Treatment of myopic astigmatism with the 193 nm excimer laser utilizing aperture elements

Compound Myopic Astigmatism Correction using a Mask In-the-Rail Excimer Laser Delivery System. Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

The latest development in the erodible mask technology is an excimer laser containing the mask in the laser optical pathway. This paper reports the results of the first human series of consecutive treatments performed for the correction of compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

We have treated 83 eyes. Spherical equivalent attempted correction ranged between -1.75 and -11.75 D (mean -7.07+/- 2.45 D), astigmatic attempted correction ranged between -1.00 and -5.00 D (mean -2.42+/- 1.02 D). The sphere correction was made by diaphragm using a multi-zone software with three ablation zones: 100% of the total attempted correction for the central 5.0 mm zone, 70% for the second 6.0 mm zone, 30% for the outer 6.5 mm zone. Cylinder correction was made sequentially after myopic correction using the appropriate mask.

RESULTS

One month after treatment, mean refractive error was + 1.07 +/- 1.24 D (range + 4.50/-1.75 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.49 +/- 0.57 D (range + 0.75/-2.00 D) for astigmatism. Forty-eight eyes (57.8%) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. At six months, mean refractive error was +0.42 +/- 0.97 D (range + 3.75/-1.00 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.44 +/- 0.51 D (range +0.25/-3.00 D) for astigmatism. Vector analysis showed that 57 eyes (68.7%) had 5 or less degrees rotation. Seventy-two (86.7%) and 54 eyes (65.1%) had uncorrected visual acuity equal or better than 20/40 and 20/25 respectively. One eye (1.2%) showed a best corrected visual acuity loss of more than one line, but 8 eyes (9.6%) had a gain of more than one line. One-year results on a smaller series (33 eyes) overlap with the six-month results.

CONCLUSIONS

The mask in-the-rail excimer laser delivery system appears to be effective and predictable in the correction of compound myopic astigmatism. We observed no significant regression of the astigmatic correction over time. Longer follow-up on larger series is necessary to draw final conclusions.

Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy (Prk) in Myopic Astigmatism

To assess the visual and refractive results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Excimer laser PRK was performed using an Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 laser in 46 myopic astigmatic eyes. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 7 eyes (15.2%); -2.50 D. (+/- 0.50 in 14 eyes (30.5%); -3.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 13 eyes (28.3%); -4.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 8 eyes (17.4%); and -5.50 D. (+/- 0.50) in 4 eyes (8.6%). Mean preoperative cylinder was -3.50 D. (+/- 2.50). Mean preoperative sphere was -4.50 D. (+/- 2.25). Pre and post-operative visual acuity, refraction, keratometer readings, corneal topography, intraocular pressure, and slit lamp findings were recorded.

RESULTS

By one year of follow-up, postoperative cylinder was between +0.50 and -0.50 D. in 31 eyes (67.4%); between -0.50 and -1.50 D. in 11 eyes (23.9%); between -1.50 and -2.50 D. in 4 eyes (8.7%). Mean post-operative cylinder was -1.21 D. (+/- 1.70). Mean postoperative sphere was -1.09 D. (+/- 1.25). Myopic and astigmatic improvement was achieved in each patient (100%). Topography analysis showed 69.4% were within 0.5 mm, 96.8% within 1 mm, 97.8% within 1.5 mm of centration; 55% of the patients achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 10/10 (Snellen). One patient (2.2%) lost one line of best corrected vision due to decentration and change of axis.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results of myopic astigmatic excimer laser PRK procedures compare favorably in efficiency and safety with reports of PRK for myopia.

Contact lenses and special back surface design after penetrating keratoplasty to improve contact lens fit and visual outcome

AIMS

To describe the fitting of patients with high or irregular astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty with contact lenses and to answer the question whether or not contact lenses with special back surface design can improve visual acuity in complex cases after penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

28 eyes were included. They were fitted with contact lenses with a special back surface that was designed for optical rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty. Four different types of these lenses (tricurve, keratoconus, reverse, oblong) were used selectively depending on abnormal eccentricity determined by videokeratoscope. The patients were followed up for an average period of 15.5 months. Lens tolerance and corrected visual acuity were evaluated and compared with that corrected with spectacles.

