Why don't British radiotherapists give single fractions of radiotherapy for bone metastases?

Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre

•

Single fraction radiotherapy is feasible for uncomplicated bone metastases.

•

Four-week mortality was similar between single fraction and multiple fraction.

•

Our paper has the highest rate of reported single fraction radiotherapy in literature.

•

Re-irradiation were higher for single fraction radiotherapy in uncomplicated bone metastases.

Background

Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant).

Results

Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively).

Conclusions

Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature.

Choosing Wisely at the End of Life: Use of Shorter Courses of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis

PURPOSE

American Society for Radiation Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend ≤10 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastasis, with consideration for 1 fraction in patients with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate characteristic differences in guideline concordance to fractionation regimens in a modern cohort of older patients with a diagnosis of bone metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years treated with RT for bone metastasis from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Guideline-concordant RT fractionation was defined in the entire cohort as ≤10 fractions. Utilization of 1 fraction versus ≥2 fractions was analyzed in deceased patients. Patient demographic, disease, and facility characteristics associated with shorter fractionation were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 569 patients treated with RT, the median age at diagnosis was 73 years. The most common cancer types were lung (37%), genitourinary (26%), breast (15%), and gastrointestinal (10%). Among all patients, 34%, 30%, and 36% received 1 fraction, 2 to 10 fractions, and ≥11 fractions, respectively. In comparison with receipt of 1 to 10 fractions, receipt of ≥11 fractions was associated with a $1467 increase in per-patient cost to Medicare during the calendar quarter of RT. Almost two-thirds of patients who died within 30 days of RT completion were treated with >1 fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Although guideline concordance was high overall, a large number of patients received longer courses of RT at the end of life. Strong consideration should be made for utilization of shorter courses, particularly in patients with a limited prognosis.

The INTER-ROMA Project - a Survey among Italian Radiation Oncologists on Their Approach to the Treatment of Bone Metastases

Aims and background

Radiotherapy has an established palliative role for bone metastases but despite the large number of patients treated there is still controversy surrounding the optimal radiotherapy schedule to prescribe. The aim of this survey was to determine the decision patterns of Italian radiation oncologists in four different clinical cases of patients with bone metastases.

Methods and study design

During the latest national meeting of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), four clinical cases were presented to attending radiation oncologists. The cases were different with respect to the histology of the primary tumor, performance status, pain before and after analgesics, tumor site, and radiological characteristics of the metastatic lesions. For each clinical case the respondents were asked to give an indication for treatment; prescribe doses, volumes and treatment field arrangements; decide whether to prescribe prophylactic supportive therapy or not; and provide information about factors that particularly influenced prescription. Finally, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Three hundred questionnaires were distributed to radiation oncologists attending the congress. One hundred twenty-five questionnaires were returned but only 122 (40.6%) were adequately completed and considered for the analysis. Considerable differences were observed among radiation oncologists in prescribing and delivering radiotherapy for bone metastases. There was also a notable divergence from international guidelines, which will be discussed in this report.

Conclusions

Despite the results of clinical trials, Italian radiation oncologists differ considerably in their decisions on treatment doses and volumes. National guidelines are needed in order that patients can be treated uniformly and better data will become available for evidence-based palliative radiotherapy.

Utilization of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases near end of life in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can significantly improve quality of life for patients dying of cancer with bone metastases. However, an aggressive cancer treatment near end of life is an indicator of poor-quality care. But the optimal rate of overall palliative RT use near the end of life is still unknown. We sought to determine the patterns of palliative radiation therapy (RT) utilization in patients with bone metastases towards their end of life in a population-based, publicly funded health care system.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with bone metastases treated with RT between 2007 and 2011 were identified in a provincial Canadian cancer registry database. Patients were categorized as receiving RT in the last 2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, or >4 weeks before their death. Associations between RT fractionation utilization by these categories, and patient and provider characteristics were assessed through logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 16,898 courses 1734 (10.3) and 709 (4.2%) were prescribed to patients in the last 2-4 weeks and <2 weeks of their life, respectively. Primary lung (8%) and gastrointestinal (6.9%) cancers received palliative RT more commonly in the last 2 weeks of life (OR 3.72 [2.86-4.84] & 3.33 [2.42-4.58] respectively, p <0.001). Among the 709 patients who received RT in the last 2 weeks of life, 350 (49), 167 (24), and 127 (18%) were for spine, pelvis, and extremity metastases, respectively. RT was prescribed most frequently to spine (5%) and extremity (4%) metastases p <0.001 in the last two weeks of life, though only varied between 1% (sternum) and 5% (spine) by site of metastases. Single fraction RT was prescribed more commonly in the last 2 weeks of life (64.2%), compared to individuals who received RT 2-4 weeks (54.5), and >4 weeks (47.9%) before death (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based analysis found that only 4% of patients with bone metastases received radiation therapy during the last 2 weeks of their life in our population-based, publicly funded program, though it was significantly higher in patients with lung cancer and those with metastases to the spine or extremity. Appropriately, use of multiple fractions palliative RT was less common in patients closer to death.

Longitudinal Trends in Costs of Palliative Radiation for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

In recent years, palliative treatment of prostate cancer metastases has been characterized by the use of more complex radiation treatment, despite a lack of evidence demonstrating a clinical benefit of these technologies in the palliative setting. The impact of adoption of these technologies on the costs of palliative radiation treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer remains poorly understood in the general patient population.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Medicare data of men aged 66 and older who died from metastatic prostate cancer between 2000 and 2007 and received radiation therapy for bony metastases in the last year of life. Direct costs were obtained from Medicare carrier and outpatient facility payments for all radiation treatment claims and adjusted to 2008 dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 1705 men met study inclusion criteria. Total Medicare payments for radiation therapy for bony metastases in the last year of life increased by 44.4% from an average of $2,763 in 2000 to $3,989 in 2007, with the proportion of all payments accrued within hospital-based settings increasing from 48% to 57%. Complexity of radiation therapy techniques over the same period was characterized by use of less simple (30.1% to 23.3%) and more complex (59.9% versus 66.7%) radiation therapy. From 2000-2003 to 2004-2007, the use of shorter treatment courses (≤5 fractions) decreased from 22% to 14%, and the use of single fraction treatment courses decreased by half (6.3% to 2.9%; P≤.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2000 and 2007, palliative radiation therapy for bony prostate cancer metastases was characterized by the use of more advanced treatment technologies and prolonged radiation treatment courses. Further research investigating barriers to cost-effective palliation is warranted.

Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from lung cancer: Evidence-based medicine?

