comparisons of these surgical approaches would provide more precise estimates of effects but are unlikely to modify our conclusions. Future trials may elect to focus on participant-reported outcomes such as satisfaction with vision before and after surgery and effects of remaining visual aberrations, in addition to contrast sensitivity and clinical outcomes analyzed in this review.

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes and predictability of higher order aberrations (HOAs) after personalized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and personalized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for simple myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, 100 eyes were included. A total of 50 eyes underwent personalized LASIK and 50 eyes underwent personalized PRK. Preoperative and postoperative wavefront data were compared between the two groups. The influential factors and predictability of HOAs were also assessed.

RESULT

Total HOA increased in the amount of 0.01 ± 0.14 μm for the 5 mm pupil (P = 0.55) and 0.08 ± 0.22 μm for the 6 mm pupil (P = 0.02) after PRK; however after LASIK the corresponding values for the 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes were 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.18 μm, respectively (P < 0. 001). Mean changes were not significantly different between the PRK and LASIK groups for both 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes (P = 0.21 and P = 0.13, respectively). Spherical aberration increased following LASIK more than following PRK (P < 0.001). Changes in the root mean square (RMS) of total HOA had a statistically significant negative correlation (P < 0.001) with its preoperative value. HOA and spherical aberration reduced in majority of eyes when the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was low.

CONCLUSION

For the 6mm pupil size, the total HOA increased following both personalized PRK and LASIK with no significant difference between the two groups. Change of the total HOA RMS was influenced by the preoperative values. The known influencing factors could predict nearly 50% of the changes in total HOA.

Wavefront-guided versus cross-cylinder photorefractive keratectomy in moderate-to-high astigmatism: a cohort of two consecutive clinical trials

Background

Although there have been many studies of the efficacy and safety of wavefront- guided (WF) and cross-cylinder photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), there are few studies on moderate-to-high astigmatism cases. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of WF and cross-cylinder PRK in moderate-to-high astigmatism.

Methods

In a comparative cohort, the results of two before-and-after clinical trials conducted on moderate-to-high astigmatism were studied. In the first trial, 50 eyes of 25 patients with stable refraction were enrolled in a before-and-after clinical trial to undergo WF PRK using the VISX™ (VISX Inc, Santa Clara, CA) system. The second clinical trial enrolled 48 eyes of 24 patients with stable refraction and moderate-to-high astigmatism to undergo PRK by the cross-cylinder method using a NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser system (NIDEK Co Ltd, Gamagori, Japan).

Results

After 6 months, 80% of the eyes in the WF group had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better compared to 40% in the cross-cylinder group. Only one eye in the cross-cylinder group and no eyes in the WF group lost more than one line of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 6 months of treatment. No treated eyes in either group lost more than two lines of BCVA. The percentage of eyes with no change in BCVA was 54% and 58.3% in the WF and cross-cylinder groups, respectively. Mean postoperative absolute changes in total root-mean-square higher order aberrations in the WF group and cross-cylinder group were 0.05 ± 0.22 μm and 0.17 ± 0.20 μm, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Both methods of PRK, using the NIDEK EC-5000 and VISX excimer laser systems, are effective for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism. The WF approach appeared more successful in improving the refractive results.

Prospective contralateral eye study to compare conventional and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of customized/wavefront guided with conventional ablation in myopic patients with or without astigmatism undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis.

METHODS

A prospective, comparative, contralateral eye study was performed. Sixty-eight eyes of 34 myopic patients with similar refractive error in both eyes were included. One eye was randomly selected to undergo conventional and the fellow eye customized ablation. Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb, Surrey, UK). Uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), astigmatism, aberrometry and contrast sensitivity were recorded pre and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean MRSE treated in the conventional and customized groups were 3.77 ± 1.61 dioptres and -3.83 ± 1.59 dioptres respectively. Three months postoperatively there was no significant difference between the groups in mean MRSE (p = 0.99) or cylinder (p = 0.56). The factor increase in postoperative total higher order aberrations (HOAs) was less in the customized (1.32) compared with the conventional (1.54) treatment group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Scotopic contrast sensitivity decreased significantly postoperatively in the conventional but not in the customized treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Visual acuity and refractive error outcomes were similar in both treatment group and no patient preference was observed. Customized ablation was associated with a smaller but not statistically significant postoperative increase in HOAs, better preservation of scotopic contrast sensitivity, quicker treatment time and removal of less corneal tissue.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations.

SETTING

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Metaanalysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trails. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised and data extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using metaanalytical methods. Comparison between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations was measured as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean difference and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

RESULTS

Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included. After wavefront-guided LASIK, the pooled OR of achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P=.72), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ± 0.50 diopter of intended target (predictability) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.60-1.75; P=.92), and the weighted mean difference in induced HOAs was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01; P=.04). No study reported loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaanalysis showed no clear evidence of a benefit of wavefront-guided over non-wavefront-guided ablations. However, there was a lack of standardized reporting of UDVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in wavefront-guided treatment. With high preexisting HOAs, wavefront-guided has advantages over non-wavefront-guided treatment.

Temporal evolution of ocular aberrations following laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To study the temporal evolution of ocular aberrations after standard LASIK to correct myopia.

METHODS

The ocular, corneal and internal aberrations for a 6-mm pupil were measured in 22 young myopic eyes (n = 12 subjects; range -2.0 to-7.6 D) before and during a 9-month follow-up after standard myopic LASIK. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor, while corneal aberrations were estimated from the elevation data obtained by corneal topography. For every patient and condition the eye's modulation transfer function (MTF) and Strehl ratio (SR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared to preoperative results, we found that standard myopic LASIK produced a significant increase of ocular high-order aberrations at 1 month after surgery. During the next 8 months, we found a small increase of ocular and corneal positive spherical aberration (SA), although with a large inter-subject variability. However, all eyes treated for myopia higher than -5 D showed a significant increase of positive SA during the first 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard myopic LASIK decreases ocular optical quality. For most subjects, the increase in aberrations induced by the surgery was stable during the next 9 months after LASIK. However, further changes of the ocular SA after myopic LASIK are possible in patients treated for higher amounts of myopia. The changes in aberrations mainly appeared between the first and the sixth month after surgery, which suggests the need to wait at least 6 months after myopic LASIK before comparing outcomes, especially for patients treated for higher myopias.

