Locally advanced primary breast cancer: medium-term results of a randomised trial of multimodal therapy versus initial hormone therapy

A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond

BACKGROUND

Use of the neoadjuvant approach to treat breast cancer patients has increased since the early 2000s, but the overall pathway of care for such patients can be highly variable. The aim of our project was to establish a multidisciplinary consensus among clinicians with expertise in neoadjuvant therapy (nat) for breast cancer and to determine if that consensus reflects published methods used in randomized controlled trials (rcts) in this area.

METHODS

A modified Delphi protocol, which used iterative surveys administered to 85 experts across Canada, was established to obtain expert consensus concerning all aspects of the care pathway for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer. All rcts published between January 1, 1967, and December 1, 2012, were systematically reviewed. Data extracted from the rcts were analyzed to determine if the methods used matched the expert consensus for specific areas of nat management. A scoring system determined the strength of the agreement between the literature and the expert consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for all areas of the pathway of care for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer, with the exception of the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-treatment or preoperative setting. The levels of agreement between the consensus statements and the published rcts varied, primarily because specific aspects of the pathway of care were not well described in the reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

A true consensus of expert opinion concerning the pathway of care appropriate for patients receiving nat for breast cancer has been achieved. A review of the literature illuminated gaps in the evidence about some elements of nat management. Where evidence is available, agreement with expert opinion is strong overall. Our study is unique in its approach to establishing consensus among medical experts in this field and has established a pathway of care that can be applied in practice for patients receiving nat.

Features of occult invasion in biopsy-proven DCIS at breast MRI

The purpose of this study is to determine if MRI BI-RADS criteria or radiologist perception correlate with presence of invasive cancer after initial core biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Retrospective search spanning 2000-2007 identified all core-biopsy diagnoses of pure DCIS that coincided with preoperative MRI. Two radiologists fellowship-trained in breast imaging categorized lesions according to ACR MRI BI-RADS lexicon and estimated likelihood of occult invasion. Semiquantitative signal enhancement ratio (SER) kinetic analysis was also performed. Results were compared with histopathology. 51 consecutive patients with primary core biopsy-proven DCIS and concurrent MRI were identified. Of these, 13 patients (25%) had invasion at excision. Invasion correlated significantly with presence of a mass for both readers (p = 0.012 and 0.001), rapid initial enhancement for Reader 1 (p = 0.001), and washout kinetics for Reader 2 (p = 0.012). Significant correlation between washout and invasion was confirmed by SER (p = 0.006) when threshold percent enhancement was sufficiently high (130%), corresponding to rapidly enhancing portions of the lesion. Radiologist perception of occult invasion was strongly correlated with true presence of invasion. These results provide evidence that certain BI-RADS MRI criteria, as well as radiologist perception, correlate with occult invasion after an initial core biopsy of DCIS.

[Speech and general development in children receiving early cochlear implants]

BACKGROUND

After cochlear implantation, most parents expect a normal speech and general development of their child. However, it remains unclear how quickly after early cochlear implantation these children can compensate for their deficits compared to normal-hearing children.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed ELFRA-1 questionnaire data from 40 children with borderline deafness or high-grade hearing loss (without other known impairments) who had undergone cochlear implantation at a university medical center before reaching 2 years of age. ELFRA-1 questionnaires were filled out parents assisted by specialists 12 months after implantation. Questions assessed the children's speech production and comprehension, as well as their use of gestures and fine motoric skills.

RESULTS

At an average hearing-age of 12 months, the children achieved normal values in all of the subgroups that were comparable to those of 12-month-old children without hearing impairments. A significant correlation (p = 0.01) between the individual subgroups of the ELFRA-1 (speech production, speech comprehension, gestures and fine motor skills) was observed. Unilingual educated children performed significantly better overall.

CONCLUSION

Within 12 months of receiving a cochlear implant, all children passed the four categories of the ELFRA-1. This demonstrates a rapid compensation of deficits in speech, motor skills and gesture development by children undergoing early cochlear implantation.

