The remarkable spectrum of methotrexate toxicities

Chemotherapy-Induced Leukoencephalopathy Revealed by Seizure and Alteration of the Mental Status

Leukoencephalopathy is progressive demyelination of the white matter, induced by a variety of factors. Among the causes of leukoencephalopathy, chemotherapy is an uncommon cause that generates potentially reversible lesions. The clinical presentation is classically made of alterations in mental status, hallucinations, hypertension, seizures, and acute visual changes. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of this entity, especially by conventional and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging which enables an accurate diagnosis by identifying symmetric white matter lesions, especially in the parietal and occipital lobes. Herein, we report a 54-year-old female patient, newly diagnosed with non-metastatic moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the cecum. The patient received her first cancer chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil at 300 mg/m²). Five days later she was admitted to the intensive care unit for confusion following two generalized seizures. Conventional and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed and showed diffuse white matter lesions of the parietal and occipital lobes. A diagnosis of 5-fluorouracil-induced leukoencephalopathy was established. The diagnosis of leukoencephalopathy should be considered in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy with alterations in mental status and seizures.

Safety of long-term use of four common conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis for a long time. Whereas methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine are used along with MTX either in combination or sequentially. Together these four drugs are the most commonly used DMARDs. They are also used in combination with biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) to enhance their efficacy and MTX in particular to reduce antibodies against anti-tumour necrosis factor. Despite their widespread use, concerns regarding their safety especially when used long-term hinder their optimum use in clinical medicine. In this narrative review we have critically appraised the available literature regarding the safety of these four DMARDs when used long-term.

MRI in Chemotherapy induced Leukoencephalopathy: Report of Two Cases and Radiologist's Perspective

Leukoencephalopathy is a progressive white matter disease primarily caused due to myelin damage by a variety of factors. Chemotherapy for oncological treatment is an uncommon but important cause of potentially reversible leukoencephalopathy. In current radiological setting, conventional and diffusion weighted MRI play a significant role in early and accurate detection of this entity. We are hereby presenting MRI evaluation of two cases of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil induced toxic leukoencephalopathy.

Interaction Between Low-Dose Methotrexate and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Penicillins, and Proton Pump Inhibitors

Objective: To review the potential drug interactions between low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), penicillins, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) given the disparity between interactions reported for high-dose and low-dose MTX to help guide clinicians. Data Sources: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (1946 to September 2016), EMBASE (1974 to September 2016), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to January 2015) to identify reports describing potential drug interactions between LD-MTX and NSAIDS, penicillins, or PPIs. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed to find additional eligible articles. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language observational, randomized, and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies assessing LD-MTX interactions in humans were analyzed to determine clinical relevance in making recommendations to clinicians. Clinical case reports were assigned a Drug Interaction Probability Scale score. Data Synthesis: A total of 32 articles were included (28 with NSAIDs, 3 with penicillins, and 2 with PPIs [1 including both PPI and NSAID]). Although there are some PK data to describe increased LD-MTX concentrations when NSAIDs are used concomitantly, the clinical relevance remains unclear. Based on the limited data on LD-MTX with penicillins and PPIs, no clinically meaningful interaction was identified. Conclusion: Given the available evidence, the clinical importance of the interaction between LD-MTX and NSAIDs, penicillins, and PPIs cannot be substantiated. Health care providers should assess the benefit and risk of LD-MTX regardless of concomitant drug use, including factors known to predispose patients to MTX toxicity, and continue to monitor clinical and laboratory parameters per guideline recommendations.

Use of Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation Wristband to Treat Methotrexate-Induced Nausea

Background:

Although methotrexate is a highly effective treatment for psoriasis, nausea and vomiting may be dose-limiting side effects. Various approaches have been used to improve the tolerability of methotrexate therapy, including changing the dose or form of administration of the methotrexate or concomitant administration of folic acid or an antiemetic.

Objective:

The objective of this case report is to present the use of a novel, nonpharmacologic approach for controlling the nausea associated with methotrexate therapy.

