1
|
Wang SJ, Zhao MY, Zhao PC, Zhang W, Rao GW. Research Status, Synthesis and Clinical Application of Antiepileptic Drugs. Curr Med Chem 2024; 31:410-452. [PMID: 36650655 DOI: 10.2174/0929867330666230117160632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
According to the 2017 ILAE's official definition, epilepsy is a slow brain disease state characterized by recurrent episodes. Due to information released by ILAE in 2017, it can be divided into four types, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and unknown epilepsy. Since 1989, 24 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved to treat different types of epilepsy. Besides, there are a variety of antiepileptic medications under clinical monitoring. These novel antiepileptic drugs have plenty of advantages. Over the past 33 years, there have been many antiepileptic drugs on the mearket, but no one has been found that can completely cure epilepsy. In this paper, the mentioned drugs were classified according to their targets, and the essential information, and clinical studies of each drug were described. The structure-activity relationship of different chemical structures was summarized. This paper provides help for the follow-up research on epilepsy drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Jie Wang
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Min-Yan Zhao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Peng-Cheng Zhao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Wen Zhang
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Guo-Wu Rao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Löscher W, Sills GJ, White HS. The ups and downs of alkyl-carbamates in epilepsy therapy: How does cenobamate differ? Epilepsia 2021; 62:596-614. [PMID: 33580520 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Since 1955, several alkyl-carbamates have been developed for the treatment of anxiety and epilepsy, including meprobamate, flupirtine, felbamate, retigabine, carisbamate, and cenobamate. They have each enjoyed varying levels of success as antiseizure drugs; however, they have all been plagued by the emergence of serious and sometimes life-threatening adverse events. In this review, we compare and contrast their predominant molecular mechanisms of action, their antiseizure profile, and where possible, their clinical efficacy. The preclinical, clinical, and mechanistic profile of the prototypical γ-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) modulator phenobarbital is included for comparison. Like phenobarbital, all of the clinically approved alkyl-carbamates share an ability to enhance inhibitory neurotransmission through modulation of the GABAA receptor, although the specific mechanism of interaction differs among the different drugs discussed. In addition, several alkyl-carbamates have been shown to interact with voltage-gated ion channels. Flupirtine and retigabine share an ability to activate K+ currents mediated by KCNQ (Kv7) K+ channels, and felbamate, carisbamate, and cenobamate have been shown to block Na+ channels. In contrast to other alkyl-carbamates, cenobamate seems to be unique in its ability to preferentially attenuate the persistent rather than transient Na+ current. Results from recent randomized controlled clinical trials with cenobamate suggest that this newest antiseizure alkyl-carbamate possesses a degree of efficacy not witnessed since felbamate was approved in 1993. Given that ceno-bamate's mechanistic profile is unique among the alkyl-carbamates, it is not clear whether this impressive efficacy reflects an as yet undescribed mechanism of action or whether it possesses a unique synergy between its actions at the GABAA receptor and on persistent Na+ currents. The high efficacy of cenobamate is, however, tempered by the risk of serious rash and low tolerability at higher doses, meaning that further safety studies and clinical experience are needed to determine the true clinical value of cenobamate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Löscher
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.,Center for Systems Neuroscience Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Graeme J Sills
- School of Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - H Steve White
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah YD, Singh K, Friedman D, Devinsky O, Kothare SV. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of felbamate in the context of a black box warning: A single center experience. Epilepsy Behav 2016; 56:50-3. [PMID: 26828692 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Felbamate was approved in 1993 to treat partial seizures with and without secondary generalization in adults and in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in children. Its use was later restricted when rare but fatal cases of aplastic anemia and hepatic failure were identified. METHODS This single center analysis retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of felbamate in a cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with epilepsy. RESULTS A chart review identified 103 patients taking felbamate. The range of felbamate dose was 300-4500 mg (mean: 1800 ± 900 mg). The duration of therapy ranged from 1 month to 20 years (mean duration: 35 ± 45 months). Eighteen (17.5%) subjects experienced adverse events including insomnia, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, weight loss, gastric discomfort, diarrhea, mood and behavioral problems, high blood pressure, headache, and elevated liver enzymes. Out of these, 6 (5.9%) patients discontinued the therapy. No hepatic failure or agranulocytosis was observed. Fifty-nine (57.72%) patients achieved ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 30 (29.12%) patients achieved seizure freedom. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that felbamate is safe, well tolerated, and effective in treatment of various types of epilepsy syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash D Shah
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, USA
| | - Kanwaljit Singh
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA
| | | | - Orrin Devinsky
