Anaplastic gliomas: an emerging entity

Clinical nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with cerebral anaplastic gliomas

The present study aimed to develop an effective nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with cerebral anaplastic glioma (AG).This study included 1939 patients diagnosed with AG between 1973 and 2013 who were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, histology, tumor site, marital status, radiotherapy, and surgery were independent prognostic factors and, thus, these factors were selected to build a clinical nomogram. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve were formulated to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram using bootstrapping.A nomogram was developed to predict 5- and 9-year OS rates based on 6 independent prognostic factors identified in the training set: age, tumor site, marital status, histology, radiotherapy, and surgery (P < .05). The Harrell's concordance index values of the training and validation sets were 0.776 (0.759-0.793) and 0.766 (0.739-0.792), respectively. The calibration curve exhibited good consistency with the actual observation curve in both sets.Although the prognostic value of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification has been validated, we developed a novel nomogram based on readily available clinical variables in terms of demographic data, therapeutic modalities, and tumor characteristics to predict the survival of AG patients. When used in combination with the WHO classification system, this clinical nomogram can aid clinicians in making individualized predictions of AG patient survival and improving treatment strategies.

Update on treatment strategies for anaplastic glioma: a review of literature

Anaplastic gliomas (AG) include 6-10% of all newly diagnoses of primary brain tumors. They have an unfavourable prognosis and, to date, there is not an established treatment universally recognized. Four recent randomized clinical trials were identified for a total of 1,170 patients (anaplastic-astrocytomas, anaplasticoligoastrocytoma, anaplastic-oligodendroglioma), in order to define the better sequence and timing of chemo-radiotherapy, Three studies compared radiotherapy (RT) treatment vs. radio-chemotherapy with procarbazine-lomustine-vincristine (PCV) or temozolomide (TMZ) or dibromodulcitol and bichloroethylnitrosurea (DBD/BCNU) and only one compared RT vs chemotherapy (CT) with PCV or TMZ. Results show no significant differences in terms of PFS/OS between RT/CT alone or combined treatment although a trend toward an improvement of OS was observed after RT + CT treatment (m-OS in RT + adjuvant PCV was 42.3 vs. 30.6 months in RT alone p=0.0003). Grade 3-4 mielotoxicity has been observed in almost all cases of patients treated with PCV + RT. None of four studies reviewed conducted a head to head comparison between PCV vs. TMZ. Only a study randomized patients to PCV/TMZ without however providing data in terms of PSF and OS between the two treatments. It found no significant differences in PFS from initial RT and adjuvant CT (PCV-TMZ) at progression compared to initial CT followed by RT at progression. The optimal treatment of AG should reasonably consider not only the histology as well as the molecular markers of the tumor, but also clinical conditions, age of patients, life expectancy, Karnofsky-performance-status and tumor resection to achieve in future the personalization of care.