To review current recommendations for palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases secondary to lung cancer, and to analyze surveys to examine whether global practice is evidence-based, English language publications related to best practice palliative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases (BM) from lung cancer were sought via literature search (2003-2013). Additional clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents were obtained from the online Standards and Guidelines Evidence Directory. Eligible survey studies contained hypothetical case scenarios which required participants to declare whether or not they would administer palliative EBRT and if so, to specify what dose fractionation schedule they would use. There is no convincing evidence of differential outcomes based on histology or for spine vs non-spine uncomplicated BM. For uncomplicated BM, 8Gy/1 is widely recommended as current best practice; this schedule would be used by up to 39.6% of respondents to treat a painful spinal lesion. Either 8Gy/1 or 20Gy/5 could be considered standard palliative RT for BM-related neuropathic pain; 0%-13.2% would use the former and 5.8%-52.8% of respondents the latter (range 3Gy/1-45Gy/18). A multifraction schedule is the approach of choice for irradiation of impending pathologic fracture or spinal cord compression and 54% would use either 20Gy/5 or 30Gy/10. Survey results regarding management of complicated and uncomplicated BM secondary to lung cancer continue to show a large discrepancy between published literature and patterns of practice.

Patterns of practice in the prescription of palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program between 2005 and 2012

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether patterns of practice in the prescription of palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases had changed over time in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (rrrp).

METHODS

After reviewing data from August 1, 2005, to April 30, 2012, we analyzed patient demographics, diseases, organizational factors, and possible reasons for the prescription of various radiotherapy fractionation schedules. The chi-square test was used to detect differences in proportions between unordered categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression analysis and the simple Fisher exact test were also used to determine the factors most significant to choice of dose-fractionation schedule.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2549 courses of radiation therapy were prescribed. In 65% of cases, a single fraction of radiation therapy was prescribed, and in 35% of cases, multiple fractions were prescribed. A single fraction of radiation therapy was more frequently prescribed when patients were older, had a prior history of radiation, or had a prostate primary, and when the radiation oncologist had qualified before 1990.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with bone metastasis, a single fraction of radiation therapy was prescribed with significantly greater frequency.

A survey of patterns of practice on palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis in Korea

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to understand the practice patterns of palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis in Korea among Korean radiation oncologists by survey and to determine the decision factors affecting the prescription of radiation therapy fractionation schedules.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey was performed from October 5 to October 23, 2009, among 177 active full members of the Korean Society for Radiation and Oncology (KOSRO). The survey questionnaire included general information about the respondent, three types of clinical scenario, depending on the life expectancy of the patients, and the decision factors that affected the prescription of a radiation therapy schedule.

RESULTS

The most prescribed schedule was 30 Gy in 10 fractions regardless of the life expectancy of the patient. Also, it was found that a single fraction was seldom prescribed routinely in Korea. An increasing number prescribed fewer than 10 fractions as the life expectancy shortened; however, the prescription rate of a single fraction was still low. The general performance (and/or accompanying diseases) of patients and the life expectancy were the most considered factors in deciding the prescription of radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the abundant evidence supporting the equivalence of single- and multi-fraction radiation therapy, still, most Korean radiation oncologists continue to prescribe multi-fraction schedules depending on the general performance and life expectancy of the patients. Thus, we confirmed that there was a gap between evidence and practice, and treatment prescriptions can be strongly affected by decision factors other than published literature results.

Palliative radiotherapy tailored to life expectancy in end-stage cancer patients: reality or myth?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to investigate the adequacy of palliative radiation treatment in end-stage cancer patients.

METHODS

Of 216 patients referred for palliative radiotherapy, 33 died within 30 days and constitute the population of the study. Symptoms, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), laboratory tests, and survival estimates were obtained. Treatment course was evaluated by medical records. Univariate analyses were performed by using the 2-sided chi-square test. With significant variables, multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years, and median survival was 15 days. Prevailing primary cancer types were lung (39%) and breast (18%). Metastases were present in 94% of patients, brain (36%), bone (24%) and lung (18%). In 91%, KPS was < 0%. KPS, lactate dehydrogenase, dyspnea, leucocytosis, and brain metastases conveyed a poor prognosis. From 85 survival estimates, only 16% were correct, but 21% expected more than 6 months. Radiotherapy was delivered to 91% of patients. In 90% of radiation treatments, regimens of at least 30 Gy with fractions of 2-3 Gy were applied. Half of the patients spent greater than 60% of their remaining lifespan on therapy. In only 58% of patients was radiotherapy completed. Progressive complaints were noted in 52% and palliation in 26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy was not appropriately customized to these patients considering the median treatment time, which resembles the median survival time. About half of the patients did not benefit despite spending most of their remaining lives on therapy. Prolonged irradiation schedules probably reflect overly optimistic prognoses and unrealistic concerns about late radiation damage. Single-fraction radiotherapy was too seldom used.

International variations in radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases: geographic borders define practice patterns?

Although it may be argued that single fraction (SF) radiotherapy (RT) should be regarded as the standard palliative treatment for pain due to uncomplicated bone metastases, its widespread clinical use is still underexploited. In this chapter, the authors discuss a number of surveys investigating doctors and patients' preferences for palliative RT schedules, discuss the possible reasons for this phenomenon, and suggest potential strategies to increase the use of SF.

International patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: evidence-based practice?

PURPOSE

Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the equivalence of multifraction and single-fraction (SF) radiotherapy for the palliation of painful bone metastases (BM). However, according to previous surveys, SF schedules remain underused. The objectives of this study were to determine the current patterns of practice internationally and to investigate the factors influencing this practice.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The members of three global radiation oncology professional organizations (American Society for Radiology Oncology [ASTRO], Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology [CARO], Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists) completed an Internet-based survey. The respondents described what radiotherapy dose fractionation they would recommend for 5 hypothetical cases describing patients with single or multiple painful BMs from breast, lung, or prostate cancer. Radiation oncologists rated the importance of patient, tumor, institution, and treatment factors, and descriptive statistics were compiled. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables and the Student t test for continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of the use of SF radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 962 respondents, three-quarters ASTRO members, described 101 different dose schedules in common use (range, 3 Gy/1 fraction to 60 Gy/20 fractions). The median dose overall was 30 Gy/10 fractions. SF schedules were used the least often by ASTRO members practicing in the United States and most often by CARO members. Case, membership affiliation, country of training, location of practice, and practice type were independently predictive of the use of SF. The principal factors considered when prescribing were prognosis, risk of spinal cord compression, and performance status.

CONCLUSION

Despite abundant evidence, most radiation oncologists continue to prescribe multifraction schedules for patients who fit the eligibility criteria of previous randomized controlled trials. Our results have confirmed a delay in the incorporation of evidence into practice for palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.

Did the pattern of practice in the prescription of palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of uncomplicated bone metastases change between 1999 and 2005 at the rapid response radiotherapy program?

