Behavior disorders in persons with mental retardation receiving antipsychotic medication

Efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of perampanel (PER), and to identify the relationship between behavioral impairments and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in epilepsy patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

METHODS

Participants were ASD patients with epilepsy recruited between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. Inclusion criteria were: seizures refractory to two appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs); presence of neuropsychological impairments; and ≥12 months of monitoring. PER was administered once daily, starting at a dose of 2 mg/day, increased to 12 mg/day. Seizure/EEG responders were identified as participants showing a >50 % reduction in seizure/interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) frequency (indicated as complete disappearance and response). Behavioral responders were identified as participants with a ≥50 % reduction in scores of the Japanese manuals for the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-J).

RESULTS

Eleven (64.7 %) of 17 patients were considered to be both seizure and EEG responders. Five (45.5 %) of these 11 patients with seizure/EEG response were considered as behavioral responders. Mean ABC-J scores were significantly decreased at 12 months after PER administration (p = 0.0002). A correlation between decreased IED frequency and ABC-J score was evident in frontal IEDs, but not in non-frontal IEDs. Participants presenting with frontal IEDs showed a significantly higher correlation between seizures/EEG and behavioral improvements (p = 0.023). Moreover, 2 of 6 patients without seizure/EEG improvement were considered as behavioral responders. No patients discontinued PER.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study suggest the utility of PER treatment in reducing clinical seizures and IEDs for ASD patients with intractable epilepsy, at least in some patients. Moreover, the present results also indicate the usefulness of PER in improving neuropsychiatric impairments, including behavioral disturbances in ASD related to improvement of clinical seizures/frontal IEDs, but also unrelated to seizure/EEG improvement in at least some ASD patients.

Effects of perampanel on secondary bilateral synchrony and behavioral problems in adolescents with epilepsy showing insufficient response with levetiracetam

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of perampanel (PER) on secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) and behavioral problems in adolescents with epilepsy who showed insufficient response to levetiracetam (LEV).

METHODS

The primary criterion for patient selection was the presence of SBS. The criteria such as age between 12 and 18 years, seizures refractory to antiseizure medications including LEV, at least four seizures a month, neuropsychological impairments, and at least 12 months of follow-up also had to be fulfilled. Patients were given PER at an initial dose of 2 mg/day, followed by increments of +2 mg/day every 2 weeks. Concomitant medications remained unchanged during evaluation period. Responders for electroencephalogram (EEG) and seizures were identified as showing a ≥50 % reduction from the baseline SBS on EEG and seizure frequency, respectively. Neuropsychological impairments as per the Japanese manuals for the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-J) were evaluated before and after PER administration.

RESULTS

Eight of 14 patients were considered responders for seizures. Among these 8 responders, 6 patients were considered responders for EEG and behavioral problems. Mean ABC-J scores in both EEG non-responders and responders were decreased significantly at 12 months (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively). ABC-J scores were significantly lower in EEG responders than in EEG non-responders at 12 months (p < 0.01). Moreover, among patients with decreased ABC-J scores, the degree of decrease was larger in EEG responders than in EEG non-responders (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PER may be useful in reducing SBS on EEG, seizure frequency, and behavioral problems.

Reviewing the use of antipsychotic drugs in people with intellectual disability

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics are the most widely prescribed drugs in people with intellectual disability even if schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders do not affect more than 3% of such population. Many authors outline the lack of studies on the efficacy of antipsychotics on schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in people with intellectual disability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of the present study is to review all evidences resulting from international trials selected by Medline, and compare efficacy and side effects of different antipsychotics in people with both intellectual disability and psychotic disorders and/or behavioural disorders.

RESULTS

195 studies were identified; 117 concern traditional antipychotics while 78 new generation ones. If we consider the type of studies, it results that only the 12.8% of all production is represented by meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomised and not controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews would be the golden standard for therapeutical studies; unfortunately they are really few in this field. It is anyway significative that all the studies reported focus on the use of antipsychotics in people with intellectual disability presenting behavioural problems. To increase the validity of these studies it is recommendable to proceed only with well-designed studies, possibly double-blind versus placebo or other medications. There is need to define precise inclusion criteria, precise symptomatological or behavioural targets and adaptative ability assessment, using valid and reliable diagnostic instruments.