Antibiotic Therapy for Gram-negative Bacteremia

Correlation of procalcitonin to positive blood culture results in a sample of South African trauma ICU patients between 2016 and 2017

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the screening accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) for bacteremia, as defined by a positive blood culture, in a South African trauma ICU.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review study involving 149 patients who were admitted to the ICU of a level-1 trauma center in South Africa between 2016 and 2017. Median PCT levels in patients with and without positive blood cultures were compared. The screening accuracy of PCT for a positive blood culture was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Two PCT cut-points were investigated: a general cut-point in the South African context (> 2.0 ng/mL), and a trauma ICU-specific cut-point (prioritizing specificity while optimizing sensitivity) which was determined from a receiver-operator-characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Bacteremic patients had higher median PCT levels when compared with non-bacteremic patients (30.5 ng/mL versus 6.6 ng/mL, p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PCT > 2.0 ng/mL was 86% (95% confidence interval-CI 71-94%), 29% (CI 22-38%), 28% (CI 20-37%), and 87% (CI 73-94%), respectively. The unit-specific cut-point was PCT > 31.0 ng/mL, which had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 50% (CI 34-66%), 80% (CI 71-86%), 44% (CI 30-59%), and 83% (CI 75-89%), respectively. Unlike PCT > 2.0 ng/mL, PCT > 31.0 ng/mL demonstrated fair-to-good test specificity in a sub-analysis of patients who underwent recent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased PCT levels were associated with bacteremia in this study. PCT > 31.0 ng/mL may be used to rule in suspected bacteremia in this trauma ICU setting.

Correlation of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Amikacin and Ceftazidime

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime and amikacin are often prescribed concomitantly to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Their physicochemical properties are quite similar. Both drugs are highly soluble in water, have low plasma protein binding and are >95% excreted unchanged by the kidney via glomerular filtration. Their pharmacokinetic parameters are therefore expected to correlate. This study was performed to explore the correlation between the pharmacokinetic parameters of these two drugs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study. They all received ceftazidime and amikacin concomitantly to treat their infections. After steady-state conditions had been reached, two blood samples were collected during the elimination phase of both drugs. Plasma drug concentrations were analysed and the pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug were calculated. The pharmacokinetic parameters that were examined included total drug clearance (CL), the elimination rate constant (k(e)), the elimination half life (t(1/2)) and the volume of distribution (V(d)). The correlations of the pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin and ceftazidime were determined using regression analysis.

RESULTS

Regression analysis showed that the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime and amikacin were highly correlated. The correlation coefficients (r) of CL, k(e), t(1/2) and V(d) of the two drugs were 0.966, 0.943, 0.888 and 0.671, respectively. The correlation between amikacin clearance and ceftazidime clearance was higher than the correlation between either amikacin or ceftazidime clearance and creatinine clearance, for which the r values were 0.647 and 0.661, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime and amikacin were highly correlated. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic parameters of one of these drugs can be used to predict the pharmacokinetic parameters of the other drug.

Does combination antimicrobial therapy reduce mortality in Gram-negative bacteraemia? A meta-analysis

The use of combination antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia caused by Gram-negative bacilli is controversial. We did a meta-analysis of published studies to determine whether a combination of two or more antimicrobials reduces mortality in patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia. Criteria for inclusion were: analytic studies of patients with documented Gram-negative bacteraemia that included patients receiving a single antibiotic (monotherapy) and patients receiving two or more antibiotics (combination therapy). Data on mortality (outcome) had to be provided. A pooled odds ratio was calculated with the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. Assessment of heterogeneity was done with the Breslow-Day test and reasons for heterogeneity were explored. 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, five prospective cohort studies, two prospective randomised trials, and ten retrospective cohort studies. Most studies used beta-lactams or aminoglycosides alone and in combination. The summary odds ratio was 0.96 (95% CI 0.70-1.32), indicating no mortality benefit with combination therapy. Subgroup analyses adjusting for year of publication, study design, and severity of illness did not change the results. Considerable heterogeneity was present in the main analyses. Analysis of only Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemias showed a significant mortality benefit (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.79). Our analysis does not support the routine use of combination antimicrobial therapy for Gram-negative bacteraemia, beyond settings where infection by P aeruginosa is strongly suspected or more than one drug would be desirable to assure in-vitro efficacy.

