Inhaled steroids in patients with bronchiectasis

Clinical outcomes of long-term inhaled combination therapies in patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Few studies have reported which inhaled combination therapy, either bronchodilators and/or inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), is beneficial in patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction. Our study compared the efficacy and safety among different inhaled combination therapies in patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction.

METHODS

Our retrospective study analyzed the patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity < 0.7 and radiologically confirmed bronchiectasis in chest computed tomography between January 2005 and December 2021. The eligible patients underwent baseline and follow-up spirometric assessments. The primary endpoint was the development of a moderate-to-severe exacerbation. The secondary endpoints were the change in the annual FEV1 and the adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the blood eosinophil count (BEC).

RESULTS

Among 179 patients, the ICS/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), ICS/LABA, and LABA/LAMA groups were comprised of 58 (32.4%), 52 (29.1%), and 69 (38.5%) patients, respectively. ICS/LABA/LAMA group had a higher severity of bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction, than other groups. In the subgroup with BEC ≥ 300/uL, the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation was lower in the ICS/LABA/LAMA group (adjusted HR = 0.137 [95% CI = 0.034-0.553]) and the ICS/LABA group (adjusted HR = 0.196 [95% CI = 0.045-0.861]) compared with the LABA/LAMA group. The annual FEV1 decline rate was significantly worsened in the ICS/LABA group compared to the LABA/LAMA group (adjusted β-coefficient=-197 [95% CI=-307--87]) in the subgroup with BEC < 200/uL.

CONCLUSION

In patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction, the use of ICS/LABA/LAMA and ICS/LABA demonstrated a reduced risk of exacerbation compared to LABA/LAMA therapy in those with BEC ≥ 300/uL. Conversely, for those with BEC < 200/uL, the use of ICS/LABA was associated with an accelerated decline in FEV1 in comparison to LABA/LAMA therapy. Further assessment of BEC is necessary as a potential biomarker for the use of ICS in patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adults with Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: From Bench to Bedside. A Narrative Review

Due to their potent anti-inflammatory capacity (particularly in predominantly eosinophilic inflammation) and immunosuppressive properties, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in asthmatic patients and also in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who suffer multiple exacerbations or have peripheral eosinophilia. However, there is little evidence for their use in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (hereafter, bronchiectasis). According to data extracted from large databases of bronchiectasis in adults, ICSs are used in more than 50% of patients without any scientific evidence to justify their efficacy and contrary to the recommendations of international guidelines on bronchiectasis that generally advise against their use. Indeed, bronchiectasis is a disease with predominantly neutrophilic inflammation and a high likelihood of chronic bacterial bronchial infection. Furthermore, it is known that due to their immunosuppressive properties, ICSs can induce an increase in bacterial infections. This manuscript aims to review the basic properties of ICSs, how they impact bronchiectasis in adults, the current position of international guidelines on this treatment, and the current indications and future challenges related to ICS use in bronchiectasis.

Update on pharmacotherapy for adult bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis refers to abnormal dilatation of the bronchi, which leads to the failure of mucus clearance and increased risk of infection. Pharmacotherapy for stable bronchiectasis includes oral or inhaled mucoactive agents, anti-inflammatory therapy, inhaled bronchodilators, long-term antibiotics, and long-term macrolide treatment. Among them, mucoactive agents are the most common adjunctive agents to airway clearance techniques. When patients with impaired lung function suffer from dyspnea, inhaled bronchodilators may be prescribed to relieve the symptom. Long-term macrolide treatment has been proven to prevent exacerbation in patients with frequent bronchiectasis exacerbation. If exacerbation occurs despite the above mentioned treatments, one or two weeks of antibiotics should be prescribed to cover respiratory bacteria that include <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. Because evidence supporting the use of pharmacotherapy for bronchiectasis is weak, further research is warranted.

Is bronchiectasis really a disease?

The definition of a disease requires that distinguishing signs and symptoms are present that are common, and that the constellation of signs and symptoms differentiate the condition from other causes. In bronchiectasis, anatomical changes, airways inflammation and airway infection are the distinguishing features that are common to this disease. However, bronchiectasis is a heterogenous disease: signs and symptoms are shared with other airway diseases, there are multiple aetiologies and certain phenotypes of bronchiectasis have distinct clinical and laboratory features that are not common to all people with bronchiectasis. Furthermore, response to therapeutic interventions in clinical trials is not uniform. The concept of bronchiectasis as a treatable trait has been suggested, but this may be too restrictive in view of the heterogeneity of bronchiectasis. It is our opinion that bronchiectasis should be defined as a disease in its own right, but one that shares several pathophysiological features and "treatable traits" with other airway diseases. These traits define the large heterogeneity in the pathogenesis and clinical features and suggest a more targeted approach to therapy.

