1
|
Toba MN, Godefroy O, Rushmore RJ, Zavaglia M, Maatoug R, Hilgetag CC, Valero-Cabré A. Revisiting 'brain modes' in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations. Brain 2020; 143:1088-1098. [PMID: 31764975 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The study of brain-function relationships is undergoing a conceptual and methodological transformation due to the emergence of network neuroscience and the development of multivariate methods for lesion-deficit inferences. Anticipating this process, in 1998 Godefroy and co-workers conceptualized the potential of four elementary typologies of brain-behaviour relationships named 'brain modes' (unicity, equivalence, association, summation) as building blocks able to describe the association between intact or lesioned brain regions and cognitive processes or neurological deficits. In the light of new multivariate lesion inference and network approaches, we critically revisit and update the original theoretical notion of brain modes, and provide real-life clinical examples that support their existence. To improve the characterization of elementary units of brain-behavioural relationships further, we extend such conceptualization with a fifth brain mode (mutual inhibition/masking summation). We critically assess the ability of these five brain modes to account for any type of brain-function relationship, and discuss past versus future contributions in redefining the anatomical basis of human cognition. We also address the potential of brain modes for predicting the behavioural consequences of lesions and their future role in the design of cognitive neurorehabilitation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica N Toba
- Laboratory of Functional Neurosciences (EA 4559), University Hospital of Amiens and University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Olivier Godefroy
- Laboratory of Functional Neurosciences (EA 4559), University Hospital of Amiens and University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - R Jarrett Rushmore
- Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa Zavaglia
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Focus Area Health, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
| | - Redwan Maatoug
- Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, FRONTLAB Team, Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013, and IHU-A-ICM, Paris, France
| | - Claus C Hilgetag
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Health Sciences Department, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave. Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Antoni Valero-Cabré
- Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.,Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, FRONTLAB Team, Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR S 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013, and IHU-A-ICM, Paris, France.,Cognitive Neuroscience and Information Technology Research Program, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valero-Cabré A, Toba MN, Hilgetag CC, Rushmore RJ. Perturbation-driven paradoxical facilitation of visuo-spatial function: Revisiting the 'Sprague effect'. Cortex 2019; 122:10-39. [PMID: 30905382 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The 'Sprague Effect' described in the seminal paper of James Sprague (Science 153:1544-1547, 1966a) is an unexpected paradoxical effect in which a second brain lesion reversed functional deficits induced by an earlier lesion. It was observed initially in the cat where severe and permanent contralateral visually guided attentional deficits generated by the ablation of large areas of the visual cortex were reversed by the subsequent removal of the superior colliculus (SC) opposite to the cortical lesion or by the splitting of the collicular commissure. Physiologically, this effect has been explained in several ways-most notably by the reduction of the functional inhibition of the ipsilateral SC by the contralateral SC, and the restoration of normal interactions between cortical and midbrain structures after ablation. In the present review, we aim at reappraising the 'Sprague Effect' by critically analyzing studies that have been conducted in the feline and human brain. Moreover, we assess applications of the 'Sprague Effect' in the rehabilitation of visually guided attentional impairments by using non-invasive therapeutic approaches such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS). We also review theoretical models of the effect that emphasize the inhibition and balancing between the two hemispheres and show implications for lesion inference approaches. Last, we critically review whether the resulting inter-hemispheric rivalry theories lead toward an efficient rehabilitation of stroke in humans. We conclude by emphasizing key challenges in the field of 'Sprague Effect' applications in order to design better therapies for brain-damaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoni Valero-Cabré
- Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, Frontlab Team, Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Paris, France; CNRS UMR 7225, Inserm UMR S 1127, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, F-75013, IHU-A-ICM, Paris, France; Laboratory for Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity & Rehabilitation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Monica N Toba
- Laboratory of Functional Neurosciences (EA 4559), University Hospital of Amiens and University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Claus C Hilgetag
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Germany; Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Jarrett Rushmore
- Laboratory for Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity & Rehabilitation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|