Transcription: basal factors and activation

Genome-scale chromatin binding dynamics of RNA Polymerase II general transcription machinery components

A great deal of work has revealed, in structural detail, the components of the preinitiation complex (PIC) machinery required for initiation of mRNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). However, less-well understood are the in vivo PIC assembly pathways and their kinetics, an understanding of which is vital for determining how rates of in vivo RNA synthesis are established. We used competition ChIP in budding yeast to obtain genome-scale estimates of the residence times for five general transcription factors (GTFs): TBP, TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIIE and TFIIF. While many GTF-chromatin interactions were short-lived ( < 1 min), there were numerous interactions with residence times in the range of several minutes. Sets of genes with a shared function also shared similar patterns of GTF kinetic behavior. TFIIE, a GTF that enters the PIC late in the assembly process, had residence times correlated with RNA synthesis rates. The datasets and results reported here provide kinetic information for most of the Pol II-driven genes in this organism, offering a rich resource for exploring the mechanistic relationships between PIC assembly, gene regulation, and transcription.

Genome-scale chromatin interaction dynamic measurements for key components of the RNA Pol II general transcription machinery

Background

A great deal of work has revealed in structural detail the components of the machinery responsible for mRNA gene transcription initiation. These include the general transcription factors (GTFs), which assemble at promoters along with RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) to form a preinitiation complex (PIC) aided by the activities of cofactors and site-specific transcription factors (TFs). However, less well understood are the in vivo PIC assembly pathways and their kinetics, an understanding of which is vital for determining on a mechanistic level how rates of in vivo RNA synthesis are established and how cofactors and TFs impact them.

Results

We used competition ChIP to obtain genome-scale estimates of the residence times for five GTFs: TBP, TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIIE and TFIIF in budding yeast. While many GTF-chromatin interactions were short-lived (< 1 min), there were numerous interactions with residence times in the several minutes range. Sets of genes with a shared function also shared similar patterns of GTF kinetic behavior. TFIIE, a GTF that enters the PIC late in the assembly process, had residence times correlated with RNA synthesis rates.

Conclusions

The datasets and results reported here provide kinetic information for most of the Pol II-driven genes in this organism and therefore offer a rich resource for exploring the mechanistic relationships between PIC assembly, gene regulation, and transcription. The relationships between gene function and GTF dynamics suggest that shared sets of TFs tune PIC assembly kinetics to ensure appropriate levels of expression.

The Role of Alternative Splicing in Cancer: Regulatory Mechanism, Therapeutic Strategy, and Bioinformatics Application

[Formula: see text] Alternative splicing (AS) can generate distinct transcripts and subsequent isoforms that play differential functions from the same pre-mRNA. Recently, increasing numbers of studies have emerged, unmasking the association between AS and cancer. In this review, we arranged AS events that are closely related to cancer progression and presented promising treatments based on AS for cancer therapy. Obtaining proliferative capacity, acquiring invasive properties, gaining angiogenic features, shifting metabolic ability, and getting immune escape inclination are all splicing events involved in biological processes. Spliceosome-targeted and antisense oligonucleotide technologies are two novel strategies that are hopeful in tumor therapy. In addition, bioinformatics applications based on AS were summarized for better prediction and elucidation of regulatory routines mingled in. Together, we aimed to provide a better understanding of complicated AS events associated with cancer biology and reveal AS a promising target of cancer treatment in the future.

Toward understanding of the mechanisms of Mediator function in vivo: Focus on the preinitiation complex assembly

Mediator is a multisubunit complex conserved in eukaryotes that plays an essential coregulator role in RNA polymerase (Pol) II transcription. Despite intensive studies of the Mediator complex, the molecular mechanisms of its function in vivo remain to be fully defined. In this review, we will discuss the different aspects of Mediator function starting with its interactions with specific transcription factors, its recruitment to chromatin and how, as a coregulator, it contributes to the assembly of transcription machinery components within the preinitiation complex (PIC) in vivo and beyond the PIC formation.

Identification of a transcriptional activation domain in yeast repressor activator protein 1 (Rap1) using an altered DNA-binding specificity variant

Repressor activator protein 1 (Rap1) performs multiple vital cellular functions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae These include regulation of telomere length, transcriptional repression of both telomere-proximal genes and the silent mating type loci, and transcriptional activation of hundreds of mRNA-encoding genes, including the highly transcribed ribosomal protein- and glycolytic enzyme-encoding genes. Studies of the contributions of Rap1 to telomere length regulation and transcriptional repression have yielded significant mechanistic insights. However, the mechanism of Rap1 transcriptional activation remains poorly understood because Rap1 is encoded by a single copy essential gene and is involved in many disparate and essential cellular functions, preventing easy interpretation of attempts to directly dissect Rap1 structure-function relationships. Moreover, conflicting reports on the ability of Rap1-heterologous DNA-binding domain fusion proteins to serve as chimeric transcriptional activators challenge use of this approach to study Rap1. Described here is the development of an altered DNA-binding specificity variant of Rap1 (Rap1^AS). We used Rap1^AS to map and characterize a 41-amino acid activation domain (AD) within the Rap1 C terminus. We found that this AD is required for transcription of both chimeric reporter genes and authentic chromosomal Rap1 enhancer-containing target genes. Finally, as predicted for a bona fide AD, mutation of this newly identified AD reduced the efficiency of Rap1 binding to a known transcriptional coactivator TFIID-binding target, Taf5. In summary, we show here that Rap1 contains an AD required for Rap1-dependent gene transcription. The Rap1^AS variant will likely also be useful for studies of the functions of Rap1 in other biological pathways.

Functional interplay between Mediator and TFIIB in preinitiation complex assembly in relation to promoter architecture

Mediator is a large coregulator complex conserved from yeast to humans and involved in many human diseases, including cancers. Together with general transcription factors, it stimulates preinitiation complex (PIC) formation and activates RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription. In this study, we analyzed how Mediator acts in PIC assembly using in vivo, in vitro, and in silico approaches. We revealed an essential function of the Mediator middle module exerted through its Med10 subunit, implicating a key interaction between Mediator and TFIIB. We showed that this Mediator-TFIIB link has a global role on PIC assembly genome-wide. Moreover, the amplitude of Mediator's effect on PIC formation is gene-dependent and is related to the promoter architecture in terms of TATA elements, nucleosome occupancy, and dynamics. This study thus provides mechanistic insights into the coordinated function of Mediator and TFIIB in PIC assembly in different chromatin contexts.

