Open-label dosage and tolerability study of tiagabine monotherapy in patients with refractory complex partial seizures

New generation antiepileptic drugs: what do they offer in terms of improved tolerability and safety?

Over the last two decades a total of 11 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced to the US market. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials have yielded information about each drug's efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile; however, few studies have compared the newer generation AEDs directly with the older generation. Comparative studies are not always straightforward in their interpretation, as many characteristics of drugs, both favorable and unfavorable, may not be highlighted by such studies. In general, findings from the literature suggest that the newer generation AEDs (including vigabatrin, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, pregabalin, rufinamide, and lacosamide) enjoy both improved tolerability and safety compared with older agents such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproate. This is partially supported by some of the findings of the QSS and the TTA Committee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), whose review of four AEDs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and tiagabine) is discussed. Briefly, when compared with carbamazepine, lamotrigine was better tolerated; topiramate adverse events (AEs) were fairly comparable to carbamazepine and valproate; and tiagabine compared with placebo was associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to AEs. The findings of the SANAD trial are also presented; when administered to patients with partial epilepsy, carbamazepine was most likely to fail due to AEs, and lamotrigine and gabapentin were least likely to fail due to AEs. When administered to patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, topiramate was most frequently associated with AE-related discontinuation, followed by valproate; and while valproate was the most efficacious drug in this arm of the study, lamotrigine was more tolerable. What makes the SANAD study valuable and somewhat unique is its head-to-head comparison of one drug with another. Such comparative trials are overall lacking for new AEDs, although some conclusions can be drawn from the available data. In the end, however, AED selection must be based on individual patient and drug characteristics.

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on cognitive function in individuals with epilepsy: a comparative review of newer versus older agents

Several 'new' antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), i.e. oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, zonisamide, gabapentin, tiagabine, topiramate and levetiracetam have been introduced into clinical practice within the last decade. Most of these new drugs are at least as effective as the 'old' AEDs [phenytoin, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), valproic acid (sodium valproate) and carbamazepine] and, in general, they seem to be better tolerated than the old drugs. The new AEDs might have less influence on cognitive functions but the aspect has not been systematically studied. Neuropsychological testing has been the major method of objectively examining cognitive function related to the use of AEDs but a number of methodological problems blur the results. Alteration of cognition might reflect a chronic adverse effect of AEDs but the negative effects of the drugs are only one of several factors that may influence cognition. In addition, subjective complaints about cognitive deficits (e.g. memory problems or attention) may also reflect other aspects of adverse effects than those concerning specific cognitive functions (e.g. mood and anxiety). This review focuses on studies of the cognitive effects of the new AEDs, and in particular on studies that compare cognitive effects of the old and new drugs. In general, the new AEDs seem to display no or minor negative cognitive effects. In studies in which new AEDs have been compared with old AEDs, there was a tendency in favour of the new AEDs in some of the studies.

Efficacy, pharmacology, and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

This article discusses the factors involved in the appropriate selection of anticonvulsant medications. The clinical use of commonly used traditional antiepileptic drugs and the newly marketed antiepileptic drugs is discussed. This includes the specific indications for use, adverse effects, and dosing of each drug. Drug interactions, mechanisms of action, and pharmacological properties of each drug is also reviewed.

Pharmacology and clinical experience with tiagabine

Tiagabine (TGB), a recently approved anti-epileptic drug (AED), has a specific and unique mechanism of action involving the inhibition of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) re-uptake into neurones and glia. TGB is potent and has linear and predictable pharmacokinetics. It does not induce or inhibit hepatic metabolism and has no clinically significant effects on the serum concentrations of other AEDs or commonly used non-AEDs. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in primarily hepatic enzyme-induced patients showed that TGB 30 - 56 mg/day is an effective add-on treatment for all subtypes of partial seizures. The most common adverse effects in the trials were dizziness, asthenia (weakness), somnolence, accidental injury, infection, headache, nausea and nervousness. These side effects were usually mild to moderate in severity and generally did not require medical intervention. Long-term safety studies show continued efficacy of TGB over time and no evidence of tolerance for efficacy. Open studies confirm that patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy can be successfully converted to TGB monotherapy and that TGB may be effective for other seizure types, such as infantile spasms.

Tiagabine in the treatment of epilepsy--a clinical review with a guide for the prescribing physician

Tiagabine is currently recommended mainly as add-on therapy in adults and children above 12 years with partial epilepsy not satisfactorily controlled with other antiepileptic drugs. Based on available evidence and our clinical experience, tiagabine should be used preferably in patients sharing one or more of the following additional features, (i) a history of drug-induced cutaneous adverse events; (ii) mild to moderate epilepsy allowing for a slow titration and gradual onset of anticonvulsant action over a few weeks; (iii) patients for whom it is particularly important to avoid a deterioration in cognitive performance; and, (iv) patients who failed to respond to previous treatment with sodium channel blocker agents as they may particularly benefit from the introduction of tiagabine, due to its GABAergic mechanism of action. Tiagabine can also be used successfully in other patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Tiagabine is not indicated for patients with generalized or unclassified epilepsies and for patients with severely impaired liver function.

Newer anticonvulsants: comparative review of drug interactions and adverse effects

The tolerability and drug interaction profiles of 6 new anticonvulsants: oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine and topiramate, are reviewed. In general, these new anticonvulsants are well tolerated and drug interaction problems are minor with the exception of the risk of failure of oral contraceptives during treatment with oxcarbazepine or topiramate. In this review, the clinical implications of the tolerability of these drugs are discussed for different patient groups. The choice of which new anticonvulsant for which patient depends upon individual factors, in particular, seizure type, tolerability and practical administration factors. Treating elderly patients may be complicated by an increased sensitivity to adverse effects as these patients very often receive polytherapy for accompanying diseases. Drugs with very simple pharmacokinetic properties may be preferred in this group. Women of childbearing age face specific problems related to the epilepsy and to treatment with anticonvulsants. These include impaired fertility, failure of oral contraceptives and the risk of birth defects. Some new anticonvulsants may be suggested in preference to classical drugs to avoid these problems, but the human experience with newer anticonvulsants is still limited and, therefore, so is knowledge of the risk of congenital malformations in the offspring of mothers taking anticonvulsants. Psychiatric and behavioural changes frequently complicate treatment of patients with mental retardation. Some of the new anticonvulsants, in particular those affecting the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system such as vigabatrin, seem to exacerbate this problem and should be used with caution in these patients.

Tiagabine

Tiagabine (TGB) is a recently approved antiepileptic drug (AED) that inhibits y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake into neurons and glia, a mechanism of action that is specific and unique among the AEDs. TGB is potent and has linear and predictable pharmacokinetics. It has no clinically relevant effects on hepatic metabolism or serum concentrations of other AEDs, effects on laboratory values, or interactions with common non-AEDs. TGB is effective as add-on therapy for partial seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy in doses ranging from 30 to 56 mg daily. Conversion to TGB monotherapy can be achieved in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, although additional controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of TGB as monotherapy and to establish the effective dosage range. In controlled studies, the most common adverse events of TGB are dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, accidental injury, infection, headache, nausea, and nervousness. These are usually mild to moderate in severity and almost always resolve without medical intervention.