Pregnancy and nursing in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Childbearing Adult and Newborn

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often affects people in their childbearing years and has implications for pregnancy outcomes, particularly as related to increased risk of preterm delivery and effects of immunosuppressive medications on the fetus. Ideally, people with IBD should attempt conception at a time when their disease is in remission to optimize pregnancy outcomes and reduce risks of flares. Generally, pregnant individuals should continue immunosuppressive medications throughout gestation in an attempt to control the disease. Maternal risks of IBD in pregnancy include exacerbated anemia, disease flare, cesarean delivery, and treatment risks. Fetal and neonatal risks include preterm birth, low birthweight, and medication exposures. There are too few clinical trials that include pregnant or breastfeeding patients to analyze the risk/benefit profile of immunosuppressive medications for IBD treatment during pregnancy, limiting the amount of data available to guide medical treatment in this population. More studies are needed on IBD therapies, particularly as more biologics are developed and become the mainstay of treatment. Neonatal clinicians should be aware of in utero medication exposure to help guide decisions regarding newborn care.

The impact of surgical therapies for inflammatory bowel disease on female fertility

BACKGROUND

Women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may require surgery, which may result in higher risk of infertility. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) may increase infertility, but the degree to which IPAA affects infertility remains unclear, and the impact of other surgical interventions on infertility is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective• To determine the effects of surgical interventions for IBD on female infertility.Secondary objectives• To evaluate the impact of surgical interventions on the need for assisted reproductive technology (ART), time to pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, prematurity, mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, or Caesarean section), infant requirement for resuscitation and neonatal intensive care, low and very low birth weight, small for gestational age, antenatal and postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta, postpartum depression, gestational diabetes, and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register from inception to September 27, 2018, to identify relevant studies. We also searched references of relevant articles, conference abstracts, grey literature, and trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included observational studies that compared women of reproductive age (≥ 12 years of age) who underwent surgery to women with IBD who had a different type of surgery or no surgery (i.e. treated medically). We also included studies comparing women before and after surgery. Any type of IBD-related surgery was permitted. Infertility was defined as an inability to become pregnant following 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Infertility at 6, 18, and 24 months was included as a secondary outcome. We excluded studies that included women without IBD and those comparing women with IBD to women without IBD..

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened studies and extracted data. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess bias and GRADE to assess the overall certainty of evidence. We calculated the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects models. When individual studies reported odds ratios (ORs) and did not provide raw numbers, we pooled ORs instead.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 16 observational studies for inclusion. Ten studies were included in meta-analyses, of which nine compared women with and without a previous IBD-related surgery and the other compared women with open and laparoscopic IPAA. Of the ten studies included in meta-analyses, four evaluated infertility, one evaluated ART, and seven reported on pregnancy-related outcomes. Seven studies in which women were compared before and after colectomy and/or IPAA were summarized qualitatively, of which five included a comparison of infertility, three included the use of ART, and three included other pregnancy-related outcomes. One study included a comparison of women with and without IPAA, as well as before and after IPAA, and was therefore included in both the meta-analysis and the qualitative summary. All studies were at high risk of bias for at least two domains.We are very uncertain of the effect of IBD surgery on infertility at 12 months (RR 5.45, 95% CI 0.41 to 72.57; 114 participants; 2 studies) and at 24 months (RR 3.59, 95% CI 1.32 to 9.73; 190 participants; 1 study). Infertility was lower in women who received laparoscopic surgery compared to open restorative proctocolectomy at 12 months (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.27; 37 participants; 1 study).We are very uncertain of the effect of IBD surgery on pregnancy-related outcomes, including miscarriage (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.60; 776 pregnancies; 5 studies), use of ART (RR 25.09, 95% CI 1.56 to 403.76; 106 participants; 1 study), delivery via Caesarean section (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.95; 20 pregnancies; 1 study), stillbirth (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.42 to 9.18; 246 pregnancies; 3 studies), preterm birth (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 5.48; 194 pregnancies; 3 studies), low birth weight (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.83), and small for gestational age (RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.80 to 8.01; 65 pregnancies; 1 study).Studies comparing infertility before and after IBD-related surgery reported numerically higher rates of infertility at six months (before: 1/5, 20.0%; after: 9/15, 60.0%; 1 study), at 12 months (before: 68/327, 20.8%; after: 239/377, 63.4%; 5 studies), and at 24 months (before: 14/89, 15.7%; after: 115/164, 70.1%; 2 studies); use of ART (before: 5.3% to 42.2%; after: 30.3% to 34.3%; proportions varied across studies due to differences in which women were identified as at risk of using ART); and delivery via Caesarean section (before: 8/73, 11.0%; after: 36/75, 48.0%; 2 studies). In addition, women had a longer time to conception after surgery (two to five months; 2 studies) than before surgery (5 to 16 months; 2 studies). The proportions of women experiencing miscarriage (before: 19/123, 15.4%; after: 21/134, 15.7%; 3 studies) and stillbirth (before: 2/38, 5.3%; after: 3/80: 3.8%; 2 studies) were similar before and after surgery. Fewer women experienced gestational diabetes after surgery (before: 3/37, 8.1%; after: 0/37; 1 study), and the risk of preeclampsia was similar before and after surgery (before: 2/37, 5.4%; after: 0/37; 1 study). We are very uncertain of the effects of IBD-related surgery on these outcomes due to poor quality evidence, including confounding bias due to increased age of women after surgery.We rated evidence for all outcomes and comparisons as very low quality due to the observational nature of the data, inclusion of small studies with imprecise estimates, and high risk of bias among included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effect of surgical therapy for IBD on female infertility is uncertain. It is also uncertain if there are any differences in infertility among those undergoing open versus laparoscopic procedures. Previous surgery was associated with higher risk of miscarriage, use of ART, Caesarean section delivery, and giving birth to a low birth weight infant, but was not associated with risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, or delivery of a small for gestational age infant. These findings are based on very low-quality evidence. As a result, definitive conclusions cannot be made, and future well-designed studies are needed to fully understand the impact of surgery on infertility and pregnancy outcomes.

