Brachytherapy in the treatment of thoracic tumors. Lung and esophageal

Definitive high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy of bronchial stump for lung cancer after surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to evaluate outcomes after definitive high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

We treated 34 patients after surgery for lung cancer, without nodal or distant metastases, with HDR-BT. Two groups were analyzed, one with local recurrence in stump after prior surgery (n = 13) and a second with nonradical primary lobar resection found in histopathologically positive margins (n = 21). There were 27 men and 7 women with a median age of 57.4 years. Twenty-five patients received sole brachytherapy with 4 fractions of 7.5 Gy and 9 received combined treatment consisting of 2 fractions of 6 Gy (HDR-BT) and 50 Gy from external beam radiotherapy. Overall survival time (OS) and overall disease-free survival time (OFS) were compared with prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The complete local and radiologic response rate evaluated at the first month after HDR-BT was 73.5% (25/34). The partial response rate was 26.5%. OFS time in total group was 17.4 months; OS was 18.8 months. Differences were found in OS between both groups-primary tumor or recurrence (log-rank test, p = 0.048). Differences were not found according to gender (p = 0.36), clinical stage (p = 0.76), histopathology (p = 0.93), treatment dose (p = 0.45), sole or combined treatment (p = 0.16), or grade of remission in week 4 (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT of a stump recurrence or after nonradical resection leads to a long-term OS rate in patients with localized lung cancer and could be considered curative. We found no correlations between OS and chosen clinical data; adjuvant HDR-BT gave better results.

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2008 of The Cochrane Library. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitute about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palliative EBB compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or other alternative endoluminal treatments in controlling thoracic symptoms and increasing survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL,The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2012), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1966 to January 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to January 2012) and other databases as well as reference lists, and we handsearched selected journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens of palliative EBB with EBRT or other endobronchial interventions in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and conducted risk of bias assessment.

MAIN RESULTS

We included fourteen RCTs involving 953 participants. We included a new study assessing a variety of different fractionation schedules of high dose rate palliative EBB in this update. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, in the patient characteristics and in the outcomes measured. We found trials comparing EBB to EBRT alone, EBB plus EBRT to EBRT alone, EBB plus chemotherapy to EBB alone, EBB to neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd-YAG) laser and comparisons between various fractionation schedules of high dose rate EBB. From the heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we concluded that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation of NSCLC symptoms than EBB alone. Our findings did not provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB plus EBRT to relieve symptoms compared to EBRT alone. Overall, for the primary endpoint of survival there was no evidence of benefit for EBB compared to EBRT and Nd-YAG laser or for the combination of EBB with chemotherapy. Additionally, findings from one trial suggested that twice 7.4 Gy was superior to the four times per week 3.8 Gy schedule for mean time of local control and fatal hemoptysis. No significant differences were found for fatal hemoptysis as an adverse event of EBB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence did not provide conclusive results that EBB plus EBRT improved symptom relief over EBRT alone. We were not able to provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB with EBRT, EBB in preference to EBRT, chemotherapy or Nd-YAG laser. From heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we conclude that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation than EBB alone. For patients previously treated by EBRT who are symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial central obstruction, EBB may be considered in selected cases.

Update on interventional bronchoscopy for the thoracic radiologist

Interventional bronchoscopy, together with other domains of interventional pulmonology, has experienced tremendous technological advances. Diagnostic applications include endobronchial ultrasound, which enables endoscopists to see through airway walls. White light videobronchoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and narrow band imaging have enhanced the ability to detect early lung cancer at a preinvasive stage. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy, ultrathin bronchoscopy, and virtual bronchoscopy increase the diagnostic yield of biopsy of small peripheral lung lesions. The options that are currently available for the relief of central airway obstruction are also numerous, with both flexible and rigid bronchoscopic applications. Stents, although dichotomized to silicone and metal, come in various sizes and shapes to suit the requirements of the pathology being treated. Ablative techniques are categorized into those with an immediate effect and those with a delayed effect. Laser, electrocautery, and argon plasma coagulation can immediately relieve obstruction and control hemoptysis, whereas cryosurgery, brachytherapy, and photodynamic therapy have established roles in subacute airway obstruction and in the treatment of early lung cancer. Microdebriders have recently been added to the armamentarium of modalities for mechanical debulking of tumor. Distal airway obstruction has also been targeted with bronchial thermoplasty treatment of refractory asthma and with bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for the management of severe emphysema. This array of new technology has fostered collaborative work with a wide range of other medical specialties to deliver safer, more effective, minimally invasive treatment.

The combined treatment of CT-guided percutaneous 125I seed implantation and chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment consisting of CT-guided percutaneous (125)I seed implantation with GP chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a nonrandomized, two-armed clinical trial. Of these patients, 24 received a combination treatment of CT-guided percutaneous (125) I seed implantation and GP (the combo group), while 29 were treated with GP only (the control group).