RESULTS

The visual acuity was significantly improved in nearly all eyes with an average increase of 3.6 lines (maximal nine lines) accompanied by good contact lens tolerance and satisfactory contact lens fit. No noticeable complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Contact lenses with special back surface design can improve visual results and lens tolerance, and minimise problems in contact lens fitting. This is in favour of contact lenses as an alternative to surgical procedures for correction of high or irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. This procedure is recommended especially in cases of patients who decline further operative interventions.

Elliptical ELSA (LASEK) instruments for the treatment of astigmatism

PURPOSE

To investigate newly designed, elliptical ELSA (excimer laser subepithelial ablation) instruments for the treatment of astigmatism.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, and the Rayne Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

METHODS

The new ELSA instrument set consists of an elliptical microtrephine (11.0 mm x 8.0 mm) with a 70 microm calibrated blade and an elliptical alcohol cone (11.5 mm x 8.5 mm). With this instrument set, ELSA (the laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy [LASEK] described by Camellin) was performed in 34 astigmatic eyes. The cylindrical correction was between 1.00 diopters (D) and 3.50 D and the spherical correction, between -0.75 D and -8.75 D. In all eyes, the follow-up was 6 months. The postoperative refractive outcome was analyzed using Alpins vector analysis.

RESULTS

Excimer laser subepithelial ablation was performed without intraoperative complications in all eyes. At 6 months, the mean spherical correction was -0.04 D +/- 0.27 (SD) (range +0.75 to -0.75 D) and the mean cylindrical correction, 0.27 +/- 0.23 D (range 0 to 0.75 D). The mean index of success was 0.18 +/- 0.15.

CONCLUSIONS

With the elliptical instruments, ELSA was an effective and safe surgical procedure for astigmatism.

Photoastigmatic Refractive Keratectomy in Myopes

PURPOSE

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) was studied in a multi-center clinical trial. The Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was evaluated for its effect on refraction, visual acuity, and safety measures as part of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated study.

METHODS

Eight U.S. centers enrolled adults with eyes having refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D and a myopic spherical equivalent refraction up to -8.00 D. Results are reported for 749 eyes of 486 patients with at least 6 months follow-up. The rectangular beam scanning Nidek EC-5000 used a 5.5-mm-diameter treatment zone, a 7.0-mm-diameter peripheral blend zone, and a 40 Hz pulse rate for surface treatment of myopic astigmatism. Nomogram corrections to machine settings were required to achieve the desired results.

RESULTS

Preoperative average spherical equivalent refraction of -4.90+/-1.74 D was reduced to -0.02+/-0.79 D at 6 months. Refractive stability was established at 3 months. Over 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of desired correction at 6 months, with over 86% within +/-1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by an average of 10 Snellen lines; over 64% of eyes saw 20/20 or better uncorrected and over 93% saw 20/40 or better uncorrected at 6 and 12 months. PARK treatment effectively reduced astigmatism with little average axis error or magnitude error. Corneal haze and safety concerns were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser provided significant reduction of myopia and astigmatism, with minimal complications.

One year clinical results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to correct compound myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Departments of Ophthalmology, Robert Debré Hospital and Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism treated with a Nidek EC 5000 excimer laser. The refractive results were measured at 1 year, and the cylindrical component was analyzed by the Alpins method. Mean preoperative myopia was -4.50 diopters (D) (range -0.75 to -4.00 D) and mean preoperative cylinder, -1.64 D (range -0.75 to -4.00 D).

RESULTS

At 1 year, the spherical equivalent was -0.47 D (range +1.00 to -3.00 D) and residual subjective astigmatism, -0.40 (range -0.25 to -1.50 D). Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was obtained in 22 of the 27 eyes; 21 eyes were within +/- 1.0 D of emmetropia. Vector analysis showed a mean coefficient adjustment of 1.50 D +/- 0.53 (SD), a mean axis shift of 2.64 +/- 12.10 degrees, and a mean magnitude of error of 0.45 +/- 0.56 D. Haze was absent in 22 eyes and grade 1+ in 5 eyes. Five eyes gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 3 lost 1 line. No patient lost more than 1 line.

