Long-term observations of two siblings with Lafora disease treated with zonisamide

Italian cohort of Lafora disease: Clinical features, disease evolution, and genotype-phenotype correlations

BACKGROUND

Lafora disease (LD) is characterized by progressive myoclonus, refractory epilepsy, and cognitive deterioration. This complex neurodegenerative condition is caused by pathogenic variants in EPM2A/EPM2B genes, encoding two essential glycogen metabolism enzymes known as laforin and malin. Long-term follow-up data are lacking. We describe the clinical features and genetic findings of a cohort of 26 Italian patients with a long clinical follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with EPM2A/EPM2B pathogenic variants were identified by direct gene sequencing or gene panels with targeted re-sequencing. Disease progression, motor functions, and mental performance were assessed by a simplified disability scale. Spontaneous/action myoclonus severity was scored by the Magaudda Scale.

RESULTS

Age range was 12.2-46.2 years (mean:25.53 ± 9.14). Age at disease onset ranged from 10 to 22 years (mean:14.04 ± 2.62). The mean follow-up period was 11.48 ± 7.8 years. Twelve out of the 26 (46%) patients preserved walking ability and 13 (50%) maintained speech. A slower disease progression with preserved ambulation and speech after ≥4 years of follow-up was observed in 1 (11%) out of the 9 (35%) EPM2A patients and in 6 (35%) out of the 17 (65%) EPM2B patients. Follow-up was >10 years in 7 (41.2%) EPM2B individuals, including two harbouring the homozygous p.(D146N) pathogenic variant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports an overall worse disease outcome with severe deterioration of ambulation and speech in patients carrying EPM2A mutations. However, the delayed onset of disabling symptoms observed in the EPM2B subjects harbouring the p.(D146N) pathogenic variant suggests that the underlying causative variant may still influence LD severity.

Physiology-Based Treatment of Myoclonus

Myoclonus can cause significant disability for patients. Myoclonus has a strikingly diverse array of underlying etiologies, clinical presentations, and pathophysiological mechanisms. Treatment of myoclonus is vital to improving the quality of life of patients with these disorders. The optimal treatment strategy for myoclonus is best determined based upon careful evaluation and consideration of the underlying etiology and neurophysiological classification. Electrophysiological testing including EEG (electroencephalogram) and EMG (electromyogram) data is helpful in determining the neurophysiological classification of myoclonus. The neurophysiological subtypes of myoclonus include cortical, cortical-subcortical, subcortical-nonsegmental, segmental, and peripheral. Levetiracetam, valproic acid, and clonazepam are often used to treat cortical myoclonus. In cortical-subcortical myoclonus, treatment of myoclonic seizures is prioritized, valproic acid being the mainstay of therapy. Subcortical-nonsegmental myoclonus may be treated with clonazepam, though numerous agents have been used depending on the etiology. Segmental and peripheral myoclonus are often resistant to treatment, but anticonvulsants and botulinum toxin injections may be of utility depending upon the case. Pharmacological treatments are often hampered by scarce evidence-based knowledge, adverse effects, and variable efficacy of medications.

Treatment of status epilepticus with zonisamide: A multicenter cohort study of 34 patients and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

We present a summary of clinical cases of oral zonisamide (ZNS) used to treat refractory and super-refractory episodes of status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

Zonisamide administration in SE was identified in the clinical records of patients treated in Frankfurt and Marburg between 2011 and 2017.

RESULTS

Zonisamide was administered during a total of 37 SE episodes in 34 patients with a mean age of 58.7 ± 17.8 years, 21 of them were female (61.7%). The median latency from the onset of SE to administration of ZNS was 6.3 days. Patients had already undergone unsuccessful treatment with a median of three other antiseizure drugs (ASDs). The median initial dose of ZNS was 100 mg/d, titrated to a median maintenance dose of 400 mg/d. Patients underwent ZNS treatment for a median period of 7 days. Zonisamide was the final drug administered in 9 of 37 (24.3%) episodes, with a clinical effect attributed to ZNS observed in 6 of 37 (16.2%) episodes. An effect attributed to ZNS was observed in 5 out of 30 episodes of refractory SE (RSE) and in one out of 7 episodes of super-refractory SE (SRSE). Possible negative side effects of ZNS were observed in two patients (one patient each with ataxia and skin rash). The mortality rate in hospitalized patients was 10.4% (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

The rate of SE resolution attributed to ZNS treatment (16.2%) can be considered relevant, particularly since ZNS treatment tends to be administered only after several other options have been tried, and has a treatment latency of over six days. Zonisamide may therefore be considered as an alternative oral treatment option in RSE and SRSE.

