Recent trends in the consumption of lipid-lowering drugs in Finland

From prescriptions to drug use periods - things to notice

BACKGROUND

Electronic prescription registers provide a vast data source for pharmacoepidemiological research. Prescriptions as such are not suitable for all research purposes; e.g., studying concurrent use of different drugs or adverse drug events during current use. For those purposes, data on dispensed prescriptions needs to be transformed to periods of drug use.

METHODS

We used 3,828,292 dispensed prescriptions claimed between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2009 for 28,093 persons with Alzheimer's disease. Examples of drug use histories are presented to discuss different aspects that should be noticed when using register-based data consisting of drug purchases.

RESULTS

There is no simple method for correctly transforming dispensed prescriptions to periods of drug use that is usable for all drugs and drug users. Fixed assumptions of daily dose (in defined daily doses, tablets or other units) and fixed time windows should be used with caution and adjusted for different drug use patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that when transforming prescription drug purchases to drug use periods personal dose, purchasing pattern and other behavioral differences between patients should be taken into account.

[Use of prescription drugs in Spain and Europe]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Spanish prescription drug consumption with that of European countries.

DESIGN

A review of the literature and data sources for prescription drug consumption.

SETTING

European countries; last three decades.

PARTICIPANTS

Included therapeutic groups where the available information allowed a comparison of the consumption in Spain with that of other European countries.

MEASUREMENTS

Studies, reports, or data sources were included in which the consumption was expressed in DHD (DDD/1000 inhabitants per day).

RESULTS

It was possible to compare 18 therapeutic groups: drugs for peptic ulcer (A02B), glucose lowering drugs (A10), antithrombotic agents vitamin K antagonists (B01AA), antihypertensives (C02), diuretics (C03), peripheral vasodilators (C04), beta-blocking agents (C07), calcium channel blockers (C08), agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (C09), lipid-lowering drugs (C10), antibacterials for systemic use (J01), antiinflammatory & antirheumatic products non-steroids (M01A), opioid analgesics (N02A), antipsychotics (N05A); anxiolytics (N05B), hypnotics & sedatives (N05C), antidepressants (N06A) and drugs for obstructive airway diseases (R03). With regard to the European average (100), the Spanish consumption of these therapeutic groups was: N02A, 37; C07, 40; B01AA, 41; C03, 70; N05C, 72; C10, 75; C08, 76; N05A, 77; TH01, 97; N06A, 98; C09, 104; M01A, 101; R03, 101; C02, 107; A10, 114; N05B, 137; A02B, 150 and C04, 234.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish consumption of most of the therapeutic groups was very close to the average of the group of the countries where it was possible to compare it, or clearly below average, with the exception of the consumption of drugs for peptic ulcer, anxiolytics and peripheral vasodilators, which considerably exceeded the average of the group.

Shift of statin use towards the elderly in 1995-2005: a nation-wide register study in Finland

AIM

To describe nation-wide secular trends in statin use.

METHODS

Reimbursed prescriptions for lipid lowering drugs between 1995 and 2005 in Finland were retrieved from the nation-wide Prescription Register. The 1 year prevalence and incidence of statin use stratified by gender and age of users were measured for each calendar year. The relative changes (RR) in the incidence and the prevalence were calculated by using the year 1995 as a reference.

RESULTS

The 1 year prevalence increased 11-fold (95% confidence interval 11.2, 11.5), i.e. from 7.8 per 1000 inhabitants in 1995 to 88.9 in 2005. The incidence increased five-fold (95% CI 4.9, 5.1) from 355 per 100 000 inhabitants to 1772 during the respective years. The prevalence and incidence were the highest among persons aged 65-74 years. The largest relative increase in incidence was found among those aged >/= 75 years, in both females (RR 14.1, 95% CI 13.0, 15.3) and males (RR 14.0, 95% CI 12.5, 15.7). Since 2002 the prevalence has been higher among females (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As statin use has increased particularly among the elderly, further studies on the benefits in real life situation are needed in this age group.

Trends in the use of lipid-lowering drugs by outpatients with diabetes in Taiwan, 1997-2003

PURPOSE

To analyze recent trends in LLD use by outpatients with diabetes in Taiwan over a 7-year period and to see whether the trends are consistent with clinical trial outcomes and published guidelines.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was implemented using the National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1997 and December 2003. Adult outpatients who had diagnoses of diabetes and dyslipidemia and who had concurrent antidiabetic drug and LLD claim were identified. The prescribing trends were described in terms of the prescribing rates and patterns of LLDs in each study year.

RESULTS

Between 1997 and 2000, fibrates were the most widely prescribed major class of LLDs, while the rates showed a significant decline over time. The proportions of statin use increased 3.3-fold from 20.8% of all LLDs in 1997 to 69.0% in 2003. With the continuous increase in the use of statins, by 2001, they replaced fibrates as the most heavily used LLDs. Monotherapy was the most prominent prescribing pattern comprising 98.1% and 98.3% of all LLD prescriptions in 1997 and 2003, respectively. Among patients with diabetic dyslipidemia plus CHD, the use of statins increased almost threefold instead of a large reduction in the percentage with non-statin class.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescribing rates of LLDs shifted from the fibrates to statins, especially in newer statin. The majority of patients were maintained on monotherapy. These findings may imply that management of hyperlipidemia in patients with diabetes had a positive trend towards recent clinical trial outcomes and guideline's recommendation.