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial-onset seizures contribute the bulk of seizure burden in childhood epilepsy. The therapeutic decision making involves consideration of factors specific to drug, patient and socioeconomic situation. OBJECTIVES This paper systematically reviews the available efficacy/effectiveness evidence for various anti-epileptic drugs (AED) as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in children. DATA SOURCES Relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified by a structured PubMed search, supplemented by an additional hand search of reference lists and authors' files. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Eligible studies were reviewed and data extracted into tables. Included RCTs were classified based on accepted published criteria. OUTCOMES Only efficacy and effectiveness outcome measures were evaluated since there is little scientifically rigorous comprehensive AED adverse effects data. RESULTS Oxcarbazepine is the only AED with Class I evidence for efficacy/effectiveness as initial monotherapy for partial-onset seizures in children. Carbamazepine, clobazam, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin and zonisamide have, at best, Class III efficacy/effectiveness evidence for monotherapy of partial-onset seizures in children. For adjunctive therapy, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and topiramate have Class I efficacy/effectiveness evidence for treatment of pediatric partial-onset seizures. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS This efficacy/effectiveness analysis must not be used in isolation when selecting therapy. AED selection for a specific child needs to integrate a drug's efficacy/effectiveness data with its safety and tolerability profile, pharmacokinetic properties, available formulations, and patient specific characteristics. It is critical that physicians and patients incorporate all these relevant variables when choosing AED therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chiron C, Kassai B, Dulac O, Pons G, Nabbout R. A revisited strategy for antiepileptic drug development in children: designing an initial exploratory step. CNS Drugs 2013; 27:185-95. [PMID: 23345029 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-012-0035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in refractory paediatric epilepsy usually involve the two main types of epilepsy shared by children and adults, focal epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Most other epilepsy syndromes, specifically paediatric, are excluded from drug development. In order to identify among them the candidate(s) for dedicated RCTs with a new drug, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) recently recommended proceeding in two steps: (1) an exploratory (prospective-observational) trial (POT) including a large variety of paediatric epilepsy syndromes and (2) a subsequent RCT in each of those that disclose a signal for possible efficacy. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to address the three following issues that have not been addressed by the EMA: (1) to determine a minimal threshold for this signal; (2) to establish a list of epilepsies to evaluate; and (3) to estimate the number of patients to include in such POTs. METHODS We extensively reviewed the POTs (including various syndromes) and RCTs reported in paediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy using MEDLINE (from 1990 to 2011) and the Cochrane library. We determined the threshold as the lowest percentage of responders observed in a POT with a positive corresponding RCT. The syndromes that reached this threshold in a POT were those to evaluate in an RCT. The minimal number of patients to include for each syndrome for a POT with a new antiepileptic drug was estimated in order to reach at least this threshold of responders with a 95 % confidence interval. RESULTS We found the minimal responder threshold to be 25 %. We identified eight epilepsy types/syndromes reaching this threshold and estimated for each of them the minimal sample needed: refractory focal epilepsy (n = 40), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 32), infantile spasms (n = 50), Dravet syndrome (n = 32), childhood absence epilepsy (n = 12), other symptomatic generalized epilepsy (n = 38), epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (n = 7) and epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (n = 4) [the two last samples may be underestimated due to the lack of RCTs in these conditions]. CONCLUSION Among the eight epilepsy types/syndromes that we recommend to systematically include in exploratory trials using the POT procedure, we assume that, for the minimal sample given above, a responder threshold of 25 % will provide a reliable efficacy signal, to be confirmed by a dedicated RCT. This strategy should avoid missing new therapeutic possibilities for children with epilepsy and reduce the off-label use of drugs in paediatric neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Chiron
- Inserm, U663, Service de Neurologie et Metabolisme, Hopital Necker, 149 rue de Sevres, 75015, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean P Sarco
- Department of Neurology, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a rare, age-related syndrome, characterized by multiple seizure types, a specific electro-encephalographic pattern, and mental regression. However, published data on the etiology, evolution, and therapeutic approach of LGS are contradictory, partly because the precise definition of LGS used in the literature varies. In the most recent classification, LGS belongs to the epileptic encephalopathies and is highly refractory to all antiepileptic drugs. Numerous treatments, medical and non-medical, have been proposed and results mostly from open studies or case series have been published. Sometimes, patients with LGS are included in a more global group of patients with refractory epilepsy. Only 6 randomized double-blind controlled trials of medical treatments, which included patients with LGS, have been published. Overall, treatment is rarely effective and the final prognosis remains poor in spite of new therapeutic strategies. Co-morbidities need specific treatment. This paper summarizes the definition, diagnosis and therapeutic approach to LGS, including not only recognized antiepileptic drugs, but also "off label" medications, immune therapy, diet, surgery and some perspectives for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenou van Rijckevorsel
- Reference Centre of Refractory Epilepsy, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grosso S, Maria Cordelli D, Coppola G, Franzoni E, Verrotti A, Berardi R, Balestri P. Efficacy and safety of felbamate in children under 4 years of age: a retrospective chart review. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15:940-6. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02215.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