Treatment of pregnant women with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease

The frequency of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased in younger populations. For this reason, pregnancy in patients with IBD is a topic of interest, warranting additional focus on disease management during this period. The main objective of this article is to summarize the latest findings and guidelines on the management of potential problems from pregnancy to the breastfeeding stage. Fertility is decreased in patients with active IBD. Disease remission prior to conception will likely decrease the rate of pregnancy-related complications. Most of the drugs used for IBD treatment are safe during both pregnancy and breastfeeding. Two exceptions are methotrexate and thalidomide, which are contraindicated in pregnancy. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are not advised during the third trimester as they exhibit increased transplacental transmission and potentially cause immunosuppression in the fetus. Radiological and endoscopic examinations and surgical interventions should be performed only when absolutely necessary. Surgery increases the fetal mortality rate. The delivery method should be determined with consideration of the disease site and presence of progression or flare up. Treatment planning should be a collaborative effort among the gastroenterologist, obstetrician, colorectal surgeon and patient.

Mode of childbirth and long-term outcomes in women with inflammatory bowel diseases

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD; Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis] often affect women in their reproductive years. Few studies have analyzed the impact of mode of childbirth on long-term IBD outcomes.

METHODS

We used a multi-institutional IBD cohort to identify all women in the reproductive age-group with a diagnosis of IBD prior to pregnancy. We identified the occurrence of a new diagnosis code for perianal complications, IBD-related hospitalization and surgery, and initiation of medical therapy after either a vaginal delivery or caesarean section (CS). Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for potential confounders were used to estimate independent effect of mode of childbirth on IBD outcomes.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 360 women with IBD (161 CS). Women in the CS group were likely to be older and more likely to have complicated disease behavior prior to pregnancy. During follow-up, there was no difference in the likelihood of IBD-related surgery (multivariate hazard ratio 1.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.40-7.75), IBD-related hospitalization (HR 1.39), initiation of immunomodulator therapy (HR 1.45), or anti-TNF therapy (HR 1.11). Among the 133 CD pregnancies with no prior perianal disease, we found no excess risk of subsequent new diagnosis perianal fistulae with vaginal delivery compared to CS (HR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.04-1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mode of delivery did not influence natural history of IBD. In our cohort, vaginal delivery was not associated with increased risk of subsequent perianal disease in women with CD.

Impact of mode of delivery on outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) often affects women during the reproductive years. Although several studies have examined the impact of pregnancy on luminal disease, limited literature exists in those with perianal CD. Decision regarding mode of delivery is a unique challenge in such patients due to concerns regarding the effect of pelvic floor trauma during delivery on preexisting perianal involvement.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CD with established perianal disease undergoing either vaginal delivery or caesarean section (C-section) at our institutions. We examined the occurrence of symptomatic perianal disease flares within 5 years after delivery in such women compared with nonpregnant CD controls. We also compared the occurrence of such flares between the 2 modes of delivery in women with established perianal CD.

