Invariant p53 immunostaining in primary and recurrent breast cancer

MiR-502/SET8 regulatory circuit in pathobiology of breast cancer

Our previous research and extensive epidemiological studies reproducibly demonstrated that miR-502 potentially targeted the expression of H4K20 methyltransferase SET8 in a wide spectrum of cancer. Yet, the direct targeting of SET8 by miR-502 has not been definitively proven. The clinical significance of the miR-502/SET8 regulatory circuit is also not clear. Here, we conducted cell-based experiments and clinical studies in a cohort of 279 breast cancer samples. We provide evidence that SET8 is a direct target of miR-502. Treatment with miR-502 or downregulation of SET8 suppressed cell proliferation and cell cycle, and reduced cell migration, invasion and EMT. Clinical analyses showed the miR-502 expression was lower in tumor tissues than in adjacent non-tumor tissues and had a significant inverse correlation with that of SET8. Furthermore, high expression of SET8 was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) of breast cancer. The low expression ratio of miR-502 to SET8 mRNA was also significantly associated with poor OS. Thus, the miR-502/SET8 regulatory circuit emerges as a key regulator of the pathobiology of cancer and a focal point for possible therapeutic intervention.

High expression of maspin is associated with early tumor relapse in breast cancer

Maspin is a serine protease inhibitor with tumor suppressor activity. Maspin can suppress tumor growth and metastasis in vivo and tumor cell motility and invasion in vitro. Maspin also modulates apoptosis of tumor cells, possibly by modulating the expression of the B-cell lymphoma-2 family member. p53 regulates the expression of the tumor suppressor gene maspin. Breast cancer is known for its propensity to recur even after decades. The biology behind this phenomenon of tumor dormancy is poorly understood. This study was conducted to clarify the role of maspin and B-cell lymphoma-2 in early and late recurring breast cancer. The expression of maspin, B-cell lymphoma-2, p53, and estrogen receptor was studied by immunohistochemistry in 73 primary breast cancers and in their metastatic relapses detected within 2 years, or 5 or 10 years after primary surgery. The cytoplasmic expression of maspin was significantly higher in the primary tumors of the early metastasizing breast cancers (first tumor relapse within 2 years) and also in their metastases compared to late metastasizing cancers. An opposite activity was observed in the expression of B-cell lymphoma-2. The level of B-cell lymphoma-2 staining was lower in the early relapsing cancers and significantly lower in their metastases, compared to tumors which metastasized 5 or 10 years after primary surgery. High cytoplasmic expression of maspin and low expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 in primary breast cancer predict early tumor relapse.

Successful pregnancy after breast cancer therapy: dream or reality?

Background

Nowadays, more breast cancer patients want to have children after the diagnosis of cancer. The purpose of this study is to review the possibility and risks of giving birth among women with breast cancer previously treated by chemotherapy.

Case presentation

Two young women aged 28 and 34 respectively, were treated in our clinic for breast cancer, the first (negative hormonal receptors) by surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy and the second (positive hormonal receptors) by surgery, radiotherapy and tamoxifen. They both became pregnant, 1 and 8 years after completion of the therapy respectively.

Results

Laboratory testing during pregnancy was negative in both cases and after an uneventful course each woman gave birth to a perfectly healthy child. The first patient breastfed her baby for three months, while the second one did not breastfeed her baby at all.

Conclusion

Women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer can maintain their fertility and get pregnant. Previous chemotherapy for breast cancer does not present any supplementary risks for the child's mental or physical health.

Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series

PURPOSE

Recently, a 76-gene prognostic signature able to predict distant metastases in lymph node-negative (N(-)) breast cancer patients was reported. The aims of this study conducted by TRANSBIG were to independently validate these results and to compare the outcome with clinical risk assessment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gene expression profiling of frozen samples from 198 N(-) systemically untreated patients was done at the Bordet Institute, blinded to clinical data and independent of Veridex. Genomic risk was defined by Veridex, blinded to clinical data. Survival analyses, done by an independent statistician, were done with the genomic risk and adjusted for the clinical risk, defined by Adjuvant! Online.

RESULTS

The actual 5- and 10-year time to distant metastasis were 98% (88-100%) and 94% (83-98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 76% (68-82%) and 73% (65-79%), respectively, for the poor profile group. The actual 5- and 10-year overall survival were 98% (88-100%) and 87% (73-94%), respectively, for the good profile group and 84% (77-89%) and 72% (63-78%), respectively, for the poor profile group. We observed a strong time dependence of this signature, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio of 13.58 (1.85-99.63) and 8.20 (1.10-60.90) at 5 years and 5.11 (1.57-16.67) and 2.55 (1.07-6.10) at 10 years for time to distant metastasis and overall survival, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This independent validation confirmed the performance of the 76-gene signature and adds to the growing evidence that gene expression signatures are of clinical relevance, especially for identifying patients at high risk of early distant metastases.

Meeting Highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005

The ninth St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting in January 2005 made a fundamental change in the algorithm for selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Rather than the earlier approach commencing with risk assessment, the Panel affirmed that the first consideration was endocrine responsiveness. Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive, endocrine non-responsive and tumors of uncertain endocrine responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according to menopausal status. Only then did the Panel divide patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. It agreed that axillary lymph node involvement did not automatically define high risk. Intermediate risk included both node-negative disease (if some features of the primary tumor indicated elevated risk) and patients with one to three involved lymph nodes without additional high-risk features such as HER 2/neu gene overexpression. The Panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for endocrine non-responsive disease; endocrine therapy as the primary therapy for endocrine responsive disease, adding chemotherapy for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category; and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk group.