Mediator independently orchestrates multiple steps of preinitiation complex assembly in vivo

Mediator is a large multiprotein complex conserved in all eukaryotes, which has a crucial coregulator function in transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). However, the molecular mechanisms of its action in vivo remain to be understood. Med17 is an essential and central component of the Mediator head module. In this work, we utilised our large collection of conditional temperature-sensitive med17 mutants to investigate Mediator's role in coordinating preinitiation complex (PIC) formation in vivo at the genome level after a transfer to a non-permissive temperature for 45 minutes. The effect of a yeast mutation proposed to be equivalent to the human Med17-L371P responsible for infantile cerebral atrophy was also analyzed. The ChIP-seq results demonstrate that med17 mutations differentially affected the global presence of several PIC components including Mediator, TBP, TFIIH modules and Pol II. Our data show that Mediator stabilizes TFIIK kinase and TFIIH core modules independently, suggesting that the recruitment or the stability of TFIIH modules is regulated independently on yeast genome. We demonstrate that Mediator selectively contributes to TBP recruitment or stabilization to chromatin. This study provides an extensive genome-wide view of Mediator's role in PIC formation, suggesting that Mediator coordinates multiple steps of a PIC assembly pathway.

Characterization of two tartary buckwheat R2R3-MYB transcription factors and their regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis

Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) contains high concentrations of flavonoids. The flavonoids are mainly represented by rutin, anthocyanins and proanthocyanins in tartary buckwheat. R2R3-type MYB transcription factors (TFs) play key roles in the transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. In this study, two TF genes, FtMYB1 and FtMYB2, were isolated from F. tataricum and characterized. The results of bioinformatic analysis indicated that the putative FtMYB1 and FtMYB2 proteins belonged to the R2R3-MYB family and displayed a high degree of similarity with TaMYB14 and AtMYB123/TT2. In vitro and in vivo evidence both showed the two proteins were located in the nucleus and exhibited transcriptional activation activities. During florescence, both FtMYB1 and FtMYB2 were more highly expressed in the flowers than any other organ. The overexpression of FtMYB1 and FtMYB2 significantly enhanced the accumulation of proanthocyanidins (PAs) and showed a strong effect on the target genes' expression in Nicotiana tabacum. The expression of dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) was upregulated to 5.6-fold higher than that of control, and the expression level was lower for flavonol synthase (FLS). To our knowledge, this is the first functional characterization of two MYB TFs from F. tataricum that control the PA pathway.

Expression of the sweetpotato R2R3-type IbMYB1a gene induces anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis

R2R3-type MYB transcription factors (TFs) play important roles in transcriptional regulation of anthocyanins. The R2R3-type IbMYB1 is known to be a key regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in the storage roots of sweetpotato. We previously showed that transient expression of IbMYB1a led to anthocyanin pigmentation in tobacco leaves. In this article, we generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the IbMYB1a gene under the control of CaMV 35S promoter, and the sweetpotato SPO and SWPA2 promoters. Overexpression of IbMYBa in transgenic Arabidopsis produced strong anthocyanin pigmentation in seedlings and generated a deep purple color in leaves, stems and seeds. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that IbMYB1a expression induced upregulation of several structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway, including 4CL, CHI, F3'H, DFR, AGT, AAT and GST. Furthermore, overexpression of IbMYB1a led to enhanced expression of the AtTT8 (bHLH) and PAP1/AtMYB75 genes. high-performance liquid chromatography analysis revealed that IbMYB1a expression led to the production of cyanidin as a major core molecule of anthocyanidins in Arabidopsis, as occurs in the purple leaves of sweetpotato (cv. Sinzami). This result shows that the IbMYB1a TF is sufficient to induce anthocyanin accumulation in seedlings, leaves, stems and seeds of Arabidopsis plants.

Harvest-inducibility of the promoter of alfalfa S-adenosyl-L-methionine: trans-caffeoyl-CoA3-O-methyltransferase gene

A major limitation on the expression of some foreign proteins in transgenic plants is the toxic effect of such proteins on the host plant resulting in inhibition of normal growth and development. A solution to this problem is to control the expression of genes for such proteins by means of inducible promoters, as is frequently done in microbial systems. A cDNA clone was obtained from subtractive hybridization of non-harvested and harvested alfalfa leaf tissue, named hi12. The hi12 cDNA was identified as part of the S-adenosyl-L-methionine: trans-caffeoyl-CoA3-O-methyltransferase gene of alfalfa, a gene encoding an essential key enzyme in lignin synthesis. The hi12 gene was strongly induced by harvesting and wounding but not by heat shock. The promoter of the hi12 gene, isolated by genomic walking, contained several stress response cis-elements. Transgenic plants of tobacco and Medicago truncatula containing the GUS gene driven by the promoter showed GUS expression following harvesting, demonstrating the activity of these regulatory regions in other plant species.

Transcriptional activators and activation mechanisms

Transcriptional activators are required to turn on the expression of genes in a eukaryotic cell. Activators bound to the enhancer can facilitate either the recruitment of RNA polymerase II to the promoter or its elongation. This article examines a few selected issues in understanding activator functions and activation mechanisms.