Clinical prognostic markers in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective analysis of 139 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical characteristics and determine predictive factors of mortality in previously healthy individuals suffering from severe sepsis.

METHODS

The study included 139 patients with severe sepsis, admitted to the Department of Medicine over a two years period. Data recorded on admission included demographic information, blood pressure, core temperature, white blood count, hepatic and renal function tests, coagulation factors, blood gases, serum lactic acid levels, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS-II) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).

RESULTS

On admission, 62 patients were hypotensive, 52 had signs of diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC), 72 had renal and 27 hepatic dysfunction. The overall mortality rate was 27.3%. Twenty-nine patients had septic shock on admission with a mortality rate of 62.07%. Hypoxemia, metabolic acidosis and the presence of DIC were more frequent in non-survivors, who also had significantly higher SAPS-II on admission and days 3 and 7. Independent factors associated with mortality were older age, septic shock, DIC and acute renal failure on admission, as well as SAPS-II at all time points and lactic acid levels on day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic patients with advanced age, septic shock, renal failure, DIC and metabolic acidosis on admission are at increased risk of mortality. The sustained presence of high SAPS-II and lactacidemia one week after admission are also important risk factors of poor outcome.

Cost-effectiveness of cefepime + netilmicin or ceftazidime + amikacin or meropenem monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children with malignancy in Turkey

Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children with malignancy. In addition, the economic impact of antibiotic treatment should always be evaluated, especially in developing countries. In our center between January 1998 and January 1999, 73 children with hematological malignancies [acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]; 9 children with solid tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma) had 87 febrile neutropenic episodes (related to chemotherapy). These children were randomized prospectively into three treatment groups. The first group (n: 28) received cefepime plus netilmicin, while the second group (n: 29) was treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and the third (n: 30) with meropenem as monotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the success rates and cost of fourth generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside and monotherapy of meropenem with ceftazidime plus amikacin, which is the standard therapy for febrile neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were 29.9%, clinically documented infections were 9.2% and 60.9% of the febrile neutropenic episodes were considered to be FUO. Gram-positive microorganisms were the most commonly isolated agents from blood cultures [MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in 6 patients and MSSA (Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in 4 patients]. The success rates were 78.5%, 79.3% and 73.3 % for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd groups respectively. In 4 patients (4.5%) fever responded only to amphotericin-B therapy. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment regimens with respect to efficacy, safety and tolerance (chi2 test, p>0.05), but while the third and fourth generation cephalosporins + aminoglycosides were comparable for cost, the monotherapy regimen was the most expensive. The main determining factors for the choice of treatment of febrile neutropenic children, especially in a developing country, are cost, presence of indwelling catheter and the bacterial flora of the unit, as well as efficacy.

Monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is as effective as its combination with an aminoglycoside in treatment of severe generalized peritonitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The Severe Generalized Peritonitis Study Group

In a randomized trial conducted in 35 centers, we compared the clinical efficacy and safety of piperacillin plus tazobactam (TAZ) alone (monotherapy [MT]) versus those of TAZ combined with amikacin (AMK) (combined therapy [CT]) for the treatment of severe generalized peritonitis (SGP). Primary analysis consisted of blind assessment by an independent committee of the failure rate 30 days after the end of treatment in the modified intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (mITT) population. Of the 241 patients with suspected SGP randomized into the study, 227 were eligible for ITT analysis, including 204 (99 in the MT group and 105 in the CT group) with confirmed SGP (mITT population). A total of 159 patients were eligible for per-protocol (PP) analysis. The clinical failure rates were equivalent in the mITT and PP populations (MT versus CT): 56 versus 52%, (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0. 6 to 1.27) for mITT and 49 versus 49% (OR = 1.03, 90% CI = 0.67 to 1. 59) for PP analysis. Mortality rates (ITT population, 19%; PP population, 21%) and overall adverse event rates (ITT population, 55%; PP population, 54%) were also similar. Six patients (three in MT group and three in the CT group) developed acute renal failure. In conclusion, the addition of AMK to TAZ does not seem to be necessary for the treatment of SGP, even after adjustment for the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) and type of SGP.

