Early empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia patients at low risk

Management of the cancer patient with infection and neutropenia

Infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer. The intensity and duration of immunosuppressive chemotherapy determine the risk. Cancer may be associated with immune defects, in particular hematologic malignancies. Predisposing factors include tumor site, intravenous devices, neutropenia due to underlying disease, mucosal lesions, corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies, splenic dysfunction, and treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Bacteremia is documented in approximately 25% of people with febrile neutropenia. The drug choice for empiric therapy is influenced by factors related either to the patient or to the institution. Guidelines and general statements should always take local epidemiology into consideration. The therapeutic hematopoietic growth factors should be reserved for patients with fever and neutropenia and those at high risk for infection-associated complications or poor clinical outcomes. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) has developed a Risk Index that predicts the risk of medical complications and outcome.

Evidence-based guidelines for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever in Korea

Neutrophils play an important role in immunological function. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to infection, and except fever is present, inflammatory reactions are scarce in many cases. Additionally, because infections can worsen rapidly, early evaluation and treatments are especially important in febrile neutropenic patients. In cases in which febrile neutropenia is anticipated due to anticancer chemotherapy, antibiotic prophylaxis can be used, based on the risk of infection. Antifungal prophylaxis may also be considered if long-term neutropenia or mucosal damage is expected. When fever is observed in patients suspected to have neutropenia, an adequate physical examination and blood and sputum cultures should be performed. Initial antibiotics should be chosen by considering the risk of complications following the infection; if the risk is low, oral antibiotics can be used. For initial intravenous antibiotics, monotherapy with a broad-spectrum antibiotic or combination therapy with two antibiotics is recommended. At 3-5 days after beginning the initial antibiotic therapy, the condition of the patient is assessed again to determine whether the fever has subsided or symptoms have worsened. If the patient's condition has improved, intravenous antibiotics can be replaced with oral antibiotics; if the condition has deteriorated, a change of antibiotics or addition of antifungal agents should be considered. If the causative microorganism is identified, initial antimicrobial or antifungal agents should be changed accordingly. When the cause is not detected, the initial agents should continue to be used until the neutrophil count recovers.

Infections in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an analysis of 222 febrile neutropenic episodes

A retrospective analysis was performed on febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from 1992 to 2002. There were 222 febrile neutropenic episodes in 266 ALL patients with documented ANC < 500/mm(3). Of the 222 episodes, 98 (44%) had documented focus of infection; the rest were fever without focus. There were 274 different sites of infection in the 98 episodes of documented focus of infection; pulmonary infections were the commonest site of infection (27.3%) followed by HEENT (22.9%). Of 69 bacterial isolates, gram-negative bacteria (n = 46, 67%) were twice as common as gram-positive bacteria (n = 23, 33%). Most common site of isolation for gram-negative bacteria was blood (50%) followed by urine (32.6%). Blood (78.3%) was predominant site of isolation of gram-positive bacteria followed by HEENT (8.7%). Escherichia coli (45.7%) was the commonest gram-negative isolate, while Staphylococcus aureus (39%) was the commonest gram-positive bacterial isolate. There were a total of 22 fungal isolates, the majority from urine (n = 12) and HEENT (n = 9). Of the 22 fungal isolates, 19 were detected in induction phase of chemotherapy. A total of 95/222 (42.8%) febrile neutropenic episodes improved with first-line antibiotic therapy, while modification was required in 127 episodes (57.2%). Antifungal therapy was used in 86 episodes (38.7%). There were a total of 13 deaths, 6 each during induction and intensification/consolidation phases, while 1 died during maintenance phase. Of the 13 deaths, 10 had pneumonia, 8 had bacteremia, and 7 had fungal infection. The current study stresses the importance of frequent reviewing of type, frequency, severity, and outcome of infection complications over the years to detect changing epidemiological patterns. The majority of fungal infections were detected during induction chemotherapy, which highlights the need to consider this type of infection in the evaluation of patients.

A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

The empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer requires antibacterial regimens active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. This study was performed to demonstrate the noninferiority of monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam, compared with cefepime.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized-controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial among high-risk patients from 34 university-affiliated tertiary care medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia who were undergoing treatment for leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and were hospitalized for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes. Patients received piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g every 6 h) or cefepime (2 g every 8 h) intravenously. The primary outcome was success (defined by defervescence without treatment modification) at 72 h of treatment, end of treatment, and test of cure in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, microbiological efficacy, the additional use of glycopeptide antibiotics, emergence of resistant bacteria, and safety.