Comparison of custom ablation and conventional laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon excimer laser

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive outcomes, higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront ablation and conventional ablation.

SETTING

Private practice in Córdoba, Spain and a free-standing outpatient surgery center.

METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized, observational case series comparing outcomes of 239 eyes that underwent LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism with either wavefront or conventional ablation using the LADARVISION excimer laser. Manifest refractive sphere ranged from 0.50 D to -8.00 D with astigmatism up to -4.00 D. Eighty-nine eyes underwent conventional LASIK (conventional group), and 150 eyes underwent custom ablation (custom group). Refractive outcomes, ocular higher order root mean square (HOA-RMS), and contrast sensitivity were tested for statistically significant differences between groups. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Six month postoperative data are reported here.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean SE was -0.03 D +/- 0.19 D for the custom group, and -0.14 D +/- 0.35 D for the conventional group (P = 0.003). Ninety-nine percent of the eyes in the custom group, and 92% of the eyes in the conventional group were within 0.50 D of the intended correction (P > 0.05). The HOA-RMS was 0.16 mum lower in the custom group (P < 0.001). Contrast sensitivity was statistically significantly better at 3 cycles per degree (cpd) (P < 0.001) and 6 cpd (P = 0.009) in the custom group.

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant lower induction of HOA-RMS and better predictability and contrast sensitivity in eyes that underwent custom ablation with the LADARVISION excimer laser.

Efficacy of an aspheric treatment algorithm in decreasing induced spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of an aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) algorithm for myopia with and without astigmatism in minimizing postoperative induction of spherical aberration.

SETTING

Four sites in Asia.

METHODS

Patients with -1.00 to -10.00 diopters (D) of spherical myopia with -4.00 D or less of astigmatism were recruited. Patients randomly had bilateral Zyoptix aspheric algorithm (aspheric group) or bilateral conventional Zyoptix Tissue Saving algorithm (control group). A Technolas 217z100 excimer system was used for LASIK ablation. Visual effectiveness, safety, higher-order aberrations, and corneal asphericity (Q value) were evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

The aspheric group comprised 86 eyes and the control group, 84 eyes. At 3 months, the high-contrast uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 78% of eyes in the aspheric group and 83% of eyes in the control group. The control treatment induced 0.22 microm of spherical aberration, which was significantly higher than the 0.04 microm induced with the aspheric treatment (6.0 mm pupil) (P<.0001). The aspheric treatment induced significantly less vertical coma and trefoil (P = .02). Eyes in the aspheric group had significantly lower Q values (P<.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent between the 2 groups (P >.05). Although high- and low-contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was similar between the groups, the aspheric group gained more lines of low-contrast CDVA.

CONCLUSION

The aspheric algorithm was more effective than the conventional algorithm in reducing induced spherical aberration and maintaining corneal asphericity after myopic LASIK.

Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations After Customized Aspheric Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Myopic Correction

PURPOSE

To investigate and compare the corneal wavefront aberrations and corneal asphericity after customized aspheric and conventional myopic ablation.

METHODS

Fifty-eight myopic patients from two laser centers were enrolled in this study. The patients were treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) randomly with customized aspheric algorithm (32 patients, group A) and conventional algorithm (26 patients, group B). There was no significant difference in preoperative mean equivalent sphere (p = 0.954). The manifest refraction, corneal asphericity, and corneal wavefront data were taken into account to generate the customized aspheric ablation profile. Corneal wavefront aberrations, and corneal asphericity were analyzed and compared before and 6 months after the treatment.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no significant difference was found in corneal asphericity and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between two groups (p = 0.833 and p = 0.459, respectively). Root mean square (RMS) value of corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and corneal asphericity increased postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.05), but the smaller increase was shown in group A (p < 0.05). The Zernike third-order aberration increased by 10% (p = 0.088) but without significance in group A compared with significant increase by 27% (p < 0.01) in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The customized aspheric ablation induced smaller increase in corneal higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity. It provides a good option for the customized myopic correction.

A retrospective comparison of LASIK outcomes for myopia and myopic astigmatism with conventional NIDEK versus wavefront-guided VISX and Alcon platforms

POSE: To compare visual, refractive, and safety outcomes among a non-wavefront scanning-slit laser (NIDEK EC-5000) and wavefront-driven lasers (Alcon CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue).

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of outcomes for 290 eyes that underwent LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism with either a conventional or custom ablation excimer laser system were compared. The preoperative refractive error and age of the patients were matched. Outcomes were tested for statistically significant differences among the conventional laser and each of the custom ablation lasers. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Data with 3-month follow-up are reported.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -0.12+/-0.31 diopters (D) (range: -1.50 to 0.75 D) for the NIDEK group, -0.13+/-0.39 D (range: -1.88 to 0.75 D) for the VISX group, and -0.06+/-0.26 D (range: -0.75 to 0.75 D) for the Alcon group. Eighty-nine percent of eyes in the NIDEK group, 88% of eyes in the VISX group, and 92% of eyes in the Alcon group were within a half-diopter of intended correction. None of the NIDEK and VISX eyes and 3% of Alcon eyes lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. No statistically significant differences in any of the outcomes studied between conventional and custom ablation treatments were noted (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were observed in safety, efficacy, or predictability of eyes that underwent conventional ablation with the NIDEK EC-5000 scanning slit laser compared to custom ablation with the VISX CustomVue or Alcon CustomCornea laser systems.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To describe wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK for the primary treatment of low to moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism and to examine the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in comparison with conventional LASIK.

METHODS

Literature searches conducted in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 retrieved 209 unique references from the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The panel selected 65 articles to review, and of these, chose 45 articles that they considered to be of sufficient clinical relevance to submit to the panel methodologist for review. During the review and preparation of this assessment, an additional 2 articles were included. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating was assigned to well-designed cohort and case-controlled studies; and a level III rating was assigned to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, studies that were conducted by laser manufacturers before device approval (premarket approval) were reviewed as a separate category of evidence.