RESULTS

We identified 61 pregnant patients with CD with established perianal disease (11 vaginal delivery, 50 through C-section) and 61 nonpregnant CD controls with perianal disease. One-third of the C-sections were primarily for obstetric indications. Six of the vaginal deliveries were complicated. Approximately, 36% of cases had a symptomatic perianal flare within 1 year after delivery. This was similar across both modes of delivery (P = 0.53) and similar to nonpregnant patients with CD. There was no difference in the rates of perianal surgical intervention or luminal disease flares in our population based on mode of delivery or between pregnant patients with CD and nonpregnant CD controls.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no difference in risk of symptomatic perianal flares in patients with established perianal CD delivering vaginally or through C-section.

Safety of anti-TNF agents during pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs are an effective therapeutic option in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data regarding their safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding are scarce. The aim of this study was to critically review available data on the safety of anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with IBD.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches (MEDLINE) up to January 2013.

RESULTS

The studies included provided data from 462 women with IBD exposed to anti-TNF agents during pregnancy. Although these drugs cross the placenta from the end of the second trimester, they are low-risk in the short term. The use of anti-TNF agents after the second trimester leads to intra-uterine exposure. An increase in infections has recently been observed in infants exposed to immunomodulators plus anti-TNF drugs in utero, thus raising concerns about the consequences for the development of the immune system. Accordingly, it has recently been suggested that anti-TNF drugs should be stopped during the second trimester. Certolizumab is a Fab fragment of an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, and, therefore, it may not be necessary to stop it during pregnancy. Anti-TNF drugs have been detected in breast milk, although in miniscule amounts. Case reports do not suggest toxicity; however, the effects of exposure on the neonate merit further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF drugs can cross the placenta from the latter part of the second trimester of gestation, although they seem to be safe, at least in the short term. Miniscule amounts of anti-TNF drugs are transferred in breast milk; therefore, a deleterious effect of this exposure on the neonate, although unlikely, cannot be excluded.

Safety of TNF-α inhibitors during IBD pregnancy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors are increasingly being used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Because this chronic intestinal disorder often affects women of fertile age, it is essential to assess the effect of biologics on pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the English-language literature to investigate if treatment with TNF-α blockers during pregnancy in women with IBD increases the risk of spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, stillbirth, low birth weight, congenital malformations, or risk of infections in the offspring. Of 552 articles and abstracts reviewed, 58 articles or abstracts with unique content were identified and included in this systematic review. However, most presentations were case reports or case series supplied by a limited number of observational studies. No randomized controlled studies were available.

RESULTS

TNF-α inhibitors do not seem to affect either outcome of pregnancy in mothers with IBD, or the outcome in the offspring (congenital malformations and immunosuppression). Further, recent data have not identified any increased risk of infections in the first year of life in the offspring of mothers who received biologics, even in combination with immunomodulators (thiopurines).

CONCLUSIONS

From the present systematic review, no association was found between administration of TNF inhibitors for IBD during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcome or congenital abnormalities. Further, no increased relative risk of infections has been reported in the first year of life in offspring of mothers who received biologics. Biologics should be discontinued during pregnancy solely if the IBD is in remission using the same stopping criteria as for patients with IBD in general, as uncontrolled activity of IBD may expose the mother and child to a risk greater than those only potentially coming from the use of TNF-α inhibitors. In such cases, inoculation of the offspring with live vaccines is contraindicated until the biologic agent is no longer detectable in the child's circulation.

Safety of thiopurines and anti-TNF-α drugs during pregnancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

The safety of thiopurines and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) drugs during pregnancy remains controversial, as the experience with these drugs in this situation is limited. Our aim is to assess the safety of thiopurines and anti-TNF-α drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during pregnancy.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter study in IBD patients. Pregnancies were classified according to the therapeutic regimens during pregnancy or during the 3 months before the conception: non-exposed group, pregnancies exposed to thiopurines alone (group A), and pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF-α drugs (group B). An unfavorable Global Pregnancy Outcome (GPO) was considered if pregnancy developed with obstetric complications in the mother and in the newborn.