AIMS

Since 1999, randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses have reported equal efficacy of pain relief from single- and multiple-fraction radiotherapy for bone metastases. A number of factors, including limited radiotherapy resources, waiting times, and patient convenience, suggest single fraction to be the treatment of choice for patients. However, international patterns of practice indicate that multiple fractions are still commonly used. This study examined whether dose-fractionation schemes used for the treatment of bone metastases at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) at the Odette Cancer Centre have changed since 1999.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the prospective RRRP database and hospital records were conducted for all patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases at the RRRP in 1999 (or baseline), 2001, 2004 and from 1 January to 31 July 2005. Data were collected on patient demographics and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 693 patients, 65 and 35% were prescribed single fraction (predominantly single 8 Gy) and multiple fractions (predominantly 20 Gy/five fractions), respectively. The administration of single treatments generally increased over time, from 51% in 1999 to 66% in 2005 (P=0.0001). On the basis of multiple logistic regression analyses, patients were more likely to be prescribed single-fraction radiotherapy if they had prostate cancer, had a poorer performance status, were treated to the limbs, hips, shoulders, pelvis, ribs, scapula, sternum, or clavicle (compared with the spine), were treated by a radiation oncologist who had been trained in earlier years, and who were treated after 1999.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1999 and 2005, the use of single-fraction radiotherapy increased, corresponding to publications showing equal efficacy of pain relief between single and multiple fractions in the management of uncomplicated bone metastases. However, about a third of patients still received multiple fractions.

Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective is to update previous meta-analyses with a systematic review of randomized palliative radiotherapy (RT) trials comparing single fractions (SFs) versus multiple fractions (MFs).

METHODS

The analysis includes all published reports from randomized trials comparing SF or MF schedules for the treatment of painful bone metastases with localized RT. A systematic review was performed using the random-effects model with Review Manager version 4.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated for each trial and presented in a forest plot.

RESULTS

A total of 16 randomized trials from 1986 onward were identified. For intention-to-treat patients, the overall response (OR) rates for pain were similar for SF at 1,468 (58%) of 2,513 patients and MF RT at 1,466 (59%) of 2,487 patients. The complete response (CR) rates for pain were 23% (545 of 2,375 patients) for SF and 24% (558 of 2,351 patients) for MF RT. No significant differences were found in response rates. Trends showing an increased risk for SF RT arm patients in terms of pathological fractures and spinal cord compressions were observed, but neither were statistically significant (P = .75 and P = .13, respectively). The likelihood of re-treatment was 2.5-fold higher (95% CI, 1.76 to 3.56) in SF RT arm patients (P < .00001). Repeated analysis of these end points, excluding dropout patients, did not alter the conclusions. Generally, no significant differences with respect to acute toxicities were observed between the arms.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in the arms were observed for overall and CR rates in both intention-to-treat and assessable patients. However, a significantly higher re-treatment rate with SFs was evident.

Review of patterns of practice and patients’ preferences in the treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Since the 1980s, randomized clinical trials showed that single fraction radiotherapy (RT) provided equal pain relief as multiple fractions of RT in the treatment of bone metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using Medline, a literature search was conducted on patterns of practice among radiation oncologists and patients' preferences of dose fractionations for the treatment of bone metastases.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fifteen studies on international patterns of practice published between 1966 and May 2006 were identified. Surveys of Canadian radiation oncologists indicated approximately 85% preferred multiple fractions, most often as 20 Gray in five fractions (20 Gy/5). Surveys in the United States indicated that 30 Gy/10 was most commonly used, and 90-100% of these oncologists preferred multiple over single fraction RT. Multiple fractions were most commonly used in the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand, and India; however, more radiation oncologists in these countries would prescribe a single fraction than in North America. Three studies investigated patients' preferences of dose fractionations. In the Australian study, most patients favored single fraction RT as long as long-term outcomes were not compromised. Durability of pain relief was considered more important than short-term convenience factors. In the Singapore study, 85% of patients would choose extended courses of RT (24 Gy/6) compared to a single 8 Gy. In the Canadian study, most patients (76%) would choose a single 8 Gy over 20 Gy/5 of palliative RT due to greater convenience.

CONCLUSION

Despite strong evidence supporting the use of single fraction RT, current practices and preferences favor multiple fractions for the treatment of bone metastases. This has significant implications for the overall quality of life, RT department workload, costs to healthcare systems, and patient convenience.

Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy is effective in palliating pain from bone metastases. We investigated whether 8 Gy delivered in a single treatment fraction provides pain and narcotic relief that is equivalent to that of the standard treatment course of 30 Gy delivered in 10 treatment fractions over 2 weeks.

METHODS

A prospective, phase III randomized study of palliative radiation therapy was conducted for patients with breast or prostate cancer who had one to three sites of painful bone metastases and moderate to severe pain. Patients were randomly assigned to 8 Gy in one treatment fraction (8-Gy arm) or to 30 Gy in 10 treatment fractions (30-Gy arm). Pain relief at 3 months after randomization was evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare response to treatment in terms of pain and narcotic relief between the two arms and for each stratification variable. All statistical comparisons were two-sided.

RESULTS

There were 455 patients in the 8-Gy arm and 443 in the 30-Gy arm; pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between arms. Grade 2-4 acute toxicity was more frequent in the 30-Gy arm (17%) than in the 8-Gy arm (10%) (difference = 7%, 95% CI = 3% to 12%; P = .002). Late toxicity was rare (4%) in both arms. The overall response rate was 66%. Complete and partial response rates were 15% and 50%, respectively, in the 8-Gy arm compared with 18% and 48% in the 30-Gy arm (P = .6). At 3 months, 33% of all patients no longer required narcotic medications. The incidence of subsequent pathologic fracture was 5% for the 8-Gy arm and 4% for the 30-Gy arm. The retreatment rate was statistically significantly higher in the 8-Gy arm (18%) than in the 30-Gy arm (9%) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both regimens were equivalent in terms of pain and narcotic relief at 3 months and were well tolerated with few adverse effects. The 8-Gy arm had a higher rate of re-treatment but had less acute toxicity than the 30-Gy arm.

Radiotherapy fractionation for the palliation of uncomplicated painful bone metastases - an evidence-based practice guideline

BACKGROUND

This practice guideline was developed to provide recommendations to clinicians in Ontario on the preferred standard radiotherapy fractionation schedule for the treatment of painful bone metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and published elsewhere. The Supportive Care Guidelines Group, a multidisciplinary guideline development panel, formulated clinical recommendations based on their interpretation of the evidence. In addition to evidence from clinical trials, the panel also considered patient convenience and ease of administration of palliative radiotherapy. External review of the draft report by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey, and final approval was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis did not detect a significant difference in complete or overall pain relief between single treatment and multifraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. Fifty-nine Ontario practitioners responded to the mailed survey (return rate 62%). Forty-two percent also returned written comments. Eighty-three percent of respondents agreed with the interpretation of the evidence and 75% agreed that the report should be approved as a practice guideline. Minor revisions were made based on feedback from the external reviewers and the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee. The Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee approved the final practice guideline report.