Results:

A 47-year-old patient with long-standing psoriasis was treated with methotrexate. She developed nausea refractory to standard antiemetic measures. She noted almost immediate relief of her nausea when using a transcutaneous nerve stimulation wristband.

Conclusions:

Nerve stimulation may be a valid alternative to other first-line antiemetic therapies.

Oral Methotrexate in split dose weekly versus oral or parenteral Methotrexate once weekly in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a short-term study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether methotrexate (MTX) administered orally to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in split doses at 2-3 days' interval, would result in equal or better efficacy, tolerability and compliance, without increasing toxicity compared to single weekly dose given orally or parenterally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 criteria for RA, on 7.5 mg of MTX weekly orally, with the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) > 11 were enrolled for a 24-week period. Patients were randomly divided into three groups and were given MTX: Group 1 7.5 mg twice or thrice weekly orally, Group 2 15 mg or 22.5 mg in a single dose weekly orally and Group 3 15 mg or 22.5 mg in a single dose weekly as an intramuscular injection. The primary outcomes were low disease activity (LDA) and mean change in SDAI at week 24, whereas secondary outcomes included remission, adverse events and compliance.

RESULTS

At week 24, adherence to treatment was maximum in Group 1, 69% (P = 0.09). In intention-to-treat analysis at 24 weeks, Group 1, 49%, Group 2, 36% and Group 3, 47% achieved LDA (P = 0.4). There was significant difference in mean change in SDAI at week 24 from baseline (P = 0.008) among the groups. Group 3 patients were more uncomfortable with the mode of administration of MTX (P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Oral split doses of MTX are better than an oral single dose and similar to parenteral MTX in terms of efficacy.

Ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) results from a pathological immune response to luminal antigens in genetically predisposed individuals. Since the causes of CD are complex and only partially understood, treatment is based on the empiric use of anti-inflammatory drugs. Although multiple therapies for CD currently exist, a substantial proportion of patients are unresponsive to conventional agents. Approximately a third of patients fail treatment with TNF antagonists, and up to 40% of patients who initially benefit subsequently lose response. Accordingly, new approaches are required. Ustekinumab, a fully human IgG1-κ monoclonal antibody to the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23, has emerged as a promising new treatment for both psoriasis and CD. This article reviews the available data regarding the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in CD.

Suspected methotrexate toxicity from omeprazole: a case review of carboxypeptidase G2 use in a methotrexate-experienced patient with methotrexate toxicity and a review of the literature

We report a case of methotrexate toxicity potentially induced by a drug interaction between methotrexate and omeprazole in a 25-year-old man with osteosarcoma. The patient was placed on omeprazole after his first cycle of high-dose methotrexate for stress ulcer prophylaxis, and it was discontinued before the start of the first day of the patient's second round of high-dose methotrexate. The 24-hour methotrexate level was elevated and he continued to have sustained levels for 18 days. Side effects due to elevated serum methotrexate included seizures, mucositis, acute renal failure, and thrombocytopenia. Aggressive hydration, urinary alkalinization, and leucovorin were continued during the period of elevated methotrexate levels, with the patient receiving a course of hemodialysis and a dose of carboxypeptidase G2. The patient's symptoms resolved, and his renal function returned to baseline within 2 months. The patient was able to receive future courses of chemotherapy without methotrexate. Although use of the Naranjo adverse reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship (score of 6) between the patient's development of methotrexate toxicity and omeprazole use, we believe this was a drug-drug interaction case consistent with previous reports in the literature.

