Ultrafast FLAIR imaging with single-shot echo-planar technique in evaluation of intracranial lesions

Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery in Neuroimaging: A Narrative Review on Clinical Applications and Technical Advances

While contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) has long been regarded as an adjunct sequence to evaluate leptomeningeal disease in addition to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, it is gradually being used for more diverse pathologies beyond leptomeningeal disease. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR is known to be highly sensitive to low concentrations of gadolinium within the fluid. Accordingly, recent research has suggested the potential utility of contrast-enhanced FLAIR in various kinds of disease, such as Meniere's disease, seizure, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and brain metastasis, in addition to being used for visualizing glymphatic dysfunction. However, its potential applications have been reported sporadically in an unorganized manner. Furthermore, the exact mechanism for its superior sensitivity to low concentrations of gadolinium has not been fully understood. Rapidly developing magnetic resonance technology and unoptimized parameters for FLAIR may challenge its accurate application in clinical practice. This review provides the fundamental mechanism of contrast-enhanced FLAIR, systematically describes its current and potential clinical application, and elaborates on technical considerations for its optimization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 5.

Optimization of magnetization transfer contrast for EPI FLAIR brain imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of magnetization transfer (MT) on brain tissue contrast in turbo-spin-echo (TSE) and EPI fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and to optimize an MT-prepared EPI FLAIR pulse sequence to match the tissue contrast of a clinical reference TSE FLAIR protocol.

METHODS

Five healthy volunteers underwent 3T brain MRI, including single slice TSE FLAIR, multi-slice TSE FLAIR, EPI FLAIR without MT-preparation, and MT-prepared EPI FLAIR with variations of the MT-preparation parameters, including number of preparation pulses, pulse amplitude, and resonance offset. Automated co-registration and gray matter (GM) versus white matter (WM) segmentation was performed using a T1-MPRAGE acquisition, and the GM versus WM signal intensity ratio (contrast ratio) was calculated for each FLAIR acquisition.

RESULTS

Without MT preparation, EPI FLAIR showed poor tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 0.98), as did single slice TSE FLAIR. Multi-slice TSE FLAIR provided high tissue contrast (contrast ratio = 1.14). MT-prepared EPI FLAIR closely approximated the contrast of the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images for two combinations of the MT-preparation parameters (contrast ratio = 1.14). Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provided a 50% reduction in scan time compared to the reference TSE FLAIR acquisition.

CONCLUSION

Optimized MT-prepared EPI FLAIR provides comparable brain tissue contrast to the multi-slice TSE FLAIR images used in clinical practice.

Clinical feasibility of single-shot fluid-attenuated inversion recovery with wide inversion recovery pulse designed to reduce cerebrospinal fluid and motion artifacts for evaluation of uncooperative patients in acute stroke protocol

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging is a key sequence for stroke assessment. Motion artifact reduction with short acquisition time is still challenging, but necessary in the magnetic resonance (MR) stroke protocol, especially for uncooperative patients suspected of stroke. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of modified single-shot FLAIR with wide inversion recovery pulses for use in stroke patients. This is a prospective study, which included 30 patients clinically suspected of stroke who were examined by MR stroke protocol from January 2018 to September 2018. A 1.5 T, multi-shot-turbo spin-echo (TSE) conventional FLAIR, and single-shot-TSE-FLAIR with wide inversion recovery pulse were used. Modified single-shot FLAIR was obtained for 30 patients with suspected stroke who moved during conventional FLAIR scan. Motion artifacts were randomly and independently scored using a 5-grade scale by three radiologists in blinded fashion. Whether the FLAIR vessel hyperintensity sign was present was visually evaluated. Statistical tests included Wilcoxon-signed rank test and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. The motion artifact score was significantly lower in single-shot FLAIR than in conventional FLAIR (0.37 ± 0.56 vs. 1.83 ± 1.18; p < 0.05. The vessel hyperintensity sign was visualized in 6 and 5 patients on single-shot and conventional FLAIR images, respectively. This study demonstrates the value of single-shot FLAIR for stroke assessment. Single-shot FLAIR reduced motion artifact and visualized vessel hyperintensity sign more than conventional FLAIR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Clinical Experience of 1-Minute Brain MRI Using a Multicontrast EPI Sequence in a Different Scan Environment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The long scan time of MR imaging is a major drawback limiting its clinical use in neuroimaging; therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of a 1-minute full-brain MR imaging using a multicontrast EPI sequence on a different MR imaging scanner than the ones previously reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 146 patients who underwent a multicontrast EPI sequence, including T1-FLAIR, T2-FLAIR, T2WI, DWI, and T2*WI sequences. Two attending neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of each sequence to compare the multicontrast EPI sequence with routine MR imaging protocols. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test to compare the 2 MR imaging protocols.