CONCLUSION

Excimer laser PARK successfully corrected low and moderate myopia combined with up to 4.0 D of astigmatism with a low mean angle of error. To increase the accuracy of toric ablation, specific algorithms for the cylinder component are needed.

Refractive versus Corneal Changes After Photorefracive Keratectomy for Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To define measures of assessing success and subsequent ways to improve excimer laser treatment of astigmatism.

METHODS

We studied 97 eyes of 79 patients, followed for 12 months, that underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia and astigmatism with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser. Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction at the corneal plane was between -1.00 and -15.00 D. Mean preoperative refractive astigmatism at the spectacle plan was -2.17 +/- 1.05 D (range, -1.25 to -6.00 D), which is -1.81 +/- 0.86 D (range -1.04 to -4.97 D) when calculated at the corneal plane. All patients were examined before and after surgery; examination included refraction, keratometry, and topography measurement.

RESULTS

The success in treatment of astigmatism appeared measurably less than the treatment of sphere when analogous indices were used for assessment. Success in astigmatism surgery improved, as measured by all parameters, after an additional 20% was applied to astigmatism treatment magnitude indicated by the VISX computer algorithm. The sequential modes of treatment undercorrected astigmatism magnitude to a greater extent than elliptical, but equivalent success rates were present in view of the greater astigmatic changes attempted using the sequential mode. The elliptical mode tended to produce a greater undercorrection of associated sphere (p = 0.313). Results measured by refraction showed a larger change than those measured by topography and keratometry.

CONCLUSION

During PRK with the VISX 20/20 laser, adjustment for undercorrection of astigmatism treatment achieves a fuller correction of astigmatism. When measuring astigmatic changes, results are different when comparing refractive astigmatism changes with corneal astigmatism changes measured by keratometry and topography.

Evaluation of axis alignment system for correction of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of in situ axis alignment for the treatment of myopic astigmatism with an excimer laser.

METHODS

In this prospective clinical trial, 71 eyes with stable astigmatism of -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D) with or without stable myopia of up to 10.00 D were randomized to receive excimer treatment of their astigmatic component aligned to the axis determined by subjective refraction (control group) or to have the alignment verified and altered is necessary by in situ alignment (axis alignment group). A VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser was used for the treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months.

RESULTS

In 85% of eyes in the axis alignment group, the axis of cylinder was different from that calculated by routine refraction. Pretreatment mean cylinder was -1.81 D +/- 0.91 (SD) in the axis alignment group and -1.75 +/- 0.60 D in the control group. At 6 months, an undercorrection of cylinder was seen in both groups; the mean residual cylinder was -0.70 +2- 0.56 D in the axis alignment group and -0.59 +/- 0.50 D in the control group. More than 80% of all eyes were within +/- 1.00 D of plano and achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better. A loss of two or more lines of best corrected visual acuity was recorded in three eyes.

CONCLUSION

The in situ alignment technique did not produce better results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy than the routine axis alignment technique.

Excimer laser treatment of myopic astigmatism. A comparison of three ablation programs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the precision, accuracy, and safety of three different modes of excimer laser surgery for myopic astigmatism.

DESIGN

A prospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 150 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism were treated.

INTERVENTION

Ablation programs included the VISX Twenty/Twenty excimer laser using either the sequential mode (58 eyes) or the elliptical mode (54 eyes) and the Technolas-Chiron Keracor 116 hybrid scanning laser (38 eyes).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in cylinder and sphere, vector analysis (polar values), uncorrected visual acuity, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were evaluated at 1, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

By 12 months, sphere was reduced by 95.1%, 87.7%, and 75% in low-astigmatism eyes treated with the VISX sequential, VISX elliptical, and Technolas modes, respectively, and by 92.2%, 98%, and 77.6% in high-astigmatism eyes. By 12 months, cylinder was reduced by 51.5%, 72.2%, and 36.3% in low-astigmatism eyes and by 70%, 78%, and 45.6%, respectively, in high-astigmatism eyes. Vector analysis showed that the elliptical treatment produced more significant reductions in mean polar values than the other two treatments at various timepoints.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the ablation approach may influence the clinical result.

