7alpha-Arylaliphatic androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-diones as enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitors of aromatase

Screening for compounds with aromatase inhibiting activities from Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz

Ten compounds were isolated from the dichloromethane extract of Atractylodes macrocephala and their aromatase inhibiting activities were tested using an in vitro fluorescent-based aromatase assay. The results indicated that atractylenolide I (1), atractylenolide II (2) and atractylenolide III (3) had inhibition ratios of 94.56 ± 0.70%, 90.93 ± 1.41% and 86.31 ± 8.46%, respectively, at a concentration of 10 μM. We conclude from our results that atractylenolide and its derivates may serve as potential aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and thus merit continued study in the future.

Molecular docking and QSAR studies of aromatase inhibitor androstenedione derivatives

Objectives

Aromatase (CYP19) inhibitors have emerged as promising candidates for the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. In this study, a series of androstenedione derivatives with CYP19 inhibitory activity was subjected to a molecular docking study followed by quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analyses in search of ideal physicochemical characteristics of potential aromatase inhibitors.

Methods

The QSAR studies were carried out using both two-dimensional (topological, and structural) and three-dimesional (spatial) descriptors. We also used thermodynamic parameters along with 2D and 3D descriptors. Genetic function approximation (GFA) and genetic partial least squares (G/PLS) were used as chemometric tools for QSAR modelling.

Key findings

The docking study indicated that the important interacting amino acids in the active site were Met374, Arg115, Ile133, Ala306, Thr310, Asp309, Val370, Leu477 and Ser478. The 17-keto oxygen of the ligands is responsible for the formation of a hydrogen bond with Met374 and the remaining parts of the molecules are stabilized by the hydrophobic interactions with the non-polar amino acids. The C2 and C19 positions in the ligands are important for maintaining the appropriate orientation of the molecules in the active site. The results of docking experiments and QSAR studies supported each other.

Conclusions

The developed QSAR models indicated the importance of some Jurs parameters, structural parameters, topological branching index and E-state indices of different fragments. All the developed QSAR models were statistically significant according to the internal and external validation parameters.

Molecular docking and QSAR study on steroidal compounds as aromatase inhibitors

In order to develop more potent, selective and less toxic steroidal aromatase (AR) inhibitors, molecular docking, 2D and 3D hybrid quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study have been conducted using topological, molecular shape, spatial, structural and thermodynamic descriptors on 32 steroidal compounds. The molecular docking study shows that one or more hydrogen bonds with MET374 are one of the essential requirements for the optimum binding of ligands. The QSAR model obtained indicates that the aromatase inhibitory activity can be enhanced by increasing SIC, SC_3_C, Jurs_WNSA_1, Jurs_WPSA_1 and decreasing CDOCKER interaction energy (ECD), IAC_Total and Shadow_XZfrac. The predicted results shows that this model has a comparatively good predictive power which can be used in prediction of activity of new steroidal aromatase inhibitors.

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

Estradiol, the most potent endogenous estrogen, is biosynthesized from androgens by the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex called aromatase. Aromatase is present in breast tissue, and intratumoral aromatase is the source of local estrogen production in breast cancer tissues. Inhibition of aromatase is an important approach for reducing growth-stimulatory effects of estrogens in estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Steroidal inhibitors that have been developed to date build upon the basic androstenedione nucleus and incorporate chemical substituents at varying positions on the steroid. Nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors can be divided into three classes: aminoglutethimide-like molecules, imidazole/triazole derivatives, and flavonoid analogs. Mechanism-based aromatase inhibitors are steroidal inhibitors that mimic the substrate, are converted by the enzyme to a reactive intermediate, and result in the inactivation of aromatase. Both steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of breast cancer. The potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, were introduced into the market as endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients failing antiestrogen therapy alone or multiple hormonal therapies. These agents are currently approved as first-line therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Several clinical studies of aromatase inhibitors are currently focusing on the use of these agents in the adjuvant setting for the treatment of early breast cancer. Use of an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy or after treatment with tamoxifen is now recommended as adjuvant hormonal therapy for a postmenopausal woman with hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are involved in numerous physiologic processes and have crucial roles in particular disease states, such as mammary carcinomas. Estradiol, the most potent endogenous estrogen, is biosynthesized from androgens by the cytochrome P-450 enzyme complex called aromatase. Aromatase is found in breast tissue, and the importance of intratumoral aromatase and local estrogen production is being unraveled. Inhibition of aromatase is an important approach for reducing growth stimulatory effects of estrogens in hormone-dependent breast cancer. Effective aromatase inhibitors have been developed as therapeutic agents for controlling estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Investigations into the development of aromatase inhibitors began in the 1970s and have expanded greatly in the past three decades. Competitive aromatase inhibitors are molecules that compete with the substrate androstenedione for noncovalent binding to the active site of the enzyme to decrease the amount of product formed. Steroidal inhibitors that have been developed to date build on the basic androstenedione nucleus and incorporate chemical substituents at varying positions on the steroid. The structure-activity relationships for steroidal inhibitors have become more refined in the past decade, and only some modifications can be made to the steroid and