RESULTS

The multicontrast EPI sequence generally showed sufficient image quality of >2 points using a 4-point assessment scale. Regarding image quality and susceptibility artifacts, there was no significant difference between the multicontrast EPI sequence DWI and routine DWI (P > .05), attesting to noninferiority of the multicontrast EPI, whereas there were significant differences in the other 4 sequences between the 2 MR imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

The multicontrast EPI sequence showed sufficient image quality for clinical use with a shorter scan time; however, it was limited by inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts compared with routine brain MR imaging. Therefore, the multicontrast EPI sequence cannot completely replace the routine MR imaging protocol at present; however, it may be a feasible option in specific clinical situations such as screening, time-critical diseases or for use with patients prone to motion.

Reliability of fast magnetic resonance imaging for acute ischemic stroke patients using a 1.5-T scanner

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether fast scanned MRI using a 1.5-T scanner is a reliable method for the detection and characterization of acute ischemic stroke in comparison with conventional MRI.

METHODS

From May 2015 to June 2016, 862 patients (FLAIR, n = 482; GRE, n = 380; MRA, n = 190) were prospectively enrolled in the study, with informed consent and under institutional review board approval. The patients underwent both fast (EPI-FLAIR, ETL-FLAIR, TR-FLAIR, EPI-GRE, parallel-GRE, fast CE-MRA) and conventional MRI (FLAIR, GRE, time-of-flight MRA, fast CE-MRA). Two neuroradiologists independently assessed agreements in acute and chronic ischemic hyperintensity, hyperintense vessels (FLAIR), microbleeds, susceptibility vessel signs, hemorrhagic transformation (GRE), stenosis (MRA), and image quality (all MRI), between fast and conventional MRI. Agreements between fast and conventional MRI were evaluated by generalized estimating equations. Z-scores were used for comparisons of the percentage agreement among fast FLAIR sequences and fast GRE sequences and between conventional and fast MRA.

RESULTS

Agreements of more than 80% were achieved between fast and conventional MRI (ETL-FLAIR, 96%; TR-FLAIR, 97%; EPI-GRE, 96%; parallel-GRE, 98%; fast CE-MRA, 86%). ETL- and TR-FLAIR were significantly superior to EPI-FLAIR in the detection of acute ischemic hyperintensity and hyperintense vessels, while parallel-GRE was significantly superior to EPI-GRE in the detection of susceptibility vessel sign (p value < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in the other scores and image qualities (p value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast MRI at 1.5 T is a reliable method for the detection and characterization of acute ischemic stroke in comparison with conventional MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Fast MRI at 1.5 T may achieve a high intermethod reliability in the detection and characterization of acute ischemic stroke with a reduction in scan time in comparison with conventional MRI.

[Detectability of High Intensity Areas in FLAIR and Multi Shot EPI-FLAIR: Phantom Study]

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, fast spin echo-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FSE-FLAIR) is widely used to detect high intensity areas (HIAs). The way of getting FLAIR contrast at high speed includes echo planar imaging-FLAIR (EPI-FLAIR), and in EPI-FLAIR there are single shot EPI-FLAIR (SS-EPI-FLAIR) and multi shot EPI-FLAIR (MS-EPI-FLAIR). There were negative opinions for the reports of SS-EPI-FLAIR, and it is reported that SS-EPI-FLAIR is able to acquire image quality that is equal to FSE-FLAIR in a shorter time, recently. But there are few reports that utilized contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR. Our object was to compare HIA detectability in FSE-FLAIR and MS-EPI-FLAIR in equal imaging time, and to evaluate a basic characteristic. We dissolved indigestive dextrin in the aqua destillata and created a 0-46 wt% phantom. The concentration that correspond to T1, T2 value of brain white matter was 42 wt%. We calculated contrast by using signal intensities of each phantom, and compared contrast by signal intensities of each phantom, and compared the contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR and FSE-FLAIR. In the range of 18-46 wt%, the contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR was positive value, and that of FSE-FLAIR was 26-42 wt%. By the statistical test, contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR in 18-26% was significantly different for FSE-FLAIR. In conclusion, it was suggestive that MS-EPI-FLAIR is able to detect HIA equally or sharply.