Strategies for cost-containment: once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer

Administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics as empiric therapy to febrile granulocytopenic patients has become a widely accepted practice. In order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone plus amikacin in single daily doses as empiric treatment for febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer, a retrospective review (January-December 1996) of all febrile episodes at our institution was carried out. Overall, 101 febrile episodes in 89 granulocytopenic children with cancer were empirically treated with a once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin combination. 59/101 (59%) patients had absolute granulocyte count lower than 100/mm3 at entry; 46 (45%) were affected by solid tumors, 16 (15%) by Hodgkin's disease or lymphoma, and 30 (30%) patients underwent bone marrow transplantation. The ceftriaxone plus amikacin combination was effective in 72/101 (72%) patients with a median time to defervescence of 3 days (range, 1-4). We also evaluated the economic advantages of the ceftriaxone plus amikacin once-daily regimen when compared with another treatment regimen such as ceftazidime plus amikacin requiring three daily doses. Compared with the multiple daily dose regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin, there is a cost saving of US $11 (17,500 Italian liras) and US $66 (105,000 Italian liras) for both 1-day and 6-day treatments, respectively, by using the single daily dose regimen of ceftriaxone plus amikacin. The potential of ceftriaxone to lower costs in hospitalized patients depends upon its comparable efficacy with other extended-spectrum beta-lactams, in which case it can reduce overall treatment costs because of its once-daily administration schedule.

Gram-negative bacteremia in non-neutropenic patients: a 3-year review

The causative organisms, clinical manifestations, factors influencing prognosis, and other epidemiological characteristics of 81 episodes of bacteremia due to gram-negative organisms, in non-neutropenic patients, were studied retrospectively during a 3-year period (1992-1994) at the Department of Internal Medicine of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece. The gram-negative bacteremia incidence was 2% and the overall mortality 12%. All 81 patients had fever; Escherichia coli was the most frequent organism isolated (from 47 patients--58%) and was associated with shock (9/47), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (8/47), anuria (5/47), adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (3/47), and pneumonia (1/47). Other less frequent gram-negative microorganisms were Klebsiella spp. (ten patients; 12%), Pseudomonas spp. (7; 7%), Salmonella spp. (5; 6%), Enterobacter spp. (5; 6%), Proteus spp. (3; 3.4%), Stenotrophomonas spp. (3; 3.4%), and Acinetobacter spp. (1; 1.2%). ARDS. shock, DIC, anuria, presence of central venous catheter, urinary catheter, unknown origin of infection and inappropriate treatment were significantly associated with a higher death rate. Early initiation of appropriate therapy was the most important intervention that favorably affected the outcome of gram-negative bacteremias in this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily amikacin in combination with ceftazidime in critically ill adults with severe gram-negative infections

Forty critically ill adult patients with severe Gram-negative infection were treated with once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime. The mean age was 56.6 +/- 19 years and mean APACHE II score was 22.7 +/- 6.6. Forty percent of patients required mechanical ventilation. The mean creatinine clearance at onset of therapy was 59.4 +/- 28 ml/min. All bacterial isolates were sensitive to amikacin. Fixed doses of amikacin 15 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, and 8 mg/kg body weight were given once daily to patients with estimated creatinine clearance of > 80 ml/min., 50-80 ml/min., and < 50 ml/min, respectively. Forty-two causative gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 40 patients. The most common bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18), and Escherichia coli (10). Overall clinical success and bacteriological eradication occurred in 85% and 87.5% of patients; 78.9% and 79% of patients with hospital-acquired infections; 90.5% and 95.2% of patients with community-acquired infections; and 62.5% and 81.3% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, respectively. Therapeutic failure was documented in 15% of patients. Death due to infection was scored in two patients. The remaining were all due to persistence of the initial causative bacteria in patients with hospital-acquired infections. Persistence was documented with Ps. aeruginosa (2), Serratia spp. (1), and Acinetobacter spp. (1). Overall mortality occurred in 22.5% patients. Death unrelated to infection occurred in 7 patients. There was no clinical evidence of ototoxicity in any of our patients, however, nephrotoxicity was documented in 5%. In conclusion, once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime is practical, efficacious and probably safe in critically ill infected patients.