CONCLUSION

For adult patients with single or multiple radiographically confirmed bone metastases of any histology corresponding to painful areas in previously non-irradiated areas without pathologic fractures or spinal cord/cauda equine compression, we conclude that: Where the treatment objective is pain relief, a single 8 Gy treatment, prescribed to the appropriate target volume, is recommended as the standard dose-fractionation schedule for the treatment of symptomatic and uncomplicated bone metastases. Several factors frequently considered in clinical practice when applying this evidence such as the effect of primary histology, anatomical site of treatment, risk of pathological fracture, soft tissue disease and cord compression, use of antiemetics, and the role of retreatment are discussed as qualifying statements.Our systematic review and meta-analysis provided high quality evidence for the key recommendation in this clinical practice guideline. Qualifying statements addressing factors that should be considered when applying this recommendation in clinical practice facilitate its clinical application. The rigorous development and approval process result in a final document that is strongly endorsed by practitioners as a practice guideline.

Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy--a systematic review of randomised trials

Recent randomised studies have reported that single fraction radiotherapy is as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving pain caused by bone metastasis. However, there are concerns about the higher re-treatment rates and the efficacy of preventing future complications, such as pathological fracture and spinal cord compression, by single fraction radiotherapy. A systematic review of randomised studies, examining the effectiveness of single fraction radiotherapy versus multiple fraction radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain relief and prevention of bone complications, was conducted to help answer this controversy. Randomised studies comparing single fraction radiotherapy with multifraction radiotherapy on metastatic bone pain were identified. The analyses were performed using intention-to-treat principle. The results were pooled using meta-analysis to estimate the effect of treatment on pain response, re-treatment rate, pathological fracture rate and spinal cord compression rate. Twelve trials involving 3621 sites were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pain-response rates for single fraction radiotherapy and multifraction radiotherapy were 60% (1080/1814) and 59% (1060/1807), respectively, giving an odds ratio (OR) of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.19), indicating no difference between the two radiotherapy schedules. There was also no difference in complete pain response rates for single fraction radiotherapy (34% [508/1476]) and multifraction radiotherapy (32% [475/1473]), with an OR of 1.10 (950% CI 0.94-1.30). Patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy had a higher re-treatment rate, with 21.5% (267/1240) requiring re-treatment compared with 7.4% (91/1236) of patients in the multifraction radiotherapy arm (OR 3.44 [95% CI 2.67-4.43]). The pathological fracture rate was also higher in single fraction radiotherapy arm patients. Three per cent (37/1240) of patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy developed pathological fracture compared with 1.6% (20/1236) for those treated by multifraction radiotherapy (OR 1.82 [95% CI 1.06-3.11]). The spinal cord compression rates were similar for both arms (OR 1.41 [95% CI 0.72-2.75]). Single fraction radiotherapy was as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving metastatic bone pain. However, the re-treatment rate and pathological fracture rate were higher after single fraction radiotherapy. Studies with quality of life and health economic end points are warranted to find out the optimal treatment option.

Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy - a systematic review of the randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Recent randomised studies reported that single fraction radiotherapy was as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving pain due to bone metastasis. However, there are concerns about the higher re-treatment rates and the efficacy of preventing future complications such as pathological fracture and spinal cord compression by single fraction radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of single fraction radiotherapy versus multifraction radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain relief and prevention of bone complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings. Relevant data was extracted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised studies comparing single fraction radiotherapy with multifraction radiotherapy on metastatic bone pain

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The analyses were performed using intention-to-treat principle. The results were pooled using meta-analysis to estimate the effect of treatment on pain response, re-treatment rate, pathological fracture rate and spinal cord compression rate.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials that involved 3435 patients were identified. Of 3435 patients, 52 patients were randomised more than once for different painful bone metastasis sites. Altogether, 3487 painful sites were randomised. The trials included patients with painful bone metastases of any primary sites, but were mainly prostate, breast and lung. The overall pain response rates for single fraction radiotherapy and multifraction radiotherapy were 60% (1059/1779) and 59% (1038/1769) respectively, giving an odds ratio of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 - 1.19) indicating no difference between the two radiotherapy schedules. There was also no difference in complete pain response rates for single fraction radiotherapy (34% [497/1441]) and multifraction radiotherapy (32% [463/1435]) with an odds ratio of 1.11 (95%CI 0.94-1.30). Patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy had a higher re-treatment rate with 21.5% (267/1240) requiring re-treatment compared to 7.4% (91/1236) of patients in the multifraction radiotherapy arm (odds ratio 3.44 [95%CI 2.67-4.43]). The pathological fracture rate was also higher in single fraction radiotherapy arm patients. Three percent (37/1240) of patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy developed pathological fracture compared to 1.6% (20/1236) for those treated by multifraction radiotherapy (odds ratio 1.82 [95%CI 1.06-3.11]). The spinal cord compression rates were similar for both arms (odds ratio 1.41 [95%CI 0.72-2.75]). Repeated analyses excluding dropout patients gave similar results.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Single fraction radiotherapy was as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving metastatic bone pain. However, the re-treatment rate and pathological fracture rates were higher after single fraction radiotherapy. Studies with quality of life and health economic end points are warranted to find out the optimal treatment option.

Patient preference for radiotherapy fractionation schedule in the palliation of painful bone metastases

PURPOSE

The radiotherapeutic management of painful bone metastases is controversial, with several institutional and national guidelines advocating use of single-fraction radiotherapy. We aimed to determine patient choice of fractionation schedule after involvement in the decision-making process by use of a decision board.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advantages and disadvantages of two fractionation schedules (24 Gy in six fractions v 8 Gy in one fraction) used in the randomized Dutch Bone Metastasis Study were discussed with patients using a decision board. Patients were asked to choose a fractionation schedule, to give reasons for their choice, and to indicate level of satisfaction with being involved in decision making.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were entered. Eighty-five percent (95% confidence interval, 74% to 93%) chose 24 Gy in six fractions over 8 Gy in one fraction (P <.0005). Variables including age, sex, performance status, tumor type, pain score, and paying class were not significantly related to patient choice. Multiple fractionation was chosen for lower re-treatment rates (92%) and fewer fractures (32%). Single-fraction treatment was chosen for cost (11%) and convenience (89%). Eighty-four percent of patients expressed positive opinions about being involved in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSION

Decision board instruments are feasible and acceptable in an Asian population. The vast majority of patients preferred 24 Gy fractionated radiotherapy compared with a single fraction of 8 Gy. These results indicate the need for further research in this important area and serve to remind both clinicians and national or institutional policy makers of the importance of individual patient preference in treatment decision making.

