Progress in the management of T3-4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Management of high-risk populations with locally advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer that extends beyond the confines of the prostatic gland on clinical and/or radiographic assessment, without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases, is regarded as locally advanced. The locally advanced prostate cancer patient population consists of a heterogeneous group of men, some of whom have tumors that may be amenable to primary curative intent with local definitive therapy associated with acceptable long-term cancer control rates. In order to optimally manage this group of patients, it is important to be able to recognize who is at a high risk of tumor recurrence after primary local therapy. In this brief review, we discuss the factors that contribute to the prediction of high risk in populations with locally advanced disease and the treatment options available.

The external radiotherapy with three-dimensional conformal boost after the neoadjuvant androgen suppression for patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the results in patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma treated by hormonal therapy followed by external radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) boost.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1987 to 1995, 46 patients with histologically proven locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3D-CRT at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo. The neoadjuvant androgen suppression started immediately after the diagnosis followed by radical radiation therapy, according to the prospective protocol. They were treated with photons of 6-14 MV for wide fields and the boost, of which a multiple-leaf collimator of 2-cm width was available. The boosted dose was delivered with the rotational 3D-CRT, after the delivery of whole pelvis 4-field box from a dose of 40-46 Gy up to 66 Gy. The planning target volume encompassed 1 cm outside throughout the clinical target volume, and the prostate and the seminal vesicles were included in the boost field.

RESULTS

The 3D-CRT boost treatment completed as planned in all 46 patients. The median follow-up for all the patients was 60 months (range, 5-120 months). Nineteen of 46 patients died. Of these, 11 patients died of the intercurrent diseases. For all 46 patients, the 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 61.3% and 42.4%, and the 5- and 8-year cause-specific survival rates were 82.4% and 64.4%, respectively. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free rates for 5- and 8-year were 64.6% and 52.5%, and the clinical local control rates for 5 and 8 years were 75.3% and 69.9%, respectively. The preradiation therapy PSA and the Gleason score were the factors that significantly associated with PSA relapse-free survival. Sixteen of 46 patients (35%) showed at least one form of late toxicities. Of these, 3 patients experienced late complications of Grade 3 (urinary, 2, proctitis, 1).

CONCLUSION

The treatment results were fairly good and were consistent with those in Western countries, indicating that this study shows the preliminary status of 3D-CRT for the locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan. Preradiation therapy PSA seems to be a significant predictor of PSA relapse-free survival (p = 0.004) after neoadjuvant androgen suppression.

Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: is chemotherapy the next step?

PURPOSE

Management of locally advanced prostate cancer remains controversial. Various single and combination modality approaches have been advocated, but an accepted standard of care remains undefined. The purpose of this review is to define the current knowledge in managing locally advanced prostate cancer and to propose new treatment approaches based on current knowledge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search to detect all relevant articles on the management of locally advanced prostate cancer was performed. A review of the staging, natural history, and prognosis of this disease was also performed.

RESULTS

The lack of a clearly defined treatment approach to patients with locally advanced prostate cancer stems from multiple factors, including ambiguities in clinical staging, inadequate knowledge of the natural history of the cancer, and a dearth of comparative randomized trials evaluating efficacy of different therapies. Single modality treatment, including radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiotherapy alone, is associated with high rates of failure. The use of adjuvant hormonal ablation therapy in combination with external-beam radiotherapy has shown improvement in progression-free and overall survival, although similar improvements have not been clearly demonstrated for surgical patients treated with hormonal therapy. New advances in chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer suggest that response rates may be as high as 50% or more, and current trials are evaluating the addition of chemotherapy to hormonal ablation in either surgery or radiation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

Optimal management of locally advanced prostate cancer remains undefined. Standard treatment options include RP, external-beam radiotherapy, or hormonal ablation therapy, alone or in combination. New approaches being tested include improved methods for delivering radiation or combining hormonal ablation with surgery or radiation. It is possible that other forms of systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, may become important components of multimodality treatment. Clinical trials designed to test this hypothesis are ongoing.