Thoracic radiation therapy before autologous bone marrow transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease. PMH Lymphoma Group, and the Toronto Autologous BMT Group

Contemporary radiation therapy use in Hodgkin lymphoma

Radiation therapy assumes a pivotal role in Hodgkin lymphoma management, especially within combined modality therapy. It serves as a cornerstone in early-stage disease and in mitigating high-risk instances of local relapse in advanced stages. Over recent decades, radiation therapy has undergone significant advancements, notably alongside diagnostic imaging improvements, facilitating the reduction of radiation field size and dosage. This progress has notably led to minimized toxicity while upholding treatment efficacy. This comprehensive review extensively evaluates the indications and advancements in radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with a primary focus on enhancing treatment efficacy while minimizing radiation-related toxicities. The exploration encompasses a detailed examination of various radiation fields, techniques and delivery modalities employed in Hodgkin lymphoma treatment, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and proton therapy. It delves into the intricacies of optimal dose selection and treatment planning strategies aimed at achieving maximal disease control while concurrently minimizing the risk of long-term side effects.

Risk of Pneumonitis and Outcomes After Mediastinal Proton Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: A PTCOG and PCG Collaboration

PURPOSE

Despite high response rates, there has been reluctance to use radiation therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin (HL) or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) given concerns for subacute and late toxicities. Symptomatic pneumonitis, a subacute toxicity, has an incidence of 17% to 24% (≥grade 2) even with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Proton therapy (PT), which has no exit radiation dose, is associated with a lower dose to lung compared with other radiation techniques. As risk of radiation pneumonitis is associated with lung dose, we evaluated whether pneumonitis rates are lower with PT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Within an international, multi-institutional cohort, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence and grade of radiation pneumonitis (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4) among patients with r/r HL or NHL treated with PT.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with r/r lymphoma (66% HL, 34% NHL; 46% primary chemorefractory) received thoracic PT from 2009 to 2017 in the consolidation (45%) or salvage (54%) setting. Median dose was 36 Gy(RBE). Before PT, patients underwent a median of 1 salvage systemic therapy (range, 0-4); 40% received PT within 4 months of transplant. With a median follow-up of 26.3 months among living patients, 11 patients developed symptomatic (grade 2) pneumonitis (12.8%). No grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was observed. Dose to lung, including mean lung dose, lung V5, and V20, significantly predicted risk of symptomatic pneumonitis, but not receipt of brentuximab, history of bleomycin toxicity, sex, or peritransplant radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

PT for relapsed/refractory lymphoma was associated with favorable rates of pneumonitis compared with historical controls. We confirm that among patients treated with PT, pneumonitis risk is associated with mean lung and lung V20 dose. These findings highlight how advancements in radiation delivery may improve the therapeutic ratio for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. PT may be considered as a treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma in the consolidation or salvage setting.

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 72 consecutive patients who had undergone ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL at our institution from 2006 to 2014. Pretransplant conditioning consisted of HDC and total body irradiation. Of the 72 patients, 13 received post-transplant consolidative RT at the discretion of the consulted radiation oncologist.

RESULTS

Consolidative RT was associated with significantly improved 2-year locoregional control (LRC) (92% vs. 68%; P = .04). However, no difference was seen in either the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (69% vs. 54%; P = .25) or overall survival (OS) (85% vs. 59%; P = .44). Analysis of the subgroup of 19 patients with persistent residual masses ≥ 2 cm on post-transplant imaging demonstrated a significant improvement in LRC (100% vs. 36%; P < .01), PFS (88% vs. 27%; P = .01), and OS (100% vs. 45%; P = .02) with consolidative RT.

CONCLUSION

The use of consolidative RT after HDC and ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL appears to significantly improve LRC. For patients with masses ≥ 2 cm after ASCT, improved 2-year PFS and OS were seen. Prospective trials are needed to further identify the patients who would derive the most benefit from consolidative RT in the ASCT setting.

Role of Consolidative Radiation Therapy After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Purpose

To evaluate the role of the addition of consolidative radiation therapy after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Methods and Materials

Medical records were reviewed from a total of 80 consecutive patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy with AHCT treated under a single protocol at University of Minnesota between November 2005 and January 2014. Of these, 32 patients received radiation therapy after AHCT as planned consolidation.

