Outpatient transesophageal echocardiography with intravenous propofol anesthesia in children and adolescents

Feasibility of clinical hypnosis for transesophageal echocardiography in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

The use of hypnosis in children has been described more than two centuries ago, with a more recent research and clinical application. There is currently a good level of evidence for the efficacy of clinical hypnosis in children for minor surgery, medical procedures or pain management. The use of clinical hypnosis, in paediatric cardiology, for invasive procedures such as transesophageal echocardiography, has not been reported.

AIMS

This study evaluated the feasibility of clinical hypnosis in children undergoing transesophageal echocardiography.

METHOD

This prospective, non-randomised, cross-sectional study was carried out over 24 months in a paediatric cardiology referral centre. All children aged 10-18 years requiring a transesophageal echocardiography examination, outside the operating room and the catheterisation laboratory, were eligible for the study. Children and families could choose between transesophageal echocardiography under clinical hypnosis or under general anaesthesia (<15 years) or sedation (⩾15 years).

RESULTS

We included 16 children aged 11-18 years (seven girls, mean age 14.1±2.5 years). The hypnotic state was achieved for 15 out of the 16 participating children (94%). The transesophageal echocardiography examination could be completely achieved with a full diagnosis for 15 out of 16 children (94%). In all cases, a transesophageal echocardiography examination under clinical hypnosis provided a complete diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that hypnosis was feasible and effective for transesophageal echocardiography in adolescents and might be a good alternative to general anaesthesia. Further study with larger numbers of subjects and more diverse congenital cardiac conditions are needed to confirm the results in a more diverse sample.

Safety and efficacy of sedation with propofol for transoesophageal echocardiography in children in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Transoesophageal echocardiography has become a powerful tool in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital cardiac malformations. Unlike adults, children will not tolerate transoesophageal echocardiography under light sedation. This study was undertaken, therefore, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deep sedation with propofol for transoesophageal echocardiography in children examined in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography with propofol given in bolus aliquots to achieve a level of sedation adequate to insert the transoesophageal echocardiographic probe and maintain sedation throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

We included a total of 118 patients, 57% being male, with a mean age of 12.9 years. Adequate sedation was achieved using a mean propofol dose of 8.3 milligrams per kilogram, with the dose per kilogram decreasing concomitant with increasing weight of the patient. Patients less than two years of age were intubated for the procedure. There were no clinically significant changes in cardiac function or haemodynamics. Non-intubated patients received supplemental oxygen prior to, or just after, the onset of sedation, with transient hypoxaemia observed in one-fifth. Complications were rare, with minor problems occurring in 7.6%, and major ones in 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transoesophageal echocardiography can be performed on an outpatient basis in children with a wide spectrum of congenital cardiac malformations, and propofol is an ideal sedative agent in this setting. Although not common, preparations must be made for significant haemodynamic and respiratory complications. In our study, we intubated all the children under 2 years of age.

The safe and effective use of propofol sedation in children undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: experience in a pediatric ICU and a review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To describe our experience using propofol sedation to facilitate elective diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and to document the safety profile of propofol in this setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series and review of the literature.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit of a United States Navy tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

Children receiving propofol for procedural sedation over an 18-month period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive features of sedation including adverse events.

RESULTS

During the study period, 91 children received propofol to facilitate the performance of 110 medical procedures. The mean induction dose was 2.41 mg/kg, the mean infusion rate was 179.3 microg/kg/min, and the mean total dose of propofol administered was 4.23 mg/kg. In all cases, sedation was successfully achieved. The average length of stay in the PICU was 108.4 minutes. Three children (3.3%) had transient episodes of oxygen desaturation that improved with repositioning of the airway. No child required placement of an endotracheal tube. Three (3.3%) children experienced hypotension requiring a decrease in the infusion rate of propofol and a 10-mL/kg bolus infusion of normal saline. No cardiac arrhythmias or adverse neurologic effects secondary to propofol infusion were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric intensivists can safely and effectively administer propofol to facilitate the performance of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside the operating room setting.

Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of 2 medication regimens, propofol/fentanyl (P/F) and ketamine/midazolam (K/M), for brief orthopedic emergency department procedural sedation. This study was powered to compare recovery times (RT) and procedural distress as measured by the Observational Score of Behavioral Distress-revised (OSBD-r; range: 0-23.5 with 23.5 representing maximal distress).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, partially-blinded controlled comparative trial comparing intravenous P/F with K/M in a convenience sample of 113 patients aged 3 to 18 years old undergoing orthopedic procedural sedation. All medications were administered by the intermittent intravenous bolus method. An independent sedation nurse recorded total sedation time and RT. Effectiveness was measured using 6 parameters: 1) patient distress as assessed by independent blinded observers after videotape review using the OSBD-r; 2) orthopedic satisfaction score (Likert scale 1-5); 3) sedation nurse satisfaction score (Likert 1-5); 4) parental perception of procedural pain using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with the upper limit being "most pain"; 5) patient recall of the procedure; and 6) 1 to 3 week follow-up.