RESULTS

The assessment describes studies reporting results of WFG LASIK clinical trials, comparative trials, or both of WFG and conventional LASIK that were rated level II and level III. There were no studies rated as level I evidence. Four premarket approval studies conducted by 4 laser manufacturers were included in the assessment. The assessment did not compare study results or laser platforms because there were many variables, including the amount of follow-up, the use of different microkeratomes, and the level of preoperative myopia and astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial level II and level III evidence that WFG LASIK is safe and effective for the correction of primary myopia or primary myopia and astigmatism and that there is a high level of patient satisfaction. Microkeratome and flap-related complications are not common but can occur with WFG LASIK, just as with conventional LASIK. The WFG procedure seems to have similar or better refractive accuracy and uncorrected visual acuity outcomes compared with conventional LASIK. Likewise, there is evidence of improved contrast sensitivity and fewer visual symptoms, such as glare and halos at night, compared with conventional LASIK. Even though the procedure is designed to measure and treat both lower- and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), the latter are generally increased after WFG LASIK. The reasons for the increase in HOA are likely multifactorial, but the increase typically is less than that induced by conventional LASIK. No long-term assessment of WFG LASIK was possible because of the relatively short follow-up (12 months or fewer) of most of the studies reviewed.

Corneal wavefront-guided retreatments for significant night vision symptoms after myopic laser refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of corneal wavefront (WF)-guided enhancements in patients with night vision symptoms and significantly high positive spherical aberration (SA) after myopic laser refractive surgery.

DESIGN

Noncomparative, interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes of 20 patients with significant night vision symptoms and positive corneal SA (Z(4)(0)) higher than 0.5 microm after myopic laser refractive surgery were included in the study at Vissum-Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante, Spain. Enhancement surgery was planned to remove residual refractive error and corneal SA (Z(4)(0)) in all cases. All patients underwent corneal WF-guided excimer laser retreatments using the ESIRIS/SCHWIND excimer laser system (Schwind Eye Tech Solutions, Kleinostham, Germany). The main outcome measures were visual symptoms, change in corneal SA (Z(4)(0)), and corneal asphericity (Q-value).

RESULTS

Subjective reports of night vision symptoms were improved in all patients. Mean corneal SA (Z(4)(0)) decreased from 0.75 +/- 0.19 microm before surgery to 0.43 +/- 0.42 microm after surgery (P < .001). Mean asphericity in the 4.5-mm zone significantly decreased from 1.02 +/- 1.07 before surgery to 0.52 +/- 0.88 after surgery (P = .008), and the mean asphericity in 8 mm did not change significantly (P = .362). The mean spherical equivalent significantly shifted to hyperopia from -0.22 +/- 1.14 diopters (D) before surgery to 0.33 +/- 0.54 D after surgery (P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Cornea wavefront-guided retreatment was effective in improving subjective night vision symptoms, reducing corneal SA, and decreasing asphericity in eyes that underwent myopic laser refractive surgery.

Prospective randomized trial of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the CustomCornea and CustomVue laser systems

PURPOSE

To compare visual function, safety, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the LadarVision CustomCornea (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and Star S4 CustomVue (Visx) laser systems.

SETTING

John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

METHODS

Seventy-eight eyes of 39 patients with myopia with or without astigmatism were randomized for LASIK treatment in 1 eye with the CustomCornea laser; the other eye was treated with the CustomVue laser. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and changes in HOAs.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA was -0.0135 +/- 0.07 (SD) in the CustomVue group and 0.0417 +/- 0.12 in the CustomCornea group (P = .023). Eighty-eight percent of eyes in the CustomVue group had 20/20 or better UCVA compared with 67% in the CustomCornea group (P<.02). At 6 months, 91% of eyes in the CustomVue group and 79% in the CustomCornea group were within +/-0.50 diopter (D) of emmetropia (P<.1); 88% and 50%, respectively, were within +/-0.25 D (P<.001). Both platforms led to a small increase in total HOAs. The CustomVue system reduced trefoil and induced less of an increase in total HOAs, whereas the CustomCornea platform increased trefoil but induced less of an increase in spherical aberrations and coma.

CONCLUSIONS

Both laser systems were effective, safe, and predictable. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the CustomVue system resulted in better visual acuity, with more eyes having 20/20 acuity than in the CustomCornea group.

Changes in higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To assess efficacy, safety, and changes in higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in comparison with conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia with myopic astigmatism using a WASCA Workstation with the MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser.

METHODS

A total of 126 myopic or myopic-astigmatic eyes of 112 patients were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, the study group; and Group 2, the control group. Group 1 consisted of 78 eyes treated with wavefront-guided PRK. Group 2 consisted of 48 eyes treated with spherocylindrical conventional PRK.

RESULTS

Two years postoperatively, in Group 1, 5% of eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 0.05; 69% achieved a UCVA of 0.00; 18% of eyes experienced enhanced visual acuity of -0.18 and 8% of -0.30. In Group 2, 8% of eyes achieved a UCVA of 0.1; 25% achieved a UCVA of 0.05; and 67% achieved a UCVA of 0.00 according to logMAR calculation method. Total higher-order root-mean square increased by a factor 1.18 for Group 1 and 1.6 for Group 2. There was a significant increase of coma by a factor 1.74 in Group 2 and spherical aberration by a factor 2.09 in Group 1 and 3.56 in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the safety and effectiveness of the wavefront-guided PRK using a WASCA Workstation for correction of low to moderate refractive errors. This method reduced the number of higher order aberrations induced by excimer laser surgery and improved uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity when compared to conventional PRK.

Matched Population Comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens and Standard LASIK for Myopia of -3.00 to -7.88 Diopters

PURPOSE

To compare matched populations of LASIK and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) cases in the correction of myopia between -3.00 and -7.88 diopters (D).

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four LASIK eyes with prospective data collected from a single center and 164 ICL eyes from the multicenter US ICL Clinical Trial were compared in this observational non-randomized study. The LASIK and ICL groups were well matched for age, gender, and mean level of preoperative spherical equivalent refraction.