Excimer laser correction of astigmatism with multipass/multizone treatment. The Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of excimer laser correction of myopic astigmatism by multipass/multizone photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK).

SETTING

Tertiary referral ophthalmic hospital with an associated private laser facility.

METHODS

This study comprised a consecutive series of 332 eyes of 289 patients who were followed for 6 months. All patients were 18 years or older, had stable myopic astigmatism (up to a -19.0 diopters [D] spherical equivalent [SE] at the spectacle plane), and had a best corrected visual acuity of at least 20/60 in both eyes. All eyes were treated with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser. The correction was divided between ablation zones using a multipass/multizone treatment paradigm based on the amount of myopia and astigmatism. Patients were examined 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Analysis of the mean percentage of spherical correction across the range of myopic preoperative SEs treated demonstrated 90% correction for most amounts of myopic astigmatism. Eyes with low myopia (mean preoperative SE < or = -5.0 D) treated with < or = -1.0 diopter cylinder (DC) of astigmatism achieved a mean percentage of spherical correction of 91% versus 93% in eyes with high myopia (> -5.0 D mean preoperative SE). Eyes with low myopia treated with > -1.0 DC of astigmatism achieved a mean percentage spherical correction of 90% versus 89% in eyes with high myopia. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. Patients with high relative cylinder (> 80% of total sphere treated) achieved comparable results. Analysis of the astigmatic component of the treatment, independent of the spherical result, showed a trend toward overcorrection in the high myopia group with less than -1.0 DC and a mean astigmatic correction of 89 and 98%, respectively, in the low and high myopic astigmatism groups. The mean angle of error was +2.0 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Multipass/multizone PARK for myopic astigmatism demonstrated a high degree of predictability and stability with desirable results for low and high levels of astigmatism across the range of myopic astigmatism treated by surface ablation.

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for primary treatment and revision of myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results in 43 eyes treated with a rotating mask for myopic astigmatism and followed for up to 1 year.

SETTING

Lucerne Eye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (42 eyes) were selected to have photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK). In 33% (14 eyes), this treatment was the second or third ablation. The Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser was operated in toe scanning slit mode, and a rotating mask was used. To evaluate cylindrical shaping, vector analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One year after PARK, mean uncorrected visual acuity in all patients (26 eyes) improved from 20/160 preoperatively to 20/40. Surgically induced astigmatism in 20 of 26 eyes (77%) was within +/- 1.00 diopter (D) of the targeted induced astigmatism. At 1 year, 81% of patients who had primary excimer laser treatment for myopic astigmatism equivalent to -10.00 D or less were within +/- 1.00 D of target refraction compared with 44% of re-treated eyes.

CONCLUSION

The result of PARK in eyes with low to moderate degrees of myopic astigmatism was satisfactory. However, in eyes with extensive scarring and wound healing activity after the first ablation, re-treatment was less predictable.

Treatment of myopic astigmatism with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser

PURPOSE

To assess the results of surface sequential toric photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser using an erodible mask.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on consecutive eyes having surface sequential toric PRK over a 4 month treatment period. Attempted astigmatism correction varied from 70 to 100%, depending on the power and axis of the cylinder. The myopic correction was adjusted so the combined treatment aim was emmetropia. Refraction, manual keratometry, corneal haze, and visual acuity data from preoperative and follow-up visits over 12 months were divided into various groups based on the preoperative refraction and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine eyes from 48 patients had sequential toric PRK. Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent at glasses plane (SEGP) was -4.88 diopters (D) +/- 3.20 (SD) and the mean refractive cylinder, 2.02 +/- 1.04 D. The mean attempted cylinder correction was 1.87 D. At 12 months the mean SEGP was -0.02 +/- 0.67 D, which was not statistically significant from plano. The mean refractive cylinder was 0.84 +/- 0.84 D, which was statistically significantly different from zero cylinder power. There was a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative and the 12 month postoperative refractive cylinder powers. At 12 months, 34 of 43 eyes (79.1%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better. While 2 eyes in one patient (4.7%) lost two lines of best corrected visual acuity, with a final acuity of 6/12 in each, no patient lost more than two lines.