The RPB2 flap loop of human RNA polymerase II is dispensable for transcription initiation and elongation

The flap domain of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs), also called the wall, forms one side of the RNA exit channel. In bacterial RNAP, the mobile part of the flap is called the flap tip and makes essential contacts with initiation and elongation factors. Cocrystal structures suggest that the orthologous part of eukaryotic RNAPII, called the flap loop, contacts transcription factor IIB (TFIIB), but the function of the flap loop has not been assessed. We constructed and tested a deletion of the flap loop in human RNAPII (subunit RPB2 Δ873-884) that removes the flap loop interaction interface with TFIIB. Genome-wide analysis of the distribution of the RNAPII with the flap loop deletion expressed in a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK 293) revealed no effect of the flap loop on global transcription initiation, RNAPII occupancy within genes, or the efficiency of promoter escape and productive elongation. In vitro, the flap loop deletion had no effect on promoter binding, abortive initiation or promoter escape, TFIIS-stimulated transcript cleavage, or inhibition of transcript elongation by the complex of negative elongation factor (NELF) and 5,6-dichloro-1-β-d-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) sensitivity-inducing factor (DSIF). A modest effect on transcript elongation and pausing was suppressed by TFIIF. Although similar to the flap tip of bacterial RNAP, the RNAPII flap loop is not equivalently essential.

Mapping functional domains of transcription factors

Transcription factors are modular in nature in all organisms. In general, they have a DNA binding domain, one or more transcription activation and/or repressor domain, and often a dimerization domain. In many cases, transcription factors also have other protein-protein interaction domain(s). Mapping these functional domains in transcription factors is critical in understanding their molecular function. In this chapter, protocols for mapping the DNA binding domain and the transcription activation domain of a bHLH class of transcription factor are described. In principle, these protocols can be applied to other classes of transcription factors for mapping their functional domains.

Mediator-dependent recruitment of TFIIH modules in preinitiation complex

In vitro, without Mediator, the association of general transcription factors (GTF) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in preinitiation complexes (PIC) occurs in an orderly fashion. In this work, we explore the in vivo function of Mediator in GTF recruitment to PIC. A direct interaction between Med11 Mediator head subunit and Rad3 TFIIH subunit was identified. We explored the significance of this interaction and those of Med11 with head module subunits Med17 and Med22 and found that impairing these interactions could differentially affect the recruitment of TFIIH, TFIIE, and Pol II in the PIC. A med11 mutation that altered promoter occupancy by the TFIIK kinase module of TFIIH genome-wide also reduced Pol II CTD serine 5 phosphorylation. We conclude that the Mediator head module plays a critical role in TFIIH and TFIIE recruitment to the PIC. We identify steps in PIC formation that suggest a branched assembly pathway.

Function and structural organization of Mot1 bound to a natural target promoter

Mot1 is an essential, conserved TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a member of the Snf2/Swi2 ATPase family. Mot1 uses ATP hydrolysis to displace TBP from DNA, an activity that can be readily reconciled with its global role in gene repression. Less well understood is how Mot1 directly activates gene expression. It has been suggested that Mot1-mediated activation can occur by displacement of inactive TBP-containing complexes from promoters, thereby permitting assembly of functional transcription complexes. Mot1 may also activate transcription by other mechanisms that have not yet been defined. A gap in our understanding has been the absence of biochemical information related to the activity of Mot1 on natural target genes. Using URA1 as a model Mot1-activated promoter, we show striking differences in the way that both TBP and Mot1 interact with DNA compared with other model DNA substrates analyzed previously. These differences are due at least in part to the propensity of TBP alone to bind to the URA1 promoter in the wrong orientation to direct appropriate assembly of the URA1 preinitiation complex. The results suggest that Mot1-mediated activation of URA1 transcription involves at least two steps, one of which is the removal of TBP bound to the promoter in the opposite orientation required for URA1 transcription.

Metabolic engineering of flavonoids in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): the potential for metabolomics

Flavonoids comprise a large and diverse group of polyphenolic plant secondary metabolites. In plants, flavonoids play important roles in many biological processes such as pigmentation of flowers, fruits and vegetables, plant-pathogen interactions, fertility and protection against UV light. Being natural plant compounds, flavonoids are an integral part of the human diet and there is increasing evidence that dietary polyphenols are likely candidates for the observed beneficial effects of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables on the prevention of several chronic diseases. Within the plant kingdom, and even within a single plant species, there is a large variation in the levels and composition of flavonoids. This variation is often due to specific mutations in flavonoid-related genes leading to quantitative and qualitative differences in metabolic profiles. The use of such specific flavonoid mutants with easily scorable, visible phenotypes has led to the isolation and characterisation of many structural and regulatory genes involved in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway from different plant species. These genes have been used to engineer the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in both model and crop plant species, not only from a fundamental perspective, but also in order to alter important agronomic traits, such as flower and fruit colour, resistance, nutritional value. This review describes the advances made in engineering the flavonoid pathway in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Three different approaches will be described; (I) Increasing endogenous tomato flavonoids using structural or regulatory genes; (II) Blocking specific steps in the flavonoid pathway by RNA interference strategies; and (III) Production of novel tomato flavonoids by introducing novel branches of the flavonoid pathway. Metabolite profiling is an essential tool to analyse the effects of pathway engineering approaches, not only to analyse the effect on the flavonoid composition itself, but also on other related or unrelated metabolic pathways. Metabolomics will therefore play an increasingly important role in revealing a more complete picture of metabolic perturbation and will provide additional novel insights into the effect of the introduced genes and the role of flavonoids in plant physiology and development.

Role for PSF in mediating transcriptional activator-dependent stimulation of pre-mRNA processing in vivo

In a recent study, we provided evidence that strong promoter-bound transcriptional activators result in higher levels of splicing and 3'-end cleavage of nascent pre-mRNA than do weak promoter-bound activators and that this effect of strong activators requires the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (pol II). In the present study, we have investigated the mechanism of activator- and CTD-mediated stimulation of pre-mRNA processing. Affinity chromatography experiments reveal that two factors previously implicated in the coupling of transcription and pre-mRNA processing, PSF and p54(nrb)/NonO, preferentially bind a strong rather than a weak activation domain. Elevated expression in human 293 cells of PSF bypasses the requirement for a strong activator to promote efficient splicing and 3'-end cleavage. Truncation of the pol II CTD, which consists of 52 repeats of the consensus heptapeptide sequence YSPTSPS, to 15 heptapeptide repeats prevents PSF-dependent stimulation of splicing and 3'-end cleavage. Moreover, PSF and p54(nrb)/NonO bind in vitro to the wild-type CTD but not to the truncated 15-repeat CTD, and domains in PSF that are required for binding to activators and to the CTD are also important for the stimulation of pre-mRNA processing. Interestingly, activator- and CTD-dependent stimulation of splicing mediated by PSF appears to primarily affect the removal of first introns. Collectively, these results suggest that the recruitment of PSF to activated promoters and the pol II CTD provides a mechanism by which transcription and pre-mRNA processing are coordinated within the cell.