The overlap between bronchiectasis and chronic airway diseases: state of the art and future directions

Bronchiectasis is a clinical and radiological diagnosis associated with cough, sputum production and recurrent respiratory infections. The clinical presentation inevitably overlaps with other respiratory disorders such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In addition, 4-72% of patients with severe COPD are found to have radiological bronchiectasis on computed tomography, with similar frequencies (20-30%) now being reported in cohorts with severe or uncontrolled asthma. Co-diagnosis of bronchiectasis with another airway disease is associated with increased lung inflammation, frequent exacerbations, worse lung function and higher mortality. In addition, many patients with all three disorders have chronic rhinosinusitis and upper airway disease, resulting in a complex "mixed airway" phenotype.The management of asthma, bronchiectasis, COPD and upper airway diseases has traditionally been outlined in separate guidelines for each individual disorder. Recognition that the majority of patients have one or more overlapping pathologies requires that we re-evaluate how we treat airway disease. The concept of treatable traits promotes a holistic, pathophysiology-based approach to treatment rather than a syndromic approach and may be more appropriate for patients with overlapping features.Here, we review the current clinical definition, diagnosis, management and future directions for the overlap between bronchiectasis and other airway diseases.

Current and future pharmacotherapy options for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, there has been an increasing number of clinical trials investigating the effect of pharmacological treatments on patients with bronchiectasis. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of current drugs used in bronchiectasis patients as well as those that could make a future contribution to the management of this disease. Expert commentary: Bronchiectasis is a very heterogeneous disease, so it can be studied from a phenotypic standpoint and its pathophysiological mechanisms (endotypes) can be defined. This provides an interesting field of research as it enables the identification of patients suitable for inclusion in specific clinical trials on new drugs.

Inhaled corticosteroids for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is being increasingly diagnosed and recognised as an important contributor to chronic lung disease in both adults and children in high- and low-income countries. It is characterised by irreversible dilatation of airways and is generally associated with airway inflammation and chronic bacterial infection. Medical management largely aims to reduce morbidity by controlling the symptoms, reduce exacerbation frequency, improve quality of life and prevent the progression of bronchiectasis. This is an update of a review first published in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children and adults with stable state bronchiectasis, specifically to assess whether the use of ICS: (1) reduces the severity and frequency of acute respiratory exacerbations; or (2) affects long-term pulmonary function decline.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Register of trials, MEDLINE and Embase databases. We ran the latest literature search in June 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICS with a placebo or no medication. We included children and adults with clinical or radiographic evidence of bronchiectasis, but excluded people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reviewed search results against predetermined criteria for inclusion. In this update, two independent review authors assessed methodological quality and risk of bias in trials using established criteria and extracted data using standard pro forma. We analysed treatment as 'treatment received' and performed sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included seven studies, involving 380 adults. Of the 380 randomised participants, 348 completed the studies.Due to differences in outcomes reported among the seven studies, we could only perform limited meta-analysis for both the short-term ICS use (6 months or less) and the longer-term ICS use (> 6 months).During stable state in the short-term group (ICS for 6 months or less), based on the two studies from which data could be included, there were no significant differences from baseline values in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) at the end of the study (mean difference (MD) -0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.26 to 0.09) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD 0.01 L, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.17) in adults on ICS (compared to no ICS). Similarly, we did not find any significant difference in the average exacerbation frequency (MD 0.09, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.79) or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) total scores in adults on ICS when compared with no ICS, though data available were limited. Based on a single non-placebo controlled study from which we could not extract clinical data, there was marginal, though statistically significant improvement in sputum volume and dyspnoea scores on ICS.The single study on long-term outcomes (over 6 months) that examined lung function and other clinical outcomes, showed no significant effect of ICS on any of the outcomes. We could not draw any conclusion on adverse effects due to limited available data.Despite the authors of all seven studies stating they were double-blind, we judged one study (in the short duration ICS) as having a high risk of bias based on blinding, attrition and reporting of outcomes. The GRADE quality of evidence was low for all outcomes (due to non-placebo controlled trial, indirectness and imprecision with small numbers of participants and studies).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review indicates that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of ICS in adults with stable state bronchiectasis. Further, we cannot draw any conclusion for the use of ICS in adults during an acute exacerbation or in children (for any state), as there were no studies.

Diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis

KEY POINTS Following a diagnosis of bronchiectasis, it is important to investigate for an underlying cause. Goals of management are to suppress airway infection and inflammation, to improve symptoms and health-related quality of life. There are now validated scoring tools to help assess disease severity, which can help to stratify management. Good evidence supports the use of both exercise training and long-term macrolide therapy in long-term disease management.

The Saudi Thoracic Society guidelines for diagnosis and management of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

This is the first guideline developed by the Saudi Thoracic Society for the diagnosis and management of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Local experts including pulmonologists, infectious disease specialists, thoracic surgeons, respiratory therapists, and others from adult and pediatric departments provided the best practice evidence recommendations based on the available international and local literature. The main objective of this guideline is to utilize the current published evidence to develop recommendations about management of bronchiectasis suitable to our local health-care system and available resources. We aim to provide clinicians with tools to standardize the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis. This guideline targets primary care physicians, family medicine practitioners, practicing internists and respiratory physicians, and all other health-care providers involved in the care of the patients with bronchiectasis.

Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic bronchiectasis isolate reveal differences from cystic fibrosis and laboratory strains

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an environmentally ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium and important opportunistic human pathogen, causing severe chronic respiratory infections in patients with underlying conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) or bronchiectasis. In order to identify mechanisms responsible for adaptation during bronchiectasis infections, a bronchiectasis isolate, PAHM4, was phenotypically and genotypically characterized.

