URBAN CHILDREN AND ASTHMA

Mapping inequality: Childhood asthma and environmental injustice, a case study of St. Louis, Missouri

As a geographic continuum of poverty and affluence has emerged, so too has a geographic continuum of good and poor health. Asthma is currently one of the most prevalent chronic childhood diseases. Over the past three decades, the greatest increases in asthma rates have been in urban areas and have disproportionately affected youth in poverty and those in racial and ethnic minority groups. Neighborhoods serve as a mechanism fostering environmental injustice and perpetuating these disparities in health outcomes and life opportunity for our most vulnerable populations. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) methods in a case study of St. Louis Missouri, this study examines local environmental risk by identifying 'hotspots,' or statistically significant spatial clustering of high or low levels of childhood asthma, and associations with neighborhood characteristics, socio-demographic characteristics, and access to healthcare resources within these hotspots. Results revealed statistically significant clustering of high asthma rates in areas with more non-White and poor residents, higher rates of public housing, deteriorating housing, and violent crime. High asthma hotspots were also located in areas with limited physical access to healthcare resources, such as physicians and medication, and lower school attendance rates. Residents of these high asthma hotspots experience greater environmental risk, and significant disparities in health and education outcomes, physical and financial healthcare resources, and overall well-being. This study demonstrates these place-based inequalities and presents clear evidence of environmental injustice, supporting the need for investments and interventions to improve the environments, health, and economic resources of our most vulnerable youth.

Effect of weatherization combined with community health worker in-home education on asthma control

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the benefits of adding weatherization-plus-health interventions to an in-home, community health worker (CHW) education program on asthma control.

METHODS

We used a quasi-experimental design to compare study group homes (n = 34) receiving CHW education and weatherization-plus-health structural interventions with historical comparison group homes (n = 68) receiving only education. Data were collected in King County, Washington, from October 2009 to September 2010.

RESULTS

Over the 1-year study period, the percentage of study group children with not-well-controlled or very poorly controlled asthma decreased more than the comparison group percentage (100% to 28.8% vs 100% to 51.6%; P = .04). Study group caregiver quality-of-life improvements exceeded comparison group improvements (P = .002) by 0.7 units, a clinically important difference. The decrease in study home asthma triggers (evidence of mold, water damage, pests, smoking) was marginally greater than the comparison group decrease (P = .089). Except for mouse allergen, the percentage of study group allergen floor dust samples at or above the detection limit decreased, although most reductions were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining weatherization and healthy home interventions (e.g., improved ventilation, moisture and mold reduction, carpet replacement, and plumbing repairs) with CHW asthma education significantly improves childhood asthma control.

An exploration of factors underlying asthma care and morbidity: a factor analysis of clinical variables

BACKGROUND

Clinical risk models use recognized risk factors to identify patients at risk for future asthma morbidity. However, the low predictive values of these models suggest an important need to re-evaluate risk assessment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To use exploratory factor analysis to define underlying factors operative in asthma treatment and morbidity, and characterize their interrelationships and association with 6-month morbidity.

METHODS

Children (n = 197) presenting to an emergency department for an acute asthma episode were followed for 6 months (follow-up data available for 84%). Baseline data included demographics, asthma history, current and past symptoms, and current treatment and management. Factor analysis was used to summarize the underlying relationships between variables. Correlations between factors and 6-month morbidity were calculated.

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed that 4 factors provided a parsimonious summary of the variables. The factors were labeled current symptom severity, quality of care indicators, previous severe disease, and sociodemographic factors. Positive correlations were observed between quality of care, current symptom severity, and previous severe disease. The factor describing sociodemographic factors was inversely related to current symptom severity and quality of care. Previous severe disease significantly predicted 6-month morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Quality of care was better in subjects with increased current symptoms or previous severe disease, but poorer in individuals with adverse sociodemographic factors. Previous severe disease was the only factor associated with 6-month morbidity, suggesting that current assessment methods do not adequately account for all underlying factors likely operative in asthma morbidity.

Reducing home triggers for asthma: the Latino community health worker approach

This study assessed the ability of a community health worker asthma intervention to change home asthma triggers. A total of 56 children and 47 adults with asthma were enrolled. Home trigger scores for the children averaged 2.8 at the initial home visit and then 2.3, 2.1, and 2.0 at 3, 6, and 12 months. Home trigger scores for the adults showed a similar trend. Every home visit was associated with a 0.32 reduction in home trigger score (p < 0.01) for children and a 0.41 reduction (p < 0.01) for adults. This intervention shows promise as a way to reduce asthma triggers in urban low-income Latino communities.

Improving asthma research in an inner-city Latino neighborhood with community health workers

This study tests the feasibility of a partnership between an academic medical center and community health workers to perform mutually beneficial research investigating asthma in an urban Latino neighborhood. Community heath workers participated in the study design, instrument development, implementation, and analysis. The 103 participants recruited by the community health workers were primarily Mexican with very low education and acculturation levels. After the 1-year enrollment period, the community health workers described the challenges of data collection and gave explanations for the access to care outcomes. This academic-community partnership showed that community health workers can be effective research partners.

