Clinical features of atopic dermatitis

Improvement of sleep in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria treated with omalizumab: results of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies

Background

Patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) report difficulty with sleep.

Methods

We examined the effect of omalizumab on sleep-related outcomes during 3–6 months omalizumab or placebo treatment and a 16-week follow-up period within three Phase III double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pivotal trials in CIU/CSU: ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, and GLACIAL. Sleep quality was assessed in all three studies using sleep-related questions included in an electronic diary, the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale. Score changes from baseline in the treatment arms were compared with that in the placebo arm and adjusted for baseline score and weight. We also examined correlations of sleep scores at baseline, week 12, and week 24 and the slopes of change between sleep and itch and hive.

Results

Patients treated with omalizumab reported a larger reduction in sleep problems than those in the placebo arm; omalizumab 300 mg demonstrated the greatest improvement on all sleep components among all treatment arms. The largest reduction in sleep problems was reported within the first 4 weeks of therapy. After treatment discontinuation, sleep quality worsened. Sleep scores demonstrated moderate-to-strong correlation between them, and the change in sleep scores was associated with changes in itch and hives.

Conclusions

Improvement in sleep was reported after the first dose of omalizumab. Sleep continued to improve throughout the active treatment period. Patients receiving omalizumab 300 mg achieved greater improvement in sleep than those in other treatment arms.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01287117 (ASTERIA I), NCT01292473 (ASTERIA II), and NCT01264939 (GLACIAL)

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13601-016-0120-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric atopic dermatitis: a critical analysis of current issues

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common disease in children. Despite good skin care and trigger avoidance, many children with AD require pharmacologic treatment to manage their disease. In recent years, topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) have been used as an alternative to topical corticosteroids to treat some children with AD. However, revisions to the US labeling for TCIs (i.e. a boxed warning and a medication guide) have generated concern among pediatricians regarding TCI safety and raised questions about the appropriate use of TCIs in the pediatric population. Data from several well designed studies support the efficacy of TCIs in the treatment of AD. Safety concerns arise from a small number of reported malignancies, animal toxicology studies, and the potential adverse effects (including immunosuppression and risk of lymphoma) observed in patients who received systemically administered calcineurin inhibitors for suppression of solid-organ transplant rejection. Several factors indicate that these effects do not occur with topical administration: (i) systemic levels following topical administration are at least 10-fold lower than with oral administration; (ii) the small number of lymphomas reported to date in persons exposed to TCI use are not consistent with the types seen in transplant patients or other immunosuppressed patients; and (iii) no adverse effects on the immune system (as assessed by measures including vaccination response and skin delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction) have been observed in clinical trials of TCIs in children with AD. Overall, TCIs have an established safety and efficacy profile as long-term maintenance therapy in children with AD.

Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, highly pruritic, and frequently recurring inflammatory skin disease that can be burdensome to affected individuals as well as to their family members, the health care system, and society as a whole. Immunomodulatory agents, such as topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), target the underlying immunopathology of atopic dermatitis and are the foundation of pharmacologic treatment for disease exacerbations. Recent recommendations from the United States Food and Drug Administration prompted the addition of a black-box warning and medication guide for tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream (both TCIs). The recommendations were based on a theoretical risk of malignancy derived from safety profiles, animal data, and reported cases of malignancy from clinical trials and postmarketing safety surveillance of oral calcineurin inhibitors. We know of no data that suggest that TCI use increases the risk of malignancy. Several dermatologic associations have issued statements supporting the safety of TCIs, and independent oncology experts have concluded that reported lymphomas were not related to TCI use. The black-box warning added to the TCI prescribing information also states that no causal link has been established. Effective treatment of atopic dermatitis can help alleviate the burden this disease imposes, and TCIs remain important treatment options.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is commonly associated with immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody-related mechanisms, which are the focus of this article. The vast majority of patients with AD exhibit hyperproduction of IgE, particularly during disease onset or flare. IgE-dependent late-phase reactions may influence the chronic inflammatory response in AD. Clearly, genetics plays a major role in determining who develops AD. However, the recent increase in AD prevalence suggests that a complex interaction between environmental factors and susceptibility genes results in clinical expression of the disorder. These immunologic "triggers" differ among individuals and include various foods, airborne allergens, irritants and contactants, hormones, stress, climate, and microorganisms. Although much about AD remains to be elucidated, our current understanding of its pathophysiology has provided clinicians with the ability to construct more rational therapeutic interventions, including multiple-agent regimens that provide both immediate relief and effective long-term management. Future advances will come from identification of the genes causing this disease and further elucidation of the immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of AD.