An Update on Myoclonus Management

INTRODUCTION

Myoclonus is a hyperkinetic movement disorder characterized by sudden, brief, lightning-like involuntary jerks. There are many possible causes of myoclonus and both the etiology and characteristics of the myoclonus are important in securing the diagnosis and treatment. Myoclonus may be challenging to treat, as it frequently requires multiple medications for acceptable results. Few randomized controlled trials investigating the optimal treatment for myoclonus are available, and expert experience and case series guide treatment. Areas Covered: In this article, the authors review the basics of myoclonus and its classification. The authors discuss the current management of myoclonus and then focus on recent updates in the literature, including both pharmacologic and surgical options. Expert opinion: Myoclonus remains a challenge to manage, and there is a paucity of rigorous clinical trials guiding treatment paradigms. Furthermore, due to the etiological heterogeneity of myoclonus, defining the appropriate scope for high-quality clinical trials is challenging. In order to advance the field, the myoclonus study group needs to be revived in the US and abroad so that interested investigators can collaborate on multicenter clinical trials for myoclonus treatments.

The progressive myoclonic epilepsies

Progressive myoclonic epilepsies are a group of disorders characterised by a relentlessly progressive disease course until death; treatment-resistant epilepsy is just a part of the phenotype. This umbrella term encompasses many diverse conditions, ranging from Lafora body disease to Gaucher's disease. These diseases as a group are important because of a generally poor response to antiepileptic medication, an overall poor prognosis and inheritance risks to siblings or offspring (where there is a proven genetic cause). A correct diagnosis also helps patients and their families to accept and understand the nature of their disease, even if incurable. Here, we discuss the phenotypes of these disorders and summarise the relevant specific investigations to identify the underlying cause.

Seizure control and improvement of neurological dysfunction in Lafora disease with perampanel

Lafora disease is a rare and fatal disease characterized by seizures, progressive cognitive and behavioral deterioration, as well as cerebellar dysfunction. Currently, there is no efficacious treatment that will control the seizures and improve the cognitive decline in this disease. We report a patient with Lafora disease who experienced a dramatic amelioration in her seizure frequency as well as the associated neurological and cognitive dysfunction following initiation of treatment with perampanel administered as monotherapy. Perampanel is the first potentially efficacious treatment for Lafora disease. We discuss a potential mechanism for the efficacy of perampanel in this disease.

Seizures and the neurosurgical intensive care unit

The cause of seizures in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) can be categorized as emanating from either a primary brain pathology or from physiologic derangements of critical care illness. Patients are typically treated with parenteral antiepileptic drugs. For early onset ICU seizures that are easily controlled, data support limited treatment. Late seizures have a more ominous risk for subsequent epilepsy and should be treated for extended periods of time or indefinitely. This review ends by examining the treatment algorithms for simple seizures and status epilepticus and the role newer antiepileptic use can play in the NICU.

Lafora disease: severe phenotype associated with homozygous deletion of the NHLRC1 gene

Lafora disease (LD) is a severe, autosomal recessive, latechildhood- to teenage-onset, progressive myoclonic epilepsy. It is due to either EPM2A or NHLRC1 mutations. We describe a patient with homozygous deletion encompassing the entire NHLRC1 gene, not previously reported, and with clinical course more progressive than in the most patients with NHLRC1 mutations. The diagnosis of LD in our patient was based on the typical clinic, neurophysiological presentation, as well as skin biopsy followed by molecular genetics findings. She developed normally until the age of 15, when she had her first occipital and generalized seizures. Four years after the first seizure the patient became bedridden, demented and presented with severe clinical condition. She died of pneumonia at age 20. This report is the first case of homozygosity for NHLRC1 deletion and thus adds to mutational heterogeneity of LD. Besides, it widens the spectrum of LD patients with severe phenotype and NHLRC1 mutations.