The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project: a randomized, controlled trial of a community health worker intervention to decrease exposure to indoor asthma triggers

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the effectiveness of a community health worker intervention focused on reducing exposure to indoor asthma triggers.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up among 274 low-income households containing a child aged 4-12 years who had asthma. Community health workers provided in-home environmental assessments, education, support for behavior change, and resources. Participants were assigned to either a high-intensity group receiving 7 visits and a full set of resources or a low-intensity group receiving a single visit and limited resources.

RESULTS

The high-intensity group improved significantly more than the low-intensity group in its pediatric asthma caregiver quality-of-life score (P=.005) and asthma-related urgent health services use (P=.026). Asthma symptom days declined more in the high-intensity group, although the across-group difference did not reach statistical significance (P=.138). Participant actions to reduce triggers generally increased in the high-intensity group. The projected 4-year net savings per participant among the high-intensity group relative to the low-intensity group were 189-721 dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

Community health workers reduced asthma symptom days and urgent health services use while improving caregiver quality-of-life score. Improvement was greater with a higher-intensity intervention.

Environmental health promotion: bridging traditional environmental health and health promotion

This article highlights the juncture between environmental health and health promotion and underscores the need for health promotion involvement in environmental health practice. It begins with a synopsis of current issues in environmental public health and deficiencies in environmental public health practice that could be partly ameliorated by an increased focus on environmental health promotion. Environmental health promotion lies at the intersection between the two disciplines and can be defined as any planned process employing comprehensive health promotion approaches to assess, correct, control, and prevent those factors in the environment that can potentially harm the health and quality of life of present and future generations. An introduction is also provided to the six articles contained in this special issue focused on environmental health promotion, and a brief discussion of crosscutting themes and issues is presented.

Using community-based participatory research to address social determinants of health: lessons learned from Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities

Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities (SPHC) is a multidisciplinary collaboration of community agencies, community activists, public health professionals, academics, and health providers who conduct research aimed at improving the health of urban, socioeconomically marginalized Seattle communities. SPHC uses a community-based participatory research approach to address social factors that affect the health of these communities. This article describes three SPHC projects that focus on social determinants of health, particularly the development of social support and improving housing quality. The characteristics of community participation in each of these projects are discussed and show a spectrum of participation. Although projects successfully addressed proximal social factors affecting health, influencing more distal underlying factors was more difficult. Implications for researchers using a community-based participatory research approach and public health practitioners seeking to engage communities in addressing social determinants of health are presented.

Differences in asthma prevalence between samples of American Indian and Alaska Native children

OBJECTIVES

To better understand the prevalence of asthma among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) children and to explore the contribution of locale to asthma symptoms and diagnostic assignment, the authors surveyed AI/AN middle school students, comparing responses from metropolitan Tacoma, Washington (metro WA) and a non-metropolitan area of Alaska (non-metro AK).

METHODS

Students in grades 6-9 completed an asthma screening survey. The authors compared self-reported rates of asthma symptoms, asthma diagnoses, and health care utilization for 147 children ages 11-16 self-reporting as AI/AN in metro WA and 365 in non-metro AK.

RESULTS

The prevalences of self-reported asthma symptoms were similar for the metro WA and non-metro AK populations, but a significantly higher percentage of metro WA than of non-metro AK respondents reported having received a physician diagnosis of asthma (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.23, 4.39). The percentages of respondents who reported having visited a medical provider for asthma-like symptoms in the previous year did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in rates of asthma diagnosis despite similar rates of asthma symptoms and respiratory-related medical visits may reflect differences in respiratory disease patterns, diagnostic labeling practices, or environmental factors. Future attempts to describe asthma prevalence should consider the potential contribution of non-biologic factors such as diagnostic practices.

Regulatory action criteria for filth and other extraneous materials v. strategy for evaluating hazardous and nonhazardous filth

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses regulatory action criteria for filth and extraneous materials to evaluate adulteration of food products. The criteria are organized into three categories: health hazards, indicators of insanitation, and natural or unavoidable defects. The health hazard category includes criteria for physical, chemical, and microbiological hazards associated with filth and extraneous materials. The health hazard category encompasses criteria for HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) hazards and HACCP contributing factors. The indicators of insanitation category includes criteria for visibly objectionable contaminants, contamination from commensal pests, and other types of contamination that are associated with insanitary conditions in food processing and storage facilities. The natural or unavoidable category includes criteria for harmless, naturally occurring defects and contaminants. A decision tree is presented for the sequential application of regulatory action criteria for filth and extraneous materials associated with each category and with each type of filth or extraneous material in the three categories. This final report of a series in the development of a transparent science base for a revised FDA regulatory policy in the area of filth and extraneous materials in food includes a comprehensive list of the references that form the science base for the FDA regulatory policy.