The Technical and Clinical Features of 3D-FLAIR in Neuroimaging

In clinical MR neuroimaging, 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) with a variable-flip-angle turbo spin echo sequence is becoming popular. There are more than 100 reports regarding 3D-FLAIR in the PubMed database. In this article, the technical and clinical features of 3D-FLAIR for neuroimaging are reviewed and summarized. 3D-FLAIR allows thinner slices with multi-planar reformation capability, a higher flow sensitivity, high sensitivity to subtle T1 changes in fluid, images without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflow artifacts, and a 3D dataset compatible with computer-aided analysis. In addition, 3D-FLAIR can be obtained within a clinically reasonable scan time. It is important for radiologists to be familiar with the features of 3D-FLAIR and to provide useful information for patients.

Role of EPI-FLAIR in patients with acute stroke: a comparative analysis with FLAIR

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Further improvement in acquisition speed is needed, if MR imaging is to compete with CT for evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an echo-planar fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (EPI-FLAIR) sequence into an acute MR stroke protocol with potential reduction in scan time and to compare the results with conventional FLAIR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients (28 men and 24 women; age range, 32-96 years) with acute ischemic stroke were prospectively evaluated with an acute stroke MR protocol, which included both conventional FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR imaging with integration of parallel acquisition. The image acquisition time was 52 seconds for EPI-FLAIR and 3 minutes for conventional FLAIR. FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR studies were assessed by 2 observers independently for image quality and conspicuity of hyperintensity in correlation with DWI and were rated as concordant or discordant. Coregistered FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR images were evaluated for signal intensity ratio of the DWI-positive lesion to contralateral normal white matter.

RESULTS

An estimated 96% of all FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR studies were rated of diagnostic image quality by both observers, with interobserver agreements of κ = 0.82 and κ = 0.63 for FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR, respectively. In 36 (95%) of 38 patients with acute infarction, FLAIR and EPI-FLAIR were rated concordant regarding DWI lesion. The mean ± standard deviation of the signal intensity ratio values on EPI-FLAIR and FLAIR for DWI-positive lesions were 1.28 ± 0.16 and 1.25 ± 0.17, respectively (P = .47), and demonstrated significant correlation (r = 0.899, z value = 8.677, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute stroke, EPI-FLAIR is feasible with comparable qualitative and quantitative results to conventional FLAIR and results in reduced acquisition time.

Comparison of multishot echo-planar fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery imaging with fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery and T2-weighted imaging in depiction of white matter lesions

PURPOSE

To compare a multishot echo-planar fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (EPI-FLAIR) sequence with fast spin-echo FLAIR (F-FLAIR) and fast spin-echo T2-weighted (FSE-T2W) sequences in depiction of white matter lesions.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with various white matter lesions were included in this prospective study. Two independent readers for lesion detection (lesion size, >2 mm) compared sequences quantitatively. In 22 patients, contrast was calculated between periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

RESULTS

EPI-FLAIR revealed more lesions than FSE-T2W (p < 0.01). However, F-FLAIR revealed more lesions than EPI-FLAIR (p < 0.01). For PVH-to-CSF contrast, EPI-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher contrast than FSE-T2W. There were no differences in PVH-to-CSF contrast between EPI-FLAIR and F-FLAIR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that EPI-FLAIR has distinct advantages over FSE-T2W in the depiction of white matter lesions. Although EPI-FLAIR reduces imaging time by more than 60% relative to F-FLAIR, it cannot replace F-FLAIR for the detection of lesions in the cerebral white matter.

Multi-shot echo-planar Flair imaging of brain tumors: comparison of spin-echo T1-weighted, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and fast spin-echo Flair imaging

Multi-shot echo-planar fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (EPI-Flair) was compared with spin-echo T1-weighted (SE-T1W), fast SE T2-weighted (FSE-T2W), and fast Flair (F-Flair) in imaging brain tumors. In 32 patients with various different brain tumors, three reviewers independently evaluated image quality. Two reviewers evaluated the image quality of precontrast EPI-Flair to be significantly better than that of precontrast SE-T1W. Two reviewers evaluated the image quality of postcontrast EPI-Flair as superior to that of postcontrast SE-T1W. Artifacts on postcontrast EPI-Flair were significantly more prominent than those on postcontrast F-Flair. Multi-shot EPI-Flair appeared to be superior to SE-T1W, and almost equivalent to FSE-T2W in terms of image quality.