Surgical approach in patients with acute pancreatitis. Is infected or sterile necrosis an indication--in whom should this be done, when, and why?

Evolution and results of the surgical management of 143 cases of severe acute pancreatitis in a referral centre

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the accepted treatment for infected acute pancreatitis, although mortality remains high. As an alternative, a staged management has been proposed to improve results. Initial percutaneous drainage could allow surgery to be postponed, and improve postoperative results. Few centres in Spain have published their results of surgery for acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE

To review the results obtained after surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis during a period of 12 years, focusing on postoperative mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have reviewed the experience in the surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) at Bellvitge University Hospital from 1999 to 2011. To analyse the results, 2 periods were considered, before and after 2005. A descriptive and analytical study of risk factors for postoperative mortality was performed

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients were operated on for SAP, and necrosectomy or debridement of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrosis was performed, or exploratory laparotomy in cases of massive intestinal ischemia. Postoperative mortality was 25%. Risk factors were advanced age (over 65 years), the presence of organ failure, sterility of the intraoperative simple, and early surgery (< 7 days). The only risk factor for mortality in the multivariant analysis was the time from the start of symptoms to surgery of<7 days; furthermore, 50% of these patients presented infection in one of the intraoperative cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic infection can appear at any moment in the evolution of the disease, even in early stages. Surgery for SAP has a high mortality rate, and its delay is a factor to be considered in order to improve results.

Long-term results and quality of life of patients undergoing sequential surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis complicated by infected pancreatic necrosis

BACKGROUND

Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is one of the most severe complications of acute pancreatitis (AP). Sequential surgical debridement represents one of the most effective treatments in terms of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this paper is to describe the quality of life and long-term results (e.g., nutritional, muscular, and pancreatic function) of patients treated by sequential necrosectomy at the Department of Surgery of the University of Insubria (Varese, Italy).

METHODS

Data were collected on patients undergoing sequential surgical debridement as treatment for IPN. The severity of AP was evaluated using the Ranson criteria, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) Score, and the Sepsis Score, as well as the extent of necrosis. The surgical approach was through a midline or subcostal laparotomy, followed by exploration of the peritoneal cavity, wide debridement, and peritoneal lavage. The abdomen was either left open or closed partially with a surgical zipper, with multiple re-laparotomies scheduled until debridement of necrotic tissue was complete. The long-term evaluation focused on late morbidity, performance status, and abdominal wall function.

RESULTS

In the majority of patients (68%), mixed flora were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the microorganism identified most commonly (59%), often associated with Candida albicans or C. glabrata. The mean total hospital stay was 71+/-38 days (range 13-146 days), of which 24+/-19 days (range 0-66 days) were in the intensive care unit. Eight patients died, the deaths being caused by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in seven patients and hemorrhage from the splenic artery in one. Normal exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function was observed in 28 patients (88%). At discharge, four patients had steatorrhea, which was temporary. Eight patients (23%) developed pancreatic pseudocysts, and in six, cystogastostomy was performed. Most patients (29/32, 91%) developed a post-operative hernia, but only five required surgical repair. All patients had a Short Form (SF)-36 score>60%, and 20 of the 32 patients (68%) had scores>70-80% (good quality of life). The worst scores were related to alcoholic pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of pancreatic failure (exocrine and endocrine function) is not related to the amount of pancreatic necrosis. Even with a need for repeated laparotomy and multiple surgical procedures, the abdominal wall capacity as well as long-term quality of life remain excellent.

JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management

Acute pancreatitis represents a spectrum of disease ranging from a mild, self-limited course to a rapidly progressive, severe illness. The mortality rate of severe acute pancreatitis exceeds 20%, and some patients diagnosed as mild to moderate acute pancreatitis at the onset of the disease may progress to a severe, life-threatening illness within 2–3 days. The Japanese (JPN) guidelines were designed to provide recommendations regarding the management of acute pancreatitis in patients having a diversity of clinical characteristics. This article sets forth the JPN guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis, excluding gallstone pancreatitis, by incorporating the latest evidence for the surgical management of severe pancreatitis in the Japanese-language version of the evidence-based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis published in 2003. Ten guidelines are proposed: (1) computed tomography-guided or ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for bacteriology should be performed in patients suspected of having infected pancreatic necrosis; (2) infected pancreatic necrosis accompanied by signs of sepsis is an indication for surgical intervention; (3) patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis should be managed conservatively, and surgical intervention should be performed only in selected cases, such as those with persistent organ complications or severe clinical deterioration despite maximum intensive care; (4) early surgical intervention is not recommended for necrotizing pancreatitis; (5) necrosectomy is recommended as the surgical procedure for infected pancreatic necrosis; (6) simple drainage should be avoided after necrosectomy, and either continuous closed lavage or open drainage should be performed; (7) surgical or percutaneous drainage should be performed for pancreatic abscess; (8) pancreatic abscesses for which clinical findings are not improved by percutaneous drainage should be subjected to surgical drainage immediately; (9) pancreatic pseudocysts that produce symptoms and complications or the diameter of which increases should be drained percutaneously or endoscopically; and (10) pancreatic pseudocysts that do not tend to improve in response to percutaneous drainage or endoscopic drainage should be managed surgically.

