The Management and Survival of Patients with Advanced Germ-Cell Tumours: Improving Outcome in Intermediate and Poor Prognosis Patients

Pathological complete response with cocktail chemotherapy in mediastinal seminoma

A mediastinal mass can present a diagnostic challenge, especially when symptoms necessitate urgent treatment. Mediastinal seminoma, a rare extragonadal germ cell tumour, shares clinical features with testicular seminoma, such as slow growth and high sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This case is of a man in his 40s presenting with cough and chest discomfort, with imaging revealing a large anterior mediastinal mass that was causing left diaphragmatic paralysis due to phrenic nerve involvement. Urgent CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis and tissue biopsy supported the diagnosis of mediastinal seminoma, prompting the immediate initiation of chemotherapy with an induction dose of etoposide and cisplatin, followed by the cisplatin, vincristine, methotrexate, bleomycin alternating with actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, etoposide regimen. This approach led to significant tumour reduction, facilitating complete surgical resection and sparing of the right phrenic nerve. Despite early fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography suggesting residual activity, resection histopathology confirmed no malignant cells. The patient achieved a favourable outcome, underscoring the importance of rapid treatment initiation, effective chemotherapy regimens and multidisciplinary management in mediastinal seminoma cases.

Emergency Etoposide-Cisplatin (Em-EP) for patients with germ cell tumours (GCT) and trophoblastic neoplasia (TN)

Background

Etoposide (E) at 100 mg/m² combined with Cisplatin (P) at 20 mg/m² represents an induction 2-day regimen embedded in our clinical practice for patients with advanced GCT or TN at high risk of early death. We evaluated 24/7 Em-EP administration to a combined GCT-TN cohort at our Emergency Cancer Treatment Centre (ECTC) to determine its efficacy within the acute setting.

Methods

Patients who received Em-EP during a five-year interval were identified from electronic databases at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Data collected included demographics, treatment details and clinical outcome.

Results

Em-EP was administered in the emergency setting to 104 patients, predominantly young adults (median age 35, range 17–71). Half the cases were GCT (n = 52): 22 male (6 seminomas, 13 non-seminomas); 30 female (2 dysgerminomas, 28 non-dysgerminomas). The other 50% were treated for TN (n = 52): 45 gestational (GTN) and 7 non-gestational. Most patients received Em-EP for a new cancer diagnosis (n = 100, 96%), within 24 h (n = 93, 89%) and out-of-hours (n = 74, 70%). Indications for Em-EP included symptomatic disease (n = 66, 63%), high-burden disease, (n = 51, 49%) and organ failure requiring Intensive Care Unit support (n = 9, 9%). Neutropenic sepsis was observed in 5%. Four-week overall survival after Em-EP administration was 98%.

Conclusions

Despite the potentially fatal complications encountered in the acute setting, early mortality with Em-EP is low at our ECTC. Specialist units that treat unwell patients with advanced GCT or TN should consider making Em-EP available 24/7 for emergency administration. Its efficacy within a prospective cohort and in other platinum-sensitive malignancies requires evaluation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5968-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy among men between 14 and 44 years of age, and its incidence has risen over the past two decades in Western countries. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the development of testicular cancer, for which cryptorchidism is the most common risk factor. Progress has been made in our understanding of the disease since the initial description of carcinoma in situ of the testis in 1972 (now referred to as germ cell neoplasia in situ), which has led to improved treatment options. The combination of surgery and cisplatin-based chemotherapy has resulted in a cure rate of >90% in patients with testicular cancer, although some patients become refractory to chemotherapy or have a late relapse; an improved understanding of the molecular determinants underlying tumour sensitivity and resistance may lead to the development of novel therapies for these patients. This Primer provides an overview of the biology, epidemiology, diagnosis and current treatment guidelines for testicular cancer, with a focus on germ cell tumours. We also outline areas for future research and what to expect in the next decade for testicular cancer.