RESULTS

A total of 187 pregnancies in the group A, 66 pregnancies in the group B, and 318 pregnancies in the non-exposed group were included. The rate of unfavorable GPO was different among the three groups (31.8% in non-exposed group, 21.9% in group A, and 34.8% in group B), being lower in pregnancies under thiopurines than among non-exposed (P = 0.01). The rate of pregnancy complications was similar among the three groups (27.7% in non-exposed, 20.9% in group A, and 30.3% in group B). The rate of neonatal complications was different among the three groups (23.3% in non-exposed group, 13.9% in group A, and 21.2% in group B), being lower in pregnancies under thiopurines than among non-exposed (P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the treatment with thiopurines (odds ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.4-0.9, P = 0.02) was the only predictor of favorable GPO, whereas maternal age >35 years at conception was the only predictor of unfavorable GPO. The treatment with anti-TNF-α drugs was not associated with an unfavorable GPO.

CONCLUSION

The treatment with thiopurines and anti-TNF-α drugs does not seem to increase the risk of complications during pregnancy and does seem to be safe for the newborn.

Family planning and inflammatory bowel disease: the patient and the practitioner

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are commonly in their child-bearing years. Maintainance medication, as recommended by international guidelines, is an emotive topic and an anxiety source. This study measures the awareness of patients and primary practitioners of the issues involved.

METHODS

A prospective questionnaire was sent to female patients (18-50 years) with an IBD diagnosis in Kerry General Hospital, Ireland, who were identified from radiology and pathology databases. A seperate questionnaire was sent to General Practitioners (GPs) in the region.

RESULTS

About 31 female patients (42%) and 49 GPs (43%) returned completed questionnaires. About 29% had Crohn's disease and 71% ulcerative colitis. A total of 42% of patients would allow having IBD or its treatment to influence decisions about family planning. Most patients were on maintainance medications. Despite this, 68% had not discussed family planning with a doctor. One-third believed all medications should be stopped during pregnancy and 68% reported significant anxiety about future pregnancies. A total of 68% GPs report regular contact with IBD patients, but consultations with pregnant IBD patients are less frequent. About 41% of GPs have not opportunistically raised family planning with this patient group and 67% would refer to a tertiary specialist for advice. About 2% of GP's had need to research the topic in the last 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant patient knowledge deficit about pregnancy and IBD resulting in unwarranted fears and anxiety. Further evidence based education for GP's with increased gastroenterologist/IBD nurse specialist support should maximize exploitation of health promotion opportunities to electively address this issue.

Safety of immunomodulators and biologics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and breast-feeding

The aim of this article is to critically review available data regarding the safety of immunomodulators and biological therapies during pregnancy and breast-feeding in women with inflammatory bowel disease. Methotrexate and thalidomide can cause congenital anomalies and are contraindicated during pregnancy (and breast-feeding). Although thiopurines have a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rating D, available data suggest that these drugs are safe and well tolerated during pregnancy. Although traditionally women receiving azathioprine or mercaptopurine have been discouraged from breast-feeding because of theoretical potential risks, it seems that these drugs may be safe in this scenario. Treatment with cyclosporine for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) during pregnancy can be considered safe and effective, and the use of this drug should be considered in cases of severe UC as a means of avoiding urgent surgery. Breast-feeding is contraindicated for patients receiving cyclosporine. Biological therapies appear to be safe in pregnancy, as no increased risk of malformations has been demonstrated. Therefore, the limited clinical results available suggest that the benefits of infliximab and adalimumab in attaining response and maintaining remission in pregnant patients might outweigh the theoretical risks of drug exposure to the fetus. Stopping therapy in the third trimester may be considered, as it seems that transplacental transfer of infliximab is low prior to this. Certolizumab differs from infliximab and adalimumab in that it is a Fab fragment of an antitumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, and therefore it may not be necessary to stop certolizumab in the third trimester. The use of infliximab is probably compatible with breast-feeding.

