Management of Surgical and Procedural Pain in a Critical Care Setting

Comparison of two pain assessment tools in nonverbal critical care patients

It is recommended that patient's self-report of pain should be obtained as often as possible as the "gold standard." Unfortunately in critical care, many factors can alter verbal communication with patients, making pain assessment more difficult. Scientific advances in understanding pain mechanisms, multidimensional methods of pain assessment, and analgesic pharmacology have improved pain management strategies. However, pain assessment for nonverbal patients in critical care continues to present a challenge for clinicians and researchers. The purpose of this study was to compare the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) scores for assessment in nonverbal critical care patients. A descriptive, comparative, prospective design was used in this study. A convenience sample of 100 critical care, nonverbal, adult patients of varying medical diagnoses who required pain evaluation were assessed with the PAINAD and CPOT scales. Data were collected over a 6-month period in all critical care areas. Observations of pain assessments for nonverbal patients who required pain evaluation were recorded on the PAINAD and the CPOT successively. Internal consistency reliability for the PAINAD was 0.80 and for the CPOT 0.72. Limits of agreement indicated that there was no difference in PAINAD and CPOT scores for assessing pain in nonverbal patients in critical care. Further research in the area of pain assessment for nonverbal patients in critical care is needed.

Clinical tools for the assessment of pain in sedated critically ill adults

AIM

This paper aims to review the evidence regarding pain assessment tools for sedated patients and to establish whether the use of a tool can be recommended in practice.

BACKGROUND

Pain assessment is a challenging area of critical care nursing practice, particularly among sedated patients. Tools to aid in assessing pain among this patient group have been developed and tested recently.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In this systematic review five papers that tested pain assessment tools for sedated patients are discussed. These papers were identified via the CINAHL and MEDLINE databases using the search terms: 'pain assessment' and 'sedated' or 'unconscious' or 'critically ill' or 'critical illness' or 'critical care'.

CONCLUSIONS

The Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) has been tested among the broadest range of patients and was found to be a reliable and valid tool in three studies. Research is needed to further demonstrate the reliability and validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), as the paper of Gelinas et al. did not test its internal consistency and domain structure. The CPOT also needs testing among different critical care populations. The design of Odhner et al. study did not allow adequate testing of the Non-verbal Pain Scale (NVPS).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The implementation of the BPS can be recommended in intensive care units and may improve the management of pain among sedated patients by providing a systematic and consistent approach to pain assessment to guide interventions. The CPOT may also prove useful in assessing pain among sedated patients, but first requires further validation. Also, further research is needed into the effects of pain assessment tools on pain management practices and patient outcomes.

Capturing postoperative pain responses in critically ill infants aged 0 to 9 months

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe physiologic and behavioral pain behaviors in postoperative critically ill infants. A secondary aim was to identify how these pain responses vary over time.

DESIGN

This observational study was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit at two tertiary referral hospitals. Using ethological methods of observation, video recordings of postoperative infants were viewed to depict different situations of pain and no pain and were then coded using a reliable checklist.

PATIENTS

A total of 803 recorded segments were generated from recordings of five critically ill infants aged between 0 and 9 months who had undergone major surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was an 82% agreement between the two coders. Multivariate analyses showed that physiologic responses differed only when adjusted for time. Significant decreases in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure (p < .001 and p = .036, respectively) were associated with postoperative pain exacerbated by painful procedures on day 2. On day 3, however, heart rate, arterial pressure (systolic, diastolic, and mean), and central venous pressure significantly increased (p < .05) in response to postoperative pain. Indicators included vertical stretch of the mouth, hand twitching, and jerky leg movements for postoperative pain and increase in respiratory distress, frown, eyes tightly closed, angular stretch of the mouth, silent or weak cry, jerky head movements, fist, pulling knees up, and spreading feet for postoperative pain exacerbated by painful stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the ability to capture different intensities of postoperative pain in critically ill infants beyond neonatal age. These pain indicators can be used for the development of a pain assessment tool for this group of infants.