RESULTS

At 6 months, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) > or = 20/20 was 85% with LASIK and 95% with ICL (P = .003) compared to preoperative values of 93% and 88%, respectively (P = .292). Loss of > or = 2 lines of BSCVA was significantly lower with the ICL at 1 week (0.6% vs 10%, P < .001) and 1 month (7% vs 0%, P = .001) with comparable outcomes at 6 months (0% vs 1%). At 6 months postoperatively, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > or = 20/15 (11% vs 25%, P = .001) and > or = 20/20 (49% vs 63%, P = .001) was better in the ICL cases. Predictability within 0.50 D at 6 months for ICL cases was 85% (67% LASIK, P < .001); 97% of ICL cases were within 1.00 D (88% LASIK, P = .002). Refractive stability (+/- 0.50 D) between 1 and 6 months was 93% with ICL compared to only 82% with LASIK (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICL performed better than LASIK in almost all measures of safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability in this matched population comparison, supporting the ICL as an effective alternative to existing refractive laser surgical treatments for the range of myopia studied.

Corneal Wavefront-guided Ablation With the Schwind ESIRIS Laser for Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of corneal wavefront-guided LASIK for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

This study included 56 myopic virgin eyes of 28 patients with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -4.40 +/- 1.83 diopters (D) (range: -1.25 to -9.75 D) and astigmatism < 2.50 D. The corneal wavefront aberrations were analyzed using a corneal topography system. The preoperative corneal wavefront aberration data obtained from the above analyses combined with manifest refraction were used to generate a customized ablation profile. The safety, efficacy, and predictability of the correction, contrast sensitivity, and corneal higher order wavefront aberrations were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up, the mean residual spherical equivalent refractive error was -0.15 +/- 0.3 D (range: 0 to -1.25 D) and mean cylinder was -0.54 +/- 0.34 D (range: 0 to -1.50 D). Ninety-five percent of eyes were in the residual refractive error range of +/- 0.50 D and uncorrected visual acuity improved by 1.00 D or better in 94% of eyes. The safety index and efficacy index were 1.13 and 0.92, respectively. After treatment, corneal higher order wavefront aberrations with a 6-mm pupil diameter increased significantly (paired sample t test, P < .01), and contrast sensitivity with glare had small reductions at high spatial frequencies. Changes in spherical-like aberration (R = 0.708, P < .001) and higher order wavefront aberration (R = 0.449, P = .001), except for coma-like aberration (P = .238), were positively correlated with the amount of achieved correction.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of clinical results showed that corneal wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism was safe and effective. There was an increase in all higher order aberrations postoperatively.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for Myopia With the Technolas 217z: Results at 3 Years

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with low to high myopia.

METHODS

The study included 316 eyes of 158 patients; 172 eyes with low to moderate myopia (< or = 6.00 diopters [D]) and 144 eyes with high myopia (> or = 6.25 D). Preoperative wavefront analysis was performed with the Hartmann-Shack aberrometer, and LASIK was done with the Technolas 217z excimer laser. Follow-up was 36 months. Safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was -6.50 +/- 7.72 D (range: -1.50 to -16.00 D) in the entire study group, -4.91 +/- 1.38 D in the low to moderate myopia group, and -9.41 +/- 2.51 D in the high myopia group. At 36 months, 222 (70%) eyes showed no change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 67 (21%) eyes gained > or = 1 line. In the low to moderate myopia group, SE of +/- 0.50 D was achieved by 85% of eyes and +/- 1.00 D by 97%, and 65% and 80%, respectively, in the high myopia group. Undercorrection > 0.50 D was observed in 25% (36 eyes) of the high myopia group and 5% (8 eyes) of the low to moderate myopia group. All eyes showed significant reduction in spherical aberration (Z4,0) at 12 months postoperatively with no complications except diffuse lamellar keratitis in 2 eyes (1 eye in each group).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK is an efficient refractive surgery technique for patients with low to moderate myopia. Higher degrees of myopia may be subject to under- and overcorrection.

Comparison of high order aberration after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient

PURPOSE

To verify whether there exists any difference in higher order aberrations after undergoing myopic LASIK (laser in situ keratomileusis) with conventional ablation and customized ablation in different eyes of the same patient.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized study of 54 myopic eyes (27 patients) that underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser system (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). Topography-guided customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) was used in the first eye of the patient (study group) and the other eye of the same patient was operated on with conventional ablation (control group). Higher order aberrations [root-mean-square (RMS) in the 5-mm zone] of both groups were observed with the Nidek OPD-Scan aberrometer before and 3 months after LASIK. Preoperative mean refractive error was similar between two eyes of the same patient (t=-0.577, P>0.05).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, higher order aberrations (RMS in the 5-mm zone) in the CATz ablation and conventional groups were (0.3600+/-0.0341) microm and (0.2680+/-0.1421) microm, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (t=1.292, P>0.05). Three months after LASIK, higher order aberrations (RMS in 5-mm zone) in the CATz ablation and conventional groups were (0.3627+/-0.1510) microm and (0.3991+/-0.1582) microm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between pre- and postoperative higher order aberrations in the CATz group (t=-0.047, P>0.05). However, a statistically significant increase in higher order aberrations was observed after conventional ablation (t=-5.261, P<0.05). A statistically significant difference was noted in the increase of higher order aberrations after LASIK between groups (t=-2.050, P=0.045).

CONCLUSION

LASIK with conventional ablation and topography-guided CATz ablation resulted in the same BSCVA (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) 3 month after LASIK. Higher order aberrations were increased, but the increase of higher order aberrations after customized ablation treatment was less than that after conventional ablation.

Long-term results of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia: Risk for ectasia

PURPOSE

To ascertain the long-term stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in highly myopic eyes.

SETTING

Clinical practice office-based surgery.

METHOD

Charts of eyes with high myopia who had LASIK surgery by the same surgeon between 1994 and 2000 were reviewed in 2003, and patients were given an appointment for follow-up examinations. In these highly myopic eyes, surgery was originally performed to create undercorrections with or without decreasing the ablation diameters to maximally conserve the residual stromal bed thickness.

RESULTS

Of the 107 eyes with myopia between -10.00 diopters (D) and -35.00 D reviewed and operated on in a 3-year period between 1994 and 1998, 35 eyes of 31 patients had a single enhancement procedure. One case of ectasia as a result of excessive tissue removal occurred in a patient with a preoperative refraction of -28.00 D. Of the 107 eyes reviewed, 78 (73%) were examined after 5 years, 68 (63%) after 7 years, and 15 (14%) between 9 years and 11 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Operating on eyes with highly myopic refractive errors and removing substantial tissue thickness did not produce ectasia in this series. Although high myopia has been considered a risk factor for post-LASIK ectasia, adherence to proper screening and intraoperative pachymetry appears to decrease the risk.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for Myopia Using the LADAR CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue

PURPOSE

To evaluate the objective and subjective visual outcomes and refractive results of wavefront-guided LASIK with LADAR CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue.

