Niguldipine impairs the protective activity of carbamazepine and phenobarbital in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats

Synergistic combinations of anticonvulsant agents: what is the evidence from animal experiments?

PURPOSE

Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use.

METHODS

Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p<0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.

Interactions between non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice--an isobolographic analysis

The aim of this study was the isobolographic evaluation of interactions between three non-barbiturate intravenous anesthetics and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2-s stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension taken as the endpoint). Adverse effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs were measured by immunofluorescence. Obtained results indicate that ketamine acts synergistically with valproate and carbamazepine. Also the combinations of propofol and valproate or phenobarbital led to synergistic interactions. An antagonism was found between etomidate and carbamazepine or phenobarbital. On the other hand, interactions between diphenylhydantoin and injectable anesthetics proved to be additive. The only exception was the combination of diphenylhydantoin and propofol (1:3). Pharmacokinetic phenomena do not seem to interfere with the observed interactions, since none of anesthetics influenced the free plasma concentrations of antiepileptic drugs. Referring to undesired effects, only propofol impaired long-term memory. Although propofol did not disturbed motor coordination, it enhanced motor impairment caused by carbamazepine and diphenylhydantoin. Results of the present study suggest that etomidate needs to be avoided in epileptic patients due to a possibility of negative interactions with some antiepileptic drugs and seizure precipitation.

Effects of etomidate, ketamine or propofol, and their combinations with conventional antiepileptic drugs on amygdala-kindled convulsions in rats

Ketamine, etomidate and propofol modified behavioral and electrographic correlates of kindled seizures in rats. In detail, ketamine (5 mg/kg) and propofol (15 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, reduced seizure severity and shortened seizure and afterdischarge durations. Etomidate (7.5 mg/kg) was effective in terms of seizure and afterdischarge durations. Moreover, the combinations of ketamine (2.5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (15 mg/kg) or valproate (50 mg/kg; all drugs at their subeffective doses), reduced the severity and duration of kindled seizures. The antiseizure potency of the ketamine/carbamazepine combination was comparable to that of carbamazepine alone administered at 20 mg/kg, while the effect of ketamine/valproate was comparable to the efficacy of valproate alone at 100 mg/kg. However, the combinations of ketamine with phenobarbital or diphenylhydantoin did not exert any protective action. Propofol and etomidate entirely failed to interact with conventional antiepileptics. The combinations of ketamine with carbamazepine or valproate did not induce any significant motor impairment in the chimney test or memory deficit in the passive avoidance task. A pharmacokinetic interaction, at least in plasma, can be excluded, because ketamine (2.5 mg/kg) did not affect the free plasma concentrations of carbamazepine or valproate. Results of the present study may suggest that there may be no risk of negative interactions between injectable anesthetics and antiepileptics in cases of partial epilepsy.

Polytherapy in epilepsy: the experimental evidence

Monotherapy is recommended preferentially among newly diagnosed epileptic patients. In monotherapy-resistant patients polytherapy may be necessary. Two antiepileptic drugs may produce antagonistic, additive, and supra-additive (synergistic) anticonvulsant effects. The drug combination providing the supra-additive effect seems of clinical significance. However, when the supra-additive anticonvulsant efficacy is also associated by a distinct increase in toxicity, the protective index may be not affected or even lowered. Synergistic interactions have been shown for the combinations of valproate-phenytoin/ethosuximide, topiramate-carbamazepine/phenobarbital and felbamate-all major conventional antiepileptics. In contrast, the protective action of conventional antiepileptics has not been affected by felbamate at subprotective doses against maximal electroshock in mice. This is indicative that synergism is evident at only some drug ratios. Potential antiepileptic drugs, excitatory amino acid antagonists and calcium channel inhibitors, generally enhanced the protection offered by antiepileptic drugs. The experimental data may be helpful for predicting which drug combinations may prove effective in epileptic patients.