Results

This strain displays phenotypes that have been associated with chronic respiratory infections in CF including alginate over-production, rough lipopolysaccharide, quorum-sensing deficiency, loss of motility, decreased protease secretion, and hypermutation. Hypermutation is a key adaptation of this bacterium during the course of chronic respiratory infections and analysis indicates that PAHM4 encodes a mutated mutS gene responsible for a ~1,000-fold increase in mutation rate compared to wild-type laboratory strain P. aeruginosa PAO1. Antibiotic resistance profiles and sequence data indicate that this strain acquired numerous mutations associated with increased resistance levels to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones when compared to PAO1. Sequencing of PAHM4 revealed a 6.38 Mbp genome, 5.9 % of which were unrecognized in previously reported P. aeruginosa genome sequences. Transcriptome analysis suggests a general down-regulation of virulence factors, while metabolism of amino acids and lipids is up-regulated when compared to PAO1 and metabolic modeling identified further potential differences between PAO1 and PAHM4.

Conclusions

This work provides insights into the potential differential adaptation of this bacterium to the lung of patients with bronchiectasis compared to other clinical settings such as cystic fibrosis, findings that should aid the development of disease-appropriate treatment strategies for P. aeruginosa infections.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2069-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bronchiectasis in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease : prevalence, diagnosis and therapeutic management

The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases with age. Recent evidence suggests that the finding of co-existent bronchiectasis is becoming increasingly common, possibly because of increased use of high-resolution CT scanning in the assessment of patients with COPD. This may represent a distinct phenotype of COPD, but, nevertheless, it is likely to pose an increased burden to health services and challenges in determining the correct management of these patients. Here, we review the factors associated with bronchiectasis in older patients with COPD and the evidence for many of the therapies currently used in the treatment of patients, providing a rational approach to their management.

Bronchiectasis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiectasis is a common condition and is likely to be underestimated, as bronchiectasis is now a recognised problem complicating other chronic lung diseases such as severe asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and advanced pulmonary fibrosis. In more advanced bronchiectasis, there is a vicious cycle of excess neutrophilic airways inflammation and chronic infection of the airways. This leads to the clinical syndrome, including a chronic productive cough and recurrent chest infections.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the current pharmacotherapy options available and the potential future perspectives for treatment in adult patients with idiopathic or post-infection bronchiectasis. A PUBMED search for all Phase III and above trials on current therapies focusing on optimising airway dilatation and treatments to break the vicious cycle of infection and inflammation were sought. These therapies include antibiotics, anti-inflammatory and mucoactive therapies alongside chest physiotherapy. Landmark Phase II studies were also included.

EXPERT OPINION

Current practice has predominantly been based on treatment advised from national guidelines that are mainly grade D expert opinion. Randomised controlled trials are greatly needed to improve practice of evidence-based medicine.

Bronchiectasis: new approaches to diagnosis and management

Non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis is a common, potentially serious, condition. Further investigations should be performed in an attempt to identify the underlying cause because it may lead to a change in therapy and have significant prognostic implications. MRI is being investigated as a radiation free alternative to high-resolution CT scan of the chest. Many of the treatment recommendations for non-CF bronchiectasis have not been studied in randomized controlled trials but have been extrapolated from the management recommendations for CF. Studies are beginning to inform decisions regarding the management of non-CF bronchiectasis, and an understanding of the best treatment options is beginning to emerge.

[Treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis]

Bronchiectasis is currently growing in importance due to both the increase in the number of diagnoses made as well as the negative impact that its presence has on the baseline disease that generates it. A fundamental aspect in these patients is the colonization and infection of the bronchial mucous by potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPM), which are the cause in most cases of the start of the chronic inflammatory process that results in the destruction and dilatation of the bronchial tree that is characteristic in these patients. The treatment of the colonization and chronic bronchial infection in these patients should be based on prolonged antibiotic therapy in its different presentations. Lately, the inhaled form is becoming especially prominent due to its high efficacy and limited production of important adverse effects. However, one must not overlook the fact that the management of patients with bronchiectasis should be multidisciplinary and multidimensional. In addition to antibiotic treatment, the collaboration of different medical and surgical specialties is essential for the management of the exacerbations, nutritional aspects, respiratory physiotherapy, muscle rehabilitation, complications, inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity and the hypersecretion that characterizes these patients.

Should the bronchiectasis treatment given to cystic fibrosis patients be extrapolated to those with bronchiectasis from other causes?

OBJECTIVE

To profile the characteristics of adult patients with bronchiectasis, drawing comparisons between cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and those with bronchiectasis from other causes in order to determine whether it is rational to extrapolate the bronchiectasis treatment given to CF patients to those with bronchiectasis from other causes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the medical charts of 87 patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis and under follow-up treatment at our outpatient clinic. Patients who had tuberculosis (current or previous) were excluded. We evaluated the clinical, functional, and treatment data of the patients.

RESULTS

Of the 87 patients with bronchiectasis, 38 (43.7%) had been diagnosed with CF, through determination of sweat sodium and chloride concentrations or through genetic analysis, whereas the disease was due to another etiology in 49 (56.3%), of whom 34 (39.0%) had been diagnosed with idiopathic bronchiectasis. The mean age at diagnosis was lower in the patients with CF than in those without (14.2 vs. 24.2 years; p < 0.05). The prevalence of symptoms (cough, expectoration, hemoptysis, and wheezing) was similar between the groups. Colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus was more common in the CF patients (82.4 vs. 29.7% and 64.7 vs. 5.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The causes and clinical manifestations of bronchiectasis are heterogeneous, and it is important to identify the differences. It is crucial that these differences be recognized so that new strategies for the management of patients with bronchiectasis can be developed.