Clinical applications of a new parenteral antibiotic in the treatment of severe bacterial infections

Cephalosporins are one of the mainstays of antibiotic therapy, and third-generation cephalosporins are first-line agents for the treatment of many types of serious infections, including those of nosocomial origin. Gaps in activity of currently available third-generation cephalosporins such as cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime, and increasing reports of gram-negative bacilli resistance to some of these agents, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp., make it necessary to investigate new compounds. Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a wide range of activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including multi-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, was evaluated in comparison with ceftazidime for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients. Ceftazidime is a commonly prescribed third-generation cephalosporin used for empiric treatment of serious infections such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and skin and skin-structure infection. This investigation was an open, randomized comparative study involving 882 patients in North America. Cefepime 2 g every 12 hours demonstrated similar efficacy to that of ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hours for the treatment of pneumonia and urinary tract infection (including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia), and skin and skin-structure infections. The bacteriologic responses were generally >85%. The most common pathogens isolated were Escherichia coll, Streptococcus pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus, group B. Overall, approximately 94% of pathogens isolated in pretreatment cultures were susceptible to cefepime and ceftazidime. Cefepime and ceftazidime were well tolerated; only 3% of patients in each group discontinued therapy because of an adverse event. The most common adverse events were headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and rash. The results of this study indicate that cefepime is a promising, effective, and safe single-agent therapy for serious infections in hospitalized patients.

An anti-idiotype antibody which mimics the inner-core region of lipopolysaccharide protects mice against a lethal challenge with endotoxin

Recently, we described the generation and characterization of an Armenian hamster Ab2 beta anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody (MAb4G2) specific for the binding site of a mouse monoclonal antibody, MAbY1-4A6, directed against the conserved 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonate (Kdo)-containing inner-core region of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (S. K. Field, M. Pollack, and D. C. Morrison, Microb. Pathog. 15:103-120, 1993). In that study, mice and hamster immunized with MAb4G2 generated serum immunoglobulin G and M (IgG and IgM) antibodies which cross-react with Salmonella minnesota R595-chemotype rough mutant LPS (Re-LPS). In this report, we demonstrate that in C3Heb/FeJ mice, MAb4G2 elicits an immune response which is characterized by specific binding of antibody to Re-LPS, as assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The practical use of MAb4G2 as a potentially effective therapeutic agent against gram-negative bacterial sepsis is suggested by the demonstration that immunization of these mice with MAb4G2 results in significant protection of D-galactosamine-sensitized animals against an otherwise lethal dose of Re-LPS. Assessment of the temporal changes in Re-LPS-specific serum antibody titers from mice immunized with MAb4G2 or Re-LPS over a 40-day period indicates that immunization with Re-LPS elicits significantly higher titers of serum IgM antibodies compared with those in animals immunized with MAb4G2. Conversely, two immunizations with MAb4G2 result in an up to 10-fold increase in anti-Re-LPS-specific IgG serum antibody titers relative to those obtained in mice immunized with Re-LPS. Nineteen days after the secondary boost with MAb4G2, anti-Re-LPS-specific IgG serum antibody titers were significantly higher (three- to fourfold) compared with those in Re-LPS-treated animals. Initial immunization with the anti-idiotype antibody primes animals for enhanced secondary responses to Re-LPS, as assessed by the titers of anti-Re-LPS-specific IgG profiles. These data suggest the potential utility of MAb4G2 as a candidate vaccine against the lethal properties of gram-negative bacterial LPS.

Economic study of neutropenia induced by myelotoxic chemotherapy

This article describes the economic and social impact of neutropenia induced by myelotoxic chemotherapy in patients with cancer during the period 1 January-31 December 1991. Neutropenia is a life-threatening complication of chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The episodes of fever and infections originating from neutropenia require hospitalization of the patient until the granulocyte levels are restored. The calculation of the economic cost was based on the following parameters: length of stay in hospital, analytical tests performed on the patient, type and cost of drug therapy administered, blood transfusions performed, health assistance received, cost of isolation and absence from work. The overall economic cost of neutropenia in patients with cancer reached 329,775 pesetas ($2,893). Cost of the health-care staff was the largest budget item in relation to the total health resources estimated.