Antisperm antibodies: fact or fiction?

Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Male Infertility: Juxtacrine, Paracrine, and Endocrine Dysregulation

According to global data, there is a male reproductive potential decrease. Pathogenesis of male infertility is often associated with autoimmunity towards sperm antigens essential for fertilization. Antisperm autoantibodies (ASAs) have immobilizing and cytotoxic properties, impairing spermatogenesis, causing sperm agglutination, altering spermatozoa motility and acrosomal reaction, and thus preventing ovum fertilization. Infertility diagnosis requires a mandatory check for the ASAs. The concept of the blood-testis barrier is currently re-formulated, with an emphasis on informational paracrine and juxtacrine effects, rather than simple anatomical separation. The etiology of male infertility includes both autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases but equally develops through autoimmune links of pathogenesis. Varicocele commonly leads to infertility due to testicular ischemic damage, venous stasis, local hyperthermia, and hypoandrogenism. However, varicocelectomy can alter the blood-testis barrier, facilitating ASAs production as well. There are contradictory data on the role of ASAs in the pathogenesis of varicocele-related infertility. Infection and inflammation both promote ASAs production due to "danger concept" mechanisms and because of antigen mimicry. Systemic pro-autoimmune influences like hyperprolactinemia, hypoandrogenism, and hypothyroidism also facilitate ASAs production. The diagnostic value of various ASAs has not yet been clearly attributed, and their cut-levels have not been determined in sera nor in ejaculate. The assessment of the autoimmunity role in the pathogenesis of male infertility is ambiguous, so the purpose of this review is to show the effects of ASAs on the pathogenesis of male infertility.

Single versus double intrauterine insemination: are outcomes affected?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intrauterine insemination with or without superovulation is the initial step in assisted reproductive technologies. There have been many attempts to increase the efficiency of this route. One approach may be to increase the frequency of insemination. In the last decade, there has been a continuing debate regarding the increased efficiency of IUI with double IUI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the initial studies showed that superovulation with double intrauterine insemination had better pregnancy rates than with a single application, recent studies found that ovarian stimulation with double insemination has not increased the pregnancy rates.

SUMMARY

Superovulation with intrauterine insemination is a treatment modality used in unexplained infertility and mild male infertility. Increasing the efficiency of the technique has always been an interest of research. Double intrauterine insemination has been suggested to increase efficiency; recent studies, however, have not confirmed this finding.