[Guidelines on the use of methotrexate in psoriasis]

Psoriasis, a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease that develops in genetically predisposed individuals, affects approximately 1.5% of the Spanish population. This disease has a negative impact on patients' quality of life, and long-term therapy is often required to control the symptoms. In addition to the classical systemic treatments (methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine, and ultraviolet light), the group of drugs known as biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) provides the dermatologist with an expanded therapeutic armamentarium, thereby improving the likelihood of controlling psoriasis in patients with severe and/or extensive disease. Methotrexate, a classic antipsoriatic drug, is still very useful either as single-drug therapy or in combination with other systemic drugs, particularly as a rescue therapy or combined with biologics. This article aims to establish the role of methotrexate in the treatment of psoriasis. We considered it of interest to develop guidelines for using methotrexate in the management of psoriasis with a view to ensuring the safe and proper use of this drug in the management of psoriasis. This document was developed by consensus among members of the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Nodulosis in systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an uncommon event with spontaneous resolution

Accelerated nodulosis is a rare complication of methotrexate therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. When nodulosis does occur in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on methotrexate, it is almost always seen in patients with polyarthritis with rheumatoid factor seropositivity, but only occasionally in polyarthritis patients who are rheumatoid factor negative. It has been described previously in only one patient with systemic arthritis. In this study, we describe three patients with systemic arthritis, all of whom developed nodulosis while receiving methotrexate. Interestingly, it was not necessary to discontinue methotrexate in any of these patients. In fact, methotrexate dose was escalated without consequences and with complete resolution of nodules. This observation suggests that nodulosis occurring in patients with systemic arthritis already on methotrexate may not be because of methotrexate itself, but may be a component of the disease process. The other likely possibility given the fact that nodulosis occurs with other immunomodulatory agents and is not specifically related to methotrexate is that immunomodulatory agents in general precipitate the development of nodulosis. Thus, we propose that the new terminology "immunomodulatory agents induced nodulosis" rather than "methotrexate-induced nodulosis" be used in the literature.

Four-year experience with methotrexate exposures

INTRODUCTION

Unintentional methotrexate (MTX) acute oral overdose is rarely reported.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all human exposure calls (>150,000 charts) for MTX ingestions reported to our Poison Center during 2000-2003.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients met the criteria. The average amount of MTX ingested was 13.03 mg (data from 7 cases), and the average patient age was 43 years (20 months to 80 years). No significant toxicities occurred.

DISCUSSION

Although intravenous MTX toxicity can be severe, this does not appear to be a phenomenon associated with either acute unintentional or suicidal oral ingestion.

Medical management of mild to moderate Crohn's disease: evidence-based treatment algorithms for induction and maintenance of remission

BACKGROUND

Patients with Crohn's disease alternate between periods of active, symptomatic disease and periods of remission. The treatment goal for Crohn's disease is to induce and then maintain remission of symptoms.

AIM

To review evidence from randomized, controlled, clinical trials on medical therapies for inducing and maintaining remission in patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease, and to suggest the best evidence-based approaches for induction and maintenance therapies.

METHODS

PubMed search using the following terms: sulfasalazine or salicylazosulfapyridine or aminosalicylate or aminosalicylic acid or mesalamine or mesalazine or corticosteroid or prednisone or prednisolone or methylprednisolone or budesonide or antibiotic or metronidazole or ciprofloxacin or immunosuppressive or azathioprine or mercaptopurine or thiopurine or methotrexate and Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated that sulfasalazine, budesonide, and conventional corticosteroids are effective for inducing remission of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease when administered for a period of 8-16 weeks. An ideal maintenance therapy does not currently exist.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of maintenance therapy is based on a combination of evidence from controlled trials and patient features including disease severity and location, co-morbidities, previous response to treatment, and previous surgical resection. The options for maintenance therapy include therapy cessation and patient observation following successful induction, budesonide, or immunosuppressive therapy.

