The quotient end-tidal/inspired concentration of sevoflurane in a low-flow system

A randomised prospective comparison of equilibration point and changing gas composition during low-flow anaesthesia with sevoflurane vs desflurane

Background and Aims:

Safety and economy are the main concerns while using low- flow anaesthesia with newer inhalational agents. The main objective of this study was to use and compare 'equilibration time' of sevoflurane and desflurane after change-over from high-to-low flow anaesthesia.

Methods:

This prospective study included consenting adult patients between 18–70 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised initially to receive high-flow anaesthesia with 1.3 MAC of either desflurane or sevoflurane with nitrous oxide. After equilibration point, low-flow anaesthesia was initiated. Heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximeter, 5 electrode ECG and gas monitoring was done. Statistical analysis was done with the help of Med CalC version 12.5.0.0 (student version) and IBM SPSS Version 20.0.

Results:

Mean equilibration time in sevoflurane group was higher (4.59 ± 0.77 minutes) than desflurane group (3.78 ± 0.56 minutes, P < 0.001). Inspired concentrations of both inhalational agents varied from their vaporiser settings over 2 hours, more so with sevoflurane than desflurane. Inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) remained above 30% during anaesthesia in both groups with stable haemodynamics.

Conclusion:

Change-over from high-to-low flow anaesthesia is faster in desflurane. With fresh gas flow (FGF) of 1 L with 50% oxygen and dial concentration of 1–1.5% of sevoflurane and 3.8–4.4% of desflurane, the risk of hypoxia is minimal. The disparity between the set and delivered concentrations is more (20%) in sevoflurane than desflurane (12%).

Site of fresh gas inlet and ratios of the delivered fraction and inspired fraction of inhaled isoflurane and sevoflurane in low-flow anesthesia

PURPOSE

The use of low-flow anesthesia causes a discrepancy between the delivered fraction (FD) and the inspired fraction (FI) of inhaled gases. We compared the FI/FD ratios of a new circle (fresh gas inlet located between the inspiratory valve and the patient) to those of the conventional circle (fresh gas inlet located between the inspiratory valve and the CO2 absorber) in low-flow isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia, using three anesthetic machines (Dräger NM-GS, Dräger Fabius-GS, and ACOMA KMA-1300-III).

METHODS

Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. For experiment 1, 32 patients were allocated to the NM-GS conventional/new, NM-GS new/conventional, ACOMA conventional/new, and ACOMA new/conventional groups. For experiment 2, 14 patients were allocated to ACOMA conventional/conventional and ACOMA new/new groups to measure isoflurane FI/FD ratios. For experiment 3, 36 patients were allocated to ACOMA conventional/conventional, ACOMA new/new, Fabius conventional/conventional, and Fabius new/new to measure sevoflurane FI/FD ratios.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, the NM-GS showed no significant changes in the FI/FD ratios. However, in the ACOMA, the new circle improved the FI/FD ratio. In experiment 2, the isoflurane FI/FD ratios in the new circle of the ACOMA were significantly higher than those in the conventional circle. In experiment 3, the sevoflurane FI/FD ratios in the new circle of both the ACOMA and the Fabius were significantly higher than those in the conventional circles.

CONCLUSION

The positioning of the fresh gas inlet between the inspiratory valve and the patient improved the FI/FD ratios of both isoflurane and sevoflurane during low-flow anesthesia in two decoupling-style anesthetic machines (ACOMA and Fabius).

Effect of fresh gas flow on isoflurane concentrations during low-flow anaesthesia

The effect of fresh gas flow (FGF) on isoflurane concentrations at given vaporizer settings during low-flow anaesthesia was investigated. Ninety patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I or II) were randomly allocated to three groups (FGF 1 l/min, FGF 2 l/min and FGF 4 l/min). Anaesthesia was maintained for 10 min with vaporizer setting isoflurane 2 vol% and FGF 4 l/min for full-tissue anaesthetic uptake in a semi-closed circle system. Low-flow anaesthesia was maintained for 20 min with end-tidal isoflurane 1.5 vol% and FGF 2 l/min. FGF was then changed to FGF 1 l/min, FGF 2 l/min or FGF 4 l/min. Measurements during the 20-min period showed that inspired and end-tidal isoflurane concentrations decreased in the FGF 1-l/min group but increased in the FGF 4-l/min group compared with baseline values. No haemodynamic changes were observed. Monitoring of anaesthetic concentrations and appropriate control of vaporizer settings are necessary during low-flow anaesthesia.

N2O-free low-flow anesthesia technique for children

BACKGROUND

The use of N2O during low-flow anesthesia (LFA) causes difficulty in predicting inspired gas mixtures and oxygen concentration due to accumulation. An alternative technique, which uses a mixture of oxygen and air and a morphine infusion to replace N2O, has been evaluated in children during LFA, and the clinical effects and composition of gases in the system are presented here.

METHODS

Thirty-five children aged 2-13 years undergoing major urogenital surgery were recruited into the study. Following a standardized induction, anesthesia was maintained with 2% sevoflurane in combination with a morphine infusion. After induction with 4 l min(-1), flow rates were reduced to 2 l min(-1) and finally to 1 l min(-1) at 10 min (0.5 l oxygen + 0.5 l air). The delivered oxygen concentration, oxygen saturation and the inspired and expired O2 sevoflurane and CO2 concentrations were recorded from the start of induction to the end of anesthesia.

RESULTS

The duration of LFA was 132+/-89 min. The concentration of oxygen delivered by the flow meters during this period was 55-60%. Although the changes in inspired and expired oxygen and sevoflurane and inspired CO2 related to the duration of LFA were statistically significant (P < 0.0001), they were not clinically relevant. All vital parameters were stable. Four patients required supplemental morphine and nine presented emergence agitation.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that an N2O-free LFA technique with 0.5 l min(-1) of air and 0.5 l min(-1) of O2 supplemented by sevoflurane and a morphine infusion is safe and effective in children. The resulting high-inspired oxygen concentration prevents occurrence of hypoxic gas mixtures, and the use of supplemental morphine compensates for the absence of N2O and overcomes the possibility of light anesthesia arising from a decrease in the inspired sevoflurane concentration.