Will a handheld ultrasound scanner be applicable for screening for heart abnormalities in newborns and children?

Utility of expert focused cardiac ultrasound in paediatric cardiology outreach clinics

OBJECTIVE

This prospective observational study evaluates the utility of expert focused cardiac ultrasound (eFCU) with spectral Doppler to inform decision making in established patients with specific, selected congenital cardiac defects in outreach clinics. Secondary objectives include determining if the addition of eFCU expands capacity in paediatric cardiology outreach clinics and if it improves the patient experience.

METHODS

Patients aged 2 months to 19 years old with a diagnosis of ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, atrioventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, aortic valve stenosis, or pulmonary valve stenosis with the need for follow-up echocardiography in an outreach clinic from August 2017 to June 2018 were studied. A novel assessment tool was used to determine the success of eFCU.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients from 11 clinics underwent eFCU with one unsuccessful exam making the failure rate 2.3% (95% CI 0.0006-0.1256). Addition of eFCU led to a significant increase in volume of patients able to be seen 19 versus 15.5 (p < 0.01). A majority of parents/patients reported a positive experience with eFCU.

CONCLUSION

Expert focused cardiac ultrasound with spectral Doppler can be used successfully for follow-up in patients with select CHD and the addition of eFCU permits increased patient capacity in outreach clinics and has the potential to improve the patient experience.

Clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of palm-held, mini-sized ultrasonocardiographic scanner in congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To investigate whether a palm-held ultrasonocardiographic scanner would be useful for screening and follow-up in congenital heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiographic images from June 1, 2014 to November 1, 2014. All patients underwent two ultrasonographic examinations including palm-held scanner examination and standard echocardiography. To compare the quality of the two instruments, we developed a diagnostic scoring system ranging from 1 point to 10 points, with 10 points indicating the best quality. Two experienced echocardiographers retrospectively reviewed all recorded images blindedly and gave each examination a score. Comparisons of diagnostic score between two equipments were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 262 patients' images were reviewed. All cardiac lesions could be detected with both instruments. The mean diagnostic score of palm-held scanner and standard echocardiography were 8.20±0.53 versus 9.64±0.37 (p<0.05) in color image and 7.00±1.05 versus 8.56±1.14 (p<0.05) in gray-scale two-dimensional image, respectively. When we compared the score between the two instruments in individual CHDs, we found standard echocardiography had better quality except for detecting muscular ventricular septal defect and pulmonary regurgitation.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic sensitivity of palm-held scanner in detecting CHD was very good. Despite both instruments having a high diagnostic score in detecting CHD, standard echocardiography had better quality. Traditional echocardiography is still the standard tool for CHD evaluation. However, the palm-held scanner can support physical examination for initial screening and follow-up, and offer cardiologists an opportunity to visualize and listen to the heart at any time.

Pocket echocardiography system for detection of patent ductus arteriosus in neonates

BACKGROUND

Neonates are commonly referred for a cardiology consult and an echocardiogram to rule out patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the usefulness of current pocket echocardiography system (PES) in PDA detection compared to traditional full-featured echo system (FFES).

HYPOTHESIS

The determination of the presence of a PDA in neonates can be done using PES.

METHODS

Fifty newborns with orders for echo evaluation were included in this study. A 5-minute PES scan was performed first. Then a full echo study was performed on a traditional FFES. Images were evaluated by three pediatric cardiologists blinded to the patients and the FFES results.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of reviewers rating PES versus FFES to rule in PDA had low false-positive rates 9.5% (95% CI: 1.2-30%), 11.8% (95% CI: 1.5-36%), 11.1% (95% CI: 1.4-35%) and the false-negative rate to rule out PDA was 0% (95% CI: 0-18%), 5.5% (95% CI: 0.14-27%), 0% (95% CI: 0-26%) for each reviewer 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Upon further analysis, PES scan was shown not to be accurate on infants with body weight below 1000 g with encouraging results for infants above 1000 g and those >37 weeks gestational age.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the current PES could potentially be used in larger and near-term infants but has less than acceptable performance in low birth weight and premature infants in determining who should undergo a FFES study for persistent PDA diagnosis. Improvements in the technology along with developing limited training protocols for noncardiology personnel should make it possible for PES scan to be used as a screening tool and as an extension of physical examination especially in limited resource settings.

Diagnosis of patent ductus arteriosus by a neonatologist with a compact, portable ultrasound machine

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a pilot study assessing a neonatologist's accuracy in diagnosing patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) using compact, portable ultrasound after limited training.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of premature infants scheduled for echocardiography for suspected PDA. A neonatologist with limited training performed study exams before scheduled exams. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, compared to the scheduled echocardiogram interpreted by a cardiologist.

RESULTS

There were 24 exams. Compared to the scheduled exam, the neonatologist's exam had sensitivity 69% (95% confidence interval (CI), 41 to 89%) and specificity 88% (95% CI, 47 to 99%). When a cardiologist interpreted the study exams, the sensitivity was 87% (95% CI, 60 to 98%) and specificity 71% (95% CI, 29 to 96%).

CONCLUSION

A neonatologist with limited training was able to detect PDA with moderate success. A more rigorous training process or real-time transmission with cardiologist interpretation may substantially improve accuracy. Institutions with experienced technicians and on-site pediatric cardiologists may not gain from intensive training of neonatologists, but hospitals where diagnosis and treatment of PDA would be delayed may benefit from such processes.

Use of a hand-carried ultrasound device by critical care physicians for the diagnosis of pericardial effusions, decreased cardiac function, and left ventricular enlargement in pediatric patients

Prompt diagnosis of children with suggested cardiac disease in the acute care setting is critical for initiation of life-saving therapy. We hypothesized that pediatric critical care physicians could perform limited portable echocardiography in children. Portable hand-carried cardiac ultrasound units with 2.5-MHz phased-array transducers were used (Optigo, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Mass). Noncardiologists were trained through a 1-hour introductory course and 2 hours of practical training. Portable echocardiography performed by noncardiologists was compared with a standard echocardiogram for diagnostic accuracy. In all, 23 patients (age 3 months-20 years) were screened during 18 months. The presence or absence of a pericardial effusion was correctly diagnosed in 21 of 23 patients (91%). Left ventricular size was correctly determined in 22 of 23 patients (96%). Left ventricular systolic function was correctly diagnosed in 22 of 23 patients (96%). These results show that, with appropriate instruction, pediatric critical care physicians are effective using limited portable echocardiography.