CONCLUSION

The manifest refraction cylinder power is not fully corrected with the current treatment algorithms; however, surface sequential toric PRK using an erodible mask is capable of treating compound myopic astigmatism with moderate success.

Laser intrastromal keratomileusis for high myopia and myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND

Laser intrastromal keratomileusis (LASIK) is an evolving technique which enables high degrees of myopia (> 8.0 dioptres) and myopic astigmatism to be corrected. This paper describes initial experience with this procedure. It also details the methodology, the results, the problems encountered, and discusses retreatment procedures.

METHODS

51 eyes (48 primary cases and three retreatments) underwent LASIK for simple myopia or compound myopic astigmatism. After the keratotomy was fashioned with a Chiron corneal shaper, the ablation was performed with either a Summit or Meditec excimer laser. The actual preoperative astigmatism ranged from -0.5 D to -6.0 D (in the astigmatic myopic LASIK (AML) series), while the range of preoperative myopia in the combined myopic LASIK (ML) and AML series was -8.0 D to -37.0 D. Of the ML cases, group 1 (-8.0 to 15.0 D (dioptres)), group 2 (> -15.0 to -20.0 D), and group 3 (> -20.0 D) had mean preoperative myopia values (spherical equivalent) of -11.26 D, -16.84 D and -27.78 D. The same groupings (1, 2, and 3) for the AML cases had respective values of -9.702, -17.4, and -23.08. In the AML series the mean preoperative astigmatism was -2.109 D. Follow up ranged from 8 to 27 months (mean 15.8 months). Six of the cases required retreatment.

RESULTS

There was a reduction in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (of 1 Snellen line) in seven of the primary cases (14.5%) (three in the ML group and four in the AML group), and in one of the retreatment cases. The BCVA improved in 28 cases (58%) in the primary treatment group. The mean correction attempted (spherical equivalent) for the ML groups 1, 2, and 3 was 10.51 D, -14.5 D, and -27.78 D, versus a mean correction achieved of -9.445 D, -15.625 D, and -21.571 D. Similarly, for the AML groups, attempted correction values were -9.702 D, -17.4 D, and -23.08 D, while the values achieved were -6.95 D, -51.425 D, and -15.708 D. Regression was minimal and stabilisation of the refractive result was achieved in all groups, except group 3 of the ML series, by the 3 month examination period. The mean postoperative astigmatism in the AML series was -0.531 D. Vector analysis of the AML series showed that the mean surgically induced astigmatism was +0.93 D. The most common complication encountered was undercorrection, which occurred in 35 cases-23 cases in the ML group and 12 cases in the AML series. Twenty eight per cent of the ML cases, and 25% of the AML cases were within plus or minus 1.5 D of the attempted refraction.

CONCLUSION

For the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism, LASIK results in less postoperative pain and relatively little subepithelial haze compared with high myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Furthermore, a stable refraction and reasonably predictable outcome occurs much earlier. High myopia up to -37.0 D can be corrected, albeit with some limitations at the extremes of myopia-in terms of the amount of myopia correctable; this represents a limitation of the technique. Retreatment is a technically straightforward and effective way to treat undercorrection. Undercorrection, the main complication seen in our series, should become less common when the ablation algorithms are further refined.

New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism

PURPOSE

To describe a method for optimizing the treatment of astigmatism using vector analysis of both refractive and corneal topographic values.

SETTING

Cheltenham Eye Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

METHODS

This study evaluated a method of vector analysis for planning surgery that uses both preoperative topographic and refractive values and determined how to select the relative treatment emphasis to be given to each. In addition, the significance of the phenomenon of ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was explored. Its presence provides an inherent limitation on eliminating astigmatism from the eye's optical system.

RESULTS

Various comparisons of preoperative and ORA values are plotted in a series of 100 excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy patients. These ORA values are equivalent to the expected corneal astigmatism resulting from surgery where treatment is performed by refractive astigmatism values alone. A theoretical example is given in which the corneal astigmatism remaining from surgery is reduced by giving less emphasis to completely eliminating refractive astigmatism and consequently greater emphasis to completely eliminating topographic astigmatism.