Management of intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute pancreatitis with continuous hemodiafiltration using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter

To evaluate, with a prospective observational study, whether continuous hemodiafiltration using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter (PMMA-CHDF) is effective for prevention and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) on patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). The study was carried out in the general intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Seventeen consecutive patients with SAP were treated in the intensive care unit and underwent PMMA-CHDF whether or not they had renal failure. Blood level of interleukin (IL)-6, as an indicator of cytokine network activation, and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) were measured daily to investigate their time-course of changes and the correlation between the two. The blood level of IL-6 was high at 1350+/-1540 pg/mL on admission to the ICU. However, it significantly decreased to 679+/-594 pg/mL 24 h after initiation of PMMA-CHDF (P<0.05), and thereafter decreased rapidly. Mean intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on admission was high, at 14.6+/-5.3 mm Hg, with an IAP of 20 mm Hg or over in 2 of 17 patients, showing that they had already developed IAH. The IAP was significantly lower (P<0.05) 24 h after initiation of PMMA-CHDF, and subsequently decreased. There was a significant positive correlation between blood level of IL-6 and IAP, suggesting that PMMA-CHDF improved vascular permeability through elimination of cytokines, and that it thereby decreased interstitial edema to lower IAP. Sixteen of the 17 patients were discharged from the hospital in remission from SAP without development of complications. Continuous hemodiafiltration using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter appears to be effective for prevention and treatment of IAH in patients with SAP through the removal of causative cytokines of hyperpermeability.

N/A

N/A

[Percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage in the surgical treatment of acute severe pancreatitis]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To report results of percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage, performed by a surgeon, in the treatment of complications of acute pancreatitis (AP), and to determine the role of this technique in the therapeutic armamentarium of severe AP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 2001, 59 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients initially had severe necrotizing AP (mean Ranson score = 4.1 ; range : 2-7). Anatomical lesions included pancreatic abscess in 6 patients and necrosis in 53 (17 stage D and 36 stage E according to Balthazar's classification). Necrosis was infected in 42 and sterile in 11 respectively. Drainage was performed under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia using small-diameter drains (7-14 French).

RESULTS

Drainage was performed on average 23 days after onset of AP. Infection was proven by fine-needle aspiration in 47 (80 %) patients (41 infected necrosis and 6 localized abscess). In one patient, culture of aspirated fluid was negative but necrosis was infected (one false negative). Culture of aspirated fluid was negative and necrosis was sterile in 11 patients. Nineteen (32%) patients healed without subsequent surgery: 7 (16%) in the infected necrosis group, 6(55%) in the sterile necrosis group, and 6 (100%) in the abscess group. Forty (68%) patients had subsequent necrosectomy including 8 (14%) who died. Twenty (34 %) digestive fistulas healed spontaneously, except one treated by diversion stomia. Of the 16 (27 %) pancreatic fistulas, 6 needed subsequent interventional treatment.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, percutaneous drainage can represent an alternative to surgery with a 14% mortality rate. The high rate of subsequent necrosectomy suggests that drains with larger diameter, possibly associated with continuous irrigation, should be used.

Imaging and Percutaneous Management of Acute Complicated Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis varies from a mild, self-limited disease to one with significant morbidity and mortality in its most severe forms. While clinical criteria abound, imaging has become indispensable to diagnose the extent of the disease and its complications, as well as to guide and monitor therapy. Percutaneous interventional techniques offer options that can be life-saving, surgery-sparing or important adjuncts to operation. Close cooperation and communication between the surgeon, gastroenterologist and interventional radiologist enhance the likelihood of successful patient care.

Do pancreatic duct stents cause or prevent pancreatic sepsis?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic sepsis can occur after contrast injection into an obstructed or disrupted pancreatic duct. Whether stents cause or prevent pancreatic sepsis is unknown. Accordingly, the pancreatic duct bacteriology in patients with pancreatic duct stents was retrospectively reviewed and contrasted with biliary cultures taken from patients at the time of bile duct stent retrieval and/or exchange.

