Glare disability devices for cataractous eyes: a consumer's guide

Glaucoma and glare

PURPOSE

To determine whether a purpose-built glare tester, in combination with new glare-specific questions, can better assess glaucoma patients' experience of glare and visual disability than visual acuity (VA) or visual fields alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients attending for visual fields in a single glaucoma clinic from 03/06/2019-01/11/2019 underwent VA assessment using a Brightness Acuity Tester as a glare source, examination for media opacities, and completed the VFQ-25 with four additional glare-related questions. One hundred and sixteen eyes (64 patients) were included for analysis. The amount of disability glare (VA reduction due to glare) was compared according to presence/absence of media opacity and glaucoma severity. Subjective glare symptoms were compared with objective disability glare measurement using a Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Patients with advanced-severe glaucoma had significantly worse disability glare than those with mild-moderate glaucoma. VA reduction due to glare from mild-moderate to acute-severe glaucoma (mean -3.4 letters, P = 0.01, CI -0.8, -6.0) was of almost identical magnitude to that due to presence of any media opacity (mean -3.3 letters, P = 0.03, CI -0.4, -6.2). There was a trend towards greater disability glare in more symptomatic patients, with good agreement between subjective and objective glare measurements for those with few glare signs or symptoms, but progressively more variation either side of agreement as either measurement worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

Glaucoma is associated with objective and subjective acuity reduction in the presence of glare. We demonstrated an increase in disability glare in patients with more severe glaucoma. The worse the glare symptoms or signs, the more variable the agreement between objective and subjective assessments.

Post-DSAEK optical changes: a comprehensive prospective analysis on the role of ocular wavefront aberrations, haze, and corneal thickness

PURPOSE

The aim was to assess the visual impact of ocular wavefront aberrations, corneal thickness, and corneal light scatter prospectively after performing a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in humans.

METHODS

Data were obtained prospectively from 20 eyes preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-DSAEK. At each visit, the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and visual acuity with glare (brightness acuity testing) were recorded, and ocular wavefront measurements and corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. The magnitude and the sign of individual Zernike terms [higher-order aberrations (HOAs)] were determined. Epithelial, host stromal, donor stromal, and total corneal thicknesses were quantified. The brightness and intensity profiles of OCT images were generated to quantify light scatter in the whole cornea, subepithelial region, anterior and posterior host stroma, interface, and donor stroma.

RESULTS

The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and glare disability at low light levels improved from 1 to 12 months post-DSAEK. All corneal thicknesses and ocular lower-order aberrations and HOAs were found to be stable from 1 to 12 months, whereas total corneal, host stromal, and interface brightness intensities decreased significantly over the same period. A repeated measures analysis of variance performed across the follow-up period revealed that the change in scatter, but not the change in the HOAs, could account for the variability occurring in the acuity from 1 to 12 months post-DSAEK.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ocular HOAs and scatter are both elevated over normal values post-DSAEK, our results demonstrate that the improvements in visual performance occurring over the first year post-DSAEK are associated with decreasing light scatter. In contrast, there were no significant changes in the ocular HOAs during this time. Because corneal light scatter decreased between 1 and 12 months despite there being stable corneal thicknesses over the same period, we conclude that factors that induced light scatter, other than tissue thickness or swelling (corneal edema), significantly impacted the visual improvements that occurred over time post-DSAEK. A better understanding of the cellular and extracellular matrix changes of the subepithelial region and interface, incurred by the surgical creation of a lamellar host-graft interface, and the subsequent healing of these tissues, is warranted.

Straylight before and after phacoemulsification in eyes with preoperative corrected distance visual acuity better than 0.1 logMAR

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of changes in straylight before and after phacoemulsification in eyes with preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) better than 0.1 logMAR.

SETTING

Private refractive surgery clinic, Driebergen, the Netherlands.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

Standard phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal or multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) was performed. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative straylight values, CDVA, and refractive error were compared.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 160 eyes (89 patients). The mean CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR (range -0.1 to 0.1 logMAR) preoperatively and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR (range -0.1 to 0.2 logMAR) postoperatively. The mean preoperative straylight was 1.21 ± 0.20 log(s) (range 0.80 to 1.74 log[s]) and 1.11 ± 1.16 log(s) (range 0.76 to 1.63 log[s]), respectively; the improvement was statistically significant. There was a correlation between high preoperative straylight values and postoperative improvement in straylight values.