Recommendations for the use of methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common rheumatic diseases in childhood. In a significant number of JIA cases the disease is resistant to therapy with NSAIDs, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, and physiotherapy, and methotrexate is used as a second-line agent. The efficacy of methotrexate therapy in children with JIA has been demonstrated in prospective controlled trials and this agent appears to have slightly superior efficacy compared with leflunomide. Data from randomized studies indicate a starting dose of 10-15 mg/m(2)/week orally. The dose of parenteral methotrexate can be increased to 15-20 mg/m(2)/week. Combination therapy with methotrexate and an NSAID is recommended. However, there are still no data on when to initiate methotrexate in JIA and how long children should be treated. The most common adverse effects are aversion to the drug and nausea. In the case of minor adverse effects the use of folic acid at a dosage of 1 mg/day is feasible. In JIA, daily folate supplementation has only been studied in one small heterogeneous cohort with a very short observation period and, at present, a general recommendation on daily folate supplementation cannot be made. In summary, methotrexate is seen by many pediatric rheumatologists as the first-choice, second-line drug; there is good evidence of its efficacy in JIA. However, in light of the recent introduction of biologic agents, the place of methotrexate in the treatment of JIA may have to be redefined in the coming years.

Methotrexate should not be used for patients with end-stage kidney disease

Methotrexate is a widely used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Its effectiveness has been proven in placebo-controlled trials and in comparison with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The pharmacokinetics of methotrexate are highly variable and unpredictable. In patients with normal renal function, the recommended dose in rheumatoid arthritis ranges between 7.5 and 15 mg/week, but in recent years, even dosages up to 25 mg weekly are used. Toxicity includes myelosuppression, gastrointestinal adverse effects, hepatotoxicity and pneumonitis. Renal impairment and age are considered major risk factors for developing methotrexate toxicity, but studies show conflicting results. Whether methotrexate can be administered to patients with end-stage kidney disease has not been formally tested. The present case illustrates the severe side effects of low-dose methotrexate treatment in a patient with end-stage kidney disease. Seven other cases have reported similar and even more severe and irreversible consequences after low-dose regimen. In view of these side effects we strongly recommend to monitor toxicity rigorously in patients with stage 3 or stage 4 kidney disease and not to use methotrexate in patients with stage 5 kidney disease.

Low-dose methotrexate-induced pancytopenia

Methotrexate (MTX) has gained wide acceptance among both patients and rheumatologists due to its efficacy and safe therapeutic window in a variety of inflammatory rheumatological disorders. However, it has the potential to cause serious, life-threatening complications and even mortality. In the present series, we have reviewed our data of five patients who developed serious pancytopenia after the use of MTX, including one who died. Two of these resulted from prescription errors by primary care physicians. The clinical, laboratory, and outcome profile of all five cases are discussed with a brief review of the literature about MTX-induced pancytopenia. There is an urgent need to increase awareness in primary care physicians, patients, and pharmacists toward informed prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring of MTX to prevent such mishaps in the future.

Oral effects of low-dose methotrexate treatment

Methotrexate is used increasingly in low-dose regimes for a variety of conditions, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. While certain adverse effects of low-dose methotrexate have been described in detail, oral complications have received little attention. This article includes a summary of the uses and pharmacology of low-dose methotrexate and the mechanisms that lead to general and oral toxicity. The literature relevant to potential oral adverse effects is discussed and 7 illustrative cases are presented. The oral effects noted range from nonhealing ulcers to lymphoma-like lesions. Dental practitioners should be aware of the possible oral effects of low-dose methotrexate that have so far been largely unrecognized.

Real-world utilization of DMARDs and biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: the RADIUS (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Intervention and Utilization Study) study

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Intervention and Utilization Study (RADIUS) is a unique, real-world, prospective, 5-year, observational study of over 10 000 patients with RA. RADIUS provides a snapshot of use patterns, effectiveness, and safety of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies used to manage RA in clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with RA requiring a new DMARD or biologic (addition or switch) were eligible for the RADIUS study. Two separate patient cohorts were enrolled; RADIUS 1 patients initiated any new therapy at entry, and RADIUS 2 patients initiated etanercept at entry. Patient demographics and disease activity measures were collected at study entry, and baseline characteristics were summarized for various subgroups. Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use will be tracked for therapies utilized during the 5-year study.