Pharmacological treatment options for bronchiectasis: focus on antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory agents

Patients with bronchiectasis experience tenacious mucus, recurrent infectious exacerbations, and progressive worsening of symptoms and obstruction over time. Treatment is aimed at trying to break the cycle of infection and progressive airway destruction. Antibacterial treatment is targeted towards likely organisms or tailored to the results of sputum culture. Inhaled antibacterial therapy may offer the advantage of increased local concentration of medication, while minimizing systemic adverse effects; however, to date, studies have been equivocal in this disorder. Macrolides, in addition to their antibacterial properties, have unique anti-inflammatory properties, which may make them useful in this disorder. Other mucoactive and anti-inflammatory agents, such as inhaled corticosteroids, mannitol and hypertonic saline, may also prove useful in this disease, but further studies are needed.

Inhaled steroids for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is increasingly recognized as a major cause of respiratory morbidity especially in developing countries and in some ethnic populations of affluent countries. It is characterized by irreversible dilatation of airways, generally associated with chronic bacterial infection. Medical management largely aims to reduce morbidity by controlling the symptoms and by preventing the progression of bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children and adults with bronchiectasis (a) during stable bronchiectasis; and for reducing; (b) the severity and frequency of acute respiratory exacerbations and (c) long term pulmonary decline.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialized Register Collaboration and Cochrane Airways Group, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched by the Cochrane Airways Group. The latest searches were performed in September 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing ICS with a placebo or no medication. Children and adults with clinical or radiographic evidence of bronchiectasis were included, but patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no paediatric studies. Six adult studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the 303 randomised, 278 subjects completed the trials. In the short term group (ICS for less then 6 months duration), adults on huge doses of ICS (2g per day of budesonide equivalent) had significantly improved forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), Quality of life (QOL) score and sputum volume but no significant difference in peak flow, exacerbations, cough or wheeze, when compared to adults in the control arm (no ICS). When only placebo-controlled studies were included, there were no significant difference between groups in all outcomes examined (spirometry, clinical outcomes of exacerbation or sputum volume etc). The single study on long term outcomes showed no significant effect of inhaled steroids in any of the outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The present review indicates that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of inhaled steroids in adults with stable state bronchiectasis. While a therapeutic trial may be justified in adults with difficult to control symptoms and in certain subgroups, this has to be balanced with adverse events especially if high doses are used. No recommendation can be made for the use of ICS in adults during an acute exacerbation or in children (for any state) as there were no studies.

Bone Mineral Density in Children with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis presents as a common sequela of several chronic pulmonary diseases. Bone mineral density (BMD) is generally decreased in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although children with non-CF bronchiectasis have similar risk factors for osteopenia/osteoporosis, data on BMD in this group of patients are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate BMD in children with non-CF bronchiectasis.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated BMD of the radius and tibia in 32 children (17 girls) with non-CF bronchiectasis and in 23 healthy controls matched for age, sex and pubertal stage by quantitative ultrasound (speed of sound). Daily calcium intake and pulmonary function tests and data about steroid use were noted.

RESULTS

Mean age was 12.5 +/- 4.6 years. Six children (18%) had moderate-to-severe lung disease (FEV(1) <60% predicted). All except 2 children (94%) were receiving inhaled steroids. There was no significant difference in BMD (expressed as z-score) of the radius and tibia between the patient and control groups (tibia z-scores: -0.1 +/- 0.9 vs. -0.8 +/- 0.8 and radius z-scores -1.3 +/- 1.4 vs. -1.0 +/- 0.9 in bronchiectasis patients and controls, respectively, p > 0.05). However, more children with non-CF bronchiectasis had osteopenia (z-scores between -1 and -2 SD) and osteoporosis (z-score <or=2 SD) compared to the control group (62 vs. 30%, p = 0.019). There was a significant correlation between age and radius z-scores (r = -0.365, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between BMD and severity of lung illness, calcium intake or cumulative steroid doses.

CONCLUSION

Osteopenia is more common in children with non-CF bronchiectasis compared to controls and the risk of osteoporosis and osteopenia increases with age.

Is there a role for inhaled corticosteroids and macrolide therapy in bronchiectasis?

Bronchiectasis is characterised by permanent dilatation of the bronchi that arises from chronic inflammation predominantly caused by bacterial infection. This condition remains a major cause of excess respiratory morbidity and treatment is generally only partly successful. There is an urgent need for improved anti-inflammatory medication to treat bronchiectasis. Two potentially useful therapies are inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and macrolides. The clinical trials that have been performed in bronchiectasis with these two medications can be considered to be preliminary data. This article reviews the anti-inflammatory properties, clinical efficacy and adverse effects of ICS and macrolides.ICS have a large number of potent anti-inflammatory properties. ICS remain the first-line treatment in asthma, reduce exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and may improve lung function and symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF). Four small clinical trials have assessed the effect of high-dose ICS on bronchiectasis. The main reported effect of these trials was a reduction in sputum volume and this may be a marker of decreased airway inflammation. Other possible benefits included decreased cough and sputum inflammatory cells/biomarkers. ICS have a relatively high prevalence of local adverse effects, and may be associated with ocular complications and osteoporosis. These adverse effects can be minimised by prescribing low doses of the medication. Macrolides have both antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties. Macrolides have less marked immunosuppressive properties than corticosteroids, and effects include decreasing mucous production, inhibiting virulence factors and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, decreasing leukocyte numbers and altering inflammatory mediator release. Macrolides have been shown to be extremely effective in the treatment of diffuse panbronchiolitis, improve lung function and symptoms in asthma and CF, and reduce nasal polyps and secretions in sinusitis. Five small clinical trials have assessed the effect of macrolides on bronchiectasis. Reported benefits include reduced sputum volume, improved lung function and better symptom control. Macrolides are generally well tolerated, although they do have a number of drug interactions. There are concerns about the development of resistance, especially to non-tuberculous mycobacteria, with prolonged macrolide use. The evidence available suggests that both medications have a role in the management of bronchiectasis. More definitive trials of ICS and macrolides in bronchiectasis will clarify the likely benefit of these therapies.