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with relatively good CDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better (decimal 0.8 or better; Snellen 20/25 or better), straylight improved by 0.10 log(s) after cataract surgery. A subgroup of 44 eyes had an improvement of more than 0.20 log(s), which is comparable to a 2-line improvement on the vision chart.

History of ocular straylight measurement: A review

The earliest studies on 'disability glare' date from the early 20(th) century. The condition was defined as the negative effect on visual function of a bright light located at some distance in the visual field. It was found that for larger angles (>1 degree) the functional effect corresponded precisely to the effect of a light with a luminosity equal to that of the light that is perceived spreading around such a bright source. This perceived spreading of light was called straylight and by international standard disability glare was defined as identical to straylight. The phenomenon was recognized in the ophthalmological community as an important aspect of the quality of vision and attempts were made to design instruments to measure it. This must not be confused with instruments that assess light spreading over small distances (<1 degree), as originating from (higher order) aberrations and defocus. In recent years a new instrument has gained acceptance (C-Quant) for objective and controllable assessment of straylight in the clinical setting. This overview provides a sketch of the historical development of straylight measurement, as well as the results of studies on the origins of straylight (or disability glare) in the normal eye, and on findings on cataract (surgery) and corneal conditions.

Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective

Disability glare describes the loss of retinal image contrast as a result of intraocular light scatter, or straylight. It has increasingly important modern implications such as with cataract and refractive surgery or high-intensity lighting. However, its measurement has proven difficult despite many varying approaches. This article aims to explain the principles and problems associated with glare testing that are important for assessment and use of glare measures. After defining disability glare, this article discusses the importance of its measurement to current clinical practice. It explains the principles and mechanisms that underlie disability glare and its measurement. Finally, some examples of available glare tests are described to illustrate the principles discussed.

Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery

A certain percentage of patients complain of "glare" at night after undergoing a refractive surgical procedure. When patients speak of glare they are, technically, describing a decrease in quality of vision secondary to glare disability, decreased contrast sensitivity, and image degradations, or more succinctly, "night vision disturbances." The definitions, differences, and methods of measurement of such vision disturbances after refractive surgery are described in our article. In most cases of corneal refractive surgery, there is a significant increase in vision disturbances immediately following the procedure. The majority of patients improve between 6 months to 1 year post-surgery. The relation between pupil size and the optical clear zone are most important in minimizing these disturbances in RK. In PRK and LASIK, pupil size and the ablation diameter size and location are the major factors involved. Treatment options for disabling glare are also discussed. With the exponential increase of patients having refractive surgery, the increase of patients complaining of scotopic or mesopic vision disturbances may become a major public health issue in the near future. Currently, however, there are no gold-standard clinical tests available to measure glare disability, contrast sensitivity, or image degradations. Standardization is essential for objective measurement and follow-up to further our understanding of the effects of these surgeries on the optical system and thus, hopefully, allow for modification of our techniques to decrease or eliminate post-refractive vision disturbances.

Ophthalmic and visual profile of guide dog owners in Scotland

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Out of an estimated 90,000 visually impaired people in Scotland, 509 make use of a guide dog. Initial research in Northern Ireland suggests that the ophthalmic profile of guide dog owners (GDOs) is highly specific. The aim of this study was to compare the ophthalmic and visual characteristics of Scottish GDOs with other groups of visually impaired people.

METHODS

A random sample of GDOs from central and northern Scotland (n = 82) underwent a detailed assessment of residual vision (distance and near acuity, visual fields, contrast, and glare sensitivity). Comparative data were obtained from two populations of visually impaired non-GDOs-one group attending hospital ophthalmic and low vision clinics (n = 50) the other social services rehabilitation clients (n = 35). All participants completed a questionnaire to elicit ophthalmic history, age, and registration details.