RESULTS

RADIUS 1 enrolled 4959 patients, and RADIUS 2 enrolled 5102 patients, mostly at community private practices (88%). In RADIUS 1, most patients initiated methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, followed by MTX in combination with a biologic (e.g. infliximab plus MTX) or other DMARD. In RADIUS 2, most patients initiated etanercept in combination with MTX, followed by etanercept monotherapy. When a new therapy was required, physicians tended to add another therapy versus switching therapies. Patients initiating a biologic had a longer duration of RA and more severe disease compared with patients initiating non-biologic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data provide evidence of the prescribing practices of rheumatologists in 2001-2003. Future analyses will allow evidence-based comparisons of the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies to assist physicians in clinical decision-making.

Delayed neurotoxicity associated with therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Most children diagnosed today with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) will be cured. However, treatment entails risk of neurotoxicity, causing deficits in neurocognitive function that can persist in the years after treatment is completed. Many of the components of leukemia therapy can contribute to adverse neurologic sequelae, including craniospinal irradiation, nucleoside analogs, corticosteroids, and antifolates. In this review, we describe the characteristic radiographic findings and neurocognitive deficits seen among survivors of childhood ALL. We summarize what is known about the pathophysiology of delayed treatment-related neurotoxicity, with a focus on the toxicity resulting from pharmacologic disruption of folate physiology within the central nervous system. Finally, we suggest testable strategies to ameliorate the symptoms of treatment-related neurotoxicity or decrease its incidence.

Evidence-based use of methotrexate in children with rheumatic diseases: a consensus statement of the Working Groups Pediatric Rheumatology Germany (AGKJR) and Pediatric Rheumatology Austria

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common diagnosis in children and adolescents with rheumatic disorders. In many children and adolescents, JIA is successfully treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and physiotherapy. However, in a significant number of cases the disease is resistant to this therapy, and treatment with "second line" disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is required. Methotrexate (MTX) is frequently referred to as "first-choice second-line agent" for the treatment of JIA. To increase drug safety, the Working Groups for Children and Adolescents with Rheumatic Diseases in Germany (AGKJR) and Pediatric Rheumatology Austria have initiated the formulation of evidence-based recommendations. Evidence is based on consensus expert meetings, a MEDLINE search with the key words "Methotrexate" and "juvenile arthritis" limited to age 0-18 years, standard textbooks and review articles, data from the central registry of the German Research Center for Rheumatic Diseases (Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin DRFZ), experience with MTX in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh). Based on these data, evidence and recommendations are graded, and evidence-based recommendations for the use of MTX in children and adolescents with rheumatic disease are presented.

Drug-induced and toxic myopathies

Drug-induced myopathies and, more rarely, rhabdomyolysis, are a common biological and clinical setting for clinical rheumatologists. The focus of this chapter is to review (i) the clinical presentation and management of these adverse drug reactions (ADR) according to pain and associated neurological symptoms, (ii) the common drugs prescribed by rheumatologists which may induce reactions such as ADR, with special reference to new drugs, (iii) the pathological classification associated with specific patterns, and (iv) the risk factors leading to myotoxicity (including genetic predisposition). Specific features to be reviewed include macrophage myofasciitis and biological agents of major importance when considering terrorist attacks with biological weapons. When diagnosis is suspected, discontinuation of the putative drug(s) is mandatory and should be carefully monitored.

Use of methotrexate in sarcoid-associated optic neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the possible beneficial effects of methotrexate (MTX) therapy for patients with sarcoid-associated optic neuropathy (SAON).

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Three patients diagnosed with SAON who received MTX. Two patients had tissue biopsies consistent with sarcoidosis, and 1 patient had clinically diagnosed sarcoidosis based on laboratory and radiographic studies. All 3 patients developed side effects with corticosteroid treatment of their optic neuropathy.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with weekly doses of oral MTX and monitored with neuro-ophthalmic, medical, and laboratory examinations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity, automated perimetry, and reduction of oral prednisone therapy.

