Enrichment of ethyl docosahexaenoate by selective alcoholysis with immobilized Rhizopus delemar lipase

Integrated Production of Biodiesel and Concentration of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid in Glycerides Through Effective Enzymatic Catalysis

DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) contained in glycerides have been reported to be more advantageous for their intake than their counterpart in the form of free fatty acid or fatty acid esters. This work attempts to achieve the flexible concentration of DHA and EPA in glycerides as well as biodiesel production via a two-step process catalyzed by lipases. In the first step, several commercial lipases were investigated and Novozym ET2.0 demonstrated the highest potential in selective concentration of DHA and EPA. Over 85% of EPA and other fatty acids were converted to its corresponding FAEEs (fatty acid ethyl esters), while over 80% of DHA remained in glycerides under the optimized conditions. After the first step ethanolysis, the oil phase was subject to molecular distillation and a 97.5% biodiesel (FAEE) content could be obtained. Further flexible enrichment of DHA and EPA in glycerides was realized by immobilized lipase Novozym 435-mediated transesterification of glycerides (remaining in the heavy phase after molecular distillation) with DHA- or EPA-rich EE, and glycerides with 67.1% DHA and 13.1% EPA, or glycerides with 41.1% EPA and 38.0% DHA could be obtained flexibly. This work demonstrated an effective approach for DHA and EPA enrichment combined with biodiesel production through enzymatic catalysis.

Docosahexaenoic acid ethyl esters from Isochrysis galbana

In order to produce docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a culture of the microalgal strain Isochrysis galbana was implemented. In Erlenmeyer flasks, a natural seawater medium, the Provasoli 1/3 medium, was compared to the classical Jones medium for DHA production. The Provasoli 1/3 medium stimulated growth (0.44 d(-1)), but influenced DHA accumulation negatively (0.240 pg cell(-1)). However, DHA production per liter of culture medium were of the same order of magnitude with both media (0.961 mg l(-1)). In a 2-l bioreactor, DHA production per liter of culture medium did not increase significantly between 4 and 8 days of culture. With a view to optimize DHA productivity, cells should be harvested at the end of exponential phase i.e. after 4 days of culture. Two strategies were then attempted to produce DHA ethyl esters. First, lipids from I. galbana were submitted to lipase-catalyzed transesterification with ethanol. Secondly, fatty acids from I. galbana were submitted to lipase catalyzed esterification with ethanol. In both cases, lipase from Candida antarctica was shown to be the best candidate, among the five tested, with conversion yields of 20 and 60% after 24 h of transesterification and esterification respectively.

Stepwise ethanolysis of tuna oil using immobilized Candida antarctica lipase

Ethanolysis of fish oil under mild conditions has been strongly desired for preparing the starting materials for the purification of ethyl docosahexaenoate. Thus, we attempted ethanolysis of tuna oil using immobilized Candida antarctica lipase. The immobilized lipase was inactivated in the presence of 2 3 molar equivalent of ethanol against the total fatty acids in tuna oil. To avoid such inactivation, the first step of ethanolysis was conducted at 40 degrees C in a mixture of tuna oil and 1 3 molar equivalent of ethanol using 4% immobilized lipase. After a 10-h reaction, ethanol was consumed and 33% of tuna oil was converted to its corresponding ethyl esters (E-FAs). The reactant is named Gly/E-FA33. The lipase was not inactivated in the presence of 2 3 molar equivalent of ethanol against the total fatty acids in Gly/E-FA33. These findings and the consideration of several factors affecting ethanolysis of tuna oil led to the development of the two- and three-step ethanolyses. The two-step reaction was performed as follows: the first step was carried out at 40 degrees C for 12 h in a mixture of tuna oil and 1 3 molar equivalent of ethanol with 4% immobilized lipase; the second step was performed for 36 h (total reaction period, 48 h) after adding 2 3 molar equivalent of ethanol. On the other hand, the three-step reaction was conducted as follows: the first step was conducted under the same conditions as those in the two-step ethanolysis; in the second and third steps, 1 3 molar equivalent of ethanol was added after 12 and 24 h, respectively; and in the third step, the mixture was shaken for 24 h (total, 48 h). Both types of ethanolyses achieved the conversion of 95% or more of tuna oil to its corresponding E-FAs. To investigate the lipase stability, the two- and three-step ethanolyses were repeated by transferring the enzyme to a fresh substrate mixture of the first step after finishing one cycle of reaction. The two- and three-step reactions maintained over 95% of the conversion for 70 d and over 100 d, respectively.