Palliative radiation for vertebral metastases: the effect of variation in prescription parameters on the dose received at depth

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of prescription parameters on the dose received by the spine during palliative radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a survey, members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists were asked to define their prescription parameters for vertebral metastases. The depth of the spinal canal and vertebral body at 8 spinal levels was measured in 20 magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs). Survey results were applied to the measurements to assess the dose received at depth. The depth of spinal structures assessed at simulation and by diagnostic imaging was compared.

RESULTS

Prescriptions were most commonly to D(max) 3 cm or 5 cm using 60Co-6MV photons delivering 8-30 Gy in 1-10 fractions. Mean depths from MRI were: posterior spinal canal, 5.5 cm; anterior spinal canal, 6.9 cm; and anterior vertebral body, 9.6 cm. Application of the prescription parameters from the survey to these measurements showed a wide range in the dose at depth with variation in technique. Depths measured at simulation correlated well with diagnostic imaging.

CONCLUSION

The spinal canal and vertebral body lie >5 cm beneath the skin, and the dose received varies by up to 50% with changes in prescription depth. We suggest a suitable prescription point for vertebral metastases and a method for determining this at simulation.

Primary treatment endpoint following palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: need for a consensus definition?

OBJECTIVES

To compare and contrast the definitions of primary treatment endpoints in randomized studies of dose-fractionation schedules for treating bone metastases and to identify basic characteristics of treatment endpoint that may require consensus among investigators.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various dose-fractionation schedules for painful bone metastases, published between 1980 and 1999, and on-going trials whose protocols were available, were systematically reviewed based on the following features of the primary treatment endpoint: (i) degree of pain relief; (ii) timing of the pain response assessment; (iii) effect of co-interventions on pain relief; (iv) the reduction of analgesic as a treatment response; and (v) quantification of response duration.

RESULTS

Ten published RCTs (each sampled over 100 patients), plus two current trial protocols were reviewed. Five of the 12 studies defined any reduction in pain score as the primary endpoint. Three trials defined response at pre-determined time points, whereas eight studies attributed pain improvement at any time during follow-up to the effect of radiotherapy. No trial incorporated effect of systemic treatments on response. Only two trials incorporated analgesic scores into the primary endpoint criteria, although several trials reported results of combined pain and analgesic relief. Eight trials reported duration of response. Three provided some estimation of duration with respect to survival: two of them employing actuarial time to pain progression, and one calculated the ratio of pain response to median survival duration (percent net relief). Quality of life was measured in four of 12 studies, as secondary endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Although available data suggest similarity in pain relief among various dose-fractionation schedules, accurate and consistent description of the degree of benefit from radiotherapy is lacking. While pain relief is a consistent primary treatment goal among randomized trials, a consensus on several important features of treatment endpoint is needed in order to establish common grounds for future trials in palliative radiotherapy.

Prospective patient-based assessment of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this report is to prospectively evaluate pain control provided by palliative radiotherapy for all irradiated patients with bone metastases by using their own assessments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective database was set up for all patients referred for palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using an 11 categorical point scale (0=lack of pain, 10=worst pain imaginable). Analgesic consumption during the preceding 24 h was recorded and converted into equivalent total daily dose of oral morphine. For those who received radiotherapy, follow-up was conducted via telephone interviews at week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 post treatment using the same pain scale and analgesic diary. Radiotherapy outcome was initially assessed by pain score alone. Complete response (CR) was defined as a pain score of 0. Partial response (PR) was defined as a reduction of score > or =2 or a> or =50% reduction of the pre-treatment pain score. We further analyzed outcomes using integrated pain and analgesic scores. Response was defined as either a reduction of pain score > or =2 with at least no increase in analgesics or at least stable pain score with a > or =50% reduction in analgesic intake.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients were treated with palliative radiotherapy. When response evaluation was by pain score alone, the PR rates at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks were 44, 42, 30 and 38%, respectively; while the CR rates were 24, 32, 31 and 29%, respectively. The overall response rate at 12 weeks was 67%. When assessed by the integrated pain and analgesic scores, the response rates were 50, 46, 43 and 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The response rate in our patient population is comparable with those reported in clinical trials. This is important when counselling our patients on the expected effectiveness of radiotherapy outside of clinical trials. Our observations confirm the generalizability of the trials conducted to date. While randomized trials still remain the gold standard of research, observational studies can serve as useful adjuncts to randomized trials to confirm the efficacy and guide the design of new controlled trials.

Palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases: an evaluation of outcome measures

The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate important patient-based outcomes that are specific to the palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. We first conducted a literature review to identify and evaluate outcomes that are currently in use. To identify outcomes that are important to patients, in-depth patient interviews were conducted. Finally, issues identified through the interviews were quantified through a prospective survey, in which patients completed a questionnaire prior to commencing radiotherapy and again after 6 weeks. In our literature review, we found that there was no standardized definition of either response to radiotherapy or assessment of pain relief. Pain measurement in many studies was undertaken using very simple measures, which could possibly yield inaccurate results. The vast majority of studies did not include quality of life as an endpoint. The patient interviews and survey showed that chronic pain and associated limitation of movement were the disease symptoms causing the most concern. Having a clear, alert mind and being able in self-care were the aspects of daily living given the highest priority. Sustained pain relief and minimizing the risk of future complications were the main priorities relating to radiotherapy treatment. The practical aspects of treatment (travelling distance, remaining at home and brevity of treatment) were of least importance. This study indicates the complexity of evaluating the outcomes of palliative interventions, and confirms the deficiencies of pain relief as the primary end-point. The patient's quality of life is affected by many factors other than pain (such as limited mobility, reduced performance, side effects and impaired role functioning); hence a wider range of end-points is required. Greater sensitivity is required than in currently used end-points. Concurrent diseases as well as concurrent therapies can make it difficult to attribute effects with precision. Unless such factors are considered in research design, the results may prove unreliable.

[Production process in external radiotherapy and cost-inducers research in 2 hospital units]

PURPOSE

To analyse the process of outpatient radiation therapy by dividing it into elementary acts, and to determine the cost-inducers (staff and machine time, equipment) in order to enhance the value of radiotherapy activity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The care process was analysed from 1 June 1997 to 1 September 1997, in two institutions (Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Saint Etienne and centre de Lutte contre le Cancer de Lyon), in terms of consumption of human and equipment means, representing a cost for the care institution. The valorization was expressed in physics units for material means, and in time units for human and heavy equipment. Parameters able to modify the consumption of means had been defined. The following data had been collected for each activity: patient characteristics, characteristics of the process, specific parameters of each activity, data related to the care staff and care unit.