METHODS

This prospective randomized single-institution multisurgeon study comprised 100 eyes of 58 patients (50 eyes on each laser platform). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and manifest refraction were measured postoperatively at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Contrast sensitivity, higher order aberrations measurement, and a subjective vision questionnaire were performed preoperatively and at 3 months.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the CustomCornea group had a mean manifest sphere of -3.58 +/- 1.61 diopters (D) (range: -0.50 to -7.25 D), cylinder of +0.64 +/- 0.45 D (range: 0 to +1.75 D), and manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -3.26 +/- 1.56 D. The CustomVue group had a manifest sphere of -4.00 +/- 1.69 D (range: -1.50 to -7.50 D), cylinder of +0.60 +/- 0.52 D (range: 0 to +2.00 D), and MRSE of -3.70 +/- 1.64 D. At 3 months, 94% of CustomCornea eyes and 84% of CustomVue eyes had UCVA > or = 20/20 (P = .20). Twenty-four percent of CustomVue eyes and 22% of CustomCornea eyes gained 1 line of BSCVA. In both groups, 96% of eyes were within 0.50 D of emmetropia. Mean CustomCornea glare contrast sensitivity improved (P = .04) whereas more eyes improved than worsened in both groups. Spherical aberration and total higher order aberrations increased, and trefoil decreased in both groups. A decrease in coma was noted in 70% of CustomCornea eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK with both platforms is safe, effective, and delivers excellent visual results. CustomCornea improves contrast sensitivity under glare conditions.

Higher Order Aberrations in Normal Eyes Measured With Three Different Aberrometers

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability of measurements of higher order aberrations using three different aberrometers and to compare higher order aberration measurements between optical path difference (OPD) scanning and the Hartmann-Shack method.

METHODS

Wavefront aberration data obtained using the NIDEK OPD-Scan, Bausch & Lomb Zywave wavefront aberrometer, and VISX CustomVue wavefront analyzer were compared. A total of 19 subjects were included in the study. The repeatability in each machine was assessed by calculating the difference between measurements and the mean of three consecutive measurements in the same eye. Subsequent analysis of the distribution of these differences yields the mean difference, the standard deviation of the differences, and the 95% confidence interval for repeated measurements, also termed the "repeatability coefficient".

RESULTS

Repeatability errors in all three machines were found to be low, suggesting that all three machines are reliable in their repeated measurements. Significant differences were demonstrated between OPD scanning and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers. All three machines showed statistically significant differences in several higher order aberration parameters when compared to each other.

CONCLUSIONS

The three different aberrometers provided repeatable measurements but statistical differences were noted in the measurement of higher order aberrations when comparing the machines. No instrument was superior over the other and all three were reliable.

Topography-guided CATz Versus Conventional LASIK for Myopia With the NIDEK EC-5000: A Bilateral Eye Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in visual acuity, subjective night vision glare, and higher order aberrations in eyes with myopia with or without astigmatism operated with topography-guided customized corneal LASIK and conventional LASIK.

METHODS

This contralateral study includes 46 eyes (23 patients) that underwent topography-guided corneal customized LASIK using the customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) ablation profile in one eye and conventional LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 Advanced Vision Excimer laser system (NAVEX) in the other eye for myopia with or without astigmatism. Patients were masked to which eye underwent topography-guided CATz or conventional LASIK. Postoperative glare and root-mean-square (RMS) values for total higher order aberrations were measured at 1 and 3 months and compared between the two eyes.

RESULTS

No significant difference was noted in uncorrected visual acuity between the two groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Of all patients, 81% stated glare was higher in conventionally treated eyes than in the CATz-treated eyes at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The RMS values for total coma (0.2385 vs 0.1522) and spherical aberration (0.2381 vs 0.1058) in conventionally treated and CATz-treated eyes were significantly higher in conventionally treated eyes (P=.029 and P=.004, respectively) at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided corneal customized LASIK with the CATz profile gave better night vision quality as compared to conventional LASIK with expanded treatment zone. Better night vision quality was associated with less induced spherical aberrations and coma postoperatively in the CATz treatment group.

Bilateral Comparison of Conventional Versus Topographic-guided Customized Ablation for Myopic LASIK With the NIDEK EC-5000

PURPOSE

To compare visual acuity and higher order aberrations before and after myopic LASIK using conventional versus customized ablation.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study included 54 myopic eyes in 27 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser system (NIDEK Technologies, Gamagori, Japan). Customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) treatment was used in one eye (CATz group) and conventional ablation (conventional group) was used in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and higher order aberrations (root-mean-square [RMS] in 4-mm and 6-mm zones) of both groups were observed with the NIDEK OPD-Scan aberrometer before and 3 months after LASIK. Preoperative mean refractive error was similar for both eyes of each patient (P>.05).

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were noted in preoperative higher order aberrations (RMS in 4-mm and 6-mm zones) between groups (P>.05). No statistically significant difference was noted between pre- and postoperative higher order aberrations in the CATz group (P>.05). However, a highly statistically significant increase in higher order aberrations was observed after conventional ablation (P<.001). There was a statistically significant higher increase of higher order aberrations after LASIK in the conventional group than the CATz group (P<.05). Postoperative UCVA with both conventional and customized ablation was not significantly different (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK with conventional ablation and CATz ablation resulted in the same UCVA. The increase in higher order aberrations after CATz ablation was less than after conventional ablation.

Measurement of Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions Following Wavefront-guided and Conventional LASIK Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare contrast and glare vision in a prospective study of eyes treated using conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. The reproducibility of a glaremeter device used to quantitatively measure glare and halo was also determined.

METHODS

Ninety-two eyes of 46 patients underwent conventional LASIK surgery and 104 eyes of 52 patients underwent wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. Visual acuity, glare disability measured using a glaremeter, and contrast sensitivity assessed using a Pelli-Robson chart were measured monthly for 6 months postoperatively. Glaremeter testing was performed under both mesopic (5.4 +/- 0.4 cd/m2) and photopic (78.3 +/- 4.4 cd/m2) conditions. To evaluate the reproducibility of the glaremeter, 36 eyes of 18 nonoperated myopic patients were tested.