Survival of non-seminomatous germ cell cancer patients according to the IGCC classification: An update based on meta-analysis

The International Germ Cell Consensus (IGCC) Classification distinguishes patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) with a good, intermediate or poor prognosis, with a reported 5-year overall survival of 92%, 80% and 48%, respectively. Since the IGCC classification was based on patients treated between 1975 and 1990, we aimed to investigate whether survival has improved for more recently treated patients. We did a systematic search of the literature and included studies on survival of patients with NSGCT, treated after 1989 and classified according to the IGCC classification. Survival estimates of selected studies were pooled using meta-analytic techniques. We included 10 papers, describing 1775 patients with NSGCT with good (n = 1087), intermediate (n = 232), or poor (n = 456) prognosis. Pooled 5-year survival estimates were 94%, 83% and 71%, respectively. Since the publication of the IGCC classification, there was a small increase in survival for good and intermediate prognosis patients, and a large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis. This increase is most likely due to both more effective treatment strategies and more experience in treating NSGCT patients.

Testicular germ-cell cancer

Testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCTs) represent the model of a curable malignancy; sensitive tumour markers, accurate prognostic classification, logical series of management trials, and high cure rates in both seminomas and non-seminomas have enabled a framework of effective cancer therapy. Understanding the molecular biology of TGCT could help improve treatment of other cancers. The typical presentation in young adults means that issues of long-term toxicity become especially important in judging appropriate management. A focus of recent developments has been to tailor aggressiveness of treatment to the severity of the prognosis. Recent changes affect the most common subtypes and include the reduction of chemotherapy for patients who have metastastic non-seminomas and a good prognosis, and alternatives to adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I seminomas. We summarise advances in the understanding and management of TGCT during the past decade.

Testicular seminoma--unusual histology and staging with sub epithelial spread of seminoma along the vas deferans

Background

The route of local and metastatic spread of testicular seminoma is well recognised and accepted. The spread is via lymphatics to the paraaortic nodes.

Case Presentation

We present a case report of testicular seminoma in a 56 year old man with previously unreported histological findings. In this case seminoma tumour cells did not appear to have spread by the expected lymphatic route. There was no involvement of retro-peritoneal para-aortic lymph nodes. The tumour appeared to have spread directly along the vas deferans in the sub epithelial plane to the mesenteric lymph nodes.

Conclusion

This type of seminoma tumour spread has not previously been described and it is not a recognised route for metastasis by seminoma tumour. In this case the macroscopic clinical appearance was of a stage I tumour with normal tumour markers. However, the pathological stage of the tumour was surprisingly increased to stage III on the basis of histology and CT radiological findings. We present the unusual histological findings. In view of this unusual histological finding we reinforce the need for accurate staging and for resection of the spermatic cord close to the deep inguinal ring. Accurate staging is crucial in planning the treatment and follow up of seminoma and determines the prognosis.

Recent advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is remarkable because it is curable by combination cytotoxic chemotherapy even when widely disseminated. Treatment is defined by widely accepted staging and prognostic factors. Three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin has been defined as the current optimum treatment in good prognosis metastatic disease, curing 90-95% of patients. Outcomes are less impressive for patients in intermediate and poor prognostic categories. A number of different approaches, including introduction of new agents and dose intensification, are being investigated to improve outcomes in these patients. Data developed over the last few years have identified increased risks of second malignancy and cardiovascular disease in long-term survivors. This has led to re-evaluation of strategies to manage Stage I patients. In particular, the use of radiotherapy in Stage I seminoma and the need for adjuvant therapy in Stage I nonseminoma are being re-examined. It is anticipated that advances in imaging and prognostic factors will facilitate this process.

The management of poor-prognosis, non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours

Despite a high cure rate in men with testicular cancer, some men in the poor-prognosis group have a less favourable outcome. Poor-prognosis non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT) are defined as those with high tumour markers, non-pulmonary visceral metastases or a mediastinal primary site at presentation. When treated with standard chemotherapy regimens, such as bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP), cure rates of less than 50% have been achieved in an international pooled analysis. Some strategies aimed at improving results include the use of multi-agent regimens (e.g. POMB/ACE), intensive-induction chemotherapy (e.g. CBOP/BEP), new chemotherapy drugs, such as ifosfamide, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, high-dose chemotherapy, including autotransplantation. To date, no schedule has been proven to be better than standard BEP in randomised trials. We will review the published data relating to first-line and salvage treatment of poor-prognosis NSGCT. To advance the management of this disease, physicians treating poor-prognosis disease are urged to support multi-centre trials, such as the recently launched MRC TE23 study comparing BEP and CBOP/BEP.