The effect of screening for cardio-renal risk factors on drug use in the general population

AIM

To evaluate the effect of a cardio-renal screening programme on desired and undue drug use.

METHODS

Data from the PREVEND cohort (Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENd-stage Disease) were used. The drug use of screened (randomly) selected subjects (n = 2650) was compared with unscreened subjects, matched for age and sex (n = 10 434). Drug use in the overall PREVEND cohort, enriched for albuminuria (n = 6751), was also studied. Screening-related drugs (antihypertensive, antilipidaemic, antidiabetic and antithrombotic) were selected, as well as screening-unrelated drugs (benzodiazepines, drugs for acid-related disorders and painkillers). Time to first prescription after screening is presented as Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

After 6.5 years of follow-up, the incidence of drug use was not significantly different between the screened, randomly selected and unscreened cohorts. Antihypertensives were used by 21.5 and 20.8%, respectively; antilipidaemic 12.8 and 10.2%, antidiabetics 4.0 and 3.9%, and antithrombotic 11.4 and 12.0%. Screening-unrelated drugs were used at comparable frequencies. Compared with the unscreened cohort, screening-related drugs were prescribed more frequently for subjects in the enriched cohort (25.8, 15.5, 5.5 and 13.5% for antihypertensive, antilipidaemic, antidiabetic and antithrombotic, respectively), whereas screening-unrelated drugs were used at comparable frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of drug use did not differ between the screened, randomly selected and unscreened cohorts. Screening does not lead to more drug prescription, thus arguing against the fear of undue medicalization after screening. The data also show that, for screening to be successful, it should be performed in a targeted population, such as one enriched for albuminuria.

Theoretical exposure of chronically treated patients to lipid lowering agents

PURPOSE

The objective was to analyse the exposure to lipid lowering agents (LLA) using the databases of health insurance companies and to appraise its concordance with the findings of evidence based medicine.

METHODS

Three health insurance companies' prescription based databases were analysed in the years 1997-2000. All inhabitants in the Czech Republic (CR) have to be insured. The insured person with a recorded prescription for LLA in the year of interest was defined as a patient, the insured person with a recorded prescription for LLA in the years bordering the year of interest was defined as a chronically treated patient. In the year of interest the percentage of chronically treated patients without LLA medication, with 'very low' (<122 defined daily doses (DDD)/year), 'low' (122-243 DDD/year) and 'adequate' (>243 DDD/year) consumption was determined.

RESULTS

During the observed period the total consumption of LLA increased among 450 000 inhabitants twice (by 109.6%) to 24.8 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day. In 2000 the rate of the consumption of statins and fibrates represented 34.2 and 65.6% respectively. In 1998 33.5% and in 1999 41.0% of the chronically treated patients occurred in the 'adequate' consumption group.

CONCLUSIONS

The signals of inappropriate drug treatment such as the preferred use of fibrates and low doses of LLA prescribed to the Czech population were identified. Conversely, the increasing proportion of the chronically treated patients belonging to the group with the 'adequate' consumption could be considered as a positive signal.

Prospective, noninterventional, uncontrolled, open-chart, pharmacoepidemiologic study of prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs at a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India

BACKGROUND

The guidelines for management of dyslipidemia released by the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have been questioned for their relevance in the South Asian Indian populations because these populations are reported to have significantly different lipoprotein parameters and atherogenic risk factors than Western populations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine current prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) adopted by physicians in North India.

METHODS

This prospective, noninterventional, uncontrolled, open-chart, pharmacoepidemiologic study was conducted from June 2000 to August 2000 at a tertiary care hospital in North India and included 200 dyslipidemic patients. The pattern of prescribing LLDs was recorded, along with the serum levels of lipid parameters-total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a])-at the time of initiating LLD therapy and compared with the 1993 NCEP-II therapeutic guidelines for dyslipidemia management.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) levels of lipid parameters in the study population were as follows: TC, 223.2 (21.5) mg/dL; TG, 258.4 (61.3) mg/dL; LDL-C, 131.6 (26.5) mg/dL; HDL-C, 39.8 (8.9) mg/dL; and Lp(a), 44.8 (26.8) mg/dL. The LLDs prescribed were fibrates (53.5%) and statins (46.5%). Forty percent of patients prescribed LLDs did not meet the NCEP-II criteria for initiation of LLD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable differences in prescribing patterns of LLDs were observed compared with the then-prevalent NCEP-II guidelines. However, due to the abnormally high serum Lp(a) levels present in the average dyslipidemia profile in South Asian Indian populations, this pattern was in accordance with the specific recommendations made for these populations, as well as with the 2001 NCEP-III guidelines.