Treatment of seizures in the neurologic intensive care unit

Seizures occur more often in the neurologic intensive care unit (NICU) than in general or other specialty ICUs, in part because of the patient population, but also due to the enhanced neurologic monitoring undertaken in such units. Especially important for the detection of seizures is the use of specialty trained personnel and the use of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring. The etiology of seizures often can be categorized either by primary brain pathology, at macro- or microscopic level, or by physiologic derangements of critical care illness, such as toxic or metabolic abnormalities. Particular etiologies at risk for seizures include hemorrhagic stroke and traumatic brain injury. The use of prophylactic antiepileptic drug administration remains controversial. If seizures occur, patients are typically treated with parenteral antiepileptic drugs. The duration of treatment is unclear in most situations, but data support limited treatment for early-onset ICU seizures that are easily controlled, with treatment not extending beyond a few weeks or a month. Late seizures, which occur more than 2 weeks after the insult, have a more ominous correlative risk for subsequent epilepsy and should be treated for extended periods of time or indefinitely. Electrolyte and glucose abnormalities, when corrected, usually lead to seizure control. This review concludes by examining the treatment algorithms for simple seizures and status epilepticus and the role newer antiepileptic use can play in the NICU.

Rapidly progressive phenotype of Lafora disease associated with a novel NHLRC1 mutation

Lafora disease is a fatal, autosomal recessive form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Patients characteristically exhibit myoclonic and tonic-clonic seizures and cognitive impairment, beginning in their second decade. Alterations in two genes were identified as the cause of the disease. Mutations in the NHL repeat containing 1 (NHLRC1) gene were described in association with a more benign clinical course and later age of death, compared with epilepsy progressive myoclonus type 2A (EPM2A) mutations. We describe a rapidly progressive phenotype of Lafora disease in an adolescent patient with a novel NHLRC1 mutation. He developed severe disability and dementia less than 2 years after the onset of signs.

Myoclonus

Myoclonus can be classified as physiologic, essential, epileptic, and symptomatic. Animal models of myoclonus include DDT and posthypoxic myoclonus in the rat. 5-Hydrotryptophan, clonazepam, and valproic acid suppress myoclonus induced by posthypoxia. The diagnostic evaluation of myoclonus is complex and involves an extensive work-up including basic electrolytes, glucose, renal and hepatic function tests, paraneoplastic antibodies, drug and toxicology screens, thyroid antibody and function studies, neurophysiology testing, imaging, and tests for malabsorption disorders, assays for enzyme deficiencies, tissue biopsy, copper studies, alpha-fetoprotein, cytogenetic analysis, radiosensitivity DNA synthesis, genetic testing for inherited disorders, and mitochondrial function studies. Treatment of myoclonus is targeted to the underlying disorder. If myoclonus physiology cannot be demonstrated, treatment should be aimed at the common pattern of symptoms. If the diagnosis is not known, treatment could be directed empirically at cortical myoclonus as the most common physiology. In cortical myoclonus, the most effective drugs are sodium valproic acid, clonazepam, levetiracetam, and piracetam. For cortical-subcortical myoclonus, valproic acid is the drug of choice. Here, lamotrigine can be used either alone or in combination with valproic acid. Ethosuximide, levetiracetam, or zonisamide can also be used as adjunct therapy with valproic acid. A ketogenic diet can be considered if everything else fails. Subcortical-nonsegmental myoclonus may respond to clonazepam and deep-brain stimulation. Rituximab, adrenocorticotropic hormone, high-dose dexamethasone pulse, or plasmapheresis have been reported to improve opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome. Reticular reflex myoclonus can be treated with clonazepam, diazepam and 5-hydrotryptophan. For palatal myoclonus, a variety of drugs have been used.

