Natural history of patients with unoperated atherosclerotic carotid artery disease--results from a retrospective study

Medical (Nonsurgical) Intervention Alone Is Now Best for Prevention of Stroke Associated With Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis

Significant advances in vascular disease medical intervention since large randomized trials for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis were conducted (1983–2003) have prompted doubt over current expectations of a surgical benefit. In this systematic review and analysis of published data it was found that rates of ipsilateral and any-territory stroke (+/−TIA), with medical intervention alone, have fallen significantly since the mid-1980s, with recent estimates overlapping those of operated patients in randomized trials. However, current medical intervention alone was estimated at least 3 to 8 times more cost-effective. In conclusion, current vascular disease medical intervention alone is now best for stroke prevention associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis given this new evidence, other cardiovascular benefits, and because high-risk patients who benefit from additional carotid surgery or angioplasty/stenting cannot be identified.

Influence of coronary artery and contralateral carotid artery status on long-term results of carotid artery surgery

The main cause of death and long-term disability of patients undergoing carotid artery surgery is coronary artery disease. To identify the prognostic value of the status of the contralateral artery, we studied the course of 224 consecutive patients in whom one or both carotid arteries were operated on at our institution between 1985 and 1995. The 224 patients were divided into three groups: group I (n = 56) had an occluded contralateral carotid artery, in group II (n = 56) both carotids were operated on, and group III (n = 112) had a normal contralateral carotid artery. The clinical status of all patients except one was ascertained by one of us. We found that the status of the contralateral artery does not influence the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing carotid artery surgery. A periodic cardiological and vascular follow-up of these patients seems warranted to improve their survival.

[Do the long-term results of carotid surgery influence the status of the contralateral carotid artery?]

AIM

The main cause of long-term death and disability of patients undergoing carotid artery surgery is coronary artery disease. To identify the prognostic value of the status of the contralateral artery, we studied the course of 224 patients operated consecutively on one or both carotid arteries in the same institution between 1985 and 1995.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 224 patients were divided into three groups: group I (n = 56) having an occluded contralateral carotid artery; group II (n = 56) in which both carotids were operated on; and, group III (n = 112) having a normal contralateral carotid artery. The clinical status of all patients was ascertained by one of us for all patients except one. This study concerned also the course of 40 patients (group R) belonging to the three groups, who had during the follow-up period a coronary and/or a peripheral vascular intervention with a preoperative coronarography.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 62.8, 78 and 65 months for groups I, II and III, respectively. Actuarial survival rates were 67%, 73%, 72.5% at 5 years, and 39%, 51.5% and 42% at 10 years, for group I, II and III respectively. Actuarial stroke-free rates were 96%, 100%, 91% at 5 years, and 96%, 100% and 78.5% at 10 years for group I, II and III respectively. Actuarial cardiac death rates were 26%, 23%, 19% at 5 years, and 49%, 42% and 37% at 10 years for group I, II and III, respectively. None of the differences between the three groups regarding these three different end-points was significant. The group R fatal or non-fatal cardiac event-free rates at 5 and 10 years were 88% and 53% respectively. When compared with the rates of other patients (without revascularization): 68% and 25.5% at 5 and 10 years, the results were almost significant (P = 0.07). Average age for group R patients was significantly lower (65 vs. 69 years, P < 0.05). Using Cox's model, age alone emerged as a factor influencing survival (P = 0.07) but not revascularization (P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

The status of the contralateral artery does not influence the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing carotid artery surgery. A periodic cardiological and vascular follow-up of these patients tends to improve their survival.