Differences between a human bladder carcinoma cell line and its radiosensitive clone in the formation of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in different chromatin substrates

Assessing radiation-associated mutational risk to the germline: repetitive DNA sequences as mutational targets and biomarkers

This review assesses recent data on mutational risk to the germline after radiation exposure obtained by molecular analysis of tandemly repeated DNA loci (TRDLs): minisatellites in humans and expanded simple tandem repeats in mice. Some studies, particularly those including exposure to internal emitters, indicate that TRDL mutation can be used as a marker of human radiation exposure; most human studies, however, are negative. Although mouse studies have suggested that TRDL mutation analysis may be more widely applicable in biomonitoring, there are important differences between the structure of mouse and human TRDLs. Mutational mechanisms probably differ between the two species, and so care should be taken in predicting effects in humans from mouse data. In mice and humans, TRDL mutations are largely untargeted with only limited evidence of dose dependence. Transgenerational mutation has been observed in mice but not in humans, but the mechanisms driving such mutation transmission are unknown. Some minisatellite variants are associated with human diseases and may affect gene transcription, but causal relationships have not yet been established. It is concluded that at present the TRDL mutation data do not warrant a dramatic revision of germline or cancer risk estimates for radiation.

Potential use of the alkaline comet assay as a predictor of bladder tumour response to radiation

Bladder tumours show a variable response to radiotherapy with only about 50% showing good local control; currently there is no test to predict outcome prior to treatment. We have used five bladder tumour cell lines (T24, UM-UC-3, TCC-SUP, RT112, HT1376) to investigate the potential of the alkaline comet assay (ACA) to predict radiosensitivity. Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair were compared to clonogenic survival. When the five cell lines were irradiated and initial DNA damage was plotted against cell survival, at all doses (0-6 Gy), a significant correlation was found (r2=0.9514). Following 4 Gy X-irradiation, all cell lines, except T24, showed a correlation between SF2 vs half-time for repair and SF2 vs residual damage at 5, 10, 20 and 30 min. The T24 cell line showed radioresistance at low doses (0-2 Gy) and radiosensitivity at higher doses (4-6 Gy) using both cell survival and ACA end points, explaining the lack of correlation observed for this cell line. These data indicate that initial DNA damage and residual damage can be used to predict for radiosensitivity. Our data suggest that predictive tests of radiosensitivity, appropriate to the clinical situation, may require the use of test doses in the clinical range.

Modelling study on the protective role of OH radical scavengers and DNA higher-order structures in induction of single- and double-strand break by gamma-radiation

PURPOSE

To quantify the protective effects of (non-histonic) OH-radical scavengers and DNA higher-order structures in induction of single- (ssbs) and double-strand breaks (dsbs) by gamma-rays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Spatial distributions of energy depositions by gamma-rays in liquid water were modelled with the track structure modules of the biophysical simulation code PARTRAC. Such distributions were superimposed on different DNA structure models (e.g. linear DNA, SV40 'minichromosomes' and compact chromatin), and direct energy depositions in the sugar-phosphate were considered as potential (direct) ssbs. The diffusion and interaction of the main chemical species produced in liquid water radiolysis were explicitly simulated, and reactions of *OH with the sugar-phosphate were considered as potential (indirect) ssbs. Two ssb on opposite DNA strands within 10 base pairs were considered as one dsb. Yields of ssb and dsb Gy(-1) Dalton(-1) in different DNA target structures were calculated as a function of the *OH mean lifetime, whose inverse value was taken as representative of the scavenging capacity of the DNA environment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A further validation of the models implemented in the PARTRAC code has been provided, thus allowing a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying DNA damage. More specifically, the protection due to *OH scavengers was separately quantified with respect to that due to histones and chromatin folding, which could be 'switched off' in the simulations. As expected, for a given value of the environment scavenging capacity, linear DNA was more susceptible to strand breakage than SV40 minichromosomes, which in turn showed higher damage yields with respect to cellular DNA due to the larger accessibility offered to *OH. Furthermore, by increasing the scavenging capacity, the break yields decreased in all structures and tended to coincide with direct damage yields. Very good agreement was found with available experimental data. Comparisons with data on 'nucleoid' DNA (i.e. unfolded and histone-depleted DNA) also suggested that the experimental procedures used to obtain such structures might lower the environment scavenging capacity owing to the loss of cellular scavengers.

The use of DNA double-strand break quantification in radiotherapy

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are an important direct consequence of treating cells with ionizingradiation. A variety of evidence points toward DSBs being the key damage type linked to radiation-induced lethality. In particular, the link between DSB and chromosome breakage, which in turn closely correlates with cell death in some cell types, is strongly supportive of this concept. There has been much interest in the possibility of using measures of strand breaks as a pretreatment test of radiation response. This has largely been in the context of assessing inherent cellular sensitivity through damage induction or repair parameters. A number of studies have produced hopeful results, but overall there has been no parameter that can reliably predict radiosensitivity. This may be due to the inadequacies of the assays, but it is more likely to reflect the fact that the radiosensitivity of cells is dictated by a whole series of events; alterations in many of these can alter the overall response. In addition, it is now recognized that cell-signalling pathways form an essential part of the cellular response to damage, and these can be triggered by damage other than DSB. It is therefore possible that while DSBs are clearly important--and they may be the single most important lesion in some types--other damage types may be significant triggers of cell death pathways after ionizing radiation treatment.