RESULTS

The importance of the specific data of each activity was noteworthy. Two criteria modified the valorization: the complexity level of dosimetry and inclusion in a research trial. Total body irradiation and conformal radiotherapy were well individualized. There was no difference between the two care units. The lack of cost-inducers for the 'immobilization-simulation' activity reflects the large diversity of practice, and requires a global analysis of the 'treatment preparation' process.

CONCLUSION

The cost-inducers found in this study could permit the elaboration of the 'relative cost index' in radiation therapy. (The results obtained must be validated in other types of care units.) These relative cost indexes would describe the various phases of the treatment, such as treatment preparation, dosimetry, treatment, quality control. This approach is currently used by workshops in PMSI (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information) and NGAP (Nomenclature Générale des Actes Professionnels).

Palliation of bone metastases: a survey of patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy constitutes nearly 50% of the workload in radiotherapy. Surveys on the patterns of practice in radiotherapy have been published from North America and Europe. Our objective was to determine the current pattern of practice of radiation oncologists in Canada for the palliation of bone metastases.

METHOD

A survey was sent to 300 practicing radiation oncologists in Canada. Five case scenarios were presented. The first three were patients with a single symptomatic site: breast cancer patient with pelvic metastasis, lung cancer male with metastasis to L3 and L1, respectively. The last two were breast and prostate cancer patients with multiple symptomatic bone metastases.

RESULTS

A total of 172 questionnaires were returned (57%) for a total of 860 responses. For the three cases with a single painful bone metastasis, over 98% would prescribe radiotherapy. The doses ranged from a single 8 to 30 Gy in ten fractions. Of the 172 respondents, 117 (68%) would use the same dose fractionation for all three cases, suggesting that they had a standard dose fractionation for palliative radiotherapy. The most common dose fractionation was 20 Gy in five fractions used by 84/117 (72%), and 8 Gy in one fraction by 19/117 (16%). In all five case scenarios, 81% would use a short course of radiotherapy (single 8 Gy, 17%; 20 Gy in five fractions, 64%), while 10% would prescribe 30 Gy in ten fractions. For the two cases with diffuse symptomatic bone metastases, half body irradiation (HBI) and radionuclides were recommended more frequently in prostate cancer than in breast cancer (46/172 vs. 4/172, P<0. 0001; and 93/172 vs. 10/172, P<0.0001, respectively). Strontium was the most commonly recommended radionuclide (98/103=95%). Since systemic radionuclides are not readily available in our health care system, 41/98 (42%) of radiation oncologists who would recommend strontium were not familiar with the dose. Bisphosphonates were recommended more frequently in breast cancer than in prostate cancer 13/172 (8%) vs. 1/172 (0.6%), P=0.001.

CONCLUSION

Local field external radiotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy, and the most common fractionation for bone metastases in Canada is 20 Gy in five fractions compared with 30 Gy in ten fractions in the US. Despite randomized trials showing similar results for single compared with fractionated radiotherapy, the majority of us still advocate five fractions. The frequency of employing a single fractionation has not changed since the last national survey in 1992. Nearly 70% use a standard dose fractionation to palliate localized painful metastasis by radiotherapy, independent of the site of involvement or tumor type. The pattern of practice of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases in Canada is different to that reported previously from the US. The reasons why the results of randomized studies on bone metastases have no impact on the patterns of practice are worth exploring.

Continuing reluctance to use single fractions of radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: an Australian and New Zealand practice survey and literature review

PURPOSE

To survey Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) radiation oncologists on their preferred fractionation regimens for pain due to bone metastases in the context of similar overseas surveys and the large body of evidence from randomized trials.

METHODS

Delegates to the October 1998 Royal ANZ College of Radiologists Annual Scientific Meeting were asked to state their fractionation for four hypothetical cases viz. local bone pain from metastatic breast, prostate and lung cancer and neuropathic (radicular) pain from metastatic lung cancer. In addition to demographic data, respondents were asked to select reasons for their choices and indicate what factors would influence a change in their recommended fractionation.

RESULTS

Twelve of 32 trainees and 41 of 82 specialists completed the survey, giving an overall response rate of 46%. There was decreasing use of shorter fractionation schedules from lung through prostate to breast cancer with, in particular, single fractions recommended by, respectively, 42, 28 and 15% of respondents for local bone pain (P=0.013). However, the presence of neuropathic pain from metastatic lung cancer led to lower use of single fractions (15%, P=0.0046). There were no statistically significant differences in preferred fractionation with respect to other variables assessed in this survey. The commonest reasons cited for fractionating were desire to minimize recurrent pain and the influence of training, with desire to minimize the risk of neurological progression and optimize tumour regression also important for neuropathic pain. By contrast, use of single fractions was most commonly based upon literature results and patient convenience. Changing from multiple to single fractions was most influenced by poor performance status, while the presence of neurological signs/symptoms had the reverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this ANZ survey largely reflect the results from other surveys performed in the UK, Europe, Canada and USA. Although debate continues in the literature, the continuing preference of radiation oncologists to fractionate for local bone pain is contrary to the 16 randomized trials published to date which give little support for a dose-response relationship above a single 6-8 Gy in this setting. This practice has significant implications for departmental workload, costs to the healthcare system and patient convenience. There is no objective evidence on the influence of fractionation for neuropathic bone pain in the literature at present, although an ANZ randomized trial addressing this problem is under way (TROG 96.05).

A role for radiotherapy in neuropathic bone pain: preliminary response rates from a prospective trial (Trans-tasman radiation oncology group, TROG 96.05)

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) has a proven role in palliation of pain from bone metastases with numerous randomized trials obtaining response rates (RRs) of typically 70-80% regardless of the fractionation employed. However RT for neuropathic bone pain (NBP), i.e., pain with a radiating cutaneous component due to compression/irritation of nerves by tumor has not previously been studied, and its role is thus uncertain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In February 1996, the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) initiated a multicenter randomized trial comparing a single 8 Gy fraction with 20 Gy in 5 fractions for NBP with an accrual target of 270. Formal interim analyses were planned at 90 and 180 patients. The 90th patient was accrued in June 1998, and data from the first interim analysis with both arms combined form the basis of this report.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were randomized to a single 8 Gy, 46 to 20 Gy in 5 fractions. The commonest primary sites were prostate (34%), lung (28%) and breast (10%). Median age was 68 years (range 37-89). The index site was spine (86%), rib (13%), base of skull (1%). On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall RR was 53/90 = 59% (95% CI = 48-69%), with 27% achieving a complete response and 32% a partial response. The overall RR for eligible patients was 49/81 = 60% (95% CI = 49-71%) with 27% and 33% achieving complete and partial responses respectively. Estimated median time to treatment failure was 3.2 months (95% CI = 2.1-5.1 months), with estimated median survival of 5.1 months (95% CI = 4.2-7.2 months). To date, six spinal cord/cauda equina compressions and four new or progressive pathological fractures have been detected at the index site after randomization, although one cord compression occurred before radiotherapy was planned to commence. In February 1999, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee strongly recommended continuation of the trial.

CONCLUSION

Although these results are preliminary, it seems clear that there is indeed a role for RT in the treatment of NBP. Analysis of outcome by treatment arm awaits completion of the randomized trial.

Radiotherapy for bone metastases: a critical appraisal of outcome measures

Pain from bone metastases is a common problem in patients with advanced cancer, and radiotherapy plays an important role in its palliation. Single fraction treatments are often prescribed, but there is no clear consensus on this issue and clinical practice shows significant variability. This situation is unsatisfactory for all patients--the patient, the clinician, and the health care administrator. Randomized trials may use poor outcome measures and this contributes to practice variability. The credibility of outcome studies is often reduced due to poor study design, small sample sizes, and the use of endpoints that are both unreliable and unsuitable. The endpoints used have been narrowly defined, the patient's perspective has generally been overlooked, and quality of life has only once been used as an endpoint. A review of the current literature suggests that instruments specific to bone metastases are required. These must be based on patient experience, and rely on self-report. In addition, there is a need to understand the relative priority that patients attribute to treatment outcomes. The use of better instruments and methodologies in future trials will enhance the credibility of results and reduce practice variations.

Pain relief and quality of life following radiotherapy for bone metastases: a randomised trial of two fractionation schedules

BACKGROUND

The optimum dose and fractionation schedule for the palliative irradiation of painful bone metastases is controversial.

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, side-effects and effect on quality of life of two commonly used radiotherapy schedules in the management of painful bone metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective trial, 280 patients were randomised to receive either a single 10 Gy treatment or a course of 22.5 Gy in five daily fractions for the relief of localised metastatic bone pain.

RESULTS

Response rates have been calculated from 240 assessable treated sites of pain. The overall response rates were 83.7% (single treatment) and 89.2% (five fractions). The complete response rates were 38.8% (single treatment) and 42.3% (five fractions). The median duration of pain control was 13.5 weeks (single treatment) and 14.0 weeks (five fractions). None of these differences was statistically significant. There were no differences between the groups in the effect of treatment on a variety of quality of life parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that a single 10 Gy treatment is as effective as a course of 22.5 Gy in five fractions in the management of painful bone metastases.

Skeletal metastases

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for skeletal metastases is based on 171 scientific articles, including 13 randomized studies, 24 prospective studies, and 79 retrospective studies. These studies involve 13054 patients. Radiotherapy has been well documented as a method for alleviating pain, but the mechanisms underlying this effect are largely unknown. When used for pain palliation, radiotherapy achieves freedom from pain, or substantial alleviation of pain in nearly all cases, with few side effects. Half-body irradiation is effective in treating multiple metastatic sites and should be considered for use more frequently. However, this increases the requirements on equipment, dosimetry, and hospital beds. Systemic radiotherapy with radionuclides may be indicated for generalized skeletal pain. The role of radiotherapy in preventing or healing fractures is not fully evaluated. Optimum dose levels and fractionation schedules have not been established. Early radiotherapy for spinal cord compression may prevent symptoms from worsening, but the effects on existing paralysis are modest.

Patterns of fractionation for palliation of bone metastases

The patterns of fractionation used to treat bone metastases in a single centre in two time periods were determined. Clinical audit was carried out, for two periods of 6 months each, in 1988 and 1993. Data recorded included patient, tumour and treatment variables. Palliation of bone metastases represented 40% and 44% of palliative treatment courses, and 20% and 21% of total treatment courses, respectively, in both time periods. Shorter treatment schedules were used in 1993 compared to 1988, with mean fraction numbers of 6.4 versus 8.5, respectively (P < 0.001). This reduction in fraction numbers occurred for the common primary tumour sites. In 1993, the mean numbers of fractions used were related to the primary tumour site (7.8 fractions for breast, 5.0 for lung, 6.7 for melanoma, 6.4 for other primary sites, P = 0.05), the treatment site (7.3 fractions for weight-bearing bones, 4.0 for non-weight-bearing bones, P < 0.001) and patient address (6.0 fractions for city postcode vs 7.8 for country postcode, P = 0.02). Treating radiation oncologist (5.7-7.8 mean fractions, P = 0.06) and patient age (P = 0.56) were not significant factors for the number of fractions used. It is likely that there were multiple causes for a reduction in the number of fractions used to treat bone metastases, including the results of clinical trials and increasing pressure to optimize the use of scarce resources. However, patients who may have a better prognosis (breast primary) and those with metastases in weight-bearing bones continued to receive longer treatment schedules.

The costs of hyperfractionation: an economic analysis incorporating consideration of waiting time for treatment

Multiple fractions per day are being used increasingly in clinical radiotherapy. There are sound radiobiological reasons for this, but the approach uses more time on treatment machines than conventional radiotherapy. The effect of using hyperfractionated schedules for a small minority of radically treated patients has been assessed using a previously published model. The analysis shows that profitability is severely affected by pure hyperfractionation, and that a schedule with a 2-week gap could, by increasing the number of patients it would be possible to treat palliatively, actually increase profitability. Waiting times for treatment could increase, sometimes to clinically unacceptable levels, for patients in all categories.

Radiotherapy for Bone Pain

Painful bone metastases are a common problem for cancer patients. Although current evidence supports the use of a single fraction of radiotherapy as the treatment of choice, many radiotherapists, for a variety of reasons, continue to use fractionated regimens. Over one six month period 105 patients received external beam irradiation for painful bone metastases at the Royal London Hospital (RLH). Thirty-one per cent of the patients were aged 70 or over. The treatment of 97 of these patients was assessed. They had a total of 280 sites treated over the course of their disease. Fifty-nine per cent of sites treated received a fractionated course of radiotherapy. Site significantly influenced fractionation. Overall response rates of 82% were achieved. Fractionation did not appear to influence this. Ten patients received large field irradiation. Fifteen patients had five or more sites irradiated, of whom only one received hemibody irradiation.

Retreatment with radiotherapy for painful bone metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the response to reirradiation of painful bone metastases following initial treatment with radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of 105 consecutive patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. A total of 280 individual treatment sites were identified, of which 57 were retreated once and 8 were retreated twice.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to initial treatment was 84% for pain relief, and at first retreatment this was 87%. Seven of eight patients retreated a second time also achieved pain relief. No relation to radiation dose, primary tumor type, or site was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients relapsing after radiotherapy to painful bone metastases who have responded initially, reirradiation can be recommended with a similar probability of response.

Radiotherapy for painful bone metastases

Bone metastases are a frequent cause of morbidity in patients with malignant disease. Pain is the commonest symptom; it can be treated successfully in the majority of patients by local external beam irradiation. Controversy exists over which regimen should be used, with a single dose necessitating only one treatment visit to the radiotherapy department, or a fractionated course requiring several visits. Many radiotherapists continue to use fractionated regimens despite the current evidence that single fractions are as effective. Many reasons exist for this, including departmental policy and training, fears of recurrence, problems with retreatment of previously treated areas, fears of increased early and late morbidity, and attempts at promoting recalcification. The majority of these reasons are theoretical and have yet to be substantiated. In many patients, symptomatic bone metastases are widespread, and hemibody irradiation, although more toxic, should be considered in order to avoid the need for repeated courses of local treatment.

Patterns of palliative radiotherapy in Canada

A questionnaire study was performed to determine patterns of radiotherapy practice across Canada and the relationship of age, work-load, resources, intent and aims of therapy on departmental policy; 99 returns were analysed. Three case scenarios were given: Brain metastases were treated typically without a simulation as a parallel pair with palliative intent to 2000 cGy in 5 fractions; for locally advanced lung cancer most patients were simulated, but 40% we deemed 'radical' and there was a bimodal pattern of dose fractionation (the age of the radiation oncologist appeared to influence this and geographical differences were also notable); bony metastases from breast cancer were typically simulated as a single field using 2000-2500 cGy in 5 fractions and always considered palliative. Work-load and resources are likely to influence patterns of care. For example, over 20% felt that treatment choice was suboptimal, largely due to lack of radiation technologists and megavoltage equipment. The implications of these determinants on palliative care are discussed. Objective criteria and definitions are required to allow satisfactory workload measurements and comparisons to be made.

Audit reduces the reluctance to use single fractions for painful bone metastases

We have conducted three audits of the number of fractions used within our department to treat symptomatic bone metastases. The initial audit identified 133 patients treated for bone metastases in a 3-month period using 538 fractions (mean number of fraction = 4.1, range 1-14). These figures were presented at our audit meeting along with a literature review which provided no evidence of any advantage of multiple fractions over single fractions. Departmental guidelines recommending the use of single fractions were established. A subsequent audit identified 149 patients treated with 520 fractions (mean number of fractions = 3.5, range 1-11). A third audit identified 148 patients treated with 335 fractions (mean number of fractions = 2.3, range 1-10). Audit has resulted in a reduction in the number of fractions used to treat bone metastases in our department. The major effect was seen after the second audit.

The use of discriminant analysis to guide palliative treatment for lung cancer patients

The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic index for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer which could predict survival to 3 months. This would enable less radiation dose to be given to patients where prognosis is limited by occult metastases, giving rise to less treatment morbidity and raising the therapeutic ratio. Data on 18 known prognostic factors were collected on 96 patients. Performance status, lymphocyte count, weight loss and extent of disease were the most predictive factors and were combined into an index. Logistic discriminant analysis was employed to give a numerical score of likelihood of survival to 3 months, ranging from 0 (not likely) to 1 (certain). In this first set of 96 patients, 16 deaths were observed before 3 months, of which 6 were predicted. There was one false positive prediction. Overall accuracy of prediction was therefore 89% with 99% specificity. The same 4 prognostic factors were measured on a second set of 80 patients. Nineteen died before 3 months, of which 5 were predicted with 2 false positives, giving an overall accuracy of 80% and 97% specificity. A probability of survival of less than or equal to 0.2, although highly specific, was only applicable to 9% of patients and this was the limiting factor in the clinical usefulness of the test. A 16-branch tree diagram allows any patient to be assigned a risk factor based on the four predictive factors at the first clinic attendance. Use of the index could encourage more rational prescribing of radiation dose.

Treatment strategies in advanced and metastatic cancer: differences in attitude between the USA, Canada and Europe

Six-hundred and forty four radiation therapists from 21 European countries, Canada, and the USA responded to a questionnaire regarding the management of three cases of advanced cancer. The cases were a 64-year-old man with brain metastases from small cell carcinoma of the lung; a 64-year-old woman with bone metastases from carcinoma of the breast and a 59-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the bronchus and mediastinal nodes. There was variation as to the perceived prognosis and appropriate aims of therapy, particularly for the case of squamous cell carcinoma of the bronchus. The total dose and number of fractions could be related to the perceived aims and expectations of treatment, for example, those aiming to extend life gave higher doses of radiotherapy and those aiming only to relieve symptoms gave lower. Similarly, those describing treatment as radical and estimating longer survival gave higher doses and more fractions than those treating palliatively. Variations in the role of the radiation oncologist in the management of advanced and metastatic cancer in the USA, Canada and Europe are discussed.

Shades of gray: a personal view of palliation by radiotherapy

Palliation is a significant part of the work of a radiation oncologist and yet is discussed infrequently. All too often it is considered simple when in many cases the contrary is the case. The philosophy of palliation is discussed and is defined as non-curative treatment. Further sub-division into symptom control, growth restraint/local control is helpful. The aim of palliation must be clearly defined if it is to be achieved, taking into account not only the lesion causing the problem but also many other factors including the patient's general condition, the clinical evolution of the tumour, previous treatment and social factors. The aim should be communicated to the patient and relatives. Doses for effective palliation vary from low to high and require different fractionation regimens. Examples are given from clinical practice with emphasis on difficult and controversial areas. There are as many diseases as patients and the need to individualise treatment is stressed.

The role of radiotherapy in palliative care

Radiotherapy is an indispensable modality in the palliation of cancer. All palliative care programs should be acquainted with its indications and have a close working relationship with a radiation oncology department. The technical aspects of the subject may be intimidating to many staff and patients, and departments need to improve their outreach and education. The main indications are: pain relief (particularly bone pain), control of hemorrhage, fungation and ulceration, dyspnea, blockage of hollow viscera, and the shrinkage of any tumors causing problems by virtue of space occupancy. In addition, it has an important role in the palliation of three oncological emergencies: superior vena caval obstruction, spinal cord compression, and raised intracranial pressure due to cerebral metastases. More pragmatic fractionation schedules are being developed that are compatible with good results in terms of palliative end points, giving shorter courses with fewer hospital attendances for patient and family comfort and convenience. More clinical research and evaluation of palliative radiotherapy are required.