METHODS

Of 61 patients (29 men, 32 women; 72 stents; mean age 51 [16] years, range 14-88 years), 36 with pancreatic duct stents had pancreatic duct cultures obtained at the time of stent exchange and/or retrieval. The results of these cultures were compared with bile duct cultures taken from 36 patients at the time of biliary stent exchange/retrieval. Eleven of the 36 patients with pancreatic duct stents also had bile duct stents. Data collected included stent patency, clinical sepsis at initial stent placement or retrieval, administration of antibiotics before the procedure, indication for stent placement, stent duration, and culture results.

RESULTS

At stent retrieval and/or exchange, all 61 patients with pancreatic and/or biliary stents had contamination of the respective ducts with multiple enteric bacteria (mean 3.4 organisms in patients with pancreatic duct stents vs. 3.3 in those with bile duct stents). Clostridium perfringens was found in 17% and 0% of patients with, respectively, bile duct and pancreatic duct stents. Among the most common indications for pancreatic duct stent placement were stricture (28), sphincterotomy (9), leak (7), stones (3), and dilated pancreatic duct (1). Indications for a biliary stent included benign stricture (29), malignancy (6), stones (2), cholangitis (1), chronic pancreatitis (1), and dilated common bile duct (1). Pancreatic cultures were taken at a median of 85 days (interquartile range 60-126; range 13-273) and biliary cultures at a median of 87 days (interquartile range 45-149; range 19-927) after stent placement. Eleven patients, 6 with a bile duct stent, 4 with a pancreatic duct stent, and one with dual stents, developed pre-exchange/retrieval clinical sepsis; 3 had pancreatic sepsis. All had received antibiotics at initial placement. In the 11 patients with sepsis (12 stents), 8 stents were completely occluded at exchange/retrieval, 3 were partially occluded, and one was patent. In 50 patients (60 stents), no clinical sepsis developed; 7 stents were patent, 31 partially occluded, and 22 completely obstructed.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Comparable to patients with biliary stents, all patients with pancreatic stents had contamination of the pancreatic ductal system by enteric flora. (2) In contrast to the 17% of patients with bile duct stents who had intraductal Clostridium perfringens, there were no instances of contamination with this organism in patients with pancreatic stent (p = 0.025), although, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, statistical significance was lost. (3) There was a tendency for stent occlusion to predispose to pancreatic sepsis, but occlusion by itself was insufficient (p = 0.106). (4) Further investigation is required to define the additional variables that are associated with the development of pancreatic sepsis.

Early debridement for necrotizing pancreatitis: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

The timing for debridement of necrotizing pancreatitis is controversial. We reviewed our experience with early and delayed surgical debridement in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.

STUDY DESIGN

The records of patients diagnosed with acute necrotizing pancreatitis from January 1993 through June 2000 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were analyzed with respect to Ranson's, APACHE II, and multiple organ failure scores, etiology, presence of infection, overall and ICU length of stay, time to first debridement, number of debridements, fluid requirements, days to enteral feeding, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (18 males, 8 females, mean age 51 years) were diagnosed with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The admission Ranson's score was 4.8, the APACHE II score was 11.7, and multiple organ failure score was 4.2. All but one patient underwent pancreatic debridement (4.3 debridements per patient). Eighteen patients (69%) had infected pancreatic necrosis. The timing of debridement was based on patients' condition and surgeon's preference. The presentation and demographics of patients who underwent early (<2 weeks) or late (>2 weeks) debridement did not differ significantly. Patients debrided early had a trend toward higher mortality (29% versus 18%) and experienced a higher number of major complications (p < 0.05). The six patients (23%) who died were older, had multiple organ failure scores, and more often had Candida in the infected necrosis (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early debridement for acute necrotizing pancreatitis might not improve survival and might even be associated with increased number of complications. Most patients diagnosed with necrotizing pancreatitis eventually need debridement, but it might be beneficial to delay debridement if the patient's condition allows for it.

Management of acute pancreatitis in the intensive care unit

Acute pancreatitis is a disease with a variety of symptoms. In patients in whom the disease takes a more severe course, stabilization is mandatory, often in a high dependency unit or intensive care unit. When the pancreatitis is of biliary origin and cholangitis and cholestatic changes are proven or suspected, an endoscopic cholangiopancreaticography is indicated. Aggressive organ support and continuation of the prophylactic antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment. When infected necrosis has been proven by CT-guided fine needle biopsy, surgical necrotectomy and debridement with drainage are necessary. Enteral feeding is superior to parenteral feeding even in situations of severe pancreatitis. Further investigation into the role of selective digestive tract decontamination, by controlled randomized trials, is needed.