Results

At a median follow-up of 25 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 96% and 52%, respectively. Consolidative radiation therapy was found to significantly improve the 2-year PFS (67% vs 42%, P<.01) without a significant change in OS (100% vs 93%, P=.15). On subgroup analysis, consolidative radiation therapy was shown to improve PFS in patients with bulky disease (62% vs 39%, P=.02), B-symptoms (48% vs 28%, P=.05), primary refractory disease (47% vs 32%, P=.02), and those with a partial response on pretransplant imaging (47% vs 32%, P=.02). The improvement seen on 2-year PFS with consolidative radiation therapy remained significant on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval 1.98–10.88). Minimal toxicity was observed among the patients receiving radiation therapy.

Conclusions

The addition of consolidative radiation therapy after high-dose chemo-therapy and AHCT demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year PFS and no impact on OS. Radiation therapy was well tolerated, with minimal toxicity. Our study supports a role of consolidative radiation therapy in patients with HL treated with AHCT.

A multi-institutional analysis of peritransplantation radiotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding the use of radiotherapy (RT) in conjunction with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The objectives of the current study were to characterize practice patterns and assess the efficacy and toxicity of RT at 2 major transplantation centers.

METHODS

Eligible patients underwent HDC/ASCT from 2006 through 2015 using the combination of either carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) or cyclophosphamide, BCNU, and etoposide (CBV).

RESULTS

For the cohort of 189 patients, the 4-year overall survival rate was 80%, the progression-free survival rate was 67%, and the local control (LC) rate was 68%. RT was used within 4 months of ASCT for 22 patients (12%) and was given more often for disease that was early stage, primary refractory, or [¹⁸ F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid at the time of HDC/ASCT. Disease recurrence occurring after HDC/ASCT was associated with primary refractory disease and FDG-avidity at the time of HDC/ASCT. RT was not found to be associated with LC, progression-free survival, or overall survival on univariate analysis. In a model incorporating primary refractory HL and FDG-avid disease at the time of HDC/ASCT, RT was found to be associated with a decreased risk of local disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .02). In patients with primary refractory HL and/or FDG-avid disease at the time of HDC/ASCT, the 4-year LC rate was 81% with RT versus 49% without RT (P = .03). There was one case of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3 RT-related toxicity (acute grade 3 pancytopenia).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed/refractory HL, peritransplantation RT was used more often for disease that was early stage, primary refractory, or FDG-avid after salvage conventional-dose chemotherapy. RT was associated with improved LC of high-risk localized disease and was well tolerated with modern techniques. Cancer 2017;123:1363-1371. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE

Few studies to date have evaluated factors associated with the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), especially in patients treated with contemporary radiation techniques. These patients represent a unique group owing to the often large radiation target volumes within the mediastinum and to the potential to receive several lines of chemotherapy that add to pulmonary toxicity for relapsed or refractory disease. Our objective was to determine the incidence and clinical and dosimetric risk factors associated with RP in lymphoma patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at a single institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical charts and radiation records of 150 consecutive patients who received mediastinal IMRT for HL and NHL from 2009 through 2013. Clinical and dosimetric predictors associated with RP according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity criteria were identified in univariate analysis using the Pearson χ(2) test and logistic multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Mediastinal radiation was administered as consolidation therapy in 110 patients with newly diagnosed HL or NHL and in 40 patients with relapsed or refractory disease. The overall incidence of RP (RTOG grades 1-3) was 14% in the entire cohort. Risk of RP was increased for patients who received radiation for relapsed or refractory disease (25%) versus those who received consolidation therapy (10%, P=.019). Several dosimetric parameters predicted RP, including mean lung dose of >13.5 Gy, V20 of >30%, V15 of >35%, V10 of >40%, and V5 of >55%. The likelihood ratio χ(2) value was highest for V5 >55% (χ(2) = 19.37).

CONCLUSIONS

In using IMRT to treat mediastinal lymphoma, all dosimetric parameters predicted RP, although small doses to large volumes of lung had the greatest influence. Patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who received salvage chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were at higher risk for symptomatic RP.

Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: the Lymphoma Study Association guidelines for relapsed and refractory adult patients eligible for transplant

The Hodgkin's Lymphoma Committee of the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) gathered in 2012 to prepare guidelines on the management of transplant-eligible patients with relapsing or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. The working group is made up of a multidisciplinary panel of experts with a significant background in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Each member of the panel of experts provided an interpretation of the evidence and a systematic approach to obtain consensus was used. Grades of recommendation were not required since levels of evidence are mainly based on phase II trials or standard practice. Data arising from randomized trials are emphasized. The final version was endorsed by the scientific council of the LYSA. The expert panel recommends a risk-adapted strategy (conventional treatment, or single/double transplantation and/or radiotherapy) based on three risk factors at progression (primary refractory disease, remission duration < 1 year, stage III/IV), and an early evaluation of salvage chemosensitivity, including (18)fluorodeoxy glucose-positron emission tomography interpreted according to the Deauville scoring system. Most relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma patients chemosensitive to salvage should receive high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation as standard. Efforts should be made to increase the proportion of chemosensitive patients by alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy lines or exploring the role of novel drugs.

Involved field radiation therapy following high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant benefits local control and survival in refractory or recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent or primary refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) commonly relapse post-ASCT in previous disease sites. We sought to evaluate involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) following ASCT and patterns of recurrence, overall survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1993 and October 2003, 62 (n=66) evaluable patients with refractory/relapsed HL underwent HDT followed by ASCT. Thirty-two (52%) patients received IFRT following transplant. Survival was calculated from the day of hematopoietic stem cell infusion.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range 0.03-11.56). Estimated 3-year OS (p=0.05) and DSS (p=0.08) were 69.6% and 82.1% with IFRT and 40% and 57.6% without IFRT on univariate analysis. B-symptoms were adverse on univariate (p=0.007) and multivariate (p=0.01) analysis. HL patients who received IFRT following ASCT had improved local control in areas of previously recurrent disease (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

OS and DSS showed marginal benefit at 3 years. Given the retrospective nature of our study and attendant selection bias that can be both positive and negative, a future prospective study is warranted to better understand the value of IFRT in the transplant setting.

Second-line salvage chemotherapy for transplant-eligible patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma resistant to platinum-containing first-line salvage chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma who achieve less than a partial response to first-line salvage chemotherapy is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate response and outcomes to second-line salvage and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients not achieving a complete or partial response to platinum-containing first-line salvage chemotherapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Consecutively referred transplant-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after primary chemotherapy received gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin as first salvage chemotherapy. Those achieving a complete or partial response, and those with a negative gallium scan and stable disease with bulk <5 cm proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients with progressive disease or stable disease with a positive gallium scan or bulk ≥ 5 cm were given second salvage chemotherapy with mini-BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). Patients who responded (according to the same definition) proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma received first-line salvage gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin; of these patients 99 had at least a partial response (overall response rate 76%). One hundred and twelve (85.5%) patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation, while the remaining 19 (14.5%) patients received mini-BEAM. Among these 19 patients, six had at least a partial response (overall response rate 32%), and nine proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation. The remaining ten patients received palliative care. Seven of the nine patients transplanted after mini-BEAM had a subsequent relapse. Patients receiving second salvage mini-BEAM had poor outcomes, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 11% and a 5-year overall survival rate of 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who require a second salvage regimen to achieve disease control prior to autologous stem cell transplantation have a relatively poor outcome and should be considered for alternative treatment strategies.

How I treat relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma is a challenging problem for clinicians who treat hematologic malignancies. The standard management of these patients should include the use of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients who are chemotherapy sensitive. Open issues in this area include the role of functional imaging, the specific chemotherapy regimen to be used before ASCT, and the role of consolidative radiotherapy. Some patients will not be eligible for ASCT, and alternative approaches with conventional chemotherapy alone or with salvage radiotherapy should be considered. Prognostic factors for relapsed/refractory disease have been identified but generally are not used as a part of risk-adapted therapy. Allogeneic transplantation may offer the potential of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect, but this therapy has significant toxicity and results in few long-term disease-free survivors; hence, it should only be offered in the context of disease-specific clinical trials. An expanding list of novel drugs has exhibited promising single-agent activity. Patients have effective options beyond primary therapy, and continued progress through controlled trials remains a tangible goal in the treatment of relapsed and refractory disease.