RESULTS

The coefficient of variation and the reliability coefficient for the glare test were 13.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The glaremeter showed that glare disability under mesopic conditions differed between conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes over 6-month follow-up (907.5 +/- 491.5 vs 986.1 +/- 448.0 pixels preoperatively and 1717.1 +/- 521.2 vs 1407.8 +/- 411.3 pixels at 6 months, P<.0001). At 6 months, contrast sensitivity log values were 1.62 +/- 0.31 and 1.78 +/- 0.34 for conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes, respectively (P=.010). The visual complaint score was lower in the wavefront-guided LASIK group (P=.0116).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional ablation, wavefront-guided ablation provided superior outcomes in terms of postoperative glare under mesopic conditions, subjective complaints, and contrast sensitivity. In addition, it appears the glaremeter can be used for clinical quantitative evaluation of glare and halo.

Size of corneal topographic effective optical zone: comparison of standard and customized myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To investigate the corneal topographic effective optical zone (EOZ) in eyes after wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare them with the EOZ after standard LASIK.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control study.

METHODS

We evaluated the corneal topographic maps of 41 eyes of 25 consecutive patients who had CustomVue LASIK (CV LASIK) and 41 eyes of 23 patients who had standard LASIK with correction up to -7 diopters using the VISX Star S4 laser (VISX Inc, Santa Clara, California, USA). On the refractive map of the Humphrey Topography System, we defined the EOZ as the area outlined by a change of corneal power of 0.5 diopters from the power at the center of the pupil. We analyzed the differences in EOZs of the two ablation patterns and the correlation between EOZ and magnitude of refractive correction.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative EOZs were 17.9 +/- 3.7 mm(2) and 11.4 +/- 3.4 mm(2) after CV and standard LASIK, representing 60% and 40% of the laser-programmed optical zones, respectively (both P < .0001). There was no correlation between the postoperative EOZs and the magnitude of refractive correction for both ablations (all P > .05). In eyes with spherical correction (cylinder < or =0.25 diopters), CV LASIK increased the preoperative EOZ by 3.8 +/- 5.6 mm(2) (P = .018), whereas standard LASIK decreased EOZ by 4.5 +/- 5.2 mm(2) (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

CV LASIK created larger corneal topographic EOZs than standard ablation. In eyes with spherical correction, the preoperative EOZ was expanded by CV LASIK and reduced by standard LASIK.

Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the refractive and aberrometric outcome of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared to standard PRK in myopic patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The study group consisted of 28 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -2.25+/-0.76 diopters (D) (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with wavefront-guided PRK using the Zywave ablation profile and the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z excimer laser (Zyoptix system) and the control group included 28 eyes with a SE of -2.35+/-1.01 D (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with standard PRK (PlanoScan ablation) using the same laser. A Zywave aberrometer was used to analyze and calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) of total high order aberrations (HOA) and Zernike coefficients of third and fourth order before and after (over a 6-month follow-up period) surgery in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative SE, un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated in all cases.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation between achieved and intended correction. The differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant for UCVA, BCVA, or SE cycloplegic refraction . Postoperatively the RMS value of high order aberrations was raised in both groups. At 6-month control, on average it increased by a factor of 1.17 in the Zyoptix PRK group and 1.54 in the PlanoScan PRK group (p=0.22). In the Zyoptix group there was a decrease of coma aberration, while in the PlanoScan group this third order aberration increased. The difference between postoperative and preoperative values between the two groups was statistically significant for coma aberration (p=0.013). No statistically significant difference was observed for spherical-like aberration between the two groups. In the study group eyes with a low amount of preoperative aberrations (HOA RMS lower than the median value; <0.28 microm) showed an increase of HOA RMS while eyes with RMS higher than 0.28 microm showed a decrease (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is as safe and efficacious for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism as PlanoScan PRK. Moreover this technique induces a smaller increase of third order coma aberration compared to standard PRK. The use of Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is particularly indicated in eyes with higher preoperative RMS values.

Wavefront-supported Photorefractive Keratectomy With the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix in Patients With Myopic Astigmatism and Suspected Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and visual outcome of wavefront-supported photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism in patients with suspected keratoconus.

METHODS

Forty eyes of 20 patients with myopia -4.0 to -8.0 diopters (D) (mean: -6.25 +/- 1.04 D), cylinder -1.0 to -2.50 D (mean: -1.61 +/- 0.71 D), and corneal thickness 440 to 488 microm were treated with wavefront-supported PRK. Corneal topography evaluation revealed a significantly irregular cylinder (inferior-superior difference > 1.5 D) with possible mild or forme fruste keratoconus. Aberrometry was performed with the Hartmann-Shack aberrometer, and corneal data were evaluated with the Orbscan system. Eyes were treated with the Technolas 217z Bausch & Lomb excimer laser and followed for a minimum of 40 months.

RESULTS

Following surgery, mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.33 +/- 0.8 D. It was within +/- 0.5 D of the intended refraction in 95% of eyes and within +/- 1.0 D in 100% of eyes. Mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/400 preoperatively to 20/25 postoperatively. Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) remained unchanged (20/20) or improved to 20/20 in 92.5% of eyes and to 20/25 in 7.5% of eyes. Individually, BSCVA did not change in 28 (70%) eyes and increased by > or = 2 Snellen lines in 9 (22.5%) eyes; 3 (7.5%) eyes lost 1 Snellen line because of corneal haze. Laser treatment induced a significant flattening of the preoperative inferior corneal steepness in all eyes. Wavefront analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in high order aberrations (total root-mean-square and coma).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-supported PRK appears to be effective for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism in patients with suspected keratoconus and thin, irregular corneas. Longer follow-up is needed to prove the safety of the procedure in this patient population.

Conventional and wavefront-guided myopic LASIK retreatment

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcomes of conventional and wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized case series.

METHODS

The study comprised a cohort of 97 eyes having LASIK retreatment for residual myopia after primary LASIK. The eyes were divided into two groups: conventional retreatment (CR) group (n = 74) and wavefront-guided retreatment (WR) group (n = 23). The retreatment LASIK was performed using LADARVison 4000 with/without CustomCornea (Alcon Surgical, Orlando, Florida, USA). The mean follow-up was 8.9 +/- 5.8 months after retreatment (range three to thirty-six months).