RESULTS

After initiation of MTX, all 3 patients showed an improvement or stabilization of visual acuity. All patients had a decrease in their corticosteroid requirements, and all had improved or stabilized visual field deficits. One of the 3 patients developed leukopenia that necessitated a reduction of the methotrexate dose.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate may be effective for SAON as an adjunct to corticosteroid therapy or as an alternative for corticosteroid-intolerant patients. Oral MTX reduced the corticosteroid requirements of 3 patients with SAON, and all 3 demonstrated stable or improved visual function.

A review of methotrexate-induced accelerated nodulosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the English-language literature on methotrexate-induced accelerated nodulosis, compile case reports of its occurrences, and make recommendations on the clinical management of patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, TOXLINE, and EMBASE databases was performed, along with a bibliographic search of key articles. Case reports were compiled separately. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used to assess causality.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven case reports of patients with methotrexate-induced accelerated nodulosis were identified along with one series of 10 patients and one series of 21 patients. Probability assessment for most of the case reports was weak and left room for doubt regarding causality. Most patients were older than 50 years, were positive for rheumatoid factor, and had nodules on their fingers but did not have concurrent vasculitis. Some unusual sites of nodulosis were the larynx, lungs, Achilles tendon, and heart. Of 19 patients given hydroxychloroquine, colchicine, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, or D-penicillamine, all except two showed regression of the nodules; the response was unknown for one patient.

CONCLUSION

Controversy surrounds the management of patients who develop accelerated nodulosis while receiving methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Our review of these data does not allow definitive conclusions because the available case reports and clinical trials are fragmented and incomplete.

Folate supplementation during methotrexate treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. An update and proposals for guidelines

The efficacy of weekly low-dose methotrexate treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is well documented. Efficacy and adverse effects are both dose dependent. and adverse effects rather than lack of efficacy are the main reason for discontinuing therapy. Several adverse effects are related to folate deficiencies, largely due to the antifolate properties of methotrexate. In order to reduce adverse effects without compromising drug efficacy, numerous clinical investigations have been performed using supplementation with folic or folinic acid during methotrexate therapy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, addressing both the timing of folate supplementation and the weekly folate-to-methotrexate ratio. Based on these studies, an individually adjusted supply of folic acid rather than folinic acid is proposed. For many patients, however, a properly balanced diet is sufficient to avoid folate deficiency.

Differential efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibition in the management of inflammatory eye disease and associated rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with inflammatory eye disease that is resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (4 males and 12 females aged 7 to 78 years) who received etanercept (n = 14) or infliximab (n = 2) for either inflammatory eye disease or associated joint disease were studied retrospectively to determine the effect of these medications on their ocular inflammation.

RESULTS

Nine cases of uveitis and 7 cases of scleritis were treated. Systemic diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (n = 8), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 1), and psoriatic spondylarthropathy (n = 1). Three patients had uveitis without associated systemic disease. Although 12 of 12 patients with active articular inflammation (100%) experienced improvement in joint disease, only 6 of 16 with ocular inflammation (38%) experienced improvement in eye disease. Five patients developed inflammatory eye disease for the first time while taking a TNF inhibitor. No patient discontinued treatment because of adverse drug effects.

CONCLUSION

TNF inhibitors are well tolerated immunosuppressive medications that may benefit certain subgroups of patients with inflammatory eye disease, but they appear to be more effective in controlling associated inflammatory arthritis.