CONCLUSION

Using vectors in astigmatism surgery enables the incorporation of topography and refractive values into the surgical plan. This would achieve a greater reduction in corneal astigmatism and potentially a better visual outcome than using refractive astigmatism values alone.

Undercorrection after excimer laser refractive surgery. Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

The incidence and correlations of undercorrection were studied for 1 year after excimer laser surgery for myopia or myuopic astigmatism.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 645 eyes of 440 patients were studied. Eyes were examined preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The parameters evaluated were visual acuity, refraction, and corneal clarity.

RESULTS

Following excimer laser surgery, undercorrection of > or = -1.00 diopters gradually increased from 10% at 1 month to 40% at 12 months. Increasing degree of preoperative myopia was significantly associated with increasing occurrence of undercorrection at 3 months (chi 2 = 17.3, P < .001), 6 months (chi 2 = 53.6, P < .001), and 12 months (chi 2 = 64.8, P < .001). Undercorrection was more common in eyes that had had photorefractive keratectomy than in those that had had photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.60). At 1 year, a loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was recorded in 38% of undercorrected patients. Loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity was more common in patients undercorrected by -1.00 diopter or more (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 5.4 to 14.6). No relationship was seen between corneal haze and loss of best-corrected visual acuity. Undercorrection was not associated with age, gender, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bandage contact lens wear, or corneal haze. Patients with lower degrees of myopia reached a stable refraction more quickly. At 6 months, 71% were within +/- 0.5 diopter of 1-year refraction. Of 17 patients with undercorrection who were treated with topical corticosteroids, only one patient showed a permanent beneficial change.

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of undercorrection is more common in patients with severe myopia and when simultaneous astigmatic corrections are undertaken.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy using an erodible mask to treat myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using an erodible mask to treat myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Douglas Memorial Hospital Medical Centre, Fore Erie, Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was done on 25 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with myopic astigmatism using the OmniMed excimer laser and a compound single-use myopic erodible mask manufactured to produce a specific spherical and cylindrical correction for each individual patient. Follow-up ranged from 6 months for 25 patients to 1 year for 5 patients.

RESULTS

Six months after PRK, the mean preoperative sphere of -7.46 diopters (D) decreased to -0.17 D and the mean preoperative cylinder of 2.31 D dropped to 0.69 D; 73% of astigmatism was corrected. In the five eyes followed for 1 year, 94% of astigmatism was corrected. Correction of the myopic component was less predictable, with a wider than anticipated range of overcorrection.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser PRK successfully corrected myopic astigmatism in patients with low and high myopia. The less predictable myopia results may have been secondary to increased procedure time, corneal dehydration, and difficulty in patient fixation and thus alignment.

One-year follow-up results of photorefractive keratectomy for low, moderate, and high primary astigmatism

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high, moderate, and low degrees of primary myopic astigmatism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two eyes of 54 patients with different degrees of compound myopic astigmatism underwent PRK. The eyes were divided by degree of refractive astigmatism into three groups-high (-2.75 to -5.0 diopters [D]), moderate (-1.25 to -2.50 D), and low (< or = 1.0 D). Refraction, corneal topography, slit-lamp findings, and visual acuity with and without correction were assessed.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the mean reduction from the preoperative refractive cylinder was 80.7% in the high astigmatism group, 68.4% in the moderate astigmatism group, and 47.6% in the low astigmatism group. The post-treatment residual cylinder axis remained stable in 23 (38.3%) of 60 eyes and deviated in 37 (61.7%) of 60 eyes. The maximal deviation of the residual cylinder axis was 15 degrees. Of the 89.2% of eyes with low cylinder, 81.8% had moderate cylinder, and 85% of the eyes with high cylinder achieved a final uncorrected visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/35 at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant reduction in the refractive cylinder was found in the high, moderate, and low astigmatism groups. The difference between the mean reduction of the high and moderate cylinders compared with the mean reduction of the low cylinders also was found to be statistically significant. The laser used in this study is an efficient tool for correcting high and moderate astigmatism. However, regarding low astigmatism, it was found to be less effective.

Excimer laser correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of excimer laser correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty.