cAMP-responsive element in TATA-less core promoter is essential for haploid-specific gene expression in mouse testis

Promoters, including neither TATA box nor initiator, have been frequently found in testicular germ cell-specific genes in mice. These investigations imply that unique forms of the polymerase II transcription initiation machinery play a role in selective activation of germ cell-specific gene expression programs during spermatogenesis. However, there is little information about testis-specific core promoters, because useful germ cell culture system is not available. In this study, we characterize the regulatory region of the haploid-specific Oxct2b gene in detail by using in vivo transient transfection assay in combination with a transgenic approach, with electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Expression studies using mutant constructs demonstrate that a 34 bp region, which extends from -49 to -16, acts as a core promoter in an orientation-dependent manner. This promoter region includes the cAMP-responsive element (CRE)-like sequence TGACGCAG, but contains no other motifs, such as a TATA box or initiator. The CRE-like element is indispensable for the core promoter activity, but not for activator in testicular germ cells, through the binding of a testis-specific CRE modulator transcription factor. These results indicate the presence of alternative transcriptional initiation machinery for cell-type-specific gene expression in testicular germ cells.

Modification of flavonoid biosynthesis in crop plants

Flavonoids comprise the most common group of polyphenolic plant secondary metabolites. In plants, flavonoids play an important role in biological processes. Beside their function as pigments in flowers and fruits, to attract pollinators and seed dispersers, flavonoids are involved in UV-scavenging, fertility and disease resistance. Since they are present in a wide range of fruits and vegetables, flavonoids form an integral part of the human diet. Currently there is broad interest in the effects of dietary polyphenols on human health. In addition to the potent antioxidant activity of many of these compounds in vitro, an inverse correlation between the intake of certain polyphenols and the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and other age related diseases has been observed in epidemiological studies. The potential nutritional effects of these molecules make them an attractive target for genetic engineering strategies aimed at producing plants with increased nutritional value. This review describes the current knowledge of the molecular regulation of the flavonoid pathway and the state of the art with respect to metabolic engineering of this pathway in crop plants.

Mapping activation and repression domains of the vnd/NK-2 homeodomain protein

A transient transfection assay using Drosophila S2 tissue culture cells and WT and mutant Drosophila vnd/NK-2 homeobox cDNAs was used to localize repression and activation domains of vnd/NK-2 homeodomain protein. A repression domain was identified near the N terminus of vnd/NK-2 homeodomain protein (amino acid residues 154-193), which contains many hydrophobic amino acid residues. The major determinants of the repression domain were shown to be amino acid residues F155, W158, I161, L162, L163, and W166. Truncated protein consisting of the N-terminal repression domain and the DNA-binding homeodomain repressed transcription as efficiently as WT vnd/NK-2 protein. An activation domain was identified between the tinman domain and the homeodomain (amino acid residues 277-543), which consists of a glutamine-rich subdomain and two acidic subdomains. No effect was detected of the tinman domain or the NK-2-specific domain on either activation or repression of a beta-galactosidase reporter gene.

Direct interaction of NRSF with TBP: chromatin reorganization and core promoter repression for neuron-specific gene transcription

Neural restrictive silencer factor, NRSF (also known as REST) binds a neuronal cell type selective silencer element to mediate transcriptional repression of neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells and neuronal progenitors. Two repression domains (RD-1 and RD-2) occur in its N-terminal and C-terminal regions, respectively. RD-1 recruits mSin3 and HDAC, thereby inhibiting transcription by inducing reorganization of the chromatin structure. However, little is known about how such global repression becomes promoter-specific repression or whether the NRSF-HDAC complex can interact with transcriptional core factors at each specific promoter. Here we show evidence that NRSF interacts with core promoter factors, including TATA-binding protein (TBP). The NRSF-TBP interaction occurred between the linear segments of the N- and C-terminal-most portions of NRSF and the C-terminal half of TBP. A RD-2 mutant of NRSF lost the TBP-binding activity and was unable to repress transcription at an exogenously introduced TGTA promoter. These results indicate that the direct interaction between the NRSF C-terminal domain and TBP is essential for the C-terminal repression mechanism of NRSF. Thus, the RD-1 and RD-2 repression domains of NRSF utilize both chromatin-dependent and chromatin-independent mechanisms, which may be segregated at various stages of neural development and modulation.

Quantitative assessment of in vitro interactions implicates TATA-binding protein as a target of the VP16C transcriptional activation region

Models of mechanisms of transcriptional activation in eukaryotes frequently invoke direct interactions of transcriptional activation domains with target proteins including general transcription factors or coactivators such as chromatin modifying complexes. The potent transcriptional activation domain (AD) of the VP16 protein of herpes simplex virus has previously been shown to interact with several general transcription factors including the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TBP-associated factor 9 (TAF9), TFIIA, and TFIIB. In surface plasmon resonance assays, a module of the VP16 AD designated VP16C (residues 452-490) bound to TBP with an affinity notably stronger than to TAF9, TFIIA or TFIIB. Moreover, the interaction of VP16C with TBP correlated well with transcriptional activity for a panel of VP16C substitution variants. These results support models in which the interactions of ADs with TBP play an important role in transcriptional activation.

Molecular communication between androgen receptor and general transcription machinery

The androgen-androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway plays a key role in proper development and function of male reproductive organs. Like other transcriptional regulators, AR may communicate with the general transcription machinery on the core promoter to exert its function as a transcriptional modulator. The molecular communication between AR and the general transcription machinery may be achieved either by the direct protein-protein interaction between AR and the general transcription machinery or by the indirect interaction mediated by coregulators. Analyses of AR-mediated transcription suggest that the orchestrated interaction of AR with the transcription factors IIF (TFIIF) and IIH (TFIIH), and positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), may increase efficiency of transcriptional elongation from the androgen target genes, such as prostate specific antigen (PSA). Based on studies so far, AR may regulate transcription not by enhanced assembly of preinitiation transcription complex but by regulating promoter clearance and elongation stage of transcription.