Lafora disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management

Lafora disease is a rare, fatal, autosomal recessive, progressive myoclonic epilepsy. It may also be considered as a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism because of the formation of polyglucosan inclusion bodies in neural and other tissues due to abnormalities of the proteins laforin or malin. The condition is characterized by epilepsy, myoclonus and dementia. Diagnostic findings on MRI and neurophysiological testing are not definitive and biopsy or genetic studies may be required. Therapy in Lafora disease is currently limited to symptomatic management of the epilepsy, myoclonus and intercurrent complications. With a greater understanding of the pathophysiological processes involved, there is justified hope for future therapies.

Treatment options for epileptic myoclonus and epilepsy syndromes associated with myoclonus

BACKGROUND

Myoclonus is a brief shock-like movement that has many different etiologies. The degree to which it disturbs quality of life is extremely variable, as is its response to treatment.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we focus on the treatment strategies for epileptic myoclonus in some common disorders, and in others that are not so common but where myoclonus is a prominent feature and has been studied more.

METHODS

An extended literature review in the English language was conducted through PubMed and text books.

CONCLUSION

Epileptic myoclonus is a manifestation of cortical irritability. The precise etiology is important when determining the best course of treatment. Response to treatment is variable and usually depends on the epileptic syndrome. Some antiepileptic drugs may worsen myoclonus even in patients with syndromes where most patients have a good response to that same drug. Therefore, clinicians must always have in mind that worsening in myoclonus may be ameliorated by decrease or withdrawal rather than increase of medication.

Reassessment of phenytoin for treatment of late stage progressive myoclonus epilepsy complicated with status epilepticus

In order to find an effective treatment option for status epilepticus in progressive myoclonus epilepsy (PME), we reviewed the clinical course of 9 patients with PME. Initially, epilepsy was successfully treated with antiepileptics. However, it gradually became refractory to medication, and status epilepticus emerged 3-19 years after the onset of epilepsy. In these patients, status epilepticus in PME was classified into (1) myoclonic status epilepticus (MSE), (2) myoclonic-generalized status epilepticus (MGSE), and (3) generalized status epilepticus (GSE). MSE was common in patients with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, and GSE was common in those with dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy. MGSE was characterized by the mixture of escalating myoclonus and generalized seizures, and was observed in patients with Gaucher disease or unspecified PME. All patients were often refractory to infusion of benzodiazepines and barbiturates but phenytoin was able to terminate status epilepticus in 7 patients. Oral phenytoin administration as preventive therapy was effective in 6 patients. Aggravation of myoclonus was not provoked by these treatments. We propose that phenytoin should be considered as a treatment choice for PME patients at late stages to prevent the detrimental effects of prolonged or repeated status epilepticus on the brain tissues.

Zonisamide: review of pharmacology, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety

BACKGROUND

Zonisamide (ZNS), a sulphonamide derivative, is a new-generation anticonvulsant with multiple potential mechanisms that contribute to its antiepileptic efficacy and may also explain its as yet incompletely assessed utility for non-seizure disorders such as headaches, neuropathic pain, and weight loss.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, evidence for efficacy in different seizure types and non-seizure conditions, adverse effects, and tolerability of ZNS is presented.

METHODS

A review of all manuscripts published in the English literature on ZNS was performed in preparing this manuscript.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

ZNS has a broad label for use in Japan, while the regulatory bodies in the USA and Europe have approved it for use only as an adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults. It has favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, proven efficacy in seizure disorders, and is well tolerated in long-term use.

[Lafora's disease (EPM2)]

