How long should one wait to perform LASIK after PKP?

Post-penetrating keratoplasty astigmatism

Postoperative astigmatism is one of the common complications affecting visual outcomes after a penetrating keratoplasty. It can result from various factors related to host, donor and surgical technique, resulting in suboptimal visual outcome. While some of the measures taken during preoperative planning and during actual surgery can reduce the magnitude of postoperative astigmatism, postoperative correction of astigmatism is often required in cases with high degrees of astigmatism. When spectacles and contact lenses fail to provide optimal visual outcomes, various surgical techniques that include astigmatic keratotomy, compression sutures, toric intraocular lens placement, and laser refractive procedures can be considered. When none of these techniques are able to achieve a desired result with in the acceptable optical range, a repeat keratoplasty is considered a last option. We discuss the various causes and management of complication of postoperative astigmatism occurring after a full thickness corneal transplantation surgery.

Contact lenses and special back surface design after penetrating keratoplasty to improve contact lens fit and visual outcome

AIMS

To describe the fitting of patients with high or irregular astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty with contact lenses and to answer the question whether or not contact lenses with special back surface design can improve visual acuity in complex cases after penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

28 eyes were included. They were fitted with contact lenses with a special back surface that was designed for optical rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty. Four different types of these lenses (tricurve, keratoconus, reverse, oblong) were used selectively depending on abnormal eccentricity determined by videokeratoscope. The patients were followed up for an average period of 15.5 months. Lens tolerance and corrected visual acuity were evaluated and compared with that corrected with spectacles.

RESULTS

The visual acuity was significantly improved in nearly all eyes with an average increase of 3.6 lines (maximal nine lines) accompanied by good contact lens tolerance and satisfactory contact lens fit. No noticeable complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Contact lenses with special back surface design can improve visual results and lens tolerance, and minimise problems in contact lens fitting. This is in favour of contact lenses as an alternative to surgical procedures for correction of high or irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. This procedure is recommended especially in cases of patients who decline further operative interventions.

Corneal Lamellar Flap Retraction After LASIK Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To describe a case of lamellar flap retraction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

METHODS

Eleven months after PKP, a 34-year-old man underwent uneventful LASIK. Preoperative manifest refraction was -5.50 + 4.00 x 55, giving a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20. Three days after LASIK, the central cornea was clear with a 1- to 2-mm displacement and marked swelling of the inferior edge of the lamellar corneal flap, without central striae. The patient's uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/60. The flap was repositioned, sutured with 6 10-0 nylon interrupted sutures, and covered with a bandage contact lens.

RESULTS

Five months after the repair, the cornea was clear, UCVA was 20/400, and manifest refraction was -9.50 + 6.00 x 75, giving a BCVA of 20/60. Three years later, manifest refraction was - 9.00 + 4.00 x 70, giving a BCVA of 20/40+2.

CONCLUSION

In LASIK surgery after PKP, there is a risk of flap edema leading to retraction of the transplant wound. It may therefore be advisable to wait at least 1-2 years after PKP before performing LASIK. Patients who have corneal transplants should also be warned that they might have unique risks in LASIK treatment that may result in the loss of vision.

Laser in-situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after penetrating keratoplasty has been used more commonly for the correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism and less so for hypermetropia or hyperopic astigmatism. The primary goal after LASIK in such cases is resolution of sufficient myopia and astigmatism to allow spectacle correction of the residual refractive error and decrease anisometropia. All sutures should be removed prior to LASIK and the interval between penetrating keratoplasty and LASIK should be a minimum of 1 year. Preoperative evaluation includes refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, and specular microscopy. The technique of LASIK surgery after penetrating keratoplasty is similar to the standard procedure. However, many variations have been described. These include maneuvers during surgery such as augmentation with arcuate cuts on the stromal bed and topographically guided LASIK. Other variations are relaxing incisions followed by LASIK surgery and sequential treatment by LASIK, that is, raising of the flap as a first stage procedure followed by ablation if required, 4 to 6 weeks later after relifting the flap in the second stage. Improvement in both uncorrected visual acuity and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, as well as a decrease in spherical equivalent, cylinder, and anisometropia, has been reported in various studies. All grafts were clear and no occurrence of wound dehiscence has been reported. Intraoperative complications include hemorrhage, microkeratome failure, flap buttonhole, dislocation, and perforation. Postoperative complications include undercorrection, decentered ablation, and regression. Re-enhancements after LASIK following keratoplasty are possible with acceptable visual outcome.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Correction of High Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, and to assess the refractive results and predictability of the procedure.

METHODS

LASIK was performed on 19 patients (19 eyes) with high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. The amount of preoperative refractive astigmatism ranged from 6.50 to 14.50 D (mean, 9.21 +/- 1.95 D) and the spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -7.00 to +1.25 D (mean, -2.14 +/- 2.11 D). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

Refraction was stable after 3 months. At 1 year after LASIK, the amount of refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 1.09 +/- 0.33 D (range, 0.50 to 1.75 D), with 57.9% of the eyes within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 3.7%. The postoperative spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -1.00 to +1.75 D with a mean of +0.43 +/- 0.82 D. Vector analysis showed that the mean amount of axis deviation was 1.1 +/- 1.3 degrees and the mean percent correction of preoperative astigmatism was 92.6 +/- 8.4%. There were no intraoperative complications. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye, and improved by 2 or more lines in 42.1% of eyes after LASIK.

CONCLUSION

LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of both astigmatism and myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. The procedure proved to be safe and gave fairly predictable and stable refractive results.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Ametropia After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

Eight eyes underwent LASIK after a mean 71 months (SD 60) following the initial penetrating keratoplasty. A full ophthalmic assessment was performed before LASIK and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Mean follow-up was 8.6 months (SD 3.2).

RESULTS

No eyes lost any Snellen lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at the latest follow-up. Mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction was 91% from -6.79 D (SD 4.17) to -0.64 D (SD 1.92) and mean reduction of cylinder was 72% from -6.79 D (SD 3.28) to -1.93 D (SD 1.17) at 6 months. Mean surgically induced astigmatism was 5.50 D (SD 2.42) and the index of surgically induced astigmatism divided by the initial cylinder expressed as a percentage was 81%. Mean outcome indices were: correction index 0.87, index of success 0.31, and angle of error 0.95 degrees. Three eyes (43%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-0.50 D and 4 eyes (57%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-1.00 D of emmetropia.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty was good compared to incisional or surface based excimer laser methods and has the advantage of reducing the myopic spherical equivalent refraction in addition to astigmatism, thus improving the uncorrected visual acuities.