Association between inflammatory markers in induced sputum and clinical characteristics in children with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

To study clinical, radiological and laboratory features of children with non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis (BE) and the association between symptom scores, spirometry, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings and inflammatory markers in induced sputum in these children. Twenty-seven children with steady-state non-CF BE were cross-sectionally evaluated by symptom scores, pulmonary function tests, anatomic extension and severity scores of BE in HRCT and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels in induced sputum. There were 16 girls and 11 boys. Median (interquartile range) age of study group was 11.4 (9.5-13.6) years, follow-up duration was 3.5 (2-6.5) years and symptom scores were 4 (3-6). Pulmonary function tests revealed FEV(1) of 82%pred (72-93), FVC of 82%pred (74-92), and FEF(25-75%) of 82%pred (68-95). According to anatomic extent of BE on HRCT; 2 patients had mild, 4 had moderate and 21 had severe BE. Based on severity scores of HRCT; 10 patients had mild, 10 had moderate and 7 had severe BE. Neutrophils consisted 29.9% (14.9-53.7) of the total leucocytes in induced sputum samples. Sputum concentration of TNF-alpha was 58 pg/ml (9.2-302) while IL-8 concentration was 2.7 ng/ml (1.7-2.8). Symptom scores correlated with FEV(1) and sputum IL-8 levels (r=-0.49, r=0.67, P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between HRCT severity scores and symptoms, FEV(1), sputum IL-8 and TNF-alpha levels (r=0.64, r=-0.68, r=0.41, r=0.41, respectively, P<0.05). In children BE is associated with ongoing inflammation. This inflammation can be reliably monitored by radiological scores, spirometry, as well as sputum inflammatory markers. Follow-up of children with BE using these clinical tools may improve patient care.

Outcome in adult bronchiectasis

The outcome in adult bronchiectasis has not been well described; in particular there has been a lack of long-term prospective studies. Therefore a follow-up study was performed to assess outcome in bronchiectasis in a cohort of adult patients. One hundred-and-one sequential adults, 33 male and 68 female; age 54 +/- 14 years (mean +/- SD) with bronchiectasis had a clinical assessment and spirometry performed. All were non-smokers and 84 were classified as having idiopathic disease. Patients were commenced on a standardized treatment regime and followed up for a minimum period of 2 years. On their last review when patients were clinically stable, a repeat clinical assessment and spirometry was performed and compared with the initial review. The primary endpoints measured were symptoms and FEV1. Subjects were followed up for 8.0 +/- 4.9 years. Clinical review showed that the patients had persistent symptoms that, in the case of dyspnea and sputum volume, were worse on follow-up. Spirometry showed a significant decline in FEV1 over the follow-up period with an average loss of 49 ml per year. This study showed in this group of predominantly female adult patients with bronchiectasis followed up for 8 years, patients had persistent symptoms and an excess loss in FEV1.

Inhaled steroids improve quality of life in patients with steady-state bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

The effects of inhaled steroids upon the quality of life of patients with bronchiectasis remain unknown.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) for 6 months upon the clinical, functional, microbiological and outcome parameters of patients with steady-state bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis, and its repercussions for patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind (for effective doses) study.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

The diagnosis of bronchiectasis was made by high-resolution computed tomography. Ninety-three patients (mean age: 68.5 [8.4]) were randomized to receive 250 microg bid, 500 microg bid or no treatment with inhaled FP for 6 months. Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. HRQoL was assessed using the validated Spanish version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The group administered FP 1000 microg daily showed significant improvement in dyspnea (1.03 [2.1]-1.24 [2.2] points; P = 0.01-0.04), sputum production (P = 0.001), days without cough (P = 0.02) and short-acting beta-2 agonists used (P = 0.01) from the first month of treatment, with no changes in pulmonary function, number or severity of exacerbations, or microbiological profile of the sputum. As a result, an improvement in HRQoL was seen in this group after 3 months of treatment (45.4 [14.2] vs. 40.5 [13.9]; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhalatory FP 500 microg bid is effective from the first month of treatment for controlling the symptoms of patients with steady-state bronchiectasis-thus ensuring a significant improvement in HRQoL.

Chronic Cough Due to Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a condition that is characterized by the permanent dilation of bronchi with destruction of elastic and muscular components of their walls, usually due to acute or chronic infection. The cardinal symptom is a chronic productive cough.