The efficacy of playing a virtual reality game in modulating pain for children with acute burn injuries: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87413556]

Background

The management of burn injuries is reported as painful, distressing and a cause of anxiety in children and their parents. Child's and parents' pain and anxiety, often contributes to extended time required for burns management procedures, in particular the process of changing dressings. The traditional method of pharmacologic analgesia is often insufficient to cover the burnt child's pain, and it can have deleterious side effects [1,2]. Intervention with Virtual Reality (VR) games is based on distraction or interruption in the way current thoughts, including pain, are processed by the brain. Research on adults supports the hypothesis that virtual reality has a positive influence on burns pain modulation.

Methods

This study investigates whether playing a virtual reality game, decreases procedural pain in children aged 5–18 years with acute burn injuries. The paper reports on the findings of a pilot study, a randomised trial, in which seven children acted as their own controls though a series of 11 trials. Outcomes were pain measured using the self-report Faces Scale and findings of interviews with parent/carer and nurses.

Results

The average pain scores (from the Faces Scale) for pharmacological analgesia only was, 4.1 (SD 2.9), while VR coupled with pharmacological analgesia, the average pain score was 1.3 (SD 1.8)

Conclusion

The study provides strong evidence supporting VR based games in providing analgesia with minimal side effects and little impact on the physical hospital environment, as well as its reusability and versatility, suggesting another option in the management of children's acute pain.

Pain management in the intensive care unit

Pain management is an essential component of quality care delivery for the critically ill patient. Because outcomes are difficult to predict in the intensive care unit (ICU), high-quality pain management and palliative therapy should be a goal for every patient. For those patients actively dying, palliation may be among the main benefits offered by the health care team. Appropriate palliation of pain begins with the use of effective strategies for recognizing, evaluating,and monitoring pain. Skill in pain management requires knowledge of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies. This article focuses on expertise in the use of opiates to facilitate confident and appropriate pain therapy. To optimize palliative therapy, symptoms are best addressed by interdisciplinary care teams guided by models that acknowledge a continuum of curative therapies and palliative care.

Pain in the older adult in the intensive care unit

Effective pain management of the older adult begins with pain assessment using the proper tools. Understanding the complexities of the older adult in the ICU is the first step; this can be done by integrating the evidence-based practice guidelines provided by the American Geriatrics Society, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO pain standards: www.jcaho.org/standard/pm_hap.html), and the Society of Critical Care Medicine into physicians' and nurses' practice. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations now recommends considering pain as the "fifth vital sign" (JCAHO pain standards: www.jcaho.org/standard/pm_hap.html). In summary, Park et al highlight key concepts that must be considered for all effective treatment plans: "anticipation, recognition, quantification, treatment and reassessment of the needs of the patient." Only then can we anticipate the impacts of chronic and critical illnesses and realize reliable and superior comfort for the elderly.

From Theory to Practice: Preventing Pain After Cardiac Surgery

A pain management guideline was developed at the Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, to prevent pain after cardiac surgery. The guideline was based on a wellness model and was predicated on the World Health Organization’s analgesic ladder. Patients are given nonopioids around the clock and throughout the postoperative stay and are given an opioid to prevent procedural pain and treat breakthrough pain. In an evaluation of the guideline, records from 133 cardiac surgery patients were retrospectively reviewed. The type and dose of analgesics administered for the first 6 days after surgery, the effectiveness of the pain management plan, the occurrence of adverse effects, time to extubation, and postoperative lengths of stay were determined. Ninety-five percent of patients had effective pain relief. Almost all patients received acetaminophen around the clock. A total of 89% received indomethacin. All patients received opioids intermittently. Doses of opioids were converted to morphine oral equivalents, which peaked on day 1 after surgery (38 equivalents) and decreased sharply by day 2 (&lt;10 equivalents). Median postoperative length of stay was 5 days for patients who had bypass surgery and 6 days for patients who had valve surgery. This proactive, low-tech, low-risk, well-tolerated pain management approach is cost-effective, simple, and feasible to use. The findings support use of this approach in managing pain after cardiac surgery.