Three-dimensional echocardiography: limitations of apical biplane imaging for measurement of left ventricular volume

Pulmonary transit time measurement by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in left ventricular dyssynchrony

Background

Pulmonary transit time (PTT) is an indirect measure of preload and left ventricular function, which can be estimated using the indicator dilution theory by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In this study, we first assessed the accuracy of PTT-CEUS by comparing it with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Secondly, we tested the hypothesis that PTT-CEUS correlates with the severity of heart failure, assessed by MRI and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

Methods and results

Twenty patients referred to our hospital for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were enrolled. DCE-MRI, CEUS, and NT-proBNP measurements were performed within an hour. Mean transit time (MTT) was obtained by estimating the time evolution of indicator concentration within regions of interest drawn in the right and left ventricles in video loops of DCE-MRI and CEUS. PTT was estimated as the difference of the left and right ventricular MTT. Normalized PTT (nPTT) was obtained by multiplication of PTT with the heart rate. Mean PTT-CEUS was 10.5±2.4s and PTT-DCE-MRI was 10.4±2.0s (P=0.88). The correlations of PTT and nPTT by CEUS and DCE-MRI were strong; r=0.75 (P=0.0001) and r=0.76 (P=0.0001), respectively. Bland–Altman analysis revealed a bias of 0.1s for PTT. nPTT-CEUS correlated moderately with left ventricle volumes. The correlations for PTT-CEUS and nPTT-CEUS were moderate to strong with NT-proBNP; r=0.54 (P=0.022) and r=0.68 (P=0.002), respectively.

Conclusions

(n)PTT-CEUS showed strong agreement with that by DCE-MRI. Given the good correlation with NT-proBNP level, (n)PTT-CEUS may provide a novel, clinically feasible measure to quantify the severity of heart failure.

Clinical Trial Registry: NCT01735838

From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment

Ultrasound is a ubiquitous and versatile diagnostic tool. In the setting of acute injury, ultrasound enhances the basic trauma evaluation, influences bedside decision-making, and helps determine whether or not an unstable patient requires emergent procedural intervention. Consequently, continued education of surgeons and other acute care practitioners in performing focused emergency ultrasound is of great importance. This article provides a synopsis of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and the extended FAST (E-FAST) that incorporates basic thoracic injury assessment. The authors also review key pitfalls, limitations, controversies, and advances related to FAST, E-FAST, and ultrasound education.

Clinical application of three-dimensional echocardiography

Echocardiography is one of the most valuable diagnostic tools in cardiology. Technological advances in ultrasound, computer and electronics enables three-dimensional (3-D) imaging to be a clinically viable modality which has significant impact on diagnosis, management and interventional procedures. Since the inception of 3D fully-sampled matrix transthoracic and transesophageal technology it has enabled easier acquisition, immediate on-line display, and availability of on-line analysis for the left ventricle, right ventricle and mitral valve. The use of 3D TTE has mainly focused on mitral valve disease, left and right ventricular volume and functional analysis. As structural heart disease procedures become more prevalent, 3D TEE has become a requirement for preparation of the procedure, intra-procedural guidance as well as monitoring for complications and device function. We anticipate that there will be further software development, improvement in image quality and workflow.

Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function by cine-MR imaging depending on the investigator's experience

AIMS

To analyze the reproducibility of LV volumes calculated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) and to compare them to those obtained by conventional ventriculography.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were prospectively included. Each underwent CMRI twice and ventriculography. Left ventricular end diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV) and LV ejection fraction (EF) were calculated by two radiologists at different level of experience. Intraobserver, interobserver and interstudy variabilities were assessed.

RESULTS

The cut off values were: intraobserver variability (EDV, ESV, EF): 9.4 ml, 5.3 ml, 3.3% for well-trained radiologist; 13.1 ml, 7.5 ml, 4.1% for less-trained radiologist. interobserver variability: EDV: 11.7 and 10.4 ml; ESV: 7.0 and 6.6 ml; EF: 3.9 and 4.2%. interstudy variability (EDV, ESV, EF): 11.6 and 12.6 ml, 7.1 and 7.4 ml, 3.9 and 3.5%, for experienced and less-trained observers. Statistical differences were found between CMRI and ventriculography: CMRI underestimation of EDV and EF, overestimation of ESV.

CONCLUSIONS

CMRI volumetric quantification of LV volumes and function is highly reproducible at different levels of experience, but not interchangeable with those obtained by ventriculography.