METHODS

Review of articles cited in the systematic literature search, along with others found in Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness) from 1966 through 2003.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution CT scanning of the chest is the preferred means of establishing the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. With the increasing use of antibiotics in the treatment of childhood infection in the last several decades, an increasing percentage of patients with bronchiectasis now have an underlying disorder that predisposes them to chronic or recurrent infection. These include cystic fibrosis, common variable immunodeficiency, HIV infection, primary ciliary dyskinesia, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and chronic Mycobacterium avium complex infection. A variety of agents have been used to improve cough effectiveness and prevent infectious exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis, with variable results. Chest physiotherapy offers a modest benefit in increasing sputum volume, but its long-term effectiveness is unknown. Selected patients with localized idiopathic bronchiectasis that causes intolerable symptoms despite maximal medical therapy should be offered treatment with surgery. Patients with exacerbations of bronchiectasis should be given antibiotics, with the choice of agents depending on the likely causative pathogens.

Inhaled fluticasone in bronchiectasis: a 12 month study

BACKGROUND

The clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment has not been evaluated in bronchiectasis, despite the presence of chronic airway inflammation.

METHODS

After three consecutive weekly visits, 86 patients were randomised to receive either fluticasone 500 mug twice daily (n = 43, 23F, mean (SD) age 57.7 (14.4) years) or matched placebo (n = 43, 34F, 59.2 (14.2) years) and reviewed regularly for 52 weeks in a double blind fashion.

RESULTS

35 and 38 patients in the fluticasone and placebo groups completed the study. Significantly more patients on ICS than on placebo showed improvement in 24 hour sputum volume (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.0, p = 0.03) but not in exacerbation frequency, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, or sputum purulence score. Significantly more patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection receiving fluticasone showed improvement in 24 hour sputum volume (OR 13.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 100.2, p = 0.03) and exacerbation frequency (OR 13.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 100.2, p = 0.01) than those given placebo. Logistic regression models revealed a significantly better response in sputum volume with fluticasone treatment than with placebo among subgroups of patients with 24 hour sputum volume <30 ml (p = 0.04), exacerbation frequency </=2/year (p = 0.04), and sputum purulence score >5 (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

ICS treatment is beneficial to patients with bronchiectasis, particularly those with P. aerurginosa infection.

Treatment of paediatric non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, the abnormal dilatation of bronchial airways, is a heterogeneous condition caused by a variety of lung insults and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Although frequently reported as being an uncommon respiratory disease in the developed world, its impact on the respiratory health of specific populations has recently received increased attention. There are limited data on which to base management strategies. This article reviews the evidence for current treatment practices, provides an opinion on best practice, and discusses likely new therapies. Consideration is also given to the pharmacoeconomic hurdles that face the populations most affected.

Subjective benefit of inhaled therapies in patients with bronchiectasis: a questionnaire study

The objectives of this study were to obtain information about the use and subjective benefits of inhaled therapies in patients with bronchiectasis and to determine if these benefits were related to the presence of airflow obstruction. One hundred and twenty patients completed a questionnaire on inhaled therapies and performed spirometry. Inhalers were used daily by 85/120 patients with bronchiectasis and 42/120 patients had a nebuliser. Inhaled therapies were used extensively in patients with (FEV1 < 80%) and without (FEV1 > 80%) evidence of airflow obstruction. The majority of patients reported subjective benefits from their inhaled therapies. Chi2 analysis showed that there was no association between perceived benefits of short acting bronchodilators (SAB), long acting bronchodilators (LAB), corticosteroids or nebulisers and degree of airflow obstruction. This study provides information about the subjective benefits of inhaled therapies which could facilitate a more comprehensive assessment of the net benefit of inhaled therapies in patients with bronchiectasis with and without airflow obstruction.

Bronchiectasis in secondary care: a comprehensive profile of a neglected disease

Background: Bronchiectasis is poorly characterised in secondary care. Methods: Over 6 months, 410 bronchiectasis patients attended our clinics. One hundred randomly selected patients were characterised in detail. Results: Patients had a mean and standard error of mean (S.E.M.) age of 57 (2) years and a median and interquartile range (IQR) of three (two to four) reviews in the last 12 months. Aetiologies identified included tuberculosis (n=15), childhood pneumonia (n=7), fibrosis (n=6), connective tissue disease (n=6), whooping cough (n=5), childhood measles (n=4) and others (n=5). There was widespread use of inhaled therapy. Treatments included oral antibiotics (n=77), corticosteroid courses (n=27) and intravenous antimicrobials (n=27, 12 domicillary) in the last year. Thirty patients had hospital admissions (13 because of the inability to administer domicillary antibiotics). Haemophilus influenzae and Pseudomonas spp. were the commonest bacterial isolates. Patients culturing Pseudomonas spp. were older and had had more reviews and intravenous antibiotic courses. Conclusions: Bronchiectasis imposes a considerable burden on hospital services. Patients culturing Pseudomonas spp. impose a greater burden. Aetiology is often unknown. Therapies with unproven benefit are often used.

Regression of bilateral bronchiectasis with inhaled steroid therapy

Bronchiectasis is defined as pathological and permanent dilatation of the bronchial tree. Affected patients suffer from chronic sputum production and usually slowly progressive airway destruction as a result of continued airway infection and inflammation. Regression of bilateral bronchiectasis has never been reported in the English literature. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with longstanding progressive idiopathic bilateral bronchiectasis whose respiratory symptoms, including sputum, rapidly disappeared after commencement of inhaled budesonide. Repeat computed tomography assessment 40 months after commencement of inhaled steroid therapy, showed partial regression of bronchial dilation and resolution of small airways sepsis. In the absence of other possible explanations for the partial resolution of the bronchiectasis, the present case suggests a possible benefit of inhaled steroid therapy in bronchiectasis.

