The multidisciplinarity of stage III non-small cell lung cancer

A single EBUS-TBNA procedure can support a large panel of immunohistochemical stains, specific diagnostic subtyping, and multiple gene analyses in the majority of non-small cell lung cancer cases

Targeted therapies for pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ACA) necessitate specific subtyping and molecular testing of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). However, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has decreased the tissue available for these assessments. While EBUS-TBNA specimens have previously been reported to successfully subtype NSCLC, allow immunohistochemistry (IHC), and support molecular diagnostics, no studies have documented the extent to which all objectives are possible in a single sample. Of 107 consecutive EBUS-TBNA specimens that were eligible for molecular testing, 98.8% had enough tissue for IHC, 80.2% received a definitive subtype, and 71.0% had both sufficient tissue to attempt molecular testing and technical success on multigene next-generation sequencing and ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization assays. Both subtyping and molecular diagnostics were possible in 57.9% of patients. The mean number of immunostains performed did not differ between patients with or without successful molecular testing (4.4 versus 4.6, P = .88). Only 40% of patients with insufficient tissue underwent repeat sampling. These findings indicate that a majority of EBUS-TBNA specimens provide sufficient tissue for subtyping pulmonary NSCLC, performing IHC, and completing multiple gene analyses. Although priorities must be assessed for each case individually, performance of IHC does not detract from completion of molecular diagnostics in general. Because most patients never undergo repeat sampling, the tissue yield of EBUS-TBNA should be improved to maximize evaluation for targeted therapies.

Erythropoietin and cancer: the unintended consequences of anemia correction

Until 1990, erythropoietin (EPO) was considered to have a single biological purpose and action, the stimulation of red blood cell growth and differentiation. Slowly, scientific and medical opinion evolved, beginning with the discovery of an effect on endothelial cell growth in vitro and the identification of EPO receptors (EPORs) on neuronal cells. We now know that EPO is a pleiotropic growth factor that exhibits an anti-apoptotic action on numerous cells and tissues, including malignant ones. In this article, we present a short discussion of EPO, receptors involved in EPO signal transduction, and their action on non-hematopoietic cells. This is followed by a more detailed presentation of both pre-clinical and clinical data that demonstrate EPO’s action on cancer cells, as well as tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Clinical trials with reported adverse effects of chronic erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) treatment as well as clinical studies exploring the prognostic significance of EPO and EPOR expression in cancer patients are reviewed. Finally, we address the use of EPO and other ESAs in cancer patients.

[Resected non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma stage pIIIA-N2. Which patients will benefit most from adjuvant therapy?]

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists as regards the indications and results of surgery in the treatment of patients with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to analyze the overall survival of a multicentre series of these patients and the role of adjuvant treatment, looking for factors that may define subgroups of patients with an increased benefit from this treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 287 patients, with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC subjected to complete resection, taken from a multi-institutional database of 2.994 prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. Adjuvant treatment was administered in 238 cases (82.9%). Analyses were made of the age, gender, histological type, administration of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy treatments.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival was 24%, with a median survival of 22 months. Survival was 26.5% among patients receiving with adjuvant treatment, versus 10.7% for those without it (P=.069). Age modified the effect of adjuvant treatment on survival (interaction P=.049). In patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma, adjuvant treatment reduced the mortality rate by 37% (hazard ratio: 0,63; 95% CI; 0,42-0,95; P=.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Completely resected patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC receiving adjuvant treatment reached higher survival rates than those who did not. Maximum benefit was achieved by the subgroup of patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma.

[Role of FDG-PET scanning in stage IIIAN2 non-small cell lung cancer]

Patients with clinical stage IIIAN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a heterogeneous subgroup in term of prognosis and therapeutic management. The optimal management of this patient group is a major focus for thoracic oncology research and the concept of multimodality treatment has recently been introduced. This approach combines induction chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy followed by surgery in the case of mediastinal lymph node down-staging. positron emission tomography computed tomography with [18F]-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG-PET) is a molecular and metabolic imaging modality which combines the metabolic data of PET with morphological data from CT. FDG-PET has become a standard in lung cancer management since the different indications listed in the standards, options and recommendations (SOR) of the FNCLCC. However, the potential specific importance of FDG-PET in IIIAN2 patients needs to be addressed further. In this setting, the authors' objective is to review the potential role of metabolic imaging in stage IIIAN2 NSCLC, taking into account new multimodality treatments. In stage IIIAN2, FDG-PET has performed better than morphoradiological imaging for baseline and postinduction lymph node staging, the identification of distant metastasis, and determining prognosis, as well as assessing the response to treatment.

Role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Perhaps no topic other than stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer management is as controversial among surgeons, radiologists and medical oncologists. Much of the debate relates to the choice between surgical resection and radiation as the local control modality. Although limited, available evidence from randomized controlled trails raised concerns about the role of surgical resection. However, there is no perfect study, and the results should not be over-interpreted. This mini review will scrutinize these trials, focusing on the study design, results and, most importantly, limitations, and will explore the possible role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.