The anti-inflammatory profile of inhaled corticosteroids combined with salmeterol in asthmatic patients

Bromotyrosines in sputum proteins and treatment effects of terbutaline and budesonide in asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of persistent asthma, usually combined with inhaled beta2-agonists. Previous research suggests that short-acting beta2-agonists (SABAs) may downregulate the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids, thereby increasing asthma morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 3-bromotyrosine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine levels, specific markers of eosinophil activation, reflect treatment effects on airway inflammation of inhaled corticosteroids and SABAs and support previous conclusions.

METHODS

Levels of 3-bromotyrosine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine were measured in sputum supernatants using stable isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of treatment with terbutaline, budesonide, and their combination in patients with persistent asthma. Thirty-four individuals were randomized, and 28 completed the study.

RESULTS

Treatment with budesonide lowered median 3-bromotyrosine levels compared with treatment with placebo, terbutaline, and budesonide-terbutaline (0.24 vs 0.64, 0.62, and 0.43 3-bromotyosine/tyrosine [mmol/mol]; P < .05) and lowered median 3,5-dibromotyrosine levels compared with placebo and terbutaline treatments (0.04 vs 0.11 and 0.07 3,5-dibromotyrosine/ tyrosine [mmol/mol], P < .05). Unlike eosinophil numbers, 3-bromotyrosine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine levels did not increase with terbutaline treatment compared with placebo treatment but were significantly raised when terbutaline was added to budesonide treatment. 3-Bromotyrosine levels correlated significantly with eosinophil cationic protein levels in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

3-Bromotyrosine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine levels reflect treatment effects in asthma and support previous findings that SABAs impair the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids. In addition to eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein levels, these modified tyrosine residues provide useful information about the inflammatory state of the airways.

Different inflammatory mechanisms in lungs of severe and mild asthma: crosstalk of NF-kappa-B, TGFbeta1, Bax, Bcl-2, IL-4 and IgE

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in the apoptotic, inflammatory, allergic and immunological features in the lungs of adults with asthma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with mild asthma (MA), 16 with severe asthma (SA) and 20 healthy volunteers (HVs) were enrolled. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was processed into cell-free fluid for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detecting soluble TGFbeta1, IL-4 and IgE and BALF lymphocytes for immunocytochemical staining of cellular Bax, Bcl-2 and nuclear factor-Kappa-B (NFkappaB).

RESULTS

Cellular NFkappaB expression was higher in SA than in MA and HVs, while extracellular TGFbeta1 was high in both the SA and MA groups but low in the HVs. Bcl-2/Bax ratio was higher in SA than in MA and in MA than in HV groups and correlated significantly with NFkappaB level. Interestingly, the levels of IgE and, to a lesser extent, IL-4 were higher in MA than in SA and both were much higher than in HVs, and were inversely correlated with NFkappaB level in the SA group and with TGFbeta1 level in the MA group.

CONCLUSIONS

NFkappaB has a central role in the perpetuation of persistent inflammation in SA and might induce apoptosis via Bcl-2. The SA group appears not associated much with allergen-based IgE and IL-4 reactions as efficiently as in MA. This was supported by the lower levels of IgE and IL-4 in SA compared to MA. TGFbeta1 appears to be associated with asthma pathogenesis, especially allergen-based MA.

Nitric oxide-mediated activation of NADPH oxidase by salbutamol during acute asthma in children

A wide variety of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide, and reactive nitrogen species such as nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite are known to be involved in pathophysiology of bronchial asthma. We have investigated, in this study, the status of NADPH oxidase (NOX), a major source of superoxide anion production, in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from asthmatic patients in relation to salbutamol treatment. PBL isolated from patients with bronchial asthma were found to have a significantly increased activity of NOX. Plasma levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), an index of lipid peroxidation, and NO were also markedly elevated in asthmatic patients compared to control samples. A significantly decreased catalase activity observed in PBL from our patients underscored the severity of oxidative stress during asthma. Treatment of PBL with salbutamol (10 microg ml(-1)), prevented the attenuation of catalase activity but significantly increased the levels of NO and NOX activity. Levels of NOX-1 mRNA were significantly (p < 0.001) increased in PBL following treatment with NO donor (500 microM), S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine (SNAP). Western blot analysis revealed that gp91phox protein was also significantly (twofold-threefold) increased following treatment with SNAP. The observed transcriptional regulation of NOX-1 and gp91phox by NO was observed to result in an increased NOX activity as well. This study concludes that salbutamol treatment enhances superoxide anion production in asthma patients through NO-mediated mechanisms, however it exerts beneficial antioxidant effects through activation of catalase and attenuation of lipid peroxidation.

Adverse effects of beta-agonists: are they clinically relevant?

Inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists) are the most commonly used asthma medications in many Western countries. Minor adverse effects such as palpitations, tremor, headache and metabolic effects are predictable and dose related. Time series studies suggested an association between the relatively nonselective beta-agonist fenoterol and asthma deaths. Three case-control studies confirmed that among patients prescribed fenoterol, the risk of death was significantly elevated even after controlling for the severity of asthma. The Saskatchewan study not only found an increased risk of death among patients dispensed fenoterol, but also suggested this might be a class effect of beta(2)-agonists. However, in subsequent studies, the long-acting beta(2)-agonist salmeterol was not associated with increased asthma mortality. In a case-control study blood albuterol (salbutamol) concentrations were found to be 2.5 times higher among patients who died of asthma compared with controls. It is speculated that such toxic concentrations could cause tachyarrhythmias under conditions of hypoxia and hypokalemia. The risk of asthma exacerbations and near-fatal attacks may also be increased among patients dispensed fenoterol, but this association may be largely due to confounding by severity. Although salmeterol does not appear to increase the risk of near-fatal attacks, there is a consistent association with the use of nebulized beta(2)-agonists. Nebulized and oral beta(2)-agonists are also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, ischemic heart disease and cardiac failure. Caution should be exercised when first prescribing a beta-agonist for patients with cardiovascular disease. A potential mechanism for adverse effects with regular use of beta(2)-agonists is tachyphylaxis. Tachyphylaxis to the bronchodilator effects of long-acting beta(2)-agonists can occur, but has been consistently demonstrated only for formoterol (eformoterol) a full agonist, rather than salmeterol, a partial agonist. Tachyphylaxis to protection against induced bronchospasm occurs with both full and partial beta(2)-agonists, and probably within a matter of days at most. Underlying airway responsiveness to directly acting bronchoconstricting agents is not increased when the bronchodilator effect of the regular beta(2)-agonist has been allowed to wear off, although there may be an increase in responsiveness to indirectly acting agents. While there has been speculation that underlying airway inflammation in asthma may be made worse by regular use of short-acting beta(2)-agonists, in contradistinction, a number of studies have shown that long-acting beta(2)-agonists have positive anti-inflammatory effects. An Australian Cochrane Airways Group systematic review of the randomized, controlled trials of short-acting beta-agonists found only minimal and clinically unimportant differences between regular use and use as needed. Regular short-acting treatment was better than placebo. However, a subsequent systematic review has found that regular use of long-acting beta-agonists had significant advantages over regular use of short-acting beta-agonists. More studies and data are needed on the regular use of beta(2)-agonists in patients not taking inhaled corticosteroids, and in potentially vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with particular genotypes for the beta-receptor, who might be more prone to adverse effects.

Combination therapy: appropriate for everyone?

The severity of asthma often varies throughout the course of the disease. At times the symptoms and underlying inflammation that are characteristic of asthma can worsen. Thus during an episode of viral-induced asthma or during a seasonal increase in asthma severity, a patient may be directed to increase his or her dosage of asthma controllers (i.e., inhaled corticosteroid) or add a long-acting bronchodilator (or other controller medications such as antileukotrienes) to manage symptoms, as recommended in guidelines published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Similarly, when symptoms are stable, decreasing dosages or discontinuing certain medications may be appropriate. The recent introduction of a combination product, of a long-acting bronchodilator formulated in the same dry powder device with an inhaled corticosteroid raises new challenges for the step care approach to asthma management recommended by the NIH in 1997. Although unquestionably more convenient for the patient, a combination formulation has the potential to decrease the flexibility required to successfully manage asthma over long periods. In addition, controversy exists regarding long-acting beta-agonists alone because their regular use may mask inflammation in the lung and decrease responsiveness to the bronchodilating effects of rescue medications (i.e., short-acting beta-agonists). The purpose of this article is to help physicians make informed therapeutic decisions for their patients with asthma. It focuses on the advantages and potential disadvantages of using combination products, which contain both an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist in the context of the NIH step care approach. Recent publications outlining the use of other add-on controller medications are also discussed.

Comparison of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of formoterol dry powder and oral, slow-release theophylline in the treatment of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of therapy with formoterol and oral slow-release theophylline (THEO) in patients with COPD.

DESIGN

A randomized, parallel-group study, with double-blind arms for formoterol and placebo (PL) and an open arm for oral slow-release THEO administered in individual doses on the basis of plasma concentrations.

SETTING

Eighty-one centers worldwide.

PATIENTS

Eight hundred fifty-four patients with symptomatic COPD.

INTERVENTION

Comparison of twice-daily inhaled formoterol dry powder (12 or 24 microg), PL, and THEO (individualized doses) over 12 months.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Compared to PL, doses of formoterol and THEO both significantly improved the area under the curve for FEV(1) measured over a period of 12 h following the morning dose of study medication at 3 and 12 months (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Therapy with formoterol, 12 microg, was significantly more effective than that with THEO (p < or = 0.026). Formoterol significantly reduced the percentage of "bad days" (i.e., days with at least two individual symptom scores > or = 2 and/or a reduction in peak expiratory flow from a baseline of > 20%; p < or = 0.035 vs. PL and THEO), and the use of salbutamol rescue medication (p < or = 0.003 vs PL) over the whole treatment period, while the effect of THEO was similar to that of PL. Therapy with formoterol and THEO was more effective than PL at improving quality of life for > 12 months (p < or = 0.030). Treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations were more frequent among patients receiving THEO than among those receiving formoterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with inhaled formoterol dry powder is more effective and better tolerated than treatment with therapeutically appropriate doses of oral slow-release THEO in symptomatic patients with COPD.