Laboratory approaches to infectious diarrhea

Combatting infectious diarrhea: innovations in treatment and vaccination strategies

INTRODUCTION

The escalating prevalence of infectious diseases is an important cause of concern in society. Particularly in several developing countries, infectious diarrhea poses a major problem, with a high fatality rate, especially among young children. The condition is divided into four classes, namely, acute diarrhea, invasive diarrhea, acute bloody diarrhea, and chronic diarrhea. Various pathogenic agents, such as bacteria, viruses, protozoans, and helminths, contribute to the onset of this condition.

AREAS COVERED

The review discusses the scenario of infectious diarrhea, the prevalent types, as well as approaches to management including preventive, therapeutic, and vaccination strategies. The vaccination techniques are extensively discussed including the available vaccines, their advantages as well as limitations.

EXPERT OPINION

There are several approaches available to develop new-improved vaccines. In addition, route of immunization is important and aerosols/nasal sprays, oral route, skin patches, powders, and liquid jets to minimize needles can be used. Plant-based vaccines, such as rice, might save packing and refrigeration costs by being long-lasting, non-refrigerable, and immunogenic. Future research should utilize predetermined PCR testing intervals and symptom monitoring to identify persistent pathogens after therapy and symptom remission.

Rapid Molecular Detection of Gastrointestinal Pathogens and Its Role in Antimicrobial Stewardship

We aimed to detect the etiological agents of acute diarrhea by a molecular gastrointestinal pathogen test (MGPT) and to assess the impact of MGPT on antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). This is a prospective observational study and was conducted between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2017. We included consequent patients who had acute diarrhea. At the end of 2015, we implemented ASP in acute diarrhea cases and compared the outcomes in the pre-ASP and post-ASP periods. An FDA-cleared multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panel system, the BioFire FilmArray (Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT), which detects 20 pathogens in stool, was used. In 499 out of 699 patients (71%), at least one pathogen was detected. Among 314 adults with positive MGPT, 101 (32%) enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), 71 (23%) enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), 68 (22%) enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), 55 (18%) Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) (17%) Norovirus, 48 (15%) Campylobacter, 21 (7%) Salmonella, and 20 (6%) Clostridium difficile strains were detected. Among 185 children, 55 (30%) EPEC, 37 (20%) C. difficile, 32 (17%) Norovirus, 29 (16%) EAEC, 22 (12%) STEC, 21 (11%) ETEC, 21 (11%) Campylobacter, 20 (11%) Salmonella, and 16 (5%) Rotavirus strains were detected. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased in the post-ASP period compared with the pre-ASP period among inpatients (42.9% and 25.8%, respectively; P = 0.023). Using MGPT in clinical practice significantly decreased the unnecessary use of antibiotics. Detection of high rates of C. difficile in children and Salmonella spp., as well as relatively high rates of Campylobacter spp., which were hard to isolate by routine stool culture, were remarkable.

Culture-independent diagnostic testing: have we opened Pandora's box for good?

The ability to accurately and quickly identify microbial agents associated with infectious diseases has been a longstanding and continuous goal of diagnostic microbiology laboratories. Over the course of several decades, technology and testing methodologies in this field have gradually evolved from traditional- or classic-based culture and identification approaches to antigen capture systems and more molecular-oriented applications. Recently, these molecular-based applications have signaled a new era in clinical diagnostic microbiology with the commercial introduction of culture-independent diagnostic testing (CIDT) systems. The first major commercial venture into the CIDT arena involves the detection of acute bacterial gastroenteritis. Several commercial products are now on the market globally with at least 4 Food and Drug Administration approved since January of 2013. These new systems offer the direct detection of a variety of enteropathogens quickly without the need for traditional culture. In Greek mythology, Pandora opened a "jar" or "box" out of curiosity thereby releasing all of humanity's evils most notably diseases and plagues according to Hesiod's Theogony. While not ill-intentioned the only thing left in the box was Hope.