RESULTS

Patients in the combo group received (125)I seed implantation with prescription dose of 100-140 Gy and a total of 55 cycles of GP, and patients in the control group received a total of 73 cycles of GP. The overall response rate was 79.2% in the combo group and 41.4% in the control group. The median overall survival time was 13.5 ± 1.5 months in the combo group and 9.0 ± 1.8 months in the control group. The progression-free survival time was 8.0 ± 1.2 months in the combo group and 5.0 ± 0.8 months in the control group. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62.5 and 16.7% in the combo group, respectively, and 41.4 and 13.8% in the control group. The interventional complications in the combo group included 5 cases of pneumothorax and 4 cases of hemoptysis. There were no complications due to radiation pneumonia or radiation esophagitis in the combo group, and no patients had lethal hemoptysis or esophagotracheal fistula. Chemotherapy treatment-related toxicities, including Grade 3/4 myelosuppression and Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience showed that combined CT-guided (125)I radioactive seed implantation and GP chemotherapy are effective and safe for treating advanced NCSLC.

High dose-rate endobronchial radiotherapy for proximal airway obstruction due to lung cancer: 8-year experience of a referral center

The efficacy of high dose-rate endobronchial radiotherapy (HDERT) against proximal airway obstruction that results from lung cancer has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively reviewed tumor/obstruction characteristics prior to therapy, interventions applied, symptoms before and after intervention, complications, and survival of all patients with proximal airway obstruction resulting from lung cancer who received HDERT between 1995 and 2003 in a tertiary teaching center. Thirty-four (34) patients received HDERT, while 28 had additional treatment (external radiotherapy = 23, neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser ablation = 9, stenting = 7, electrosurgery = 5, cryosurgery = 3, and photodynamic therapy = 1). Sixteen (16) patients developed complications, the most frequent being respiratory failure and bronchial-wall necrosis, while 19 experienced symptomatic relief. The median (95% confidence interval) survival of these 34 patients was 7.8 (5.9-9.8) months, significantly longer (p = 0.004) than a historic control of 3.9 (3.7-7.1) months from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, in Cleveland, OH, and comparable to other previous reports. No single factor predicted complications or symptomatic relief. However, female gender, presence of only one symptom, absence of fatigue/weight loss, >1 HDERT sessions, and postprocedure symptom relief were associated with improved survival. Contemporary HDERT with or without additional treatment modalities is effective against central airway compromise resulting from lung cancer.

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitutes about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palliative EBB in increasing survival and to control thoracic symptoms in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or other alternative endoluminal treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were searched, as were reference lists and handsearching of selected journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens of palliative EBB with EBRT or other endobronchial interventions in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Thirteen RCTs were included. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, patient characteristics and the outcomes measured. Because of this heterogeneity no meta-analysis was attempted.

MAIN RESULTS

We found trials comparing EBB to EBRT alone, EBB plus EBRT to EBRT alone, EBB plus chemotherapy to EBB alone, EBB to Nd-YAG laser and comparisons between diverse fractionation schedules of high dose rate EBB. From the heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we concluded that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation of NSCLC symptoms than EBB alone. Our findings did not provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB plus EBRT to relieve symptoms compared to EBRT alone. Overall, for the primary endpoint of survival there was no evidence of benefit for EBB compared to EBRT and Nd-YAG laser or for the combination of EBB with chemotherapy. Additionally, findings from one trial suggested that twice 7.4 Gy was superior to the four times per week 3.8 Gy schedule for mean time of local control and fatal haemoptysis. No significant differences were found for fatal haemoptysis as an adverse event of EBB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence did not provide conclusive results that EBB plus EBRT improved symptom relief over EBRT alone. We were not able to provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB with EBRT, chemotherapy or Nd-YAG laser. For patients previously treated by EBRT who are symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial central obstruction, EBB may be considered in selected cases.