A new class of transcription initiation factors, intermediate between TATA box-binding proteins (TBPs) and TBP-like factors (TLFs), is present in the marine unicellular organism, the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii

Dinoflagellates are marine unicellular eukaryotes that exhibit unique features including a very low level of basic proteins bound to the chromatin and the complete absence of histones and nucleosomal structure. A cDNA encoding a protein with a strong homology to the TATA box-binding proteins (TBP) has been isolated from an expressed sequence tag library of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii. The typical TBP repeat signature and the amino acid motives involved in TFIIA and TFIIB interactions were conserved in this new TBP-like protein. However, the four phenylalanines known to interact with the TATA box were substituted with hydrophilic residues (His(77), Arg(94), Tyr(171), Thr(188)) as has been described for TBP-like factors (TLF)/TBP-related proteins (TRP). A phylogenetic analysis showed that cTBP is intermediate between TBP and TLF/TRP protein families, and the structural similarity of cTBP with TLF was confirmed by low affinity binding to a consensus' TATA box in an equivalent manner to that usually observed for TLFs. Six 5'-upstream gene regions of dinoflagellate genes have been analyzed and neither a TATA box nor a consensus-promoting element could be found within these different sequences. Our results showed that cTBP could bind stronger to a TTTT box sequence than to the canonical TATA box, especially at high salt concentration. Same binding results were obtained with a mutated cTBP (mcTBP), in which the four phenylalanines were restored. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a TBP-like protein in a unicellular organism, which also appears as the major form of TBP present in C. cohnii.

Transcription factor TFIIH components enhance the GR coactivator activity but not the cell cycle-arresting activity of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 protein Vpr

The human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1)-accessory protein Vpr interacts with and potentiates the activity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and arrests the host cell cycle at the G2/M boundary. Here we report that three core components of the general transcription factor (TF) IIH, CDK7, Cyclin H, and MAT1, enhance Vpr's GR coactivator activity but inhibit its cell cycle-arresting function. A CDK7 mutant defective in kinase activity for the C-terminal tail of RNA polymerase II, which cannot form a functional TFIIH complex, did not enhance Vpr coactivator activity. Overexpression of all three TFIIH components and p300 cooperatively enhanced Vpr coactivator activity, whereas TFIIH overexpression did not potentiate the transcriptional activity of a Vpr mutant, which does not bind p300/CBP. These findings suggest that TFIIH participates in Vpr's GR coactivating activity, at a step beyond its interaction with p300/CBP.

Rpb4, a non-essential subunit of core RNA polymerase II of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for activated transcription of a subset of genes

A major role in the regulation of eukaryotic protein-coding genes is played by the gene-specific transcriptional regulators, which recruit the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme to the specific promoter. Several components of the mediator complex within the holoenzyme also have been shown to affect activation of different subsets of genes. Only recently has it been suggested that besides the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, smaller subunits like Rpb3 and Rpb5 may have regulatory roles in expression of specific sets of genes. We report here, the role of Rpb4, a non-essential subunit of core RNA polymerase II, in activation of a subset of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have shown below that whereas constitutive transcription is largely unaffected, activation from various promoters tested is severely compromised in the absence of RPB4. This activation defect can be rescued by the overexpression of cognate activators. We have localized the region of Rpb4 involved in activation to the C-terminal 24 amino acids. We have also shown here that transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter is also defective in the absence of RPB4. Surprisingly, the overexpression of RPB7 (the interacting partner of Rpb4) does not rescue the activation defect of all the promoters tested, although it rescues the activation defect of the heat shock element-containing promoter and the temperature sensitivity associated with RPB4 deletion. Overall, our results indicate that Rpb4 and Rpb7 play independent roles in transcriptional regulation of genes.

Virtually unidirectional binding of TBP to the AdMLP TATA box within the quaternary complex with TFIIA and TFIIB

BACKGROUND

The TATA box binding protein (TBP) is required by all three RNA polymerases for the promoter-specific initiation of transcription. All eukaryotic TBP-DNA complexes observed in crystal structures show the conserved C-terminal domain of TBP (TBPc) bound to the TATA box in a single orientation that is consistent with assembly of a preinitiation complex (PIC) possessing a unique polarity. The binding of TBP to the TATA box is believed to orient the PIC correctly on the promoter and can function as the rate-limiting step in PIC assembly. Previous work performed with TBP from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yTBP) showed that, despite the oriented binding of eukaryotic TBP observed in crystal structures, yTBP in solution does not orient itself uniquely on the adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP) TATA box. Instead, yTBP binds the AdMLP as a mixture of two orientational isomers that are related by a 180 degree rotation about the pseudo-dyad axis of the complex. In addition, these orientational isomers are not restricted to the 8 bp TATA box, but rather bind a distribution of sites that partially overlap the TATA box. Two members of the PIC, general transcription factor (TF) IIB and TFIIA individually enhance the orientational and axial specificity of yTBP binding to the TATA box, but fail to fix yTBP in a single orientation or a unique position on the promoter.

RESULTS

We used an affinity cleavage assay to explore the combined effects of TFIIA and TFIIB on the axial and orientational specificity of yTBP. Our results show that the combination of TFIIA and TFIIB affixes yTBP in virtually a single orientation as well as a unique location on the AdMLP TATA box. Ninety-five percent of the quaternary TBP-TFIIA-TFIIB-TATA complex contained yTBP bound in the orientation expected on the basis of crystallographic and genetic experiments, and more than 70% is restricted axially to the 8 bp sequence TATAAAAG.

CONCLUSIONS

Although yTBP itself binds to the TATA box without a high level of orientational or axial specificity, our data show that a small subset of general TFs are capable of uniquely orienting the PIC on the AdMLP. Our results, in combination with recent data concerning the pathway of PIC formation in yeast, suggest that transcription could be regulated during both early and late stages of PIC assembly by general factors (and the proteins to which they bind) that influence the position and orientation of TBP on the promoter.

