Soft-tissue disorders of the ankle: a comprehensive arthroscopic approach

Arthroscopic four-step treatment for chronic ankle instability

BACKGROUND

Chronic lateral ankle instability is a condition of perception of giving way and persistent pain usually following multiple ankle sprains. Open reconstructive procedures carry the disadvantages of subtalar joint stiffness and potential morbidity at the harvesting site. Recently, arthroscopic treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability has been proposed in order to minimize invasiveness, reduce operating time, and allow a faster rehabilitation period. The purpose of our paper was to assess the outcomes in terms of postoperative recovery and return to sport following arthroscopic reconstruction of lateral ankle instability.

METHODS

Ninety patients with chronic lateral ankle instability were treated at our Department from 2004 to 2009. Mean age was 32.4 (range, 17 to 56) years. All patients underwent a four-step operative procedure, including: synovectomy, debridement of ATFL lesion borders, capsular shrinkage, and 21-day immobilization and nonweightbearing.

RESULTS

Followup examination at an average of 4~years after surgery showed significant improvement of mean AOFAS scale (preoperative, 63.5; postoperative, 92.3; p < 0.001) and average Karlsson score (preoperative, 61.8; postoperative, 88.4; p < 0.001). Mean Tegner rating changed from 3.6 preoperatively to 4.9 at followup (p < 0.001). Articular stability as assessed by Sefton scale significantly improved from a preoperative value of 4.0 to 1.8 (p < 0.001). Most patients (96.6%) rated the success of their surgery as good to excellent.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, we propose arthroscopic treatment as a suitable option for moderate chronic ankle joint laxity in patients with a complete ATFL lesion.

A Novel Endoscopic Technique in Treating Single Nerve Entrapment Syndromes with Special Attention to Ulnar Nerve Transposition and Tarsal Tunnel Release: Clinical Application

OBJECTIVE:

To describe a simple retractor integrated endoscopic technique for treating idiopathic solitary compression neuropathies with special attention to the anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve and tarsal tunnel release, and to present the clinical results.

METHODS:

Eleven patients with ulnar sulcus syndrome, eight with tarsal tunnel syndrome, and one with meralgia paraesthetica (seven females and 13 males; age range, 12–64 yr) were treated with endoscopic anterior ulnar nerve transposition and in situ decompression of the tibial (eight patients) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves (one patient), respectively. The selection criteria were: classical nerve compression symptoms, failed conservative treatment, abnormal electrophysiology, and a nonviolated anatomic region. The degree of nerve compression (after Dellon) was rated as moderate in five out of 20 patients and as severe in 15 out of 20 patients. Electrophysiological studies were conducted independently by physicians specializing in these techniques. Postoperative recovery was evaluated according to the nine-point Bishop rating system.

RESULTS:

Of the 11 patients with anterior ulnar nerve transposition, seven scored excellent, three scored good, and one scored fair (mean follow-up, 15.5 mo; range, 6–27 mo). Five patients with tarsal tunnel release scored excellent and three scored good (mean follow-up, 10.1 mo; range, 3–24 mo). The patient with meralgia paraesthetica showed an excellent score at 28 months after surgery. There were no technical or postoperative complications. None of the operations had to be converted to open surgery.

CONCLUSION:

We describe a new endoscopic technique for transposing the ulnar nerve and decompressing the tibial nerve. This technique could be extrapolated to release other single nerve entrapments. The simplicity of the technique, and our preliminary clinical results, may encourage other groups to adapt this method.

Endoscopic Exploration of the Brachial Plexus: Technique and Topographic Anatomy—A Study in Fresh Human Cadavers

OBJECTIVE

The indications for and timing of brachial plexus exploration in closed injuries are controversial. The time-consuming surgery proves its worth in some cases, whereas spontaneous regeneration might have been possible in others. The differentiation is difficult, because no investigational method reveals the exact morphological correlates of the nerve lesions. Minimally invasive, direct observation of the structures is a possible solution. Here we describe our surgical technique and the anatomic features of the normal brachial plexus appreciated with the endoscope.

METHODS

Twenty-one brachial plexus in 11 fresh cadavers were investigated. Endoscopic exploration was performed at the supraclavicular and infraclavicular levels. The method involves insertion of an optic shaft-integrated retractor through a stab wound; retraction of landmark muscles produces a working space, into which other instruments are introduced for dissection. After completion of endoscopic surgery, open dissection was performed to verify the endoscopically identified structures and to assess iatrogenic injuries.

RESULTS

The omohyoid muscle is a reliable landmark in the supraclavicular region, beneath which the suprascapular nerve can be observed. Following the suprascapular nerve proximally leads to the plexus trunks. Infraclavicular exploration first reveals the axillary artery. The plexus and its nerves are traced around this artery. The anatomic features were constant in all cases, with variations in fat accumulation depending on the corporeal constitution. We detected iatrogenic injuries to the medial circumflex humeral vessels in two cases. No nerve injuries were observed.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic technique combined with intraoperative nerve stimulation studies might provide important information on the type of morphological damage in closed brachial plexus injuries and thus might become an important tool for determination of the surgical treatment strategy. Clinical work is under way.