Lafora's disease (LD) is a comparatively frequent and particularly severe type of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Prevalence varies, LD is seen everywhere but is more common in geographic isolates and areas with high degree of inbreeding. Onset occurs during adolescence, with generalized tonic-clonic, clonic-tonic-clonic seizures, action and resting myoclonus, negative myoclonus, and focal occipital seizures with transient amaurosis. The course is marked by prominent cognitive deterioration, which can precede seizures and myoclonus, and by the progressive, relentless increase of seizures and myoclonus. Transmission is autosomal recessive. LD is genetically heterogeneous. Mutations/deletions of the EPM2A gene, localized in 1995 on 6q24, are found in 80p.cent (product: laforin), the less common EPM2B variant is on 6p22 (product: malin), but these two localizations do not account for all cases of LD. The diagnosis of LD may be suspected on the basis of the family history, age at onset, typical appearance of symptoms, rapid worsening of cognitive function, evaluation of fairly typical EEG aspects, and can easily be confirmed by axillar skin biopsy with proof of Lafora bodies (polyglucosan aggregates) in the sweat duct cells. Other biopsies, like brain biopsy, are generally not necessary. Genetic testing is useful for diagnosis but the genetic heterogeneity cannot rule out LD when none of the known mutations are detected. Genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis are theoretically possible when the genetic anomaly has been documented in an affected member of the family. The treatment of LD remains purely symptomatic. Drugs that may aggravate myoclonus must be avoided. Psychological and social management is of utmost importance in LD. Death occurs 4 to 10 years after onset in typical forms.

Management of Seizures in the Critically Ill

Seizures in a critically ill patient are not infrequent phenomena. Physicians are perplexed by the wide range of possible cranial or extracranial etiologies, alerted by the risk for further crucial organ compromise if seizures recur, and confused about the treatment options in an environment rich in complex drug interactions and multiple organ dysfunction. The advent of an armamentarium containing multiple new antiepileptic medications complicates the situation further, since several of them have less known mechanisms of action, side effects, or interactions with other intensive care unit (ICU) medications. This review contains useful information regarding the most common etiologies and treatment options for intensivists, consulting neurologists, neurosurgeons, or other specialized physicians treating ICU patients with seizures.

Introduction to zonisamide

Zonisamide (Zonegran), a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) approved recently in Europe as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults, has been used extensively in Japan and the United States. A substantial body of clinical experience has accumulated over a 14-year period, allowing the properties and pharmacologic/clinical profiles of zonisamide to be clearly defined. Zonisamide is structurally distinct from other AEDs and has multiple and complementary mechanisms of action, which likely contribute to its efficacy across a broad range of epilepsy types. Zonisamide has a long T1/2 enabling once-daily dosing, linear pharmacokinetics and minimal interaction with other drugs; plasma levels of commonly administered AEDs and oral contraceptives are unaffected by concomitant zonisamide. Effective control of partial seizures (up to 51% decrease in seizure frequency) is attained at doses of >or=300 mg/day, and optimal titration and maintenance dosing schedules have been established. The adverse event profile is well defined; in common with most AEDs, most adverse events are central nervous system-related (e.g. somnolence, dizziness, tiredness). Adverse events may be minimised with appropriate patient management. Zonisamide therefore has many characteristics considered desirable in an AED and represents a valuable addition to the therapeutic options for treating epilepsy in Europe.

Clinical experience with zonisamide monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in children with epilepsy at a tertiary care referral center

We evaluated our clinical experience with zonisamide, a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, in a group of children with predominantly medically refractory epilepsy. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients at our tertiary referral center following Institutional Review Board approval. Observers documented reports of seizure frequency, and seizure types were identified either clinically or by prior video-electroencephalography monitoring. We identified 68 patients (age range 1.9-18.1 years [median 6.9 years]; male to female ratio 1.3:1) treated with zonisamide for 0.7 to 28.9 months; at the last visit, 22% and 78% were on monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, respectively. The median duration of treatment and maintenance dose at the end of the follow-up were 11.2 months and 8.0 mg/kg/day, respectively. Seizure types included generalized (primary generalized tonic-clonic, myoclonic, tonic, atonic, absence) and partial (simple, complex, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures); 10 (15%) patients had both partial and generalized seizures. Sixteen (25.8%) patients were seizure free, although five of them were already in remission prior to starting zonisamide. Thirteen (21.0%) patients had a > 50% seizure reduction, 10 (16.1%) patients had a < 50% seizure reduction, 14 (22.6%) had no improvement in baseline seizures, and 9 (14.5%) reported having increased seizures. The latter were mostly associated with dosage alterations in concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Common side effects were central nervous system related, including behavioral or psychiatric (23.5%), cognitive dysfunction (12.0%), and sedation (10.3%). Eleven (16.2%) patients ultimately discontinued zonisamide, but only five were strictly due to side effects. Zonisamide is clinically effective against multiple seizure types in a significant proportion of children with epilepsy across a broad age range. Drug discontinuation as a result of side effects is uncommon.

