Bone metabolism in childhood rheumatic disease

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), a term referring to a group of disorders characterized by chronic arthritis, is the most common chronic rheumatic illness in children and is a significant cause of short- and long-term disability. This article discusses the classification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of JIA.

Imaging of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Over the past decade there have been considerable changes in the classification and imaging of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Radiology now has a considerable role in the management of JIA, the differential diagnosis, monitoring disease progression and detecting complications. The different imaging modalities available, their role and limitations are discussed in this article and the various disease features that the radiologist should be aware of are described. An approach to the imaging of the child with joint disease and in the monitoring of disease complications are also discussed.

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: etiology and management

Bone mass increases progressively during childhood, but mainly during adolescence when approximately 40% of total bone mass is accumulated. Peak bone mass is reached in late adolescence, and is a well recognised risk factor for osteoporosis later in life. Thus, increasing peak bone mass can prevent osteoporosis. The critical interpretation of bone mass measurements is a crucial factor for the diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis in children and adolescents. To date, there are insufficient data to formally define osteopenia/osteoporosis in this patient group, and the guidelines used for adult patients are not applicable. In males and females aged <20 years the terminology 'low bone density for chronologic age' may be used if the Z-score is less than -2. For children and adolescents, this terminology is more appropriate than osteopenia/osteoporosis. Moreover, the T-score should not be used in children and adolescents. Many disorders, by various mechanisms, may affect the acquisition of bone mass during childhood and adolescence. Indeed, the number of disorders that have been identified as affecting bone mass in this age group is increasing as a consequence of the wide use of bone mass measurements. The increased survival of children and adolescents with chronic diseases or malignancies, as well as the use of some treatment regimens has resulted in an increase in the incidence of reduced bone mass in this age group. Experience in treating the various disorders associated with osteoporosis in childhood is limited at present. The first approach to osteoporosis management in children and adolescents should be aimed at treating the underlying disease. The use of bisphosphonates in children and adolescents with osteoporosis is increasing and their positive effect in improving bone mineral density is encouraging. Osteoporosis prevention is a key factor and it should begin in childhood. Pediatricians should have a fundamental role in the prevention of osteoporosis, suggesting strategies to achieve an optimal peak bone mass.

Bone health in pediatric rheumatic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Children with chronic rheumatic disease have decreased bone mass. In adults, lowered bone mineral density is associated with increased fracture risk. This morbidity is undetermined in pediatric rheumatic disease as osteoporosis has not been well-defined in children. This review compares methods for determining bone mass in children, examines insights into molecular mechanisms of bone metabolism, and discusses the prevention and treatment of decreased bone mass in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Peak bone mass, attained during adolescence and early adulthood, is critical in determining fracture risk. Studies of children with chronic rheumatic disease demonstrate decreased bone mineral density, and potentially lowered peak bone mass. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is the most commonly used technique for monitoring bone mineral density and should be interpreted utilizing age-appropriate Z-scores. Recent studies suggest quantitative ultrasound may be as reliable as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and lacks radiation exposure. The molecular mechanisms by which inflammation alters bone mineral density involve receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1. Limited data on the use of bisphosphonates and calcitonin in children suggest they are safe and effective, but should be used cautiously.

SUMMARY

Children with chronic rheumatic disease should have bone mass monitored by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry Z-scores. Targeting the RANKL/osteoprotegerin pathway may lead to therapies that improve bone health in this population. More studies on the role of bisphosphonates and calcitonin must be pursued to establish guidelines for use in pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic disease. For now, supplemental calcium and vitamin D should be implemented in these children.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), a term referring to a group of disorders characterized by chronic arthritis, is the most common chronic rheumatic illness in children and is a significant cause of short- and long-term disability. This article discusses the classification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of JIA.

Bone status over 1 yr of etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate bone mineral status over 1 yr of etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Twenty children (13 female, 7 male) aged 5.2-11.4 yr, with active polyarticular JIA were prospectively enrolled to receive etanercept (0.4 mg/kg, twice weekly). Responders were defined according to the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 50 definition of improvement. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) by bone was determined at the left calcaneus to assess bone status at baseline and at 1-yr follow-up.

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, 15 (75%) patients were considered as responders. At baseline, responders and non-responders did not differ with regard to age, disease duration, core-set variables or BUA and Z-score values (patient's value--age specific normal value/normal group's s.d.). At 6-month and 1-yr follow-up in the whole group, BUA and Z-score values were not significantly different compared with baseline. At 1-yr follow-up, but not at 6 months, all 15 responders, differently from non-responders, showed a significant increase in both BUA and Z-score values: BUA at 1 yr 55.2 +/- 3.3 vs baseline 43.5 +/- 3.2 dB/MHz, P<0.001; Z score at 1 yr -0.3 +/- 0.2 vs baseline 1.5 +/- 0.4, P<0.002.

CONCLUSION

For the first time in childhood rheumatic disease this pilot prospective study, although in a small group, shows evidence that 1 yr of etanercept therapy by controlling the underlying disease activity induces a sustained benefit on JIA bone loss. Prospective studies in larger patient samples are needed to confirm these data.