Changing paradigms in the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis

The face of bronchiectasis may have changed in recent years but individual cases continue to pose difficult challenges. As childhood infection becomes less of a problem, alternative causes of bronchiectasis are increasingly recognized which themselves offer new problems of diagnosis and management. Evolving concepts of pathogenesis suggest alternative strategies for treatment but as yet the evidence base on which to make firm decisions is lacking. Antibacterial regimens are not universally applicable and individualized protocols with parenteral, nebulized or continuous antibacterial therapy are increasingly used in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite the theoretical appeal of using mucolytic or anti-inflammatory drugs their roles are still uncertain and have yet to be examined in adequate clinical trials. The factors determining disease progression are still poorly understood but in some patients worsening airflow obstruction heralds the onset of ventilatory failure. The management of the latter requires bronchodilators and controlled oxygen therapy, and strategies including non-invasive ventilation are increasingly an option. Changing indications for surgery are evident with fewer palliative resections but a developing role for transplantation.

Exhaled H(2)O(2) in steady-state bronchiectasis: relationship with cellular composition in induced sputum, spirometry, and extent and severity of disease

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the concentration of exhaled H(2)O(2) in patients with bronchiectasis, and to study the relationship between levels of exhaled H(2)O(2), extent of disease, symptoms score, spirometry, and cellular composition obtained from induced sputum; furthermore, to account for possible confounding effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) usage, long-term oral antibiotic treatment, and chronic colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PATIENTS

Thirty patients with steady-state bronchiectasis.

RESULTS

Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) exhaled H(2)O(2) levels were significantly elevated in patients with bronchiectasis compared to normal subjects: 1.1 (0.87 to 1.29) microM vs 0.3 (0.19 to 0.36) microM, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients treated with ICS had similar values as steroid-naïve patients. The group of patients with P aeruginosa colonization showed a significantly increased concentration of H(2)O(2) compared to the group without P aeruginosa colonization. Patients receiving long-term oral antibiotic treatment had significantly higher values of H(2)O(2) compared to those not receiving antibiotics. There was a significant positive correlation between H(2)O(2) and either the percentage of neutrophils in induced sputum or the extent of the disease as defined by high-resolution CT. A significant negative correlation was found between H(2)O(2) and FEV(1) percent predicted. Finally, there was a significant positive correlation between H(2)O(2) and the symptoms score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bronchiectasis in stable condition showed increased levels of exhaled H(2)O(2). The above-mentioned levels were not decreased either by ICS or long-term oral antibiotic treatment, but were significantly affected by chronic colonization with P aeruginosa. H(2)O(2) levels could be an indirect index of neutrophilic inflammation, impairment of lung function, and extension and severity of the disease.

Oral steroids for bronchiectasis (stable and acute exacerbations)

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Two small studies have shown small benefits from inhaled corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids may be of benefit in bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of oral corticosteroids in acute and stable bronchiectasis

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group clinical trials register, derived from MEDLINE, EMBASE and hand searching of major journals, was searched using the terms bronchiectasis AND corticosteroid* OR (beclomethasone, cortisone, deflazacort, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, dexamethasone and triamcinolone

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials were considered

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No trials met the inclusion criteria for the review

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised controlled trials were identified

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised trials upon which to make recommendations about the use of oral corticosteroids in acute or stable bronchiectasis.

Inhaled steroids for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a progressive condition characterised by irreversible destruction and dilatation of airways, generally associated with chronic bacterial infection. The two distinct therapeutic goals are: symptom control and reduction in morbidity; and prevention of progression of the underlying disease.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether regular inhaled corticosteroids produce improvement in symptom control and whether they beneficially influence the natural history of the disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group RCT register and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register were searched using the following search terms; bronchiectasis AND [corticosteroid* OR beclomethasone OR budesonide OR fluticasone OR triamcinolone OR flunisolide]. Bibliographies of each included RCT was searched for additional trials. Pharmaceutical companies that manufacture inhaled corticosteroids were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised double blind studies controlled trials were included. Patients with radiographic evidence of bronchiectasis were included, but patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by one of the reviewers (FR). Continuous outcomes were analysed as effect sizes (weighted mean difference or as standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals).

MAIN RESULTS

Only two trials on a total of 54 patients could be included. The studies were of 4 and 6 weeks duration. Inhaled corticosteroids had no significant effect on any of the outcomes included in this review, however there was a trend towards improving: FEV1, FVC, PEFR, RV and DLco.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In bronchiectasis, regular use of inhaled corticosteroids may improve lung function. The available studies were too short and too small to provide any clear evidence to guide practice. Larger and longer studies should include rate of decline of lung function, exacerbation frequency, hospitalisations and healthy status as outcomes.