Myoclonus: current concepts and recent advances

Myoclonus presents as a sudden brief jerk caused by involuntary muscle activity. An organisational framework is crucial for determining the medical significance of the myoclonus as well as for its treatment. Clinical presentations of myoclonus are divided into physiological, essential, epileptic, and symptomatic. Most causes of myoclonus are symptomatic and include posthypoxia, toxic-metabolic disorders, reactions to drugs, storage disease, and neurodegenerative disorders. The assessment of myoclonus includes an initial screening for those causes that are common or easily corrected. If needed, further testing may include clinical neurophysiological techniques, enzyme activities, tissue biopsy, and genetic testing. The motor cortex is the most commonly shown myoclonus source, but origins from subcortical areas, brainstem, spinal, and peripheral nervous system also occur. If treatment of the underlying disorder is not possible, treatment of symptoms is worthwhile, although limited by side-effects and a lack of controlled evidence.

Following catastrophic epilepsy patients from childhood to adulthood

As patients with catastrophic epilepsies move from childhood to adulthood, evolving and innovative therapeutic regimens are often required. However, the goal of providing the best quality of life while minimizing both seizures and side effects remains the same. Clinicians can develop appropriate care plans by being aware of patients' changing needs. Clinical symptoms of the catastrophic epilepsies may change over time; by understanding the natural history of a patient's condition, clinicians can help ease the transition from childhood to adulthood. Additionally, as children with catastrophic epilepsies become adults, medical issues (e.g., medication side effects, tolerance, and dependence) and nonmedical issues (e.g., guardian/caretaker issue, group home applications, and respite care options) must be considered when developing strategies for patient care. Regular assessment of patients, the development of emergency plans, and maintenance of consistency in the delivery of care are also important issues to consider. Finally, a multidisciplinary care plan that incorporates resources from health-care practitioners, social service professionals, and community agencies can be valuable in optimizing treatment for patients with catastrophic epilepsies.

Treatment Strategies for Myoclonic Seizures and Epilepsy Syndromes with Myoclonic Seizures

Despite the availability of numerous treatment options, the diagnosis and treatment of myoclonic seizures continue to be challenging. Based on clinical experience, valproate and benzodiazepines have historically been used to treat myoclonic seizures. However, many more treatment options exist today, and the clinician must match the appropriate treatment with the patient's epilepsy syndrome and its underlying etiology. Comorbidities and other medications must also be considered when making decisions regarding treatment. Rarely, some antiepileptic drugs may exacerbate myoclonic seizures. Most epileptic myoclonus can be treated pharmacologically, but some cases respond better to surgery, the ketogenic diet, or vagus nerve stimulation. Because myoclonic seizures can be difficult to treat, clinicians should be flexible in their approach and tailor therapy to each patient.

Myoclonus in childhood

The term "myoclonus" sounds esoteric, yet it is part of our normal physiology, occurring as a muscle jerk on drowsiness or falling asleep, during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and as hiccoughs. Myoclonus is also a developmental feature of the human nervous system, comprising some of the earliest fetal movements. In pathologic settings, myoclonus may be the only neurologic abnormality, as in essential myoclonus, but more often it is one symptom of a larger neurologic problem. The vast etiologic spectrum of symptomatic myoclonus can be bewildering, but defining the underlying problem may provide the opportunity to develop specific therapies. Otherwise, treatment is merely symptomatic. The approach to the patient should be to verify the nature of the movement disorder and establish a specific etiologic diagnosis. A battery of neurophysiologic, neuroradiologic, and other laboratory studies is needed to localize the origin of the myoclonus and identify causative lesions. Drug treatment is largely empiric but must be systematic and aimed at restoring activities of everyday living. Unlike in epilepsies, in myoclonus multiple drugs usually must be combined to attain functional improvement.