The initiator element of the Drosophila beta2 tubulin gene core promoter contributes to gene expression in vivo but is not required for male germ-cell specific expression

The tissue-specific expression of the Drosophila beta 2 tubulin gene ( B2t ) is accomplished by the action of a 14-bp activator element (beta2UE1) in combination with certain regulatory elements of the TATA-less, Inr-containing B2t core promoter. We performed an in vivo analysis of the Inr element function in the B2t core promoter using a transgenic approach. Our experiments demonstrate that the Inr element acts as a functional cis -regulatory element in vivo and quantitatively regulates tissue-specific reporter expression in transgenic animals. However, our mutational analysis of the Inr element demonstrates no essential role of the Inr in mediating tissue specificity of the B2t promoter. In addition, a downstream element seems to affect promoter activity in combination with the Inr. In summary, our data show for the first time the functionality of the Inr element in an in vivo background situation in Drosophila.

The N-terminal domain of human TAFII68 displays transactivation and oncogenic properties

In Ewing tumor, the (11;22) chromosomal translocation produces a chimeric molecule composed of the amino-terminal domain of EWS fused to the carboxyl-terminal DNA-binding domain of FLI-1. Previously, we have identified a novel protein TAFII68, which is highly similar to EWS and another closely related protein TLS (also called FUS). We demonstrate that the N-terminus of TAFII68 efficiently stimulates transcription when fused to two different DNA binding domains and that overexpression of TAFII68-FLI-1 chimeras in NIH3T3 cells leads to oncogenic transformation. We have also investigated the molecular mechanisms which could account for the transcriptional activation and the oncogenic transformation potential of the N-termini of TAFII68 and EWS. Thus, we have tested whether the artificial recruitment of components of the preinitiation complex (PIC) or a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) could bypass the requirement for the activation domains of either EWS or TAFII68. Recruitment of individual components of the transcription machinery or the GCN5 HAT is not sufficient to promote activation from FLI-1 responsive genes either in transfection experiments or in oncogenic transformation assays. These results suggest that the TAFII68 or EWS activation domains enhance a step after PIC formation in the transcriptional activation process.

B-Cell coactivator OBF-1 exhibits unusual transcriptional properties and functions in a DNA-bound Oct-1-dependent fashion

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators generally comprise both a DNA-binding domain that recognizes specific cis-regulatory elements in the target genes and an activation domain which is essential for transcriptional stimulation. Activation domains typically behave as structurally and functionally autonomous modules that retain their intrinsic activities when directed to a promoter by a variety of heterologous DNA-binding domains. Here we report that OBF-1, a B-cell-specific coactivator for transcription factor Oct-1, challenges this traditional view in that it contains an atypical activation domain that exhibits two unexpected functional properties when tested in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First, OBF-1 by itself has essentially no intrinsic activation potential, yet it strongly synergizes with other activation domains such as VP16 and Gal4. Second, OBF-1 exerts its effect in association with DNA-bound Oct-1 but is inactive when attached to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. These findings suggest that activation by OBF-1 is not obtained by simple recruitment of the coactivator to the promoter but requires interaction with DNA-bound Oct-1 to stimulate a step distinct from those regulated by classical activation domains.

TGFbeta-inducible early gene (TIEG) also codes for early growth response alpha (EGRalpha): evidence of multiple transcripts from alternate promoters

TGFbeta-inducible early gene (TIEG) and early growth response alpha (EGRalpha) are putative transcription factors based on homology to known zinc finger proteins SP1, EGR1, BTEB, and Wilm tumor. Here we report that TIEG and EGRalpha are expressed from alternative promoters of the same gene. The TIEG/EGRalpha gene spans 8 kb and contains five exons. Use of alternative first exons results in TIEG having 12 unique amino acids on its N-terminus. Computer analysis of the 5' upstream regions of either TIEG (exon 1a) or EGRalpha (exon 1b) does not identify a TATA box or initiator sequencebut shows consensus sequence similarities to binding sites for several transcription factors including SP1,JunB, and aromatic hydrocarbon/receptor-ligand complexes. Analysis of constructs containing 5'-flanking regions show that both the TIEG and the EGRalpha promoters have significant activity in human fetal osteoblast cells. Northern analysis of mRNA from various human tissues and several cell lines reveals that TIEG is the predominant transcript produced and regulated by growth factors from the TIEG/EGRalpha gene.

An activator target in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme

Expression of protein-coding genes in eukaryotes involves the recruitment, by transcriptional activator proteins, of a transcription initiation apparatus consisting of greater than 50 polypeptides. Recent genetic and biochemical evidence in yeast suggests that a subset of these proteins, called SRB proteins, are likely targets for transcriptional activators. We demonstrate here, through affinity chromatography, photo-cross-linking, and surface plasmon resonance experiments, that the GAL4 activator interacts directly with the SRB4 subunit of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. The GAL4 activation domain binds to two essential segments of SRB4. The physiological relevance of this interaction is confirmed by mutations in SRB4, which occur within its GAL4-binding domain and which restore activation in vivo by a GAL4 derivative bearing a mutant activation domain.

Preinitation complex assembly: potentially a bumpy path

During 1996 and 1997, several chemical issues that arise in the early stages of preinitiation complex (PIC) formation were resolved. Kinetics experiments indicated that both TBP dimerization and DNA bending influence the rate of TBP-TATA box assembly. Affinity cleavage experiments indicated that TBP lacks the specificity to nucleate assembly of a properly oriented PIC. Finally, high-resolution structures provided the atomic detail of early intermediates in PIC formation.

Viral transactivating proteins

Many viruses utilize the cellular transcription apparatus to express their genomes, and they encode transcriptional regulatory proteins that modulate the process. Here we review the current understanding of three viral regulatory proteins. The adenovirus E1A protein acts within the nucleus to regulate transcription through its ability to bind to other proteins. The herpes simplex type 1 virus VP16 protein acts within the nucleus to control transcription by binding to DNA in conjunction with cellular proteins. The human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein influences transcription through interactions with cellular proteins in the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm.