RESULTS

GDOs were found to be significantly younger and more profoundly visually impaired than non-GDOs. The main causes of visual impairment were retinitis pigmentosa (23%), optic atrophy (15%), and retinopathy of prematurity (7%). Ninety nine per cent of GDOs were registered blind and had been visually impaired for an average of 39 years. Only 31% were totally blind.

CONCLUSION

GDOs represent a unique minority of the visually impaired population. Epidemiological registration trends would suggest that the numbers of young profoundly visually impaired people are unlikely to increase relative to their elderly counterparts. This has implications on the future demand for guide dog ownership.

Comparison of methods to assess visual impairment from glare and light scattering with posterior capsule opacification

PURPOSE

To compare 2 glare tests to determine their relative usefulness in the assessment of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and to evaluate the potential benefits of combined visual, acuity, contrast sensitivity, and glare testing.

SETTING

Teaching hospital ophthalmology department.

METHODS

Sixteen patients had glare, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity testing before and after neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy. Results with the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT, Mentor), which measures disability glare, and the Straylightmeter (Foundation for Eye Research, The Netherlands), which quantifies forward scatter by direct compensation techniques, were compared. The correlation between glare, ETDRS visual acuity, and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity was determined.

RESULTS

Pretreatment visual acuity was significantly correlated with contrast sensitivity (P < .01). However, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were poorly correlated with both the BAT and Straylightmeter (P > .05), indicating that visual acuity is predictive of contrast sensitivity but a poor predictor of glare. Glare was significantly improved (Straylightmeter, P < .0001; BAT, P < .05) following capsulotomy. While the Straylightmeter consistently measured precapsulotomy forward scatter that improved with treatment, corresponding BAT disability glare was unmeasurable in 18.8% of patients with PCO, as their visual acuities improved rather than deteriorated with glare testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Glare testing provided more information than contrast sensitivity when combined with visual acuity in the evaluation of PCO. Glare related to PCO is better assessed using the Straylightmeter because the BAT may yield aberrant disability glare results.

Management of cataract

Images

Topical interferon alpha 2b for corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. The Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

To determine whether topical interferon alpha 2b (IFN-alpha) prevents corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Tertiary referral ophthalmic hospital.

METHOD

A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of 31 patients was undertaken. After surgery in a single institution, patients received a drop of either a placebo or IFN-alpha (5 x 10(6) IU/ml) four times daily for 4 weeks. The main outcome measures were corneal haze, refraction, and visual acuity.

RESULTS

The major side effect of interferon alpha treatment was a significant delay in epithelial healing by a mean of 2 days. The means of the average post-treatment clinical scores for haze in all patients up to 12 months after surgery were 0.46 +/- 0.25 for the IFN-alpha group and 0.64 +/- 0.43 for the placebo group (P = .20). Of patients with a correction of greater than 5.00 diopters (D), the IFN-alpha group had significantly less haze over the course of the study (0.39 +/- 0.23 versus 0.98 +/- 0.50; P = .03). After 12 months, the mean absolute spherical equivalent in the two groups was not significantly different (1.02 +/- 1.13 D versus 1.44 +/- 2.64 D). There was a tendency toward better uncorrected visual acuity in the INF-alpha group (P < .10, Kolmogorov-Smirnov).

CONCLUSION

Topical IFN-alpha may merit further investigation as a treatment to reduce corneal haze after excimer laser PRK for corrections greater than 5.00 D.

Disability glare: effects of temporal characteristics of the glare source and of the visual-field location of the test stimulus

One of the main early complaints of cataract patients, even when these patients exhibit only mild glare problems as measured by standard tests, is that glare impairs their night driving. To provide a better measure of the patients' impairment, glare tests should include measurements of the glare effect in conditions more similar to those found in night driving. During night driving the ambient light is very low, and oncoming headlights present a transient temporal pattern. Furthermore, the objects of interest often appear initially in the peripheral visual field. Thus three important characteristics of glare in night driving are that the ambient illuminance is in the scotopic-mesopic range, the detection stimulus is in the periphery, and the glare source is transient. Most of the current glare testers measure glare only at photopic levels, and all the glare tests that we know of use only steady sources of glare with foveal discriminations. All these conditions are dealt with. The transient glare source raised thresholds by 0.5-0.75 log unit more than the steady glare source, and the transient glare effect was more pronounced and more long lasting in the periphery. Standard glare testers seriously underestimate disability glare effects in everyday life.