SETTING

Kiel University Eye Hospital, Kiel, Germany.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we treated high astigmatism in 16 patients using a 193 nm excimer laser with a rotating mask system to make a toric ablation. Thirteen patients had postkeratoplasty astigmatism, 3, idiopathic natural astigmatism. Preoperative refractive cylinder ranged from 3.0 to 9.0 diopters (D). Minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean uncorrected visual acuity increased by 3.3 lines in 13 patients. Best corrected visual acuity decreased by no more than two lines in 6 patients and improved by at least one line in 6 patients. Mean cylindrical reduction was 2.8 D. Haze was classified from 0.5 to 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the excimer laser technique effectively reduced high corneal astigmatism. The main problems incurred were development of a hyperopic shift and, in some patients, an uncertain refractive outcome. Reasons for inadequate correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism included a slightly decentered mask and irregular astigmatism from the circular scar.

Assessment of Subjective Pain Following Photorefractive Keratectomy

BACKGROUND

Although researchers have reported that postoperative pain in patients undergoing excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery is common in the first 24 hours after excimer surgery, factors associated with increased postoperative pain have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to prospectively document self-reported pain following excimer laser surgery and explore associated factors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery to correct myopia and/or myopic astigmatism were asked to prospectively grade, on a four-point scale, the amount of pain they were experiencing immediately after treatment and again 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. They were also asked to record the type and dose of all medication taken during that time period.

RESULTS

Pain questionnaires were returned by 62 patients (72%), ranging in age from 20 to 54 years. The mean self-reported pain overall peaked 24 hours after treatment. Amount of myopia and prior excimer experience were not related to use of analgesia or self-reported pain (both p > 0.10). Patients who had three additional topical drops of indomethacin postoperatively reported significantly less pain 24 hours after treatment (t = 5.95, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

These results have implications for the education of patients about the likely course of healing after PRK. A course of five drops of topical indomethacin should be evaluated with a randomized clinical trial to assess efficacy in inhibiting ocular pain after PRK.

Early Results of Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopic Astigmatism

BACKGROUND

The Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser has been used to correct myopic astigmatism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early results in our patients.

METHODS

The Technolas Keracor 116 excimer utilizes a scanning beam to correct myopic astigmatism. Following the correction of the astigmatic error, spherical myopic component is then treated. Twenty-eight eyes with myopic astigmatism were treated utilizing a 4 x 12 mm ablation zone for astigmatism and 4.5 mm to 6.6 mm transition zone for the spherical component at the same session. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.87 +/- 3.48 diopters (D) (range: -1.00 to -14.25) and the mean preoperative astigmatic error was -2.53 +/- 1.49 D (range: -1.00 to -6.00 D) All eyes received dexamethasone eye drops for 3 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.23 D (range +1.38 to -1.50 D), the mean postoperative refractive cylinder was -0.16 +/- 0.99 D (range: +1.50 to -2.00 D) and 78% of the eyes had a refraction within +/- 1 D. Fifty-five percent achieved 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity. In three cases there was one line loss and in two cases there was two line loss in best corrected spectacle visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results from this study suggest that excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy effectively reduces myopic astigmatism. The treatment of astigmatism offers a new challenge for excimer laser corneal surgery. Lasers utilize different methods to control the beam that reshapes the cornea.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy has been used for the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. This laser removes tissue through a process termed photoablative decomposition, in which incident photon energy is sufficient to break molecular bonds. Selective removal of tissue across the anterior corneal surface results in a change in anterior corneal curvature. The surgical outcome may be influenced also by interindividual variability in wound healing and pharmacologic interventions. The nature of the excimer laser-tissue interaction, and clinical outcomes of predictability, stability and complications of surgery for myopia are discussed in detail.

The Effect of Spherical Photorefractive Keratectomy On Myopic Astigmatism

The aim of this report is to present the effects of spherical photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) by excimer laser on myopic astigmatism. Spherical PRK was performed in 96 eyes with myopia associated with astigmatism of between 0.75 and 2.00 diopters (D) using the Summit excimer laser. The reduction both in sphere and in cylinder was found to be highly statistically significant (P < 0.0001 for both). The mean reduction of cylinder was 46%. Astigmatic error of less than 2.00 D can be corrected significantly by spherical PRK.