The large subunit of basal transcription factor SNAPc is a Myb domain protein that interacts with Oct-1

The human RNA polymerase II and III snRNA promoters have similar enhancers, the distal sequence elements (DSEs), and similar basal promoter elements, the proximal sequence elements (PSEs). The DSE, which contains an octamer motif, binds broadly expressed activator Oct-1. The PSE binds a multiprotein complex referred to as SNAPc or PTF. On DNAs containing both an octamer site and a PSE, Oct-1 and SNAPc bind cooperatively. SNAPc consists of at least four stably associated subunits, SNAP43, SNAP45, SNAP50, and SNAP190. None of the three small subunits, which have all been cloned, can bind to the PSE on their own. Here we report the isolation of cDNAs corresponding to the largest subunit of SNAPc, SNAP190. SNAP190 contains an unusual Myb DNA binding domain consisting of four complete repeats (Ra to Rd) and a half repeat (Rh). A truncated protein consisting of the last two SNAP190 Myb repeats, Rc and Rd, can bind to the PSE, suggesting that the SNAP190 Myb domain contributes to recognition of the PSE by the SNAP complex. SNAP190 is required for snRNA gene transcription by both RNA polymerases II and III and interacts with SNAP45. In addition, SNAP190 interacts with Oct-1. Together, these results suggest that the largest subunit of the SNAP complex is involved in direct recognition of the PSE and is a target for the Oct-1 activator. They also provide an example of a basal transcription factor containing a Myb DNA binding domain.

Molecular cloning and characterization of P113, a mouse SNF2/SWI2-related transcription factor

A full-length cDNA encoding a 113-kDa transcription factor, named P113, was cloned from mouse preadipocyte line 30A5. P113 binds to a 7-bp consensus TNF-response element and a 30-bp fragment from mouse PAI-1 promoter (-88/-59). Sequence analysis indicates that the P113 is highly homologous to HIP116/HLTF (human) and RUSH-1alpha (rabbit). The sequence homology and the fact that P113 contains seven motifs conserved in many DNA-dependent helicases/ATPases indicate that it is a new member of the SNF2/SWI2 protein family. A cysteine-rich motif, called RING finger, was found close to the C-terminus of P113. The expression pattern of P113 mRNA in rat tissues is significantly different from that of HLTF in human tissues. Affinity-purified P113 has an ATPase activity that is activated by DNA in a sequence-specific manner. Using Northern blot analysis and the PAI-1 promoter/luciferase system, we demonstrated that P113 is a transcription factor that activates the transcription of the PAI-1 gene in 30A5 cells.

Characterization of human activating transcription factor 4, a transcriptional activator that interacts with multiple domains of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein

We demonstrate that human activating transcription factor 4 (hATF4), a member of the activating transcription factor/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (ATF/CREB) family of transcription factors, is a potent transcriptional activator in both mammalian cells and yeast. The N-terminal 113 amino acids of hATF4 activate transcription efficiently, and unexpectedly, the C-terminal bZip DNA binding domain of hATF4 also activates transcription, albeit weakly. Our results indicate that hATF4 interacts with several general transcription factors: TATA-binding protein, TFIIB, and the RAP30 subunit of TFIIF. In addition, hATF4 interacts with the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) at four regions: 1) the KIX domain, 2) a region that contains the third zinc finger and the E1A-interacting domain, 3) a C-terminal region that contains the p160/SRC-1-interacting domain, and 4) the recently identified histone acetyltransferase domain. Interestingly, both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of hATF4 interact with the above general transcription factors and CBP, providing a mechanistic explanation for their ability to activate transcription. Consistent with its role as a coactivator, CBP potentiates the ability of hATF4 to activate transcription. The potential significance of the interaction between hATF4 and multiple factors is discussed.

Exploring the role of homeobox and zinc finger proteins in pancreatic cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis

Transcription factors are DNA binding proteins that regulate gene expression in response to a large variety of extracellular stimuli, and thereby act as key molecular switches for controlling cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. During the last decade, a myriad of these proteins have been identified and classified into different structural families, including homeobox, zinc finger, leucine zipper, and helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Members of the homeobox and zinc finger superfamilies are among the best-characterized transcription factors known to act as potent regulators of normal development in organisms ranging from insects to humans. In addition, mutations or aberrant expression in genes encoding these proteins can result in neoplastic transformation in several different cell types, further supporting their role as "guardians" of normal cell growth and differentiation. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review this field of research with a particular emphasis on the role of homeobox- and zinc finger-containing transcription factors in pancreatic cell growth, cell differentiation, and apoptosis. The potential participation of these proteins in neoplastic transformation is also discussed.

Synergistic and promoter-selective activation of transcription by recruitment of transcription factors TFIID and TFIIB

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators may function by stimulating formation of RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes at the core promoter of genes. In this case, their mode of action will intrinsically depend on how these complexes assemble on promoters in living cells, an issue that remains largely unexplored. Here we show that in yeast the basal transcription machinery is brought to the promoter in the form of at least two subcomplexes, TFIID and a complex comprising TFIIB and other essential components. Individual recruitment of either complex by artificial contact with a transcriptionally inactive, sequence-specific DNA-binding protein suffices to trigger transcriptional activation from a wild-type core promoter bearing the appropriate binding site. In contrast, activation from a promoter containing a weakened TATA element is only observed upon recruitment of TFIID. Tethering TFIIB on that promoter remains without effect, but the simultaneous recruitment of both components leads to strong synergistic activation. These findings suggest a simple mechanism whereby two activators that contact distinct subcomplexes of the basal machinery may stimulate transcription synergistically and differentially depending on the nature of the promoter.

RAP74 induces promoter contacts by RNA polymerase II upstream and downstream of a DNA bend centered on the TATA box

RAP74, the large subunit of transcription factor IIF, associates with a preinitiation complex containing RNA polymerase II (pol II) and other general initiation factors. We have mapped the location of RAP74 in close proximity to promoter DNA at similar distances both upstream and downstream of a DNA bend centered on the TATA box. Binding of RAP74 induces a conformational change that affects the position of pol II relative to that of the DNA. This reorganization of the preinitiation complex minimally requires the N-terminal region of RAP74 containing both its RAP30-binding domain and another region necessary for accurate transcription in vitro. We propose a role for RAP74 in controlling the topological organization of the pol II preinitiation complex.