Is infliximab safe to use while breastfeeding?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often affects women around the age of conception and pregnancy. Most drugs used to treat IBD are safe in pregnancy, but physicians must consider the clinical implications of certain treatment regimens in young, fertile females. We report an informative case of a pregnant patient with IBD who underwent treatment with infliximab during her pregnancy and while nursing her infant. Serum and breast milk infliximab levels were monitored throughout this time period. This case report suggests that targeted monoclonal antibodies and other biologic agents can be used with caution in pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

Infliximab use in luminal Crohn's disease

Infliximab has been available in the United States and Europe for more than 6 years, and its use has revolutionized the care of patients who have CD. It is used effectively for both the induction and maintenance of remission in patients who have CD and is efficacious in patients who have steroid-dependent/refractory CD and those who have fistulizing CD. Clinical trials and practice have shown infliximab to be safe, effective, and generally well tolerated. The ACCENT I and ACCENT II trials defined the best dosing and schedule regimens for its administration. With up to 30% of patients not responding to infliximab therapy, much attention has been devoted to identifying risk factors that could allow optimization of response rates. Parsi and colleagues and Arnott and colleagues demonstrated that nonsmoking and the concurrent use of immunomodulators are predictors of response to infliximab. Research has also focused on identifying biologic and immunologic markers that may correlate with response to infliximab. To date, N0D2/CARD15, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) have not been shown to be predictive of outcome with infliximab treatment for CD. Gene polymorphisms also are being studies with the hope that knowing the patient's genotype may help predict the course or severity of the disease, including the presence of extraintestinal manifestations, response to treatments, and susceptibility to toxicities. No single variable, however, has been consistently demonstrated to be a predictor of response to infliximab. The formation of ATIs in a small number of patients creates a clinical dilemma. ATIs have been associated with an attenuated response or loss of response to the medication over time and the development of both acute and delayed infusion reactions that occasionally are severe enough to lead to discontinuation of the medication. In such patients physicians are often left to ponder what therapy to try next. Adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody used for treating rheumatologic conditions, has been investigated as an alternate treatment for patients who have CD who, after initially responding to infliximab, experience intolerance or loss of efficacy. Two studies have examined the use of adalimumab in patients who have active CD who had lost response to or developed intolerance to infliximab. In both these studies adalimumab was well tolerated and seemed to be a clinically beneficial option for such patients. Confirmation of these findings with ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials is needed, however. The limits of conventional treatment for CD can be seen as a positive evolutionary force favoring the development and use of advanced therapies. The acceptance of antimetabolites began with data published a quarter-century ago and became robust in the past 5 to 10 years. Biologic therapy has become the standard of care at a far faster rate. The success seen with infliximab has broadened the acceptance of biologic therapy among professional peers, patients, and pharmaceutical developers. The lessons learned in the years since infliximab's arrival show the importance of long-term data in revealing important toxicities and best practices for maintenance. Tempered by this experience, the short cycle from concept to drug production possible with biologic therapies should bring even more advanced treatments to patients quickly while investigators work to find a cure.

Indications for 5-aminosalicylate in inflammatory bowel disease: is the body of evidence complete?

Mesalazine is a safe drug, although adverse events may be seen in a minority of patients. This applies also to pregnant women and children. The role of mesalazine in combination therapy to improve efficacy and concomitant drug pharmacokinetics, or in chemoprevention against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related colonic carcinoma has not yet been completely elucidated. Therapeutic success of mesalazine may be optimized by a combination of high dose and low frequency of dosage to improve compliance. Therefore, due to its superior safety profile and pharmacokinetic characteristics, mesalazine is preferable to sulphasalazine. This paper reviews the literature concerning mechanisms of action, indications and off-label use, pharmacokinetic properties and formulations, therapeutic efficacy, compliance, paediatric indications, chemoprevention, and safety issues and adverse event profile of mesalazine treatment versus sulphasalazine. It also highlights these controversies in order to clarify the potential benefits of mesalazines in IBD therapy and evidence for its use.

Irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy

Irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease are gastrointestinal disorders affecting young adults. The peak incidence of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease is in the late adolescence and early adult years, the time during which many women are planning and beginning their families. Since the potential for life-altering changes and pregnancy complications exist with these diseases, affected pregnant women present a challenge for the gastroenterologist, pregnancy provider, and nurses caring for them. This article outlines what is known about these diseases and their effect on fertility and pregnancy as well as their clinical management during pregnancy.

Medical management of the pregnant patient with inflammatory bowel disease

Gastroenterologists are not infrequently faced with questions regarding pregnancy when advising or treating their patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To advise patients effectively, the following factors must be considered: (1) the inheritance patterns of IBD for accurate counseling and family planning; (2) the effects of active IBD versus medications or surgery on fertility; (3) the effects of pregnancy on the course of IBD; (4) the effects and potential risks of active IBD versus those of diagnostic tests, medical treatments, and surgical treatments on the developing fetus; (5) approach to delivery; and (6) the risks of breast-feeding while receiving treatment for IBD.