Feasibility of helical tomotherapy for debulking irradiation before stem cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma

PURPOSE

Preliminary clinical experience has suggested that radiation therapy (RT) may be effectively incorporated into conditioning therapy before transplant for patients with refractory/relapsed malignant lymphoma. We investigated the feasibility of debulking selective lymph node irradiation before autologous and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) using helical tomotherapy (HT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six consecutive patients with refractory malignant lymphoma were referred to our institution for salvage HT before SCT. All patients had been previously heavily treated but had bulky residual tumor despite chemotherapy (CT) intensification. Two patients had received previous radiation therapy. HT delivered 30-40 Gy in the involved fields (IF), using 6 MV photons, 2 Gy per daily fraction. Total duration of treatment was 28 to 35 days.

RESULTS

Using HT, doses to critical organs (heart, lungs, esophagus, and parotids) were significantly decreased and highly conformational irradiation could be delivered to all clinical target volumes. HT delivery was technically possible, even in patients with lesions extremely difficult to irradiate in other conditions or in patients with previous radiation therapy. No Grade 2 or higher toxicity occurred. Four months after the end of HT, 5 patients experienced complete clinical, radiologic, and metabolic response and were subsequently referred for SCT.

CONCLUSIONS

By more effectively sparing critical organs, HT may contribute to improving the tolerance of debulking irradiation before allograft. Quality of life may be preserved, and doses to the heart may be decreased. This is particularly relevant in heavily treated patients who are at risk for subsequent heart disease. These preliminary results require further prospective assessment.

Different response to salvage chemotherapy but similar post-transplant outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma is supported by two randomized clinical trials but its benefit in patients with primary refractory disease is less clear. Aiming to shed light on this issue, we analyzed and compared the outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with second-line chemotherapy and planned autologous stem-cell transplantation.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on 157 consecutive patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma referred to our institution for consideration of autologous stem-cell transplantation between 1999 and 2006. Of those, 73 met the definition of having primary refractory disease, ie. progressive disease during first line chemotherapy or within 3 months of completion of the treatment. Those patients achieving complete remission, partial remission and stable disease with symptomatic improvement after two or three cycles of salvage chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation.

RESULTS

From first relapse/progression, the 3-year overall survival was 76% (95% CI: 66%-89%) for the refractory cohort and 91% (95% CI: 84%-98%) for the relapsed cohort (P=0.034); the overall response rate to second-line chemotherapy was 51% and 83% (P<0.0001), respectively. Three-year progression-free survival post-transplant was 49% in refractory patients and 67% in relapsed patients (P=0.21); overall survival was 75% and 91% (P=0.097), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the group with relapsed disease as a reference, we can conclude that the subset of patients with chemosensitive primary refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma do benefit from autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Involved-Field Radiotherapy Before High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue in Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma: Long-Term Disease Control and Toxicity

Purpose

To analyze outcome, prognostic factors, and toxicities in patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) who received involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) before high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR).

Patients and Methods

Between January 1990 and August 2006, 164 patients with relapsed or refractory DLCL received IFRT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) before high-dose chemotherapy and ASCR. IFRT was delivered to involved sites measuring more than 5 cm or to sites with residual disease more than 2 cm. Radiotherapy was administered in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily to a total dose of 30 Gy. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated, and short- and long-term toxicity was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Median follow-up was 60 months (range, 2 to 187 months).

Results

Two- and 5-year progression-free survival was 62% and 53%; 2- and 5-year overall survival was 67% and 58%, respectively. Sixty-seven patients relapsed; only 10 patients relapsed completely within the radiotherapy field. There were seven early treatment-related mortalities and 11 secondary cancers (including four myelodysplastic syndromes), one of which occurred within the IFRT site and five after total-body irradiation.

Conclusion

Minimal treatment-related mortality and morbidity resulted from short, intensive, involved-field radiotherapy before high-dose chemotherapy and ASCR, which was incorporated into a salvage regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory DLCL. This chemoradiotherapy salvage regimen resulted in a low local relapse rate that could potentially translate into an improved total outcome.

Management of Hodgkin lymphoma in relapse after autologous stem cell transplant

Recurrence of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs in about 50% of patients after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), usually within the first year, and represents a significant therapeutic challenge. The natural history of recurrent HL in this setting may range from a rapidly progressive to a more indolent course. Patients in this setting are often young, without comorbidities and able to tolerate additional therapies: expectations are often still high. The approach to treatment depends on clinical variables (time to relapse, perceived sensitivity to additional cytotoxic therapy, disease stage), prior history of radiation therapy, the availability of an HLA-identical donor, and the availability of new agents via clinical trials. Although very few of these patients can be cured, results from reported series, albeit often small and sometimes with relatively short follow-up, document that excellent disease control can be achieved with radiation, single or multiagent chemotherapy, and reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation. The results of these approaches will be reviewed, and a treatment algorithm incorporating the use of standard or investigational agents or approaches will be discussed.

Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis in predicting radiation pneumonitis in Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

To quantify the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in a modern Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) cohort, and to identify any clinically relevant parameters that may influence the risk of RP.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2003 and February 2005, 64 consecutive HL patients aged 18 years or older receiving radical mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) were retrospectively reviewed. Symptomatic cases of radiation pneumonitis were identified. Dose-volume histogram parameters, including V(13), V(20), V(30), and mean lung dose (MLD), were quantified.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the actuarial survival for all patients was 91% at 3 years. There were 2 (2/64) cases of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Grade 2 RP (incidence 3.1%). Both index cases with corresponding V(20) values of 47.0% and 40.7% were located in the upper quartile (2/16 cases), defined by a V(20) value of > or =36%, an incidence of 12.5% (p = 0.03). Similarly for total MLD, both index cases with values of 17.6 Gy and 16.4 Gy, respectively, were located in the upper quartile defined by MLD > or =14.2 Gy, an incidence of 11.8% (2/17 cases, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite relatively high V(20) values in this study of HL patients, the incidence of RP was only 3%, lower compared with the lung cancer literature. We suggest the following clinically relevant parameters be considered in treatment plan assessment: a V(20) greater than 36% and an MLD greater than 14 Gy, over and above which the risk of RTOG Grade 2 or greater RP would be considered clinically significant.

The Impact of Involved Field Radiation Therapy for Patients Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Disease

OBJECTIVES

Patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin disease (HD) often receive high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant (HPCT) as salvage therapy. This study sought to determine if involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) in this setting improves patient outcomes.

METHODS

The records of 65 patients with refractory/relapsed HD who underwent HDCT followed by HPCT between September 1988 and October 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-four patients did not receive IFRT and 21 received IFRT.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were alive at the time of analysis with a median follow-up of 3.4 years in the no IFRT group and 1.8 years in the IFRT group (P = 0.38). IFRT patients were more likely to have bulky disease at initial diagnosis (P = 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in the 2 groups (P = 0.83). Twenty-two patients in the no IFRT group and 5 in the IFRT group have died (P = 0.06). Five-year overall survival rates were 55.6% for the no IFRT group and 73.3% for the IFRT group (P = 0.16). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups regarding mortality in the first 100 days after HPCT (P = 0.41), late events (P = 0.26), or failure in sites previously involved with disease (P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current study did not demonstrate an improvement in PFS with the addition of IFRT to HDCT and HPCT, there was a trend toward improved overall survival. The potential benefit of IFRT may be underestimated because of the heterogeneity of the treatment groups. The use of IFRT was not associated with an increase in the risk of acute mortality or late events.

Similar response rates and superior early progression-free survival with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin salvage therapy compared with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan salvage therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the response rates, ability to mobilize autologous hematopoietic (peripheral blood) stem cells (PBSCs), and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line chemotherapy with either gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (mini-BEAM) followed by high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

METHODS

The outcomes of 68 consecutive patients who were referred for salvage therapy (34 patients received mini-BEAM, and 34 patients received GDP) were compared retrospectively. Patients received mini-BEAM as inpatient treatment every 3-4 weeks, whereas GDP was administered on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. Responding patients proceeded to stem cell mobilization, followed by high dose etoposide and melphalan, and ASCT. Patients who had disease bulk at recurrence that measured > 5 cm received involved-field radiation post-ASCT.

RESULTS

The response rate to GDP prior to ASCT (complete responses, unconfirmed complete responses, and partial responses) was 62% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 45-78%) compared with 68% (95% CI, 52-83%) for mini-BEAM (P = 0.61). After mobilizing chemotherapy, the proportion of patients for whom the target PBSC number of > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg was obtained was 97% after GDP and 57% after MB (P = 0.0003). More patients completed collection with a single apheresis procedure after GDP than after mini-BEAM (73% vs. 36%; P = 0.004), and fewer patients in the GDP group required bone marrow harvesting to proceed to ASCT. After a median follow-up of 1.8 years after ASCT, PFS was significantly better for patients who received GDP compared with patients who received mini-BEAM (74% vs. 35% at 1.5 yrs, respectively; P = 0.005). Overall survival at 1.5 years was 91% after GDP and 82% after mini-BEAM (P = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this was a retrospective analysis, response to GDP and early PFS after ASCT compared favorably with mini-BEAM salvage chemotherapy. Based on these data, the authors believe that a Phase III trial comparing GDP with mini-BEAM or other platinum-containing regimens is warranted.