Bronchodilator response to inhaled beta-2 agonist and anticholinergic drugs in patients with bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVE

An increase in incidence of reversible airflow obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness occurs in patients with bronchiectasis. We conducted a study to assess the efficacy of bronchodilators in the treatment of bronchiectasis.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-four patients with confirmed bronchiectasis were studied. Each patient inhaled fenoterol 400 microg administered by metered dose inhaler via a spacer after a baseline lung function and a lung function test was repeated 30 min later. This was followed by a second dose of fenoterol 5 mg via nebulizer and another lung function test 30 min later. A repeat study was done at least 24 h later with ipratropium bromide 40 microg by metered dose inhaler and 500 microg by a nebulizer.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant improvement from baselines (mean percentage change +/- SD) of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) by 8.5 +/- 8.72% and 15.3 +/- 11.63%, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) by 8.77 +/- 9.69% and 10.2 +/- 12.2% and forced vital capacity (FVC) by 10.25 +/- 11.61% and 10.09 +/- 10.88% after low- and high-dose fenoterol, respectively. The improvements after low- and high-dose ipratropium bromide for PEE FEV1 and FVC were 9.89 +/- 9.35% and 14.39 +/- 12.82%, 9.38 +/- 10.41% and 13.52 +/- 17.09%, and 8.03 +/- 10.85% and 9.63 +/- 13.85%, respectively. Eleven patients (45.8%) responded to one or both bronchodilators significantly (> 15% improvement in FEV1). Five patients (20%) responded to both, three (12%) to fenoterol alone and another three (12%) to ipratropium bromide alone.

CONCLUSION

There is significant bronchodilator response in a subset of patients with bronchiectasis and patients with bronchiectasis should therefore undergo bronchodilator testing. Skin prick testing against a panel of nine allergens done on each individual yielded a positive result in 13 patients (54.2%).

Increased levels of exhaled carbon monoxide in bronchiectasis: a new marker of oxidative stress

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory lung disease associated with increased production of oxidants due mostly to neutrophilic inflammation. Induction of heme oxygenase (HO-1) by reactive oxygen species is a general cytoprotective mechanism against oxidative stress. HO-1 catabolises heme to bilirubin, free iron and carbon monoxide (CO). Exhaled CO measurements may therefore reflect an oxidative stress and be clinically useful in the detection and management of inflammatory lung disorders.

METHODS

The levels of exhaled CO of 42 non-smoking patients with bronchiectasis treated or not treated with inhaled corticosteroids were compared with CO levels in 37 normal non-smoking subjects.

RESULTS

Levels of exhaled CO were raised in patients with bronchiectasis, both those treated with inhaled corticosteroids (n = 27, median 5.5 ppm, 95% CI 5.16 to 7.76) and those not treated with inhaled corticosteroids (n = 15, median 6.0 ppm. 95% CI 4.74 to 11.8), compared with normal subjects (n = 37, median 3.0 ppm, 95% CI 2.79 to 3.81, p = 0.0024). There was no correlation between exhaled CO and HbCO levels (r = 0.42, p = 0.12) in normal subjects (n = 7), nor between the urine cotinine concentration and exhaled CO levels (r = 0.2, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased levels of exhaled CO may reflect induction of HO-1 and oxidative stress in bronchiectasis. Measurement of exhaled CO may be useful in the management of bronchiectasis and possibly other chronic inflammatory lung disorders.

Elevated levels of expired breath hydrogen peroxide in bronchiectasis

Airway inflammation is important in the development and progression of many lung diseases, including bronchiectasis. Activation of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils, eosinophils, and macrophages induces a respiratory burst resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). We have measured exhaled H2O2 in patients with documented bronchiectasis and investigated whether the concentration of H2O2 is related to the disease severity, as defined by lung function. We also investigated whether the concentrations of expired H2O2 were different in bronchiectatic patients who received inhaled corticosteroids compared with steroid-naïve patients. In 37 patients with bronchiectasis (mean age, 45 +/- 2.5 yr; FEV1, 59 +/- 3% pred), mean H2O2 concentration in exhaled breath condensate was significantly elevated as compared with the values in 25 age-matched (mean age, 42 +/- 2 yr) normal subjects (0.87 +/- 0.01 versus 0.26 +/- 0.04 microM, p < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between H2O2 and FEV1 (r = -0.76, p < 0.0001). Patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids had values of H2O2 similar to those of steroid-naïve patients (0.8 +/- 0.1 versus 0.9 +/- 0.1, p > 0.05). We conclude that H2O2 is elevated in exhaled air condensate of patients with bronchiectasis and is correlated with disease severity. Measurement of H2O2 may be used as a simple noninvasive method to monitor airway inflammation and oxidative stress.

Inhaled fluticasone reduces sputum inflammatory indices in severe bronchiectasis

Although corticosteroid therapy might be clinically beneficial for bronchiectasis, very little is known of its effects on the inflammatory and infective markers in bronchiectasis. We have therefore performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of a 4-wk administration of inhaled fluticasone in bronchiectasis. Twenty-four patients (12 female; mean age 51 yr) were randomized into receiving either inhaled fluticasone (500 microgram twice daily) via the Accuhaler device (n = 12) or placebo. At each visit, spirometry, 24-h sputum volume, sputum leukocyte density, bacterial densities, and concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) were determined. There was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in sputum leukocyte density and IL-1beta, IL-8, and LTB4 after fluticasone treatment. The fluticasone group had one and the placebo group three episodes of exacerbation. There were no significant changes in spirometry (p > 0.05) or any reported adverse reactions in either group. The results of this study show that high-dose fluticasone is effective in reducing the sputum inflammatory indices in bronchiectasis. Large-scale and long-term studies are indicated to evaluate the effects of inhaled steroid therapy on the inflammatory components in bronchiectasis.