RESULTS

The mean pre-retreatment spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.93 +/- 0.41 diopters in the CR group and -0.84 +/- 0.48 diopters in the WR group (P = .409). At the last visit, the mean SE was -0.19 +/- 0.28 diopters and +0.32 +/- 0.47 diopters, respectively (P < .001). An SE of +/- 0.50 diopters was achieved in 92% (68 of 74) of CR eyes and 65% (15 of 23) of WR eyes. In the CR group, 85% eyes had a uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > or = 20/20 and 99% > or = 20/40, and in the WR group, 35% and 100%, respectively. None of the CR eyes and 17% (4 of 23) of WR eyes lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). Nine percent (7 of 74) of CR eyes and 30% of WR eyes (7 of 23) had optical symptoms before retreatment, the number was reduced to 1% (1 of 74) and 4% (1 of 23), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study period with the current equipment, our results showed that conventional LASIK retreatment was superior to wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment in both efficacy and safety.

CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of custom laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Visx wavefront platform CustomVue for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was of the initial 140 eyes of 78 patients treated consecutively with LASIK for myopia using the Visx Star S4 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications, were evaluated at 1 week and 1 and 3 months. Vector analysis was performed on eyes that received astigmatic correction.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was reduced from -3.89 diopters +/- 1.48 (SD) to an SE of -0.21 +/- 0.36 D at 1 month and -0.28 +/- 0.36 D at 3 months (P < .001). At 1 and 3 months, UCVA was 20/20 or better in 84.3% and 87.9%, respectively. Eighty-six percent of eyes at 1 month and 81.4% of eyes at 3 months were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. Vector analysis yielded an index of success of 0.39, indicating a 61% success rate in achieving the astigmatic surgical correction at 3 months. The preoperative root-mean-square value of 0.28 +/- 0.08 microm increased slightly to 0.33 +/- 0.11 microm at 1 month and 0.34 +/- 0.11 microm at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Wavefront-guided LASIK using the Visx CustomVue system was effective, predictable, and safe for correction of low to moderate myopic refractive error.

Photorefractive keratectomy with aspheric profile of ablation versus conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia correction

PURPOSE

To analyze ocular wavefront error and corneal asphericity (Q) in patients treated with aspheric profile photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared with patients having conventional PRK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism and to evaluate the effect of postoperative corneal shape on visual performance.

SETTING

Eye Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.

METHODS

Fifty eyes were treated with aspheric profile PRK using the MEL 80 flying-spot excimer laser, and 24 eyes were treated with standard PRK using the MEL 70 flying-spot excimer laser.

RESULTS

Postoperative wavefront error increased in both groups. Six months after surgery, there was a smaller increase in root mean square (RMS) of total higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration (59% and 106%, respectively) in the aspheric profile PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (94% and 136%, respectively) (P<.01). The aspheric profile PRK group showed more prolate corneal asphericities (mean Q of 0.15 +/- 0.26) than the conventional group (mean Q of 0.45 +/- 0.26) (P<.001), with increasing oblateness for higher attempted corrections. A higher percentage of patients with better low-contrast uncorrected visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity was observed in the aspheric PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspheric profile and conventional PRK were safe and efficient for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Moreover, aspheric profile PRK induced a smaller increment of total wavefront error, was related to a smaller increase in spherical aberration, and better maintained the physiology of the corneal surface than conventional treatment.

Comparison of higher-order wavefront aberrations with 3 aberrometers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between aberrometers based on the Hartmann-Shack wavefront technology.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

Three clinical aberrometers WaveScan (Visx Inc.), LADARWave (Alcon Inc.), and Zywave (Bausch & Lomb Inc.) were used to measure HOAs in 34 cycloplegic eyes in 17 subjects. All the measurements in each subject were performed in 1 visit to reduce the impact of biologic fluctuation of HOAs. Each device was operated by an independent experienced operator, and the operators were blind to the data obtained from the other aberrometers. Root mean square (RMS) of coma, spherical aberration, and total 3rd- and 4th-order HOAs were compared between any 2 devices by a paired t test.

RESULTS

WaveScan had the lowest mean RMS, whereas Zywave reported the highest mean RMS for any HOAs. The coefficients of variation were similar between any 2 devices. Paired t tests of RMS yielded a P value <.01 in 9 of 12 comparisons. In general, the largest discrepancies of HOA measures were between WaveScan and Zywave, and similar data were found between LADARWave and WaveScan. More than 80% of the absolute difference of HOA RMS between LADARWave and WaveScan, 50% to 78% between LADARWave and Zywave, and 38% to 59% between WaveScan and Zywave were within +/-0.1 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant discrepancies in HOA measurements were found among the 3 popular aberrometers. The HOA RMS data were closer between LADARWave and WaveScan, and HOA RMS by Zywave was generally higher than the other 2 devices. The 3 devices had comparable measurement variation.

A Comparison of Induced Astigmatism in Conventional and Wavefront-guided Myopic LASIK Using LADARVision4000 and VISX S4 Platforms

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the surgically induced astigmatism in myopic eyes undergoing conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the charts of 200 myopic eyes of 121 patients who underwent either custom or conventional treatments via the VISX S4 or LADARVision4000 platforms (50 consecutive eyes in each of the four groups). The primary outcome measure was manifest refraction, which was evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The magnitude and axis of the unintended surgically induced astigmatism were calculated using vector analysis. The Student t test was used to compare the magnitudes of the surgically induced astigmatism and the absolute angle of error.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative manifest cylinder was 0.66 +/- 0.38 diopters (D) for conventional VISX S4 and 0.68 +/- 0.39 D for VISX CustomVue (P = .795), and 0.76 +/- 0.56 D for LADARVision and 0.61 +/- 0.36 D for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .114). The success index was 0.19 +/- 0.41 for VISX S4 and 0.49 +/- 0.49 for VISX CustomVue (P = .0013), and 0.25 +/- 0.47 for LADARVision and 0.20 +/- 0.39 for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .5721). The absolute mean angle of error was 4.4 +/- 13.9 degrees for VISX S4 versus 14.9 +/- 23.9 degrees for VISX CustomVue (P = .0085), and 6.1 +/- 12.30 for LADARVision versus 3.9 +/- 11.1 degrees for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .3501). Of the VISX CustomVue eyes, 32% had an absolute angle of error > 10 degrees, as compared to 10% for both the VISX S4 and LADAR CustomCornea eyes (P = .013), and 16% for the LADARVision group (P = .056).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided ablation is associated with higher surgically induced astigmatism and larger astigmatic axis shift on the VISX platform as compared to the LADAR CustomCornea and the LADAR and VISX conventional platforms. Care should be emphasized mainly during registration/alignment to minimize surgically induced astigmatism in wavefront-guided LASIK.

Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia

PURPOSE

To determine subjective patient satisfaction and self-perceived quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

METHODS

A validated questionnaire consisting of 66 items was self-administered by 142 consecutive patients. Seven scales covering a specific aspect of quality of vision were formulated. Aspects included global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected and corrected vision, quality of night vision, glare, daytime driving, and night driving. Main outcome measures were responses to individual questions and scale scores, and correlations with clinical parameters including refractive outcome, uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, ablation depth, and scotopic pupil-optical zone disparity were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean score for the overall satisfaction was 4.1 +/- 0.71 (SD) (scale 0 to 5.0). A total of 92.2% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, 93.6% considered their main goal of surgery achieved, and 92.3% would choose to have LASIK surgery again. Satisfaction with uncorrected vision was 3.03 +/- 0.71. The mean score for glare was 3.0 +/- 0.9. At night, glare from lights was believed to be more important than before surgery by 47.2%. Glare from oncoming car headlights after surgery was reported by 58.4% and was believed to be more bothersome for night driving than before surgery by 52.8%. Night driving was rated more difficult than before surgery by 39.4%, whereas 59.3% had less difficulty driving at night. There was a significant correlation between the uncorrected vision score and the postoperative spherical equivalent (r = 0.245) and postoperative astigmatism (r = 0.265). There was no correlation between the glare or night vision scores and the degree of correction, the amount of ablation depth, or the disparity between the scotopic pupil and the optical zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-perceived uncorrected vision after LASIK surgery for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism appears to be very good and is related to the postoperative residual error. Although the majority of patients postoperatively experienced glare, particularly with driving at night, this was not related to the pupil-optical zone disparity or degree of correction.

Wavefront-guided LASIK With the NIDEK NAVEX Platform for the Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism With 6-month Follow-up

PURPOSE

To assess safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and change in higher order aberrations after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the NIDEK NAVEX platform.

METHODS

Wavefront-guided LASIK was performed in 93 eyes in a 6-month trial with a goal of emmetropia. Treated eyes had a mean subjective manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -4.08+/-1.99 D diopters (D), with a range of -9.50 to -0.38 D of myopia and -4.50 to 0.00 D of astigmatism. An early nomogram with the OPDCAT software program provided by the manufacturer was used in all procedures. Safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and change in higher order aberrations were evaluated at 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 100% eyes were within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia and 95% eyes were within +/-0.5 D. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of > or = 1.0 was achieved in 89% of eyes, and 38% of eyes achieved UVCA of > or = 1.2. No eyes lost > or = 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 25% of eyes gained 1 line, 3% gained 2 lines, and 1% gained > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. Higher order root-mean-square (RMS) values increased by 19% on average between pre- and postoperative measurements. Eyes treated with higher order aberrations of < 0.3 RMS showed on average an increase of 40% on preoperative values, whereas eyes with significant aberrations showed a decrease in aberrations following wavefront treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided ablation using the NIDEK NAVEX platform is safe, effective, and predictable. However, patients with low amounts of aberrations showed an increase in aberrations following wavefront treatment, therefore, wavefront treatment may not be indicated or beneficial to every patient.

A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers

PURPOSE

To compare optical quality, visual function, corneal shape, ocular wavefront aberrations, and patient-reported symptoms and satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with two different excimer lasers.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

In an institutional practice setting, 60 eyes of 30 patients with low to moderate myopia were randomized to receive LASIK in one eye with the Technolas 217A; the other eye was treated with the VISX S3. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean best-spectacle corrected high contrast visual acuity was similar between the two treatment groups: mean difference (95% confidence interval) was -0.01 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (-0.03 to +0.01 logMAR). Uncorrected visual acuity differences were also not significant. The difference in residual spherical equivalent subjective refractive error between treatment groups was -0.15 diopter (-0.34 to +0.05 diopter). Spherical aberration increased in both groups after treatment, and the change in root mean square (RMS) ocular wavefront error was greater in the VISX group by +0.07 microm (+0.03 to +0.11 microm). After LASIK, corneal curvature was steeper in the midperipheral region among VISX-treated eyes by +1.39 diopters (+2.06 to +0.72 diopters). There were no patient-reported differences in satisfaction between eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in visual acuity or refractive outcomes attributed to either laser under any of the conditions measured. There was also no significant difference in patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, or eye preference associated with either laser. Additional study is needed to establish the importance of differences in higher-order optical aberrations and corneal shape that we observed in these two treatment groups.

CustomCornea wavefront retreatment after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment using the Alcon CustomCornea system in patients who had prior myopic LASIK using conventional (nonwavefront) software.

SETTING

Private practice ophthalmology clinic, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional trial, consecutive patients having CustomCornea retreatment following conventional LASIK were evaluated. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

RESULTS

Fourteen eyes of 10 patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 5.3 months (range 6.2 to 15.4 months). Mean UCVA improved from 20/50 (logMAR) to 20/26 (P<.001). Mean spherical equivalent changed from -1.45 diopters (D) to +0.52 (P<.00001). Total aberrations, HOAs, defocus, and spherical aberration improved significantly. No eye lost a line of BCVA; 4 eyes (28.6%) gained 1 line, and 1 eye (7.1%) gained 2 lines. Ten eyes (71.4%) were within 0.5 D of emmetropia. Four eyes were overcorrected by 1.00 to 2.00 D. Risk factors for overcorrection included increased HOAs, higher spherical aberration, and not using the surgeon's offset at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront retreatment following conventional LASIK is safe and effective. Care must be taken when treating patients with higher amounts of total aberration, especially spherical aberration. Refractive results are closer to emmetropia when the surgeon's offset is used.