[Urinary antimicrobial prophylaxis]

Comparison of cotrimoxazole vs. second-generation cephalosporins for prevention of urinary tract infections in children

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTI) in high-risk children. However, there is growing concern about the use of β-lactams as prophylaxis and subsequent development of antibiotic resistance.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial we compared cotrimoxazole (SXT) and second-generation cephalosporins (2GC) as UTI prophylaxis in children ranging in age from 1 to 60 months. Eligible patients were 1:1 randomized to receive either SXT or 2GC for the initial 6-month period (1 course), then switched to the other antimicrobial agent class for the subsequent course, with switching continuing after each course until the end of the study. Urethral orifice cultures (UOCs) were obtained at the time of switching antimicrobial prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Among 97 children (mean age 13.6 months) on prophylaxis, breakthrough UTIs occurred during 13.3 % (10/75) of SXT courses and 10.3 % (8/78) of 2GC courses (p = 0.62). 2GC failed earlier than SXT (mean ± standard error: 0.81 ± 0.1 vs. 2.37 ± 0.36 months, respectively; p = 0.028). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus spp. were more frequently isolated after 2GC courses than after SXT courses [22.6 vs. 4.8 % (p = 0.02) and 20.7 vs. 4.8 % (p = 0.035), respectively]. Prophylaxis with 2GC significantly increased resistance to both 2GC and SXT, while SXT prophylaxis did not affect susceptibility to 2GC.

CONCLUSIONS

While SXT and 2GC appear to be equally efficacious as UTI prophylaxis in children, the latter exert a broader effect on patients' flora and development of bacterial resistance, suggesting that SXT may be more appropriate for UTI prophylaxis than 2GC.

Prise en charge des pyélonéphrites aiguës du nourrisson de plus de 3 mois et de l'enfant : enquête effectuée parmi les services d'urgences pédiatriques d'Île de France en 2004

OBJECTIVES

To describe the different modalities of ambulatory management of acute pyelonephritis in patients older than 3 months of age in paediatric emergency units of the Ile de France region in 2004.

METHODS

Between October 2003 and April 2004, referents of 39 paediatric emergency units of the Ile de France region were questioned through a written questionnaire concerning the management of acute pyelonephritis: in or outpatient modalities, antibiotic regimen (molecule and route of administration), investigations and follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-one questionnaires (79.5%) were returned and analysed. A written protocol was available in 60% of the units. Outpatient management was performed in 24/31 centres. Young age, poor clinical tolerance, urological abnormalities and social difficulties were the major contra-indications for such management. Ultrasonic echography at diagnosis (within 24 h) was performed in 50% of the units. Antibiotics were started using IV route in 18/24 units (75%) and ceftriaxone and aminoside were respectively prescribed in 100% and 29.4% of the units for a duration of 1 to 5 days before switching to the oral route. Antibiotherapy was started orally in 6 units and cefixime was chosen by 5 of them. Follow-up consultations were scheduled in 100% of the units but with various delay after initiation of the treatment. The total duration of treatment was mostly 10 days and oral prophylactic antibiotherapy was prescribed by 10/24 centres after completion of the treatment. Cystoureterography was systematically realized by 83.3% of the units.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite important differences in the management of acute pyelonephritis in Ile-de-France, a majority of the units follows similar therapeutic modalities. In the absence of consensus, new recommendations are necessary concerning the management of pyelonephritis in infants and children in France.