Use of the neo-adjuvant exemestane in post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial (PTEX46) to investigate the optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment duration time and the causal relationship between neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and clinical response are not clear. Therefore, we conducted the present study to investigate the potential benefits of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy with the goal of identifying the optimal treatment duration.

METHODS

This study was conducted at three hospitals, as a multicenter, randomized phase II trial(UMIN000005668) of pre-operative exemestane treatment in post-menopausal women with untreated primary breast cancer. Fifty-one post-menopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to exemestane for 4 months or 6 months. Clinical response, pathological response, and decisions regarding breast-conserving surgery were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients that enrolled, 51 patients underwent surgery. Of those, 26 and 25 patients had been treated with exemestane for 4 and 6 months, respectively. Treatments were performed at 3 hospitals in Japan between April 2008 and August 2010. The response rates as assessed by clinical examination were 42.3% and 48.0% for 4 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. Pathological responses (minimal response or better) were observed in 19.2% and 32.0% of patients, and breast-conserving surgery was performed on 50.0% and 48.0% of patients from the 4 and 6 month treatment groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that responses were equal to 4 or 6 months of exemestane treatment. Therefore, we propose that the rates of breast-conserving surgery could be maximized by 4 months of treatment. Furthermore, in addition to using exemestane as a preoperative treatment in post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer, we envision administering the drug over the long term under careful clinical supervision.

Do current cancer follow-up care practices meet the needs of young adult cancer survivors in Canada? A qualitative inquiry

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to assess whether current cancer follow-up care practices meet the needs of young adult cancer survivors in Canada.

METHODS

This qualitative study used a constructivist grounded theory framework to analyze telephone interviews with cancer survivors from across Canada diagnosed between the ages of 18 and 39 years. The focus was specifically on cancer follow-up care (cfc).

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 55 participants, and 53 interviews were used for the analysis. The overall theme that emerged from the data was the lack of age-specific cfc. Some of the subthemes that emerged were the absence or inadequacy of fertility and infertility treatment options; of psychological services such as family, couples, and sexuality counseling; of social supports such as assistance with entry or re-entry into the education system or workplace; of access to supplemental health insurance; and of survivorship care plans. Based on the data resulting from the interviews, we developed a conceptual model of young-adult cfc incorporating the major themes and subthemes that emerged from our study. The proposed model aims to ensure a more age-appropriate and comprehensive approach to cfc for this group of cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Current Canadian cfc practices are inadequate and do not provide comprehensive care for young adult cancer survivors in Canada. The conceptual model presented here aims to ensure a more comprehensive approach to cfc that meets the needs of this unique cancer population and reduces further possible physical, psychological, or social cancer sequelae.

Primary Endocrine Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer-Is it an Inferior Approach? Experience from Nottingham

Treatment strategy for locally advanced primary breast cancer(LAPC) remains mainly multimodal involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery followed by radiotherapy and endocrine therapy, all given upfront. There have been few studies comparing this with a sequential treatment approach, for instance, using endocrine therapy as initial treatment. Based on small randomised clinical trials and local experience in Nottingham, primary endocrine therapy has been shown to produce very good early (response) and late (survival) outcome when used in ER positive, noninflammatory LAPC. This could be considered as a viable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients.

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in primary breast cancer - review of literature

Chemotherapeutic agents have dominated neoadjuvant treatment compared to endocrine agents in the past and have demonstrated their ability to produce tumour shrinkage to allow breast conservation. However, in the more recent setting, studies have been emerging with the use of aromatase inhibitors, especially comparing its use with tamoxifen in selected group of patients. The role of tamoxifen in its ability to achieve tumour shrinkage has been evaluated in the past, and has shown to produce slow but sustained response. Aromatase inhibitors have shown superiority over tamoxifen in adjuvant and metastatic setting, and the aim of our study was to compare their outcome with regard to response and breast conservation in the neoadjuvant setting. We also looked into optimum duration of neoadjuvant treatment and also the role of pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for clinical outcome. Our review highlights the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting and even challenges chemotherapy with regard to response in selected group of patients.