The treatment of partial seizures in children is based on the use of first generation and recently introduced antiepileptic drugs as well as nonpharmacological treatments such as the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation and surgical therapy. The present review discusses the efficacy and tolerability of different treatment options for partial seizures in childhood. Few adjunctive or monotherapy, placebo-controlled or comparative trials of the first-generation antiepileptic drugs and some of the more recently introduced antiepileptic drugs have been performed in children. This can be explained by the fact that it is only relatively recently (1989) that the International League against Epilepsy proposed that randomised, controlled trials be included among the required criteria for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of an antiepileptic agent. This led to controlled, comparative trials among older antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid), both in adults and in paediatric patients, being performed relatively 'late', based on when these drugs were first introduced. Carbamazepine and valproic acid may still be considered as first-line antiepileptic therapies for children with partial seizures. Phenobarbital and phenytoin are mostly considered as last choice drugs because of their adverse event profiles. The new generation of antiepileptic agents has added to the first- and second-line treatment options for paediatric partial seizures. To date, there are sufficient data to support the clinical use of some of the recently introduced antiepileptic drugs (e.g. oxcarbazepine, topiramate, gabapentin and lamotrigine) as adjunctive or first-line monotherapy. Because of the risk of visual field constriction with vigabatrin, the use of this drug is currently limited to patients refractory to other medications. Tiagabine, felbamate, levetiracetam and zonisamide have been shown to be effective in adults with partial seizures; however, at present there are not yet enough data on the efficacy of these drugs in children to support consideration of their use as either first-line or add-on therapy in this patient population, although controlled studies are expected shortly. Furthermore, the use of felbamate is considerably limited by rare, but severe, hepatic and haematological toxicity. Controlled trials for paediatric partial seizures are still lacking for the ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation, though they may represent, in given patients, useful adjunctive alternative treatments for refractory partial seizures. In conclusion, further trials are needed to determine an optimal sequence of first- and second-line therapies and to establish whether other newer antiepileptic drugs merit consideration as initial therapy in children with partial seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giangennaro Coppola
- Clinic of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome has been improved for some patients by the introduction of adjunctive therapy with newer anticonvulsants such as lamotrigine and topiramate and the availability of vagal nerve stimulation and the re-emergence of the use of the ketogenic diet in recent years. The place of standard anticonvulsants and the role of callosotomy needs to be re-evaluated in view of the new developments. Although recommendations for the treatment of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome are difficult to make in the absence of direct head-on comparative trials, the following suggested treatment recommendations are based on the best evidence available. Medical treatment should start with valproic acid (sodium valproate) and be followed by adjunctive therapy with either lamotrigine or topiramate; clobazam can be added if necessary for better seizure control while trying to reduce the dose of the other anticonvulsants. If standard treatment does not achieve sufficient seizure control or proves to be intolerable, vagal nerve stimulation, ketogenic diet, felbamate, benzodiazepines such as clonazepam, and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) are recommended as third-line choices. Further considerations include ethosuximide, methsuximide, corticotropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone) or corticosteroids, pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and vigabatrin. If adequate drug treatment and vagal nerve stimulation provide insufficient seizure control, partial callosotomy may be an option for the treatment of frequent, intractable and disabling drop attacks. These suggestions are based on the best evidence available and do not in any way exclude the use of other treatments if compelling individual risk-benefit considerations apply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Schmidt
- Epilepsy Research Group, Berlin, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- F J Vajda
- Australian Centre for Clinical Neuropharmacology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
This open-label study was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of Felbamate (FBM) add-on therapy in drug-refractory partial epilepsy. We evaluated 36 patients (12 males) aged 11-68 years (mean 29.8) in which FBM was titrated gradually from 300 mg/day to a mean total maintenance daily dose of 1936 mg. Patients were monitored according to clinical practice and performed regularly laboratory tests. Mean follow-up of FBM therapy was 10 months (range 2-27). In this study, 5% of patients resulted to be seizure-free, 11% showed a seizure reduction more than 75%, 23% decreased their seizure frequency between 50% and 75% (P = 0.0001). The adverse events which were reported more frequently were: nausea, vomiting, anorexia and weight loss. Even if the patients sample is small FBM proves its efficacy in partial epilepsy, showing a relatively well tolerated profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Canger
- Epilepsy Regional Centre, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, School of Medicine, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Seizure freedom with no side-effects is the aim of treatment, and new antiepileptic drugs have not lived up to expectations; only a few patients with chronic epilepsy have been rendered seizure-free. These treatments have side-effects but their safety profile may be better than older alternatives, although chronic effects have not yet been established. This article reviews newly marketed antiepileptic drugs. It concentrates on shortcomings of current antiepileptic treatment and on the way drugs are developed. A new approach to treatment is long overdue. The development of rational antiepileptic treatments should be strongly encouraged. More clinically relevant paradigms need to be developed and incorporated into clinical trial programmes as these are presently biased in their designs towards regulatory issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Sander
- Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|