Three-hour molecular detection of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Yersinia, and Shigella species in feces with accuracy as high as that of culture

Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia species (along with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli) are the most common causes of acute bacterial diarrheal disease in the United States. Current detection techniques are time-consuming, limiting usefulness for patient care. We developed and validated a panel of rapid PCR assays for the detection and identification of C. jejuni, C. coli, Salmonella, and Yersinia species and Shigella and enteroinvasive E. coli in stool samples. A total of 392 archived stool specimens, previously cultured for enteric pathogens, were evaluated by PCR. Overall, 104 stool specimens had been culture positive (C. jejuni/coli [n = 51], Salmonella species [n = 42], Shigella species [n = 6], and Yersinia species [n = 5]). Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity and specificity of PCR detection of these organisms were 92 and 98% (96/104 and 283/288), respectively, from fresh or Cary Blair stool (P = 0.41); 87 and 98% (41/47 and 242/246), respectively, from fresh stool (P = 0.53); and 96 and 98% (55/57 and 41/42), respectively, from Cary Blair stool (P = 0.56). For individual genera, PCR was as sensitive as the culture method, with the exception of Salmonella culture using selenite enrichment for which PCR was less sensitive than culture from fresh, but not Cary Blair (P = 0.03 and 1.00, respectively) stools. This PCR assay panel for the rapid diagnosis of acute infectious bacterial diarrheal pathogens has a sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of culture for stools in Cary Blair transport medium. Paired with reflexive culture of stools testing positive, this should provide an improvement in care for patients with acute infectious diarrheal disease.

Use of nitazoxanide as a new therapeutic option for persistent diarrhea: a pediatric perspective

Despite advances in the management of diarrheal disorders, diarrhea is the second most frequent illness in the world. Persistent diarrhea, common in community pediatrics, is often caused by organisms such as Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum and, less frequently, Cyclospora, Isospora belli, and Clostridium difficile. Identifying the causative organism is often challenging, and diagnostic tests may be inaccurate and expensive and, thus, of limited benefit. Consequently, carefully chosen empiric therapy guided by a physician's clinical impressions may be a useful and cost-effective option in children with persistent diarrhea, particularly those whose signs and symptoms suggest a protozoal etiology. This article discusses the empiric use of anti-infective nitazoxanide, a thiazolide compound, in three case reports of children with persistent diarrhea, and presents an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic issues associated with this disorder and the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Conduite à tenir devant une diarrhée aiguë. Étiologies

Les diarrhées aiguës constituent un problème de santé publique du fait de leur grande fréquence. Leur origine est presque toujours infectieuse et leur évolution spontanément résolutive, le plus souvent en moins de 3 jours. Seul 1 % des diarrhées nécessite d'emblée des explorations complémentaires, notamment des examens de selles, car leur présentation clinique évoque une colite aiguë sous-jacente (selles sanglantes, douleurs abdominales circonscrites), du fait d'un terrain fragile sous-jacent avec un risque immédiat pour le malade, ou d'un contexte particulier (séjour sous les tropiques…). Ces examens de selles doivent être orientés afin de guider le biologiste et améliorer la rentabilité des prélèvements, qui s'avère sinon très faible et coûteuse à l'échelle d'une population. Une antibiothérapie empirique basée essentiellement sur les fluoroquinolones est ensuite licite dans ces cas sélectionnés, en attendant les résultats des examens. Ces explorations sont aussi justifiées lorsque la diarrhée persiste au-delà de 3 jours. Enfin, lorsque l'épisode se prolonge au-delà de 5 jours, avec des prélèvements de selles négatifs, un avis spécialisé est nécessaire. Ainsi, seule une petite proportion de ces diarrhées aiguës va nécessiter une endoscopie, permettant de parler ainsi de colite ou de rectocolite. Au plan thérapeutique, la réhydratation précoce chez l'enfant reste d'actualité car elle a prouvé son efficacité en termes de mortalité depuis plus de deux décennies, principalement dans les pays en voie de développement.

Diagnosis and treatment of bacterial diarrhea

Diarrheal illness caused by bacterial pathogens is a global health problem and remains one of the most common complaints prompting patients to seek medical care. Strategies to increase the yield of stool culture and new rapid diagnostic tests can improve diagnostic ability. Emerging antimicrobial resistance among the common bacterial causes of diarrhea has made treatment more challenging. Emerging fluoroquinolone resistance is a particular concern. Recent studies of rifaximin, a nonabsorbed antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial diarrhea, have shown favorable results. Rifaximin may represent a much-needed addition to the armamentarium against bacterial agents.