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: an update

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is the only on-line 3D method based on real-time volumetric scanning, as compared with other 3D imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, which are based on post-acquisition reconstruction and not on volumetric scanning. In recent years, several studies have revealed possible advantages of 3DE in daily clinical practice. The aim of this manuscript is to give a brief review of the development of the clinical applications of RT3DE.

How many planes are required to get an accurate and timesaving measurement of left ventricular volume and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction?

To derive the optimal cutting planes of real-time 3-D echocardiography (RT-3DE) for measuring left ventricular volume and ejection fraction (EF) in the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities, 14 open-chest dogs were studied with RT-3DE full volume imaging and 2-D echocardiography (2DE) after left anterior descending coronary arteries were occluded for 90 min. Left ventricular end diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV) and EF were measured off-line with 2DE and RT-3DE (2-, 4- and 8-plane) methods. The autopsy EDV was estimated by the volume of saline solution injected into the excised heart and served as the reference volume (RefV) for comparison with EDV measured by 2DE and RT-3DE. Agreement analysis was performed according to the method of Bland and Altman. There were excellent correlations between 2DE, RT-3DE (2-plane) and RT-3DE (4-plane) methods on one hand, and RT-3DE (8-plane) method on the other in the measurements of EDV, ESV and SV (r = 0.84-0.99). However, 2DE and RT-3DE (2-plane) measurements significantly underestimated RT-3DE (8-plane) (p < 0.01), whereas no significant differences between RT-3DE (4-plane) and RT-3DE (8-plane) were found in terms of EDV, ESV and SV measurements. The values of EF determined by 2DE, RT-3DE (2-plane) and RT-3DE (4-plane) methods correlated highly with that by RT-3DE (8-plane) (r = 0.82-0.98) and there was no significant difference between the two measurements. EDV values determined by 2DE, RT-3DE (2-plane), RT-3DE (4-plane) and RT-3DE (8-plane) correlated highly with RefV (r = 0.84, r = 0.92, r = 0.94 and r = 0.97, respectively) and there was no significant difference between RefV and EDV by RT-3DE (4-plane) and RT-3DE (8-plane). In contrast, EDV measured by 2DE and RT-3DE (2-plane) methods underestimated RefV significantly (p < 0.01). In conclusion, RT-3DE allows reliable and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and EF, even in the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities. RT-3DE (4-plane) is the method of choice for an accurate and timesaving quantification of left ventricular volume and function.

Real-time Simultaneous Triplane Contrast Echocardiography Gives Rapid, Accurate, and Reproducible Assessment of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of simultaneous triplane echocardiography for measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) with reference to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Digital echocardiography recordings of apical LV views with and without intravenous contrast were collected from 53 consecutive patients with conventional 2-dimensional (2D) imaging and with simultaneous triplane imaging. MRI of multiple LV short-axis sections was performed with a 1.5-T scanner. Endocardial borders were manually traced, and LV volumes and EF from 2D biplane echocardiography and MRI were calculated by method of disks. On triplane data, a triangular mesh was constructed by 3-dimensional interpolation and volumes calculated by the divergence theorem.

RESULTS

Triplane image acquisition was less time-consuming than 2D biplane. Precontrast feasibility was 72% for triplane and 82% for 2D biplane images, increasing to 98% and 100% with contrast, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated LV volume underestimation by echocardiography versus MRI, which was significantly reduced by contrast and triplane imaging. The 95% limits of agreement for EF between echocardiography and MRI narrowed using triplane compared with 2D biplane (precontrast -12.5 to 6.7% vs -17.2 to 9.9%, and with contrast -7.1 to 5.8% vs -9.4 to 6.4%, respectively). At intraobserver and interobserver analysis of 20 patients, limits of agreement for EF narrowed with contrast triplane compared with 2D biplane.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous LV triplane imaging is feasible with simple and rapid image acquisition and volume analysis, and with contrast enhancement it gives accurate and reproducible LV EF measurements compared with MRI.

Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Over the past 3 decades, echocardiography has become a major diagnostic tool in the arsenal of clinical cardiology for real-time imaging of cardiac dynamics. More and more, cardiologists' decisions are based on images created from ultrasound wave reflections. From the time ultrasound imaging technology provided the first insight into the human heart, our diagnostic capabilities have increased exponentially as a result of our growing knowledge and developing technology. One of the most significant developments of the last decades was the introduction of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging and its evolution from slow and labor-intense off-line reconstruction to real-time volumetric imaging. While continuing its meteoric rise instigated by constant technological refinements and continuing increase in computing power, this tool is guaranteed to be integrated in routine clinical practice. The major proven advantage of this technique is the improvement in the accuracy of the echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac chamber volumes, which is achieved by eliminating the need for geometric modeling and the errors caused by foreshortened views. Another benefit of 3D imaging is the realistic and unique comprehensive views of cardiac valves and congenital abnormalities. In addition, 3D imaging is extremely useful in the intraoperative and postoperative settings because it allows immediate feedback on the effectiveness of surgical interventions. In this article, we review the published reports that have provided the scientific basis for the clinical use of 3D ultrasound imaging of the heart and discuss its potential future applications.

Ventricular Volume and Length in Hypertensive Diastolic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with diastolic heart failure are thought to have a normal or small ventricle with impaired ventricular filling that requires increased filling pressure to maintain normal stroke volume. In this study we test the hypothesis that patients with hypertensive diastolic heart failure have increased left ventricular volumes compared with age-, sex-, and body size-matched control subjects.

METHOD

Left ventricular chordal dimensions from 2-dimensional echocardiography and volumes from 3-dimensional echocardiography were obtained in control subjects (n = 96) and patients with hypertensive diastolic heart failure (n = 28) and compared before and after controlling for age, sex, and body size.

RESULTS

Volumes by 3-dimensional echocardiography were significantly larger in the heart failure group than in the control group (P < .05). After matching for age, sex, and body size, volumes remained significantly larger in the patients with heart failure (P < .05). Chordal dimensions were not significantly different between the two groups. Stroke volume and centerline length of the ventricle were significantly increased in the heart failure group compared with matched control subjects (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our group of patients with hypertensive diastolic heart failure had significantly increased left ventricular volumes and stroke volume compared with control subjects, compatible with volume overload heart failure. Two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of the ventricular chordal dimension failed to detect this enlargement. Ventricular length appeared to be preferentially increased in the patients with hypertensive diastolic heart failure.

Choosing Apical Long-axis Instead of Two-chamber View Gives More Accurate Biplane Echocardiographic Measurements of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate whether the use of apical long-axis (APLAX) rather than two-chamber (2CH) view, in combination with four-chamber (4CH) view, improved accuracy of biplane echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive cardiac patients underwent cardiac MRI and 2D-echocardiography. Standard apical LV views were digitally acquired with baseline tissue harmonic imaging and low-power contrast echocardiography. Echo and MRI LV volumes were calculated by manual tracing and disc summation methods.

RESULTS

Feasiblity for biplane volume measurements increased with the use of APLAX. Precontrast limits of agreement (LOA) for EF compared to MRI were -19.1 to 9.0 % (EF units) using 2CH, narrowing to -14.6 to 6.7% using the APLAX. With contrast, corresponding LOAs narrowed from -10.5 to 6.1%, to -7.3 to 3.8%, respectively. The improved accuracy with APLAX was evident regardless of image quality, previous MI and regional LV dyssynergy. Both intra- and interobserver variability improved by substituting 2CH with APLAX view.

CONCLUSION

Using APLAX rather than 2CH in combination with 4CH view improved feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility of biplane echocardiographic EF measurements in cardiac patients, even with optimisation of endocardial borders by contrast.

Freehand Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Rotational Scanning for Measurements of Left Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Measurement of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) is important in managing patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Introduction of free-hand three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) system which is equipped with small magnetic tracking system and average rotational geometry for LV volumes may provide easy and accurate quantification of LV systolic function in CAD patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of LV volumes and EF measurement by free-hand 3DE with rotational geometry in patients with CAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study subjects consisted of consecutive 25 patients with CAD who were scheduled for quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography (QGS). LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF were determined by conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), 3DE, and QGS. Three-dimensional echocardiography data acquisition and analysis were possible in 22 of 25 subjects (feasibility 88%). In this 3DE system, image acquisition time was 2 minutes, and 5 minutes were needed for off-line analysis of LV volumes and EF. Correlations and the limits of agreement between 3DE and QGS (r = 0.97, 0.0 +/- 9.1 ml for EDV, r = 0.99, 0.0 +/- 5.0 ml for ESV, and r = 0.97, 0.5 +/- 3.3% for EF, respectively) were superior to those between 2DE and QGS (r = 0.85, 12.6 +/- 26.8 ml for EDV, r = 0.85, 9.7 +/- 26.1 ml for ESV, and r = 0.90, -1.3 +/- 6.9% for EF, respectively). Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of 3DE were smaller than that of 2DE (5% vs 10%, 5% vs 10% for EDV, 6% vs 13%, 5% vs 9% for ESV, and 4% vs 11%, 4% vs 6% for EF, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional echocardiography using magnetic tracking system and average rotational geometry offered a feasible and accurate method for quantification of LV volumes and EF in patients with CAD.

Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of contrast echocardiography versus tissue harmonic imaging for measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Digital echo recordings of apical LV views before and after intravenous contrast were collected from 110 consecutive patients. Magnetic resonance imaging of multiple short-axis LV sections was performed with a 1.5-T scanner. Left ventricular volumes and EF were calculated offline by method of discs. Thirty randomly selected patients were reanalyzed for intraobserver and interobserver variability.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, contrast echo increased feasibility for single-plane and biplane volume analysis from 87% to 100% and from 79% to 95%, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated volume underestimation by echo, but much less pronounced with contrast. Limits of agreement between echo and MRI narrowed significantly with contrast: from -18.1% to 8.3% to -7.7% to 4.1% (EF), from -98.2 to -11.7 ml to -59.0 to 10.7 ml (end-diastolic volume), and from -58.8 to 21.8 ml to -38.6 to 23.9 ml (end-systolic volume). Ejection fraction from precontrast echo and MRI differed by > or =10% (EF units) in 23 patients versus 0 after contrast (p < 0.001). At intraobserver and interobserver analysis, limits of agreement for EF narrowed significantly with contrast.

CONCLUSIONS

The two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of LV volumes and EF in non-selected cardiac patients was found to be more accurate and reproducible when adding an intravenous contrast agent.

Three-dimensional visual guidance improves the accuracy of calculating right ventricular volume with two-dimensional echocardiography

Three-dimensional guidance programs have been shown to increase the reproducibility of 2-dimensional (2D) left ventricular volume calculations, but these systems have not been tested in 2D measurements of the right ventricle. Using magnetic fields to identify the probe location, we developed a new 3-dimensional guidance system that displays the line of intersection, the plane of intersection, and the numeric angle of intersection between the current image plane and previously saved scout views. When used by both an experienced and an inexperienced sonographer, this guidance system increases the accuracy of the 2D right ventricular volume measurements using a monoplane pyramidal model. Furthermore, a reconstruction of the right ventricle, with a computed volume similar to the calculated 2D volume, can be displayed quickly by tracing a few anatomic structures on 2D scans.

Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to validate 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for assessment of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume, and ejection fraction (EF) using the freehand-acquisition method. Furthermore, LV volumes by breath hold-versus free breathing-3DE acquisition were assessed and compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

From the apical position, a fan-like 3DE image was acquired during free breathing and another, thereafter, during breath hold. In 27 patients, 28 breath hold- and 24 free breathing-3DE images were acquired. A total of 17 patients underwent both MRI and 3DE. MRI contours were traced along the outer endocardial contour, including trabeculae, and along the inner endocardial contour, excluding trabeculae, from the LV volume.

RESULTS

All 28 (100%) breath hold- and 86% of free breathing-3DE acquisitions could be analyzed. Intraobserver variation (percentual bias +/- 2 SD) of end-diastolic volume, ESV, stroke volume, and EF for breath-hold 3DE was, respectively, 0.3 +/- 10.2%, 0.3 +/- 14.6%, 0.1 +/- 18.4%, and -0.1 +/- 5.8%. For free-breathing 3DE, findings were similar. A significantly better interobserver variability, however, was observed for breath-hold 3DE for ESV and EF. Comparison of breath-hold 3DE with MRI inner contour showed for end-diastolic volume, ESV, stroke volume, and EF, a percentual bias (+/- 2 SD) of, respectively, -13.5 +/- 26.9%, -17.7 +/- 47.8%, -10.6 +/- 43.6%, and -1.8 +/- 11.6%. Compared with the MRI outer contour, a significantly greater difference was observed, except for EF.

CONCLUSIONS

3DE using the freehand method is fast and highly reproducible for (serial) LV volume and EF measurement, and, hence, ideally suited for clinical decision making and trials. Breath-hold 3DE is superior to free-breathing 3DE regarding image quality and reproducibility. Compared with MRI, 3DE underestimates LV volumes, but not EF, which is mainly explained by differences in endocardial contour tracing by MRI (outer contour) and 3DE (inner contour) of the trabecularized endocardium. Underestimation is reduced when breath-hold 3DE is compared with inner contour analysis of the MRI dataset.

Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional echocardiographic determinations in man

This study was performed to compare a novel three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) system to clinical two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for determination of left ventricular mass (LVM) in humans. LVM is an independent predictor of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography is the most widely used clinical method for assessment of LVM, as it is non-invasive, portable and relatively inexpensive. However, when measuring LVM, 2DE is limited by assumptions about ventricular shape which do not affect 3D echo.

METHODS

A total of 25 unselected patients underwent 3DE, 2DE and MRI. Three-dimensional echo used a magnetic scanhead tracker allowing unrestricted selection and combination of images from multiple acoustic windows. Mass by quantitative 2DE was assessed using seven different geometric formulas.

RESULTS

LVM by MRI ranged from 91 to 316 g. There was excellent agreement between 3DE and MRI (r = 0.99, SEE = 6.9 g). Quantitative 2D methods correlated well with but underestimated MRI (r = 0.84-0.92) with SEEs over threefold greater (22.5-30.8 g). Interobserver variation was 7.6% for 3DE vs. 17.7% for 2DE.

CONCLUSIONS

LVM in humans can be measured accurately, relative to MRI, by transthoracic 3D echo using magnetic tracking. Compared to 2D echo, 3D echocardiography significantly improves accuracy and reproducibility.

Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the concordance between biplane and volumetric echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strategies and their impact on the classification of patients according to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF).

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography and MRI are noninvasive imaging modalities well suited for serial evaluation of LV volume and LVEF. Despite the accuracy and reproducibility of volumetric methods, quantitative biplane methods are commonly used, as they minimize both scanning and analysis times.

METHODS

Thirty-five adult subjects, including 25 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies, were evaluated by biplane and volumetric (cardiac short-axis stack) cine MRI and by biplane and volumetric (three-dimensional) transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricular volume, LVEF and LV function categories (LVEF > or =55%, >35% to <55% and < or =35%) were then determined.

RESULTS

Biplane echocardiography underestimated LV volume with respect to the other three strategies (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between any of the strategies for quantitative LVEF. Volumetric MRI and volumetric echocardiography differed by a single functional category for 2 patients (8%). Six to 11 patients (24% to 44%) differed when comparing biplane and volumetric methods. Ten patients (40%) changed their functional status when biplane MRI and biplane echocardiography were compared; this comparison also revealed the greatest mean absolute difference in estimates of EF for those subjects whose EF functional category had changed.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric MRI and volumetric echocardiographic measures of LV volume and LVEF agree well and give similar results when used to stratify patients with dilated cardiomyopathy according to systolic function. Agreement is poor between biplane and volumetric methods and worse between biplane methods, which assigned 40% of patients to different categories according to LVEF. The choice of imaging method (volumetric or biplane) has a greater impact on the results than does the choice of imaging modality (echocardiography or MRI) when measuring LV volume and systolic function.

Three-dimensional echocardiography improves accuracy and compensates for sonographer inexperience in assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction

This study was performed to determine whether 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) with a magnetic tracking system for image plane localization, which unlike standard 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), does not require acquisition of specific image planes or "standard views" for quantitative measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction (EF), could compensate for sonographer inexperience. Eight adults underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning; they also had 2DE and 3DE performed by 2 experienced and 3 novice sonographers. Data were analyzed by a single expert reader blinded to patient and sonographer identity. Linear regression of MRI EF (reference standard) against echocardiographic EF yielded the following results, where RD indicates the residual difference between measured MRI values and those predicted using echocardiographic results: expert 3DE: r = 0.97, RD = 2.4%, and r = 0.96, RD = 2.8%; novice 3DE: r = 0. 83, RD = 5.1%, to r = 0.95, RD = 4.8%; expert 2DE: r = 0.85, RD = 4. 8%, and r = 0.86, RD = 4.9%; and novice 2DE: r = 0.34, RD = 11.7%, to r = 0.69, RD = 6.6%. Comparison of error variances indicated that novices who used 3DE equaled the performance of experts who used 2DE, although experts were always more accurate than novices when both used the same echocardiographic method (3DE vs 3DE, 2DE vs 2DE). In a comparison of methods, 3DE was always superior to 2DE, regardless of sonographer experience. Three-dimensional echocardiography allows even novice sonographers to obtain diagnostic-quality data sets, which they were unable to accomplish with 2DE. These results suggest that scanning with 3DE, combined with remote expert interpretation, may be useful in providing echocardiographic services in regions where they are presently unavailable.