Role of neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of clinical trials

The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer are well established. For many years, 5 years of tamoxifen was the gold standard of adjuvant treatment. The recent development of new endocrine agents provides physicians with a more effective therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much more recent and less reported in the literature. This article reviews the studies published about neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors). According to the literature, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy seems to be effective. In contrast to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is well tolerated, with very few patients having to discontinue the treatment because of side effects. It does not constitute a standard treatment but could have potential for elderly women with operable, hormonosensitive, well differentiated and slowly progressing (SBR I) tumor or for patients with lobular MSBR 1 carcinoma (low chemosensitivity). The newer generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) appears to be more active (in terms of overall response rates and conservative surgery rate) than tamoxifen. Patients with an estrogen receptor Allred score of 6 and over are more likely to respond and gain a clinical benefit. The optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy has not yet been investigated in detail. These preliminary results should be confirmed by further studies.

Treatment of established breast cancer in post-menopausal women: role of aromatase inhibitors

Endocrine therapy plays a crucial and historically important role in the treatment ofwomen with hormone-responsive breast cancer. Tamoxifen has been the standard endocrine treatment for advanced and early-stage breast cancer for almost three decades. However, patients receiving tamoxifen may either fail to respond or develop disease recurrence following completion of therapy. The aromatase inhibitors (Als) have become the new and alternative modalities of endocrine treatment for post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, as a result of promising data from randomised trials in metastatic and locally advanced breast cancers. Recently, the results from several large, randomised, controlled adjuvant trials have provided further evidence that the use of Als, either as initial treatment or sequentially after tamoxifen, improves disease-free survival and, in certain patients, overall survival. With relatively short-term follow-up, the use of Als has been shown to be safe and welltolerated. Nevertheless, some detrimental adverse effects, particularly skeletal-related events or cardiovascular disease, remain important issues of concern and warrant continued monitoring and follow-up. The optimal use of Als, the appropriate timing of treatment, and the superiority of individual agents are under investigation. Use of Als in women with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea should be cautious due to the possibility of return of ovarian function. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life remain issues of interest since the high and ever increasing incidence of breast cancer has contributed to significant healthcare costs and patients with breast cancer following appropriate treatment are living longer but not necessarily being cured of their diseases.

Primary endocrine therapy in locally advanced breast cancers--the Nottingham experience

INTRODUCTION

There are trials comparing different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced primary breast cancer (LAPC). Few studies have evaluated alternative therapeutic approaches towards LAPC. A previous trial from our institute in LAPC patients unselected for oestrogen receptor (ER) status, comparing primary endocrine therapy versus multimodal treatment, showed no difference in breast cancer related deaths or overall survival. We report our experience of primary endocrine therapy in ER+ LAPC.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2007, 195 ER+, non-inflammatory LAPC patients were treated with primary endocrine agents in our institute, due to patient choice, being unfit for chemotherapy, or recruitment into the above mentioned trial. All patients had disease assessable by UICC criteria.

RESULTS

Median age was 69 years. The median follow-up was 61 months. 154 patients (79%) received endocrine treatment alone. 185 patients (95%) derived clinical benefit (complete response/ partial response/ stable disease) for > or =6 months from primary endocrine therapy. Overall 5-year survival was 76% and 5-year breast cancer specific survival was 86%.

CONCLUSION

In selected group of ER+ LAPC patients, primary endocrine treatment achieves excellent survival outcome and is a viable alternative to other modalities of treatment.

Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Endocrine treatments have been used in breast cancer since 1896, when Beatson reported on the results of oophorectomy for advanced breast cancer. In the second half of the last century, different endocrine-based compounds were developed and, in this review, the role of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor down regulators (SERDs) in the postmenopausal setting are discussed. Tamoxifen is the most investigated and most widely used representative of these agents, and has been introduced in the advanced disease, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, and for the prevention of the disease. Its role has been challenged in recent years by the introduction of third-generation aromatase inhibitors that have proven higher activities than tamoxifen with different toxicity patterns. Several other SERMs have been investigated, but none have been clearly superior to tamoxifen. SERDs act as pure estrogen antagonists and should compare favourably to tamoxifen. For the time being, they have been used in the treatment of advanced breast cancers and their role in other settings still needs investigation. The increased use of aromatase inhibitors as first-line endocrine therapy has resulted in new discussions regarding the role that tamoxifen and other SERMs or SERDs may play in breast cancer. The sequencing of endocrine therapies in hormone-sensitive breast cancer remains a very important research issue.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced primary breast cancers: the Nottingham experience

AIM

Of our study was to assess and compare the outcome of patients undergoing anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced primary breast cancers with patients receiving mitoxantrone, methotrexate and mitomycin (MMM) as neoadjuvant agents.

METHODS

Records of 50 consecutive patients receiving anthrcycline based chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancers from July 1996 to July 2004 were analysed with regard to locoregional recurrence, metastasis and survival. The MMM group comprised of 56 consecutive patients receiving MMM chemotherapy between 1989 and 1994. The unit protocol for patients receiving multimodal therapy has been neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by Patey's mastectomy, radiotherapy and endocrine treatment if ER-positive. Patients were followed-up in the clinic until either death or the last clinic visit on or before December 2005 in the anthracycline group and on or before December 1999 in the MMM group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to number of patients, tumour size, grade, ER positivity and median duration of follow-up from start of chemotherapy. Significantly more patients in the anthracycline group had complete clinical response and 44% of the patients in anthracycline group had node negative disease compared to 4% in the MMM group. Anthracycline group when compared to MMM group had a lower incidence of locoregional recurrence (6% vs 19%), distant metastasis (20% vs 55%) and survival (82% vs 45%) at the end of follow-up, which was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has better response and significantly better outcome compared to MMM chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer

The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer are well established. For many years, five years' treatment with tamoxifen was the gold standard of adjuvant treatment. The recent development of new endocrine agents provides physicians with the opportunity to take a more effective therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much more recent and less frequently reported in the literature. This article reviews the studies published on neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors). According to the literature, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy seems to be effective and well tolerated. The newer generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) appear to result in better overall response rates and more conservative surgery than tamoxifen. Patients with an ER Allred score of 6 and over are most likely to respond and gain clinical benefit. The optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy has not yet been investigated in detail. These preliminary results are interesting and should be confirmed by further studies.

Current limits of knowledge in adjuvant and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: the need for more clinical research

Adjuvant endocrine therapy following surgical resection of early, endocrine sensitive breast cancer has proven benefits in reducing risk of recurrence and death, as demonstrated in many mature well controlled clinical trials. The introduction of new endocrine therapies as potential alternatives to tamoxifen or ovarian ablation and the incorporation of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy into the overall management strategy continue to provide exciting challenges for clinical research. In this article the focus is on as yet unanswered questions pertinent to adjuvant or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. In the process, we broadly outline the current limits of knowledge as we understand it. Many relevant and current clinical trials are ongoing and a list of these with contact details or references are provided. Definitive data is urgently needed in many areas and, when available, will provide important evidence on which the management of breast cancer patients in future can be based. Participation in relevant clinical trials is vital for future progress.

Primary endocrine therapy of locally advanced breast cancer patients

Primary endocrine therapy has been traditionally reserved for elderly and unfit locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC patients). In this group, the primary endocrine therapy could not be adequately compared to primary chemotherapy. Rare studies of primary endocrine therapy, and careful subgroup analyses of their results, showed that primary endocrine therapy could achieve at least the similar magnitude of response rate, compared to primary chemotherapy, in selected patients' population. Thus, the primary treatment with tamoxifen in steroid receptor (SR)-positive LABC patients became the standard arm in current studies of primary endocrine therapy. Several questions, concerning the use of endocrine primary treatment in routine clinical practice, should be answered, including the definition of optimum endocrine agents, biomarkers for prediction of response, and patients' selection criteria.