High-dose carmustine, etoposide, and cisplatin for autologous stem cell transplantation with or without involved-field radiation for relapsed/refractory lymphoma: An effective regimen with low morbidity and mortality

Over a 10-year period (January 1993 to October 2002), 101 relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients were treated at our center with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 25-70 years). Thirty-two patients had indolent (low-grade), 42 had aggressive (intermediate-grade), and 27 had very aggressive (high-grade) non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Thirty-six patients had primary refractory disease, 20 had a chemoresistant relapse, 35 patients had a chemosensitive relapse, and 10 patients were "initial high risk" patients. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range, 1-5). The preparative regimen (BEP) was bischloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU) 600 mg/m 2 , etoposide 2400 mg/m 2 , and Platinol (cisplatin) 200 mg/m 2 given intravenously over 5 days. Within 3 weeks before transplantation, 70 patients received involved-field radiotherapy (IFR) 20 Gy to sites of currently active (>2 cm) or prior bulky (>5 cm) disease. Most patients (n = 93) received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (median CD34 + cell dose, 6.7 x 10 6 /kg). Median neutrophil (>500/microL) and platelet (>20 000/microL, untransfused) recoveries were 11 days (range, 7-19 days) and 14 days (range, 7-36 days), respectively. At a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 4 to 118 months) for survivors, Kaplan-Meier 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 58.6% and 51.1%, respectively. Four patients (4%) died within 30 days of stem cell infusion (1 pulmonary embolism, 2 septicemias with multiorgan failure, and 1 progressive lymphoma). Two patients (2%) developed interstitial pneumonitis most likely secondary to high-dose BCNU. Three cases (3%) of secondary acute myelogenous leukemia occurred. On multivariate analysis, age (<60 or > or =60 years), histologic grade (low versus intermediate or high), the use of IFR, and chemotherapy response at baseline did not affect OS or DFS. Of 70 patients given IFR, 27 relapsed: 10 (37%) within and 17 (63%) outside the radiation field. The use of IFR did not affect either OS or DFS, probably because IFR was offered to patients with bulky or chemoresistant disease. BEP with or without IFR is a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen in the relapsed/refractory lymphoma setting. It has low morbidity and transplant-related mortality and a low incidence (3%) of posttransplantation malignancy.

Optimal scheduling to reduce morbidity of involved field radiotherapy with transplantation for lymphomas: A Prospective Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group Study

This study evaluated delivery of involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) with transplantation for lymphomas timed to minimise toxicity. Patients transplanted for lymphoma had infradiaphragmatic disease irradiated pre-transplant and supradiaphragmatic disease post transplant. A total of 31 patients were studied, with a median follow-up duration of 4 years. Transplant conditioning was according to clinician preference. In all, 14 patients had pre-transplant abdominopelvic IFRT and 19 had post transplant IFRT (including three who had pre-transplant IFRT). Grade III-IV haematological toxicity from pre-transplant IFRT occurred in three patients and from post transplant IFRT in 10 patients. Pre-transplant IFRT had no effect on haematological recovery post transplant, but was associated with a trend towards increased gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.094). Pneumonitis due to post transplant thoracic IFRT occurred in one patient. Two patients failed in involved sites after completion of protocol radiotherapy. One case of myelodysplasia has been reported. As sequenced in this study, IFRT was feasible and produced a low incidence of severe pulmonary and haematological toxicities. Patient selection, field size and radiotherapy dose warrant further study.

Phase I study of involved-field radiotherapy preceding autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE

This Phase I study was designed to evaluate the tolerability of involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) to areas of persistent disease in patients with high-risk Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-one patients with primary refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's disease (n = 13) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 18) were treated with IFRT followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. All patients had bulky disease (> or =5 cm) and/or an inadequate response to salvage chemotherapy. The IFRT dose was escalated to a maximum of 36 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as Grade 3-4 Bearman toxicity (life-threatening/fatal toxicity occurring within 28 days of ASCT). The chemotherapy regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carmustine.

