Re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Benefits and toxicities

Proton Therapy for Vaginal Reirradiation

Primary or recurrent gynecologic cancers in operable patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation are typically treated with surgery based on the risk of late toxicities historically associated with reirradiation. A number of studies have demonstrated that, compared with conventional radiation therapy (RT) using photons, proton therapy (PT) offers dosimetric advantages for patients with gynecologic cancers by reducing radiation dose to healthy tissues. Thereby, we expect that, in appropriately selected cases, PT may reduce long-term treatment-related morbidities without compromising treatment efficacy. Herein, we describe the treatment planning, technique, and long-term follow-up of a patient who was treated with PT for a primary vaginal carcinoma nearly 30 years after a prior course of pelvic RT. Using this case, we illustrate the utility and advantages of PT in the treatment of cancers that occur at less favorable sites, adjacent to normal structures with low radiation tolerance, or in paients with a history of prior irradiation. Additionally, we provide a brief discussion and review of literature of prior case series of pelvic reirradiation, illustrating the value of identifying treatment approaches that can reduce treatment-related morbidities, particularly late treatment toxicities.

Workshop report: A practical approach and general principles of re-irradiation for in-field cancer recurrence

In-field cancer recurrence after previous adjuvant or radical radiotherapy presents particularly challenging clinical issues to the oncologists. A Canadian pattern of practice survey showed a wide range of approaches in treatment intent, planning and dose fractionation. A workshop on re-irradiation was conducted at the 2009 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology annual scientific meeting, under the guidance of the Symptom Control Committee, in an effort to promote a uniform approach among radiation oncologists in their approach to re-irradiation. The workshop has made various recommendations in an effort to bring consistency among radiation oncologists across Canada to their approach towards re-irradiation.

Re-irradiation of a second localization of idiopathic midline destructive disease in the head and neck area

Idiopathic midline destructive disease is a rare disease, characterized by a progressive ulceration and destruction of midline facial structures. We report a case with localization on the palate for which she received radiotherapy. Later she developed a second localization on the posterior pharyngeal wall for which she was re-irradiated, without severe sequels. Twice a complete regression was observed.

Palliative radiation therapy

Radiation is an effective modality to aid in symptom management of patients with metastatic disease. The type and duration of treatment depends on the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of the patient and type and status of the cancer. Abbreviated treatment regimens may be favored in this patient population. They provide quick palliation without the patient and family spending significant time traveling back and forth to the treatment center. Hypofractionated regimens have been found effective in relieving pain from metastatic bone disease, relieving obstruction from locally advanced lung cancer, bleeding from gynecologic cancers, and hematuria from advanced bladder cancer. More aggressive regimens such as whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery may be appropriate for select patients with a good KPS. Radiation has also been found to be effective in palliating recurrent cancer that has already received definitive radiation.

Intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine gel in advanced head and neck cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III study in North America

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel (CDDP/epi gel) for local control and palliation of tumor-related symptoms in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to either CDDP/epi or placebo gel in this phase III, double-blind study. Tumors were < or =20 cm(3); most recurrences (88%) were in a previously irradiated field. The most symptomatic or threatening tumor was designated as the target tumor. DOSE: 0.25 mL CDDP/epi gel/cm(3) tumor volume.

TREATMENTS

< or =6 weekly intratumoral injections in an 8-week period.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

target tumor response and symptom relief.

RESULTS

During the blinded phase, 34% (21 of 62) of patients achieved an objective response (CR or PR) in the target tumor treated with CDDP/epi gel vs 0% (0 of 24) treated with placebo gel (p <.001). Responses occurred within a median of four treatments (range, 2-6) and were durable (median, 95 days; range, 34-168+ days). More patients treated with CDDP/epi gel achieved palliative benefit than did those treated with placebo gel (37% vs 12%, p =.036). Most frequent side effects were local pain and local cutaneous reactions, which resolved over 3-12 weeks. Renal and hematologic toxicities were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase III trial showed that CDDP/epi gel significantly reduces tumor burden, palliates tumor-related symptoms, and is an effective local treatment for recurrent tumors.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: treatments and outcomes in the 20th century

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), although rare in Europe and North America, is not uncommon in parts of Asia such as southern China and Hong Kong. Consequently, very few oncologists in the Western world have extensive experience in treating this neoplasm. Treatment using external beam therapy and/or brachytherapy evolved greatly during the 20th century and is still evolving, particularly with the use of adjunctive chemotherapy regimes. Diagnosis of NPC has also improved with the availability of CT and MRI. This worldwide review is divided into historical, transitional and modern eras, with the latter concerning 1971-2000. Currently, the most controversial aspects of NPC are recommendations for treatment of recurrent disease and the role of chemotherapy in the overall framework of treatment. Comparison of results from different centres is not possible without an understanding of the various staging systems that are, and have been, used; a comparison is given in this review. In the future, early diagnosis, adequate radiation dose to the primary with boost to bulky disease, and regular follow-up with biopsy of any suspicious residual or recurrent disease, are likely to become key issues to improve outcome. Also, apart from direct/indirect nasopharyngoscopy, the role of follow-up CT needs to be studied for early detection of residual or recurrent disease. More clinical trials on chemo-radiation are also required, in order to study optimum doses and agents.

Current management of oral cancer. A multidisciplinary approach

BACKGROUND

Recent basic science discoveries have contributed to our understanding of the etiology of oral cancer and allowed us to consider innovative approaches to therapy.

METHODS

The authors evaluated and summarized current approaches to the management of oral cancer, emphasizing the multidisciplinary team approach to coordinate surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Current concepts in management, including complications of therapy, are described.

RESULTS

State-of-the-art surgical techniques can spare patients with oral cancer from much of the morbidity and complications common in the past. The refinement of treatment strategies reduces complications and improves efficacy. Many exciting new clinical trials in the areas of gene therapy and immunomodulation are showing promise.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of oral cancer has undergone radical change in the past 10 years and continues to evolve rapidly. Discoveries in molecular biology, diagnosis, surgery, radiation therapy and medical oncology have altered many traditional concepts and practices.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

General dental practitioners need to understand current treatment modalities for oral and pharyngeal cancers to determine to whom they should refer patients for the most appropriate treatment, and to make recommendations regarding complications associated with these cancers.