Methotrexate use in rheumatoid arthritis. A Clinician's perspective

Aminopterine, a precursor of methotrexate (MTX), was first used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 1951 [Gubner, R., 1951. Therapeutic suppression of tissue reactivity: I. Comparison of the effects of cortisone and aminopterin. Am. J. Med. Sci. 221, 169-175; Gubner, R., August, S., Ginsberg, V., 1951. Therapeutic suppression of tissue reactivity: II. Effect of aminopterin in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Am. J. Med. Sci. 221, 176-182.]. Corticosteroids, and to some extent cyclophosphamide, took MTX out of the rheumatologist's armamentarium until the late 1970s-early 1980s when the toxic profile of these compounds became apparent. By the mid 1980s, four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) had proven beyond doubt the beneficial effects of MTX when administered to patients with established disease who had failed to respond to other compounds such as gold salts and D-penicillamine [Thompson, R.N., Watts, C., Edelman, J., Esdaile, J., and Russell, A.S., 1984. A controlled two-centre trial of parenteral methotrexate therapy for refractory rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 11, 760-763; Andersen, P.A., West, S.G., O'Dell, J.R., Via, C.S., Claypool, R.G., and Kotzin, B.L., 1985. Weekly pulse methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and immunologic effects in a randomized, double-blind study. Ann. Intern. Med. 103, 489-496; Weinblatt, M.E., Coblyn, J.S., Fox, D.A., Fraser, P.A., Holdsworth, D.E., Glass, D.N., and Trentham, D.E., 1985. Efficacy of low-dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 312, 818-822; Williams, H.J., Willkens, R.F., Samuelson, C.O.J., Alarcón, G.S., Guttadauria, M., Yarboro, C., Polisson, R.P., Weiner, S.R., Luggen, M.E., Billingsley, L.M., Dahl, S.L., Egger, M.J., Reading, J.C., and Ward, J.R., 1985. Comparison of low-dose oral pulse methotrexate and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 28, 721-730.]. Subsequently, these four trials were included in a meta-analysis and the drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in RA [Health and Public Policy Committee, H.P.P.C. and American College Physicians, A.C.P., 1987. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Intern. Med. 107, 418-419; Paulus, H.E., 1986. FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee meeting: Methotrexate; guidelines for the clinical evaluation of antiinflammatory drugs; DMSO in scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 29, 1289-1290; Tugwell, P., Bennett, K., and Gent, M., 1987. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Indications, contraindications, efficacy, and safety. Ann. Intern. Med. 107, 358-366.]. Since then, rheumatologists have become aware of what Pincus et al. have called "the side effects" of RA comparing the morbidity and mortality caused by RA with that potentially caused by medications used to treat this disease [Pincus, T. and Callahan, L.F., 1993. The "side effects" of rheumatoid arthritis: joint destruction, disability and early mortality. Br. J. Rheumatol. 32, 28-37.]. Thus, during the 1990s the use of MTX for the treatment of RA became generalized [O'Dell, J.R., 1997. Methotrexate use in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N Am. 23, 779-796 (a); Bannwarth, B., Vernhes, J., Schaeverbeke, T., and Dehais, J., 1995. The facts about methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Rev. Rhum. 62, 471-473 (b); Bologna, C., Jorgensen, C., and Sany, J., 1997a. Methotrexate as the initial second-line disease modifying agent in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 15, 597-601; Bologna, C., Viu, P. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Effect of methotrexate on blood purine and pyrimidine levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The mechanism of anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate (MTX) at low dose may relate to a decrease in availability of the purine precursor or it may depend on accumulation of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AICAR) and the anti-inflammatory nucleoside adenosine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible mechanism of action by analysis of changes in blood concentrations of purine and pyrimidine metabolites during MTX treatment.

METHODS

Venous blood samples were collected from rheumatoid arthritis patients before and at different times for up to 7 days after the start of MTX treatment. Whole blood concentrations of adenosine, uridine, hypoxanthine, uric acid and erythrocyte nucleotides were measured by HPLC.

RESULTS

The initial blood adenosine concentration was 0.073 +/- 0.013 microM and no differences were observed during MTX treatment. However, a decrease in uric acid concentration was observed from 205.5+/-13.5 to 160. 9+/-13.5 microM (P<0.05) within 24 h after MTX administration. The hypoxanthine concentration decreased in parallel with uric acid, while the uridine concentration decreased 48 h after MTX administration. No accumulation of AICAR-triphosphate (ZTP) was observed in the erythrocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

MTX decreases circulating purine and pyrimidine concentrations, and their availability for DNA and RNA synthesis, which may affect immune cell proliferation and protein (cytokine) expression. The absence of adenosine concentration changes and lack of ZTP formation is evidence against an AICAR/adenosine mechanism, although localized adenosine concentration changes cannot be excluded.