RESULTS

For 528 subjects (265 received piperacillin-tazobactam and 263 received cefepime), success rates were 57.7% and 48.3%, respectively (P = .04) at the 72-h time point, 39.6% and 31.6% (P = .06) at end of treatment, and 26.8% and 20.5% (P = .11) at the test-of-cure visit. The analyses demonstrated noninferiority for piperacillin-tazobactam at all time points (P< or = .0001). Treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam was independently associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.64; P = .035). Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the noninferiority and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy, compared with cefepime, for the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Empirical treatment of sepsis in neutropenic patients

Febrile neutropenia remains a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Although the mortality associated with febrile neutropenia has dramatically decreased over the last three decades, the overall death rate during and immediately after an episode of febrile neutropenia can be as high as 10% with half of the patients dying directly as a result of the infection itself. A series of developments has led to this marked reduction in mortality. Among them, a pivotal role has been played by the concept of hospital-based empirical therapy with broad-spectrum combinations of antibiotics, aimed primarily against Gram-negative organisms, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Oral administration of cefixime to lower risk febrile neutropenic children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia is a heterogeneous condition. Recently, several risk factors have been defined, permitting the definition of a lower risk group of patients who may benefit form less aggressive therapy. The use of an oral antibiotic approach was tested in the current trial.

METHODS

From May 1997 to March 1998, 154 episodes of lower risk febrile neutropenia in 128 children with a mean age of 62 (range, 8-200) months were enrolled in this randomized, single-institution trial. Inclusion criteria were fever (> 38 degrees C), neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm(3)), lower risk features (i.e., absence of severe comorbidity factors, good clinical condition, negative blood cultures, control of local infection, no fever during the last 24 hours), and compliance of parents. After 3 days of ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg/day administered intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 hours plus amikacin (15 mg/kg/day i.v.) every 24 hours for 3 days, all patients were discharged and randomized to be allocated to 2 treatment arms. Group A (n = 74) received ceftriaxone cefixime (8 mg/kg/day administered orally) every 24 hours for 4 days, whereas Group B (n = 80) was treated with ceftriaxone plus amikacin for 7 days. Failure was defined as the need for second hospitalization during the same episode of neutropenia, or fever during the 7 days after discharge.

RESULTS

Most of the patients (49% in Group A and 55% in Group B) had acute leukemia. Fifty-four (72%) children in Group A and 46 (56%) in Group B had fever of unknown origin (P = not significant [NS]). No significant differences were found in the sites of initial infection between the two groups. Overall results were outstanding, with a favorable outcome in 73 of 78 cases (98.6%) in Group A and 78 of 80 cases (97.5%) in Group B (P = NS). Three patients needed a second hospitalization due to failure of the initial therapy: one in Group A and two in Group B. All three did well with secondary treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In lower risk febrile neutropenic children receiving anticancer therapy, the efficacy of oral cefixime, given for 4 days after 72 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin, was similar to that of 7 days of parenteral ceftriaxone plus amikacin. The oral outpatient therapy approach to the treatment of lower risk febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy is safe and may be cost-saving. This strategy might be adopted as standard therapy in the future.

Economic and resource utilization analysis of outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in low-risk pediatric patients with cancer

PURPOSE

To measure resource allocation in outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in low-risk pediatric patients with cancer and its impact on their families.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective clinical trial was conducted. Eligible patients received a single dose of intravenous (IV) antibiotics and were observed for several hours in clinic. Patients were randomly assigned to continue either IV or oral antibiotics and were seen daily as outpatients. Charges were calculated based on the number of resources used and Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement schedules. A questionnaire was used to measure the impact of outpatient treatment on the family.

RESULTS

Seventy-three episodes of fever and neutropenia were studied. The median duration of treatment was 4 days. Eighty-six percent of the episodes were managed without hospitalization. The median calculated charge was $1840. The median calculated charge for patients receiving oral antibiotics was $1544 and was significantly less than the $2039 median charge for outpatients treated with IV antibiotics. The estimated charge for comparable inpatient treatment was $4503. Nearly all families preferred outpatient care, and few reported a loss of work hours or increased child care expenses.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment of low-risk episodes of fever and neutropenia is substantially less costly than inpatient care and is preferred by most families.