A common lens nuclear area in Scheimpflug photographs

Scheimpflug photography has been proven to be a useful method for documentation of opacification of the lens nucleus. In the present study, a common lens nuclear area (CNA) is established for photometry of nuclear cataract on Scheimpflug photographs. Using the established method, one measurement for one photograph, and one photograph for each subject is enough for the photometry of nuclear density. Further, this method allows detection of a 10% change in nuclear density between two occasions with a group of at least 7 subjects, and for independent groups with at least 95 subjects in each group (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.10). It is anticipated that the CNA will provide a useful tool for quantitative determination of nuclear cataract.

Glare sensitivity in early cataracts

In a previous study significant glare sensitivity (using Vistech MCT8000) was found only in patients with posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC) beyond the very early (LOCS II grade 1) stage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate glare sensitivity in patients with early cataracts. The brightness acuity tester (BAT) was used with the Pelli-Robson chart on 50 patients with early cataracts (LOCS II grade 1 or 2) and on 14 normal volunteers. Only age and PSC were found to be associated with change in contrast sensitivity at high glare. Eyes with grade 1 PSC were not significantly different from eyes with grade 0 PSC after adjusting for age. Eyes with grade 2 PSC had significant glare effect compared with eyes having grade 0 PSC. Thus, glare sensitivity is associated only with early (grade 2) PSC. Other tests still need to be developed to assess visual function changes in patients with early cortical and nuclear cataracts.

Quantification of the reduction of glare disability after standard extracapsular cataract surgery

Glare disability is often cited as an indication for cataract extraction, but very little objective data exist showing improvement of glare disability following standard extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. In a series of 25 patients we determined glare disability by the reduction in visual acuity with dim room lighting (baseline) and with full room lights; with the brightness acuity tester (BAT) on low, medium, and high; with the true vision analyzer (TVA) glare light. Glare disability was quantified by the difference between the log VA postoperatively and the log VA preoperatively. Glare disability with BAT medium was no different than that with bright room lights (P greater than .05). Glare disability with BAT high was greater than that with BAT medium (P less than .01) but did not differ from that with TVA (P greater than .05). Glare disability was significantly reduced (P less than .01) six weeks postoperatively as measured by all tests except BAT low. Cataract surgery can be expected to reduce glare disability as measured by these tests.

Comparison of three methods of evaluating glare

A Humphrey Automatic Refractor Model 570 was used to measure the impairment of visual acuity for low contrast optotypes as a result of glare for normal subjects and for subjects with cataracts. This was compared with a direct measure of intraocular light scatter as measured by a compensating technique and with a subjective assessment of glare determined by a questionnaire. Only a weak correlation (r = 0.28) was found between the decrease in low contrast letter acuity and intraocular light scatter. The subjective assessment of glare sensitivity was not correlated with the decrease in low contrast letter acuity, but correlated to some extent (r = 0.55) with the measurement of intraocular light scatter.

On the relation between glare and straylight

An overview is given of the basic phenomena that may lead to glare complaints in patients. Prominent among them is increased intraocular straylight; this can be measured. Other causes may include: increased sensitivity to normal straylight, the length of (increased) light and dark adaptation times, (small angle) neuronal lateral interaction. Distinction must be made between disability glare and discomfort glare. Tests have been proposed to determine glare-induced loss of various visual functions. Often the test results are thought to be directly related to straylight but this may be untrue.

Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability

Conventional techniques for assessing the visual function of cataract patients include visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS) and glare disability (GD). The extent to which these measurements provide accurate information about a patient's perceived visual disability is not known. In this study, binocular and monocular VA and CS and monocular GD measurements were made using commercially available techniques on 33 cataract patients. VA was measured using a Ferris-Bailey LogMAR chart and CS by the Pelli-Robson letter CS chart. Glare disability was measured using the Mentor Brightness Acuity Tester in conjunction with both the LogMAR and Pelli Robson charts. Each patient's perceived visual disability was quantified using a 20-point questionnaire about the effect of vision on everyday activities. There was little correlation between subjective visual disability and monocular or binocular VA measurements. Measurements of binocular CS, however, were highly correlated with the patient's perceived visual disability, particularly their subjective assessment of the effect of vision on their mobility-orientation. We suggest that binocular CS measurements using the Pelli-Robson chart provide useful additional information regarding the need for surgery in cataract patients.