RESULTS

RT and total sedation time were significantly less in the P/F group than in the K/M group (33.4 minutes vs 23.2 minutes). The mean OSBD-r scores during manipulation were 0.084 and 0.278 for the K/M and P/F groups, respectively. Although this difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval for the mean difference -0.34 to -0.048), both regimens were successful in keeping the scores low. There was no statistical difference between the groups in the other measures of effectiveness. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of desaturation and late side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

RT with P/F is shorter than with K/M. P/F is comparable to K/M in reducing procedural distress associated with painful orthopedic procedures in the pediatric emergency department. Although propofol has a greater potential of respiratory depression and airway obstruction as compared with ketamine, it offers some unique advantages including a quicker offset and smoother recovery profile.

A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness, recovery time from sedation, and complication rate of propofol with those of midazolam when used for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department (PED).

METHODS

A prospective, blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing propofol and midazolam was conducted in the PED of a tertiary pediatric center. Eligible patients were aged 2-18 years with isolated extremity injuries necessitating closed reduction. All patients received morphine for pain, then were randomized to receive propofol or midazolam for sedation. Vital signs, pulse oximetry, and sedation scores were recorded prior to sedation and every 5 minutes thereafter until recovery. Recovery time, time from cast completion to discharge, and other time intervals during the PED course and all sedation-related complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Between August 1996 and October 1997, 91 patients were enrolled. Demographic data, morphine doses, and sedation scores were similar between the propofol and midazolam groups. Mean +/- SD recovery time for the propofol group was 14.9+/-11.1 minutes, compared with 76.4+/-47.5 minutes for the midazolam group, p<0.001. Mild transient hypoxemia was the most significant complication, occurring in 5 of 43 (11.6%) patients given propofol and 5 of 46 (10.9%) patients given midazolam (odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI = 0.24 to 4.76).

CONCLUSION

In this study, propofol induced sedation as effectively as midazolam but with a shorter recovery time. Complication rates for propofol and midazolam were comparable, though the small study population limits the power of this comparison. Propofol may be an appropriate agent for sedation in the PED; however, further study is necessary before routine use can be recommended.

Pediatric echocardiography: applications and limitations

Echocardiography is an extraordinarily useful imaging technique in fetuses, infants, children, and adolescents. Recent technologic innovations have expanded its versatility in the pediatric population. However, limited societal resources, limitations inherent to ultrasound imaging, and numerous imaging options even within the field of pediatric echocardiography necessitate the discriminate and thoughtful use of echocardiography in children. The clinical assessment remains a critical prelude to echocardiographic examination of the pediatric cardiovascular system.

Witnessed embolization of a right atrial mass during transesophageal echocardiography: implications regarding the safety of esophageal intubation

A patient with chronic lung disease and a right atrial density that was difficult to distinguish on a transthoracic echocardiogram underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) that demonstrated two mobile masses attached to the anterior right atrial wall. During the TEE procedure, the patient experienced coughing and retching due to the esophageal intubation, and the embolization of one of the right atrial masses was observed. This case is the first to document this mechanism of pulmonary embolism (a mechanism that was suspected in two prior reports), and it questions the safety of procedures that induce retching and coughing in patients with mobile right atrial masses.

The anaesthetic management of autistic children

Autistic children are difficult to manage and there are no anaesthesia studies to suggest management strategies. We present five case reports which describe an integrated management program taking into account the special needs of autistic children and their families. We describe a method of early warning and recognition of these patients and the establishment of a database to allow review of our program. We also present a process to minimize the stress and problems inherent in the conventional admission process. Oral ketamine (6 to 7 mg/kg) has proven to be the most reliable preoperative sedative for these patients.

Successful use of transesophageal echocardiography during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants after cardiac operations

We report the use of transesophageal echocardiography in infants after cardiac operations while supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In all patients transesophageal echocardiography provided valuable information when standard transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation was limited by poor acoustic windows. This report describes the application of transesophageal echocardiography during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac operations.

Paediatric cardiac catheterization: innovations

In recent years interventional procedures have been introduced to the field of paediatric cardiac catheterization. These procedures continue to develop in complexity and increasingly are being applied to patients with reduced cardiovascular reserve, as an alternative to cardiac surgery or when cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is contraindicated. More frequently anaesthetists are being called upon to provide support in sedating, anaesthetizing or/and resuscitating these patients. The purpose of this review is to give a comprehensive update of the interventional procedures and to review the anaesthetic management techniques as they apply to the catheterization laboratory. We will discuss possible complications and management strategies from our own experience and the experience of others. We have observed that as more complicated procedures are performed the anaesthetist plays a pivotal role in the management of the patient from arrival to departure from the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and in preventing mortality and major morbidity. Although the economic consequences of interventional cardiological techniques remain unclear, the field continues to expand and more complex procedures are continually being introduced.

Transesophageal echocardiography in the postoperative child with an open sternum

We report the use of transesophageal echocardiography in 3 children whose sternums remained open for several days postoperatively. In these patients transesophageal echocardiography provided critical information when transthoracic echocardiography was ineffective due to limited acoustic windows. This report points out the application of transesophageal echocardiography in children with chest wall distortion.