Characterization of a trimeric complex containing Oct-1, SNAPc, and DNA

The human small nuclear (sn) RNA promoters contain a proximal sequence element (PSE), which recruits the basal transcription factor SNAPc, and a distal sequence element characterized by an octamer sequence, which recruits the POU domain transcription factor Oct-1. The Oct-1 POU domain and SNAPc bind cooperatively to probes containing a PSE and an octamer sequence, and this effect contributes to efficient transcription in vitro. In vivo, however, Oct-1 regions outside of the POU domain can activate snRNA gene transcription. Here, we have examined whether the role of these regions is to contribute to cooperative binding with SNAPc. We find that they indeed improve cooperative binding, but most of the effect is nevertheless mediated by just the POU domain. This suggests that Oct-1 activates transcription of snRNA genes in at least two steps, recruitment of SNAPc mediated primarily by the POU domain, and a later step mediated by regions outside of the POU domain. We also show that a PSE-binding complex observed in nuclear extracts consists of Oct-1 and SNAPc. Although Oct-1 cannot bind effectively to the PSE probe on its own, in the complex it contacts DNA. Thus, in a nuclear extract, SNAPc can recruit Oct-1 to a probe to which Oct-1 cannot bind on its own.

Common themes in the function of transcription and splicing enhancers

Regulation of both transcription and RNA splicing requires enhancer elements, that is, cis-acting DNA or RNA sequences that promote the activities of linked promoters or splice sites, respectively. Both types of enhancer associate with regulatory proteins to form multicomponent enhancer complexes that recruit the necessary enzymatic machinery to promoter or splice site recognition sequences. This recruitment occurs as a result of direct interactions between regulatory proteins in the enhancer complexes and components of the basic enzymatic machineries. Recent advances suggest that the high degree of regulatory specificity observed for both transcription and splicing is due, in large part, to the multicomponent nature of enhancer complexes and to their cooperative assembly.

Affinity purification of a human RNA polymerase II complex using monoclonal antibodies against transcription factor IIF

Five different monoclonal antibodies that immunoreact with RAP74, the large subunit of general transcription factor (TF) IIF, were produced and characterized. Using one of these antibodies, an affinity purification procedure was devised to isolate a human RNA polymerase II complex. This procedure is fast, simple, and reproducible and does not require extensive purification. The RNA polymerase II complex isolated using this procedure contains SRB (suppressor of RNA polymerase B) polypeptides, transcription factors IIE and IIF, limiting amounts of TFIIH, and the TATA-binding protein, but was devoid of TFIIB.

Unusual oligomerization required for activity of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein

Nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) contacts a bacterial RNA polymerase from distant enhancers by means of DNA loops and activates transcription by allowing polymerase to gain access to the template DNA strand. It was shown that NtrC from Salmonella typhimurium must build large oligomers to activate transcription. In contrast to eukaryotic enhancer-binding proteins, most of which must bind directly to DNA, some NtrC dimers were bound solely by protein-protein interactions. NtrC oligomers were visualized with scanning force microscopy. Evidence of their functional importance was provided by showing that some inactive non-DNA-binding and DNA-binding mutant forms of NtrC can cooperate to activate transcription.

Switching of gene expression: analysis of the factors that spatially and temporally regulate plant gene expression

In this chapter, we have reviewed the present research and understanding of several families of transcription factors in plants. From this information, it appears there is good conservation between the types of transcription factors in plants and animals. However, there are several types of factors which have been isolated in plants that remain to be documented in animals (e.g., HD-Zip and GT). These as well as the presence of two types of TATA-binding proteins (TBPs) in plants suggest that although transcription in eukaryotes is highly conserved, fundamental differences may exist. Despite the differences, the modes of regulating transcription are well conserved. Figure 3 summarizes these modes of regulation. In recent years, the role of chromatin structure as well as subcellular localization have been the focus of a vast amount of research in mammals, Drosophila and yeast. However, very little research in these areas has been done in plants. Isolation of genes such as Curly leaf suggest a conservation of genes that influence the formation of heterochromatin-like structures. Whether or not this gene influences chromatin/heterochromatin structure in plants, however, remains to be tested. The study of nuclear localization of factors such as COP1 and KN1 is now leading to models for regulating nuclear transport as well as intercellular transport of transcription factors. Further study of the inter- and intracellular movement of these and other transcription factors may provide information on new modes of regulating transcription. In addition to understanding the role chromatin structure and subcellular localization of transcription factors may have on transcription initiation, the biological role of many plant transcription factors remains to be identified. Several approaches may be taken to understand the mechanisms by which transcription factors influence biochemical and physiological processes in the plant. These steps include 1) identification of the DNA-binding sites of the factors as well as the promoter regions which contain these sites. Presently, this approach is limiting in that not many non-coding regions have been sequenced and characterized in detail. Furthermore, the presence of a putative binding site within a promoter does not necessarily indicate that the factor will bind to the site in vivo. 2) Analysis of the binding affinity for a particular factor to a binding site in comparison to other related factors, via in vitro competition assays and quantitative titrations. This will provide information on how strongly these factors are binding to the sites, but without knowledge of all the factors present in a single cell it is difficult to recreate the in vivo conditions. 3) Generation of transgenic plants or microinjection of DNA/RNA to express a particular factor ectopically, reduce expression of the factor via antisense expression, and creation of dominant negative mutants by overexpression of key dimerization domains may provide information concerning what biological pathways these factors influence. 4) Isolation of mutations in particular transcription factors has been extremely informative in floral development. However, this approach usually entails isolation of a mutant due to a phenotype and eventual mutated locus. The cloning of the locus may or may not involve a transcription factor. 5) Many plant transcription factors have been isolated via sequence similarity to other previously identified and/or characterized transcription factors. However, the biological role of may of these factors is not known. In addition to ectopic expression of these factors by creating transgenic plants, isolation of a loss-of-function mutation may provide valuable information concerning the role of this factor in vivo. Many loss-of-function mutations in MADS box genes have led to a better understanding of how the MADS domain proteins interact with one another as well as how they influence floral development. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)