A new glare test based on low contrast letters--evaluation in cataract patients

A new simple glare test was designed and evaluated regarding clinical usefulness and reproducibility. The ability to recognize letters of equal size and varying contrast was determined with the absence and presence of glare sources above and below the letters. Ten patients with cataract, visual acuity of at least 0.3 and glare problems, and three age matched controls were tested, as well as one patient with glare complaints and exophoria, one with lens subluxation and one with cataract and no glare problem. The test was found to be cheap and simple to produce and useful for clinical testing. Normal eyes had no detectable reduction of letter contrast sensibility with glare. All cataractous eyes had a letter contrast sensitivity without glare that was well below that of the controls and under glare conditions they all had a drop in visual function that was unrelated to their visual acuity. The reproducibility was of a magnitude similar to that of other low contrast letter tests. Our conclusion is that this test will be a valuable tool in the evaluation of cataract patients providing information not only about glare-induced visual loss but also about contrast sensitivity, separating eyes with increased intraocular light scattering from normal eyes.

Glare and contrast sensitivity in contact lens corrected aphakia, epikeratophakia and pseudophakia

The effects of glare on contrast sensitivity and high contrast Snellen acuity were investigated in a group of unilaterally aphakic patients with normal fellow eyes. In spite of relatively good visual acuity and apparently satisfactory surgical results, there was a marked reduction in contrast sensitivity in epikeratophakia and contact lens corrected aphakic eyes, relative to fellow normal eyes, especially in the presence of glare (P less than 0.05). Although the results from the pseudophakic patients were more variable, there is some evidence to suggest that epikeratophakia provides inferior visual function to contact lens correction or intraocular lens implantation. The results also suggest that the measurement of visual acuity in the presence of glare fails to identify many patients with a functional visual impairment secondary to glare.

Glare testing in cataract patients: instrument evaluation and identification of sources of methodological error

This study sought to determine the relative sensitivity of two commercially available glare testers in predicting outdoor acuity in a population of patients with minimal cataracts. Two target optotypes were evaluated: high contrast letters and varying contrast sinusoidal gratings. Although both instruments demonstrated a significant correlation between indoor and outdoor acuity, they showed a significant difference between predicted outdoor acuity and obtained visual acuity. The brightness acuity tester on high intensity was inaccurate in predicting outdoor vision regardless of test optotype, overpredicting glare disability in 76% (average) of the study population. Glare disability overpredictions fell to 8% on the medium setting with +/- 2 lines of vision classified as "no change." Using the same criterion, the Miller-Nadler glare tester overpredicted glare disability in 2% of the cataract population but underpredicted glare disability in 62%. In this study, letter optotypes resulted in less variability than sinusoidal grating stimuli. In addition, we identify several methodological factors to consider before designing a glare experiment. These potential sources of error can influence the outcome of any glare study that compares indoor and outdoor acuity and include the study population, visual stimuli (optotypes), and elements of the outdoor testing situation.

Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract?

LogMAR visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity measurements were made on 39 eyes of 18 cataractous subjects and compared against normative data. Only cataracts of one of the main three morphological cataract types were used--cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular. Results indicate that contrast sensitivity decline with cataract is an intermediate and high spatial frequency loss. For nuclear and cortical cataracts with a LogMAR visual acuity of less than 0.5 (Snellen equivalent better than 6/18), there was no loss of contrast sensitivity at the lowest spatial frequency (1 c/deg). For posterior subcapsular cataracts, low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity loss did occur but was unrelated to visual acuity. Glare sensitivity increased for all cataract types. This was related to visual acuity for both cortical and nuclear cataracts but was not for the posterior subcapsular type. It was concluded that contrast and glare sensitivity measurements are a useful part of the assessment of visual function in patients with posterior subcapsular cataract.