Time trends in lipid lowering drug use in The Netherlands. Has the backlog of candidates for treatment been eliminated?

AIMS

To assess time trends in lipid lowering drug use in The Netherlands.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the PHARMO-database, comprising pharmacy records of approximately 300 000 people in The Netherlands. In the period from 1991-98, we estimated prevalence of lipid lowering drug use on the first Wednesday of October. A patient was defined as incident user if (s)he filled a prescription for lipid lowering medication after a 360 days lipid lowering drug free interval. Both prevalence and incidence estimates were weighted for the sex and age distribution of the general Dutch population.

RESULTS

From 1991 to 1998, the prevalence of lipid lowering drug use increased from 0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5, 0.6) to 2.3% (95% CI: 2.2, 2.4) in women and from 0.6% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.6) to 2.9% (95% CI: 2.8, 3.0) in men. Prevalence increased with increasing age and was highest in the age category 60-69 years (in 1998: 9.9% (95% CI: 9.4, 10.4) in women and 11.6% (95% CI: 11.0, 12.1) in men). In 1992, the estimated incidence of lipid lowering drug use was 251(95% CI: 226, 277)/100,000 person years in women and 251(95% CI: 225, 276)/100,000 person years in men. The largest incidence estimates were observed in 1996 (685(95% CI: 644, 726)/100,000 person years in women and 881(95% CI: 834, 928)/100,000 person years in men). After 1996, incidence stabilized in 1997 and decreased in 1998 to 599(561, 637)/100,000 person years in women and 731(688, 773)/100,000 person years in men. Most of the patients (approximately 95%) were treated with one lipid lowering agent. Statins were used by over 90% of patients from 1996 onwards. In 1998, 35% of the patients started with a statin that was not a first choice drug (mainly atorvastatin).

CONCLUSIONS

In the period from 1991-98, prevalence of lipid lowering drug use significantly increased in The Netherlands. However, incidence stabilized and decreased after 1996 which may be explained by the fact that the number of patients eligible for treatment was reached. The question remains whether lipid lowering medication was targeted to the appropriate patients.

Utilization of lipid-lowering drugs in men and women. a reflection of the research evidence?

This study analyzes the utilization of statin lipid-lowering drugs in a Canadian province using a population-wide drug prescription database. The utilization pattern is compared to the results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on their effectiveness. The study found that 74.7% of individuals prescribed a statin had no reported history of coronary heart disease (CHD). Women without CHD formed 23.1% of statins recipients; 32.9% of individuals filling a statin prescription were age 70 and over. Only 15.3% of men with CHD had been prescribed a statin. Based on the systematic review, 88.7% of the utilization of statins in this Canadian province was not supported by the results of the systematic review. Considering baseline lipid-levels does not substantially alter these findings. This study concludes that statins prescribing practices need to be realigned with research evidence. This implies refocusing utilization away from women and the elderly, towards men with CHD.

Lack of adherence to lipid-lowering drug treatment. A comparison of utilization patterns in defined populations in Funen, Denmark and Bologna, Italy

AIMS

The objective was to explore differences in lipid-lowering drug (LLD) prescribing in Italy and Denmark.

METHODS

We used two geographical areas with computerized drug prescription records in defined populations, one in Funen, Denmark with 500 000 inhabitants, the other in Bologna, Italy with 400 000 inhabitants. Prescriptions for patients who had purchased a LLD from 1994 until 1996 were retrieved as well as coprescriptions of antidiabetic and cardiovascular drugs as markers for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Only patients surviving and remaining in the area were included. Compliance was defined as percentage of DDDs purchased divided by the number of days within the time window. The limit between good and poor compliance was set at 82%.

RESULTS

In Bologna, LLD consumption measured in DDD increased by 41% and in Funen by 129%. Annual prevalence increased from 36.9 to 46.3 users/1000 inhabitants from 1994 to 1996 and from 3.2 to 6.6 users/1000 inhabitants in Bologna and Funen, respectively. From 1995 to 1996, the incidence of use decreased slightly in Bologna from 19.3 to 18. 8/1000 inhabitants/year, whereas in Funen the incidence increased from 1.8 to 2.3/1000 inhabitants/year. In Bologna 48% and in Funen 91% of users persisted with treatment for 2 years or longer. In Bologna, 7% and in Funen 45% were good compliers. In Bologna, 61% and in Funen, 72% received other drugs indicating cardiovascular or diabetic comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of use differed substantially between the two areas. In contrast with Funen, where long-term use was common, Bologna LLD use was sporadic. Based on a higher rate of coprescription, LLDs seemed to be used for secondary prevention to a higher extent in Funen than in Bologna. In Funen it appeared that the correct patients, but an insufficient number of them, were being treated adequately according to guidelines. The higher discontinuation rate of lipid lowering drugs in the Bologna area indicates that a large proportion of patients use these drugs for too short a period of time to benefit from treatment. Since society's health care resources are limited it is difficult to justify public funding of these medications without at the same time giving appropriate attention to these problems.