High dose rate brachytherapy: its clinical applications and treatment guidelines

Brachytherapy has the advantage of delivering a high dose to the tumor while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. With proper case selection and delivery technique, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has great promise, because it eliminates radiation exposure, allows short treatment times, and can be performed on an outpatient basis. Additionally, use of a single-stepping source, allows optimization of dose distribution by varying the dwell time at each dwell position. However, when HDR brachytherapy is used, the treatments must be executed carefully, because the short treatment times do not allow any time for correction of errors, and mistakes can result in harm to patients. Hence, it is very important that all personnel involved in HDR brachytherapy be well trained and be constantly alert. It is expected that the use of HDR brachytherapy will greatly expand over the next decade and that refinements will occur primarily in the integration of imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative ultrasonography) and optimization of dose distribution. It is anticipated that better tumor localization and normal tissue definition will help to optimize dose distribution to the tumor and reduce normal tissue exposure. The development of well-controlled randomized trials addressing issues of efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, and costs-versus-benefits will ultimately define the role of HDR brachytherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Palliative treatment by high–dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to analyze the results of palliative HDR brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-one patients with unresectable, advanced esophageal cancer were treated palliatively by HDR brachytherapy. All patients received a total dose of 22.5 Gy in three fractions per week. Remissions of dysphagia and other clinical and radiological factors were assessed in the first month posttreatment, and then in the third, sixth, and twelfth months. The survival rate was compared with some chosen clinical factors using a log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median survival time among all patients was 8.2 months. The median survival time according to the obtained remission was 14.6, 7.2, and 3.8 months (log-rank p = 00001, F Cox p = 0.00001) for complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and lack of remission (NR), respectively. A longer median survival time was observed when tumor size was less then 5 cm (12.1 months), than between 5 and 10 cm (7.8 months), or longer than 10 cm (6.4 months) (log-rank p = 0.002). Longer median survival times were observed in clinical stage II (14.1 months), compared with clinical stage III (7.7 months) and IV (7.2 months) (log-rank p = 0.01). Significant correlations were found between survival and the Karnofsky Performance Status, grade of dysphagia, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy for advanced esophageal cancer allowed for improvement of dysphagia in most patients. The complete or partial remission, the older age of patients, and the lower grade of dysphagia observed in first month posttreatment were the most important prognostic factors allowing for prolonged survival (confirmed by a multivariate analysis). In the univariate analysis, important prognostic factors for prolonged survival were: a higher Karnofsky Performance Status, a lower clinical stage and a small tumor size.

New methods for early diagnosis of lung cancer

The recent promising results with low-dose CT have stimulated the revival of the scientific discussion on screening for early lung cancer and mark the end of a significant period with lack of progress. At the same time positron emission tomography has quickly shown its value as a staging tool. Also new endobronchial techniques such as autofluorescence bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasonography have shown remarkably increased sensitivity when used by experienced hands. Cytopathological risk markers in sputum are being developed and it is expected that combinations of these new diagnostic methods will help to increase the identification of asymptomatic lung cancer patients and turn into better survival figures.

Contemporary role of modern brachytherapy techniques in the management of malignant thoracic tumors

Sole brachytherapy for carcinoma of the lung is most often performed using high-dose-rate (HDR) remote afterloading equipment, which delivers the treatment within the tracheobronchial tree in an outpatient setting. It provides excellent, rapid palliation in advanced stages, and can also be used selectively for curative intent in early stages. In better-performance patients, fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is preferred to brachytherapy as an initial treatment because it appears to provide a modest gain in survival, and more sustained palliation. In patients with centrally located tumors and limited extent of disease, the combination of external and endoluminal irradiation enables curative treatment options. Intraoperative brachytherapy may complement standard adjuvant treatment in incompletely resected, unresectable, or medically inoperable patients, and has the potential to improve local control in selected cases. Due to the rarity of the disease, the role of endoluminal brachytherapy in the treatment regimen of tracheal neoplasms is not yet clearly defined. The risk of fatal bleeding after endoluminal brachytherapy appears to be correlated with tumor localization and fraction size, but in the majority of cases fatal bleeds are caused by progression of local disease. The use of a distanceable applicator provides a central positioning of the source, prevents the delivery of high-contact doses to the mucosa, and may reduce toxicity. The standard technique for interstitial brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant EBRT is the use of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, but it may also be applied by means of pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) or HDR techniques. Prospective trials comparing different boost techniques and indications are needed to define more precisely the subgroup of patients who are most suitable for interstitial brachytherapy. Reirradiation of chest wall local recurrences using brachytherapy molds is effective and provides a high local control rate with acceptable toxicity.

The role of brachytherapy for palliation

The goal of palliative radiation is to alleviate symptoms in a short amount of time and maintain an optimal functional and quality-of-life level while minimizing toxicity and patient inconvenience. Despite advances in multimodality antineoplastic therapies, failure to control the tumor at its primary site frustratingly remains the predominant source of morbidity and mortality in many patients with cancer. Escalation of doses of radiation using external beam irradiation has been shown to improve local tumor control, but limits are imposed by the tolerance of normal surrounding structures. The highly conformal nature of brachytherapy enables the radiation oncologist to accomplish safe escalation of radiation doses to the tumor while minimizing doses to normal surrounding structures. Thus, by enhancing the potential for local control, brachytherapy used alone or as a supplement to external beam radiation therapy retains a significant and important role in achieving the goals of palliation. Proper patient selection, excellent technique, and adherence to implant rules will minimize the risk of complications. The advantages realized with the use of brachytherapy include good patient tolerance, short treatment time, and high rates of sustained palliation. This article reviews various aspects of palliative brachytherapy, including patient selection criteria, implant techniques, treatment planning, dose and fractionation schedules, results, and complications of treatment. Tumors of the head and neck, trachea and bronchi, esophagus, biliary tract, and brain, all in which local failure represents the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, are highlighted.