RESULTS

The delivered dose of IFRT was 20 Gy in 9 patients, 28-30 Gy in 20, and 32-36 Gy in 2 patients to mediastinal (n = 19) and nonmediastinal (n = 12) sites. The median interval between IFRT completion and ASCT was 19 days. One patient developed Bearman Grade 3 hepatic toxicity. No other Grade 3 or 4 Bearman toxicity was observed. An increased requirement for i.v. narcotics was observed in patients treated with mediastinal IFRT vs. nonmediastinal IFRT (p = 0.02). A trend toward increased mucositis severity was seen in patients previously treated with a larger number of chemotherapy agents (p = 0.09) and in those with a shorter interval between IFRT and ASCT (p = 0.12). Pulmonary toxicity was more common in patients treated with mediastinal IFRT than in those treated with nonmediastinal IFRT (21% vs. 0%, p = 0.13). The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rate was 70% and 49% for all patients, 84% and 50% for patients with Hodgkin's disease, and 59% and 47% for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The maximal tolerated dose of IFRT was not reached when Grade 3-4 Bearman toxicity was dose limiting. Increased pulmonary toxicity and mucositis severity was seen after mediastinal IFRT compared with nonmediastinal IFRT. Because local control was excellent, higher doses of IFRT are not recommended. The absolute benefit of IFRT in this patient population needs investigation in future studies.

The impact of external beam radiation therapy prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

External beam radiation therapy (XRT) is frequently used to treat refractory disease sites or consolidate remission in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). We report the long-term outcome and toxicities associated with this therapy. We uniformly treated 552 patients with NHL with total body irradiation, high-dose chemotherapy, and anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody-purged ABMT. Of these patients, 152 received XRT to the mediastinum, abdomen, or pelvis (n = 102) or other sites (n = 50) prior to ABMT. In this nonrandomized series, there was no difference in progression-free survival between patients treated with XRT and those not treated with XRT. For patients with indolent histology, there was no difference in overall survival between patients treated with XRT and those not treated with XRT. For patients with aggressive histology, the median overall survival time was 64 months in the XRT patients and 79 months in the patients not treated with XRT (P= .09). The risk of acute transplantation-related deaths was not influenced by prior XRT (P = .68). Of patients who received XRT, 12.5% developed secondary myelodysplasia compared with 5.8% of patients not receiving XRT (P = .01). Patients receiving XRT to the mediastinum or axilla had a significantly higher risk of late respiratory death (P = .002). In conclusion, XRT allows refractory patients to become eligible for transplantation and experience a disease-free survival interval equivalent to that of patients who do not receive XRT. However, a higher incidence of non-relapse-associated deaths was observed in patients who received XRT. Future work should explore alternative conditioning strategies and altered timing of XRT, in an attempt to limit these late toxicities.

Should involved-field radiation therapy be used as an adjunct to lymphoma autotransplantation?

Relapse at sites of prior disease involvement accounts for the majority of treatment failures following high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for both Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of 'involved-field' radiation as a treatment modality in this setting to minimize disease bulk prior to transplants, to reduce relapse rates at sites of prior disease involvement and to improve local control for disease resistant to high-dose therapy. Other studies recommend caution due to potential toxicities including radiation-induced pneumonitis and secondary myelodysplasia. Further investigations are needed to better define the optimal extent, dose and timing of radiation in the setting of transplantation, as well as to identify those subsets of patients likely to be at a higher risk of radiation-induced morbidity.

Advances in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma

Given the successful treatment for most patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, efforts have been directed primarily toward improving outcomes for the minority of patients with poor prognosis or relapsed disease or reducing the late effects of therapy for long-term survivors. Recently, a simple and clinically useful prognostic scoring system was developed for patients with advanced disease. This system allows better risk assessment for individual patients and more uniformity among patients participating in clinical trials. In addition, trials using newer chemotherapeutic regimens such as Stanford V or BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) are maturing with promising results. Other studies are helping to define the role of high-dose therapy for patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, although biologic treatments such as cellular or antibody-based therapies are still in early phases of development. Lastly, positron emission tomographic scanning is emerging as a useful tool in staging and following Hodgkin's lymphoma.