Low-risk febrile neutropenia in a medical oncology unit

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia occurring in patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumours or lymphoma is usually of short duration, and therefore may have a better outcome compared to patients with acute leukaemia or patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy.

AIMS

To review retrospectively the outcomes for febrile neutropenia occurring in patients of the Medical Oncology Unit at our institution, and to identify factors associated with worse outcome, particularly prolonged admission or death.

METHODS

We reviewed 102 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurring in 85 patients treated between 1992 and 1994. Demographic factors, tumour-related factors and clinical aspects of the episodes were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years (range, 18-87), with 56 (55%) episodes occurring in females. Twenty-eight (27%) episodes occurred in patients with lymphoma, with the remaining 74 (73%) occurring in patients with solid tumours. At presentation, the median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 0.14 x 10(9)/L with a median duration of significant neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) of three days. The median duration of fever was two days. Twenty-nine (28%) episodes had positive cultures; of these 11 had bacteraemia. Forty-four (43%) episodes were classified as unexplained fevers. The remaining 29 episodes were associated with clinically documented infection but negative cultures. There was a high treatment success rate (81%) with first-line empirical antibiotics. Of 19 treatment failures, 13 were due to the necessity for antibiotic modification; the other six patients died from infection. Factors associated with a worse outcome (including prolonged admission and death) include: diagnosis of lymphoma; increasing number of chemotherapy courses; early onset of neutropenia; pneumonia; severe hypotension; and multiple co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Febrile neutropenia in adult patients with solid tumours or lymphoma is associated with a relatively good outcome, possibly due to the short duration of neutropenia. A future prospective study to validate the risk factors identified in this study would be useful for defining patients at low risk for the adverse outcomes examined, in whom less intensive management for this condition may be possible.

Optimizing recovery from aplasia after high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Objective. Discussion of the roles of hematopoietic growth factors and the role of stem cells in shortening aplasia after transplant. In addition, the role of the treatment regimen in determining the length of aplasia.

Data Sources. A series of original research stud ies from H. Lee Moffitt Cancer center which was published from 1993 to the present. In addition, selected references were reviewed and quoted to support selective arguments.

Study Selection. Since 1989 data from four allo cated, parallel, high-dose phase I/II trials conducted at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla and include the following treatment regimens: (1) ifosfamide, carbo platin, and etoposide (ICE); (2) mitoxantrone and thio tepa (MITT); (3) busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BUCY2); and (4) Taxol, Novantrone, thiotepa (TNT). The results of hematopoietic recovery from consecutive patients allocated on these trials will be discussed.

Data Extraction. Granulocyte engraftment was defined as having occurred when an absolute granu locyte count of 500/μL has been surpassed on 3 or more consecutive days. The period of aplasia was defined as the number of days from the day of stem cell infusion to the day of engraftment. The period of granulocyte engraftment and aplasia was examined comparatively as a function of the source of stem cells given to the patient at their initial reinfusion. Time to engraftment was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Method and probability curves were compared by logrank analysis.

Data Synthesis. The duration of aplasia after high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation deter mines the risk of opportunistic infection and the cost of the transplant. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials for both sargramostim and filgrastim have clearly demonstrated a significantly shorter period of aplasia produced by high-dose therapy by several days. From sequential comparison trials, it appears that filgrastim may be superior to sargramostim in shortening aplasia after bone marrow stem cell transplantation following high-dose therapy. Erythropoietin, while not shorten ing the period of aplasia, has been demonstrated to reduce erythrocyte transfusion requirements; whereas the question about cost-effectiveness remains to be unanswered. In comparing granulocyte recovery of bone marrow stem cell transplants with peripheral blood stem cell transplants, both perform similarly, especially, if collected under identical stimulatory conditions. Both the mobilizing regimen and the treatment regimen, but not the anatomic compart ment, are significant factors which determine the speed of engraftment after high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cells are transplanted.

Conclusions. The purpose of high-dose therapy is to improve the cure rate for selected malignancies. Shortening aplasia can reduce the death rate from infections but only has a marginal impact on the cure rate as the death rate is relatively low. It behooves us, then, to develop the best treatment and with that regimen determine how best to shorten the period of aplasia.