The structure and regulation of the pituitary gonadotrophin subunit genes

GnRH-regulated expression of Jun and JUN target genes in gonadotropes requires a functional interaction between TCF/LEF family members and beta-catenin

GnRH regulates gonadotrope function through a complex transcriptional network that includes three members of the immediate early gene family: Egr1, Jun, and Atf3. These DNA-binding proteins act alone or in pairs to confer hormonal responsiveness to Cga, Lhb, Fshb, and Gnrhr. Herein we suggest that the transcriptional response of Jun requires a functional interaction between the T-cell factor (TCF)/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) family of DNA-binding proteins and beta-catenin (officially CTNNB1), a coactivator of TCF/LEF. Supporting data include demonstration that GnRH increases activity of TOPflash, a TCF/LEF-dependent luciferase reporter, in LbetaT2 cells, a gonadotrope-derived cell line. Additional cotransfection experiments indicate that a dominant-negative form of TCF7L2 (TCFDN) that binds DNA, but not beta-catenin, blocks GnRH induction of TOPflash. Overexpression of AXIN, an inhibitor of beta-catenin, also reduces GnRH stimulation of TOPflash. Transduction of LbetaT2 cells with TCFDN adenoviruses diminishes GnRH stimulation of Jun mRNA without altering expression of Egr1 and Atf3, two other immediate early genes that confer GnRH responsiveness. Reduction of beta-catenin in LbetaT2 cells, through stable expression of short hairpin RNA, also selectively compromises GnRH regulation of Jun expression and levels of JUN protein. Finally, overexpression of TCFDN attenuates GnRH regulation of Cga promoter activity, a known downstream target of JUN. Together, these results indicate that GnRH regulation of Jun transcription requires a functional interaction between TCF/LEF and beta-catenin and that alteration of either impacts expression of JUN downstream targets such as Cga.

Multiple and overlapping combinatorial codes orchestrate hormonal responsiveness and dictate cell-specific expression of the genes encoding luteinizing hormone

Normal reproductive function in mammals requires precise control of LH synthesis and secretion by gonadotropes of the anterior pituitary. Synthesis of LH requires expression of two genes [alpha-glycoprotein subunit (alphaGSU) and LHbeta] located on different chromosomes. Hormones from the hypothalamus and gonads modulate transcription of both genes as well as secretion of the biologically active LH heterodimer. In males and females, the transcriptional tone of the genes encoding alphaGSU and LHbeta reflects dynamic integration of a positive signal provided by GnRH from hypothalamic neurons and negative signals emanating from gonadal steroids. Although alphaGSU and LHbeta genes respond transcriptionally in the same manner to changes in hormonal input, different combinations of regulatory elements orchestrate their response. These hormone-responsive regulatory elements are also integral members of much larger combinatorial codes responsible for targeting expression of alphaGSU and LHbeta genes to gonadotropes. In this review, we will profile the genomic landscape of the promoter-regulatory region of both genes, depicting elements and factors that contribute to gonadotrope-specific expression and hormonal regulation. Within this context, we will highlight the different combinatorial codes that control transcriptional responses, particularly those that mediate the opposing effects of GnRH and one of the sex steroids, androgens. We will use this framework to suggest that GnRH and androgens attain the same transcriptional endpoint through combinatorial codes unique to alphaGSU and LHbeta. This parallelism permits the dynamic and coordinate regulation of two genes that encode a single hormone.

Sustained effects of a single injection of ethanol on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the male rat

The hormones responsible for regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis are essential for proper reproductive function. Ethanol (EtOH) has been shown to exert its effect at all three levels of this axis. The present study defines striking differences in the time course of recovery of luteinizing hormone (LH) in gonadally intact, compared with, castrated male rats after acute EtOH administration. Serum levels of LH and testosterone were measured at various time points up to 2 weeks (1.5, 3, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168, and 336 hr) after a single intraperitoneal injection of either saline or 3 g/kg of EtOH in intact adult male rats. One EtOH injection significantly suppressed testosterone levels as low as 20% (p < 0.01) of saline-injected intact rats. This occurred as early as 1.5 hr after EtOH administration (the first measured time point), and statistically significant suppression was sustained for 96 hr. Similarly, LH levels showed a significant decrease. However, this significant fall in LH did not begin until 3 hr (p < 0.05) and continued up to 96 hr (p < 0.01), with a gradual return to control levels at 168 and 336 hr after treatment. Despite the significant and prolonged fall in testosterone levels in the EtOH-treated intact rats, beta-LH mRNA levels were inappropriately not elevated, as would be expected in the context of low circulating testosterone. However, at 168 and 336 hr, steady-state levels of beta-LH mRNA were significantly higher than seen in saline-injected controls (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), temporally correlating with the return of serum LH to control. LH levels in the castrated animals were significantly suppressed at 1.5 hr (p < 0.05) and 3 hr (p < 0.01) after EtOH treatment, compared with controls, yet they returned much more quickly by 24 hr after treatment. beta-LH mRNA levels of castrated animals also showed a significant depression at 1.5 and 3 hr, and returned to control levels by 24 hr. In these rats, the hypothalamic LH-releasing hormone mRNA levels were not altered by a single EtOH injection at any time point. However, in the intact animals, there was a transient increase in LH-releasing hormone mRNA at 72 and 96 hr (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) that may lead to the upregulation of beta-LH mRNA expression. These studies indicate that EtOH causes prolonged decreases in important serum hormones that are essential to the reproductive axis of the adult male rat.

Recognition by the glycoprotein hormone-specific N-acetylgalactosaminetransferase is independent of hormone native conformation

Some members of the glycoprotein hormone family [luteinizing hormone (LH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and free alpha subunit] bear unique asparagine-linked oligosaccharides with the terminal sequence SO4-Gal-NAc beta 1,4GlcNAc beta 1,2Man alpha, whereas other members [human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)] bear predominantly oligosaccharides terminating in the sequence sialic acid alpha-Gal beta 1,4GlcNAc beta 1,2Man alpha. We previously identified an N-acetylgalactosaminetransferase (GalNAc-transferase) in bovine pituitary membranes that specifically recognizes the alpha subunit peptide and adds GalNAc to the synthetic intermediate GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2. In the current study we demonstrate that bLH, hCG, hCG beta, hCG alpha, and FSH alpha are recognized by the pituitary GalNAc-transferase in vitro, whereas oFSH, hFSH, and hFSH beta are not (b-, h-, and o-indicate bovine, human, and ovine). The apparent Km values for addition of GalNAc to oligosaccharides on hCG alpha and hCG beta, 13.0 and 6.2 microM, respectively, are not altered by reduction and alkylation. Thus, recognition of the peptide determinant does not require maintenance of native tertiary structural features. In the presence of the recognition determinant the Km for addition of GalNAc to the intermediate GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2 is reduced from 1.2-2.6 mM to less than 13 microM. hFSH is not efficiently recognized by the GalNAc-transferase due to the absence of the recognition marker on hFSH beta and some degree of masking of the recognition marker on the alpha subunit when combined with FSH beta. Since recognition is directed at primary and possibly secondary structural features, it should be possible to determine which regions of the alpha and beta subunits are responsible for the specificity of the GalNAc-transferase.