Is the use of shunts in carotid endarterectomy still a problem?

Endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery

BACKGROUND

Although recent advances in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis have included endovascular angioplasty and stent placement, carotid endarterectomy is still the approach of choice for carotid disease and is one of the most commonly performed operations today. Minimally invasive surgeries involving the neck have recently been performed for thyroid and parathyroid diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery in a large animal model.

METHODS

Eight 25- to 30-kg pigs were used. Animals underwent endoscopic carotid dissection with carbon dioxide insufflation at 10 mmHg. A 1.5- to 2-cm arteriotomy was made in the common carotid artery. Four animals underwent direct arteriotomy closure, and four animals underwent synthetic patch graft placement using intracorporeal suturing techniques. Open examination of the operative site and carotid angiograms were performed at the end of the procedure. Operative time was recorded in the last four cases.

RESULTS

All animals tolerated the procedure well and carotid artery repair was successfully performed in all cases using a four-trocar technique. The entire extent of the cervical common and internal carotid arteries was exposed up to the cranial base. Cranial nerves and cervical structures were clearly visualized and preserved. No bleeding occurred at the end of the procedure. Carotid angiograms confirmed patent, nonstenotic vessels in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic approach for carotid surgery is technically feasible in the porcine model. This approach may represent a valuable option for surgery of the carotid artery since it offers the advantages of minimally invasive techniques while maintaining the benefits of surgical arterial repair.

Carotid endarterectomy in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to identify the possible short- and long-term effects of diabetes on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for 781 carotid endarterectomies (in 734 patients) performed by the same vascular surgeon in a university medical center between January 1994 and December 1998. Patients were divided two groups: those with diabetes (n = 181 patients; 193 operations) and those without diabetes (n = 553; 588 operations). The two groups were similar with respect to mean age, male-female ratio, and contralateral lesions. The only significant differences were a higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease and dyslipidemia in the diabetic group and a higher prevalence of hemispheric transient ischemic attacks among the nondiabetic patients. Carotid color duplex ultrasound scan had been performed in all patients, and in 56 patients from the diabetic group and 56 patients from the nondiabetic group (matched for age, sex, and contralateral lesions), the distal extension of the lesion from the carotid bifurcation had also been defined. Both of these subgroups were fully representative of their respective groups of origin. Carotid endarterectomy was performed after the induction of general anesthesia; electroencephalographic monitoring was continuous.

RESULTS

Except for the significantly higher prevalence of calcified plaques in the diabetic patients (P <.0001), the characteristics of the carotid disease in the two groups were similar. In the 56-member subgroups, 73.2% of the diabetic and 35.7% of the nondiabetic patients (P <.0001) had lesions extending more than 2 cm beyond the carotid bifurcation. Mean length of plaque beyond the bifurcation was 2.3 +/- 0.09 cm for the diabetic and 1.7 +/- 0.08 cm for the nondiabetic patients (P <.0001). Diabetes was the only factor significantly correlated with plaque length. In the diabetic subgroup, surgery was characterized by significantly longer carotid arteriotomies (P =.03) and clamp times (P <.003). Operative mortality was 1.5% in the diabetic group (2 myocardial infarctions + 1 stroke) and 0.5% in the nondiabetic group (1 myocardial infarction + 2 strokes; P value not significant); stroke rates were 1.5% (3 major strokes) and 0.5% (2 major strokes + 1 minor stroke), respectively (P = not significant). Long-term survival (5 years) was not significantly lower among the diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus does not seem to significantly increase the surgical risk for carotid endarterectomy. The presence of more extensive plaques has no significant effect on the results of surgery.

Carotid endarterectomy contralateral to an occluded carotid artery: a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To analyse whether contralateral occlusion represents an additional perioperative risk factor in carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and whether long-term survival after surgery in patients with contralateral occlusion differs from that of patients without.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

SETTING

Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

MATERIALS

Fifty-five patients with carotid stenosis and contralateral occlusion undergoing CEA (Group 1) were compared with 110 patients (Group II), without contralateral occlusion selected from a cohort of 367 patients with a patent contralateral artery, matched for gender, age and ipsilateral symptoms.

CHIEF OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative stroke/death rate at 30 days and minor complications in Group I vs. Group II over a mean follow-up of 38 months.

MAIN RESULTS

The perioperative stroke/death rate at 30 days was 0% in Group I and 2.7% in Group II (p = 0.6) while minor complications amounted to 11% in Group I and 5% in Group II (p = 0.2). Survival rates of patients free from stroke, using Kaplan Meier curves, were 79.4% in Group I and 83.3% in Group II (p = 0.4); stroke free rates were 92.8% and 94.3% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of late stroke, fatal or not, in patients who had undergone CEA with contralateral obstruction was the same as in similarly operated patients without contralateral obstruction (7% vs. 6%). However, the incidence of late vascular death, exemplified by a crude rate of 14% vs. 6% (p = 0.1; O.R. = 2.50; C.I. = 0.77-8.25) was greater in patients with contralateral occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, CEA in patients with contralateral occlusion was not associated with an increased perioperative morbidity/mortality rate. The higher incidence of vascular death in the late follow-up of patients with contralateral carotid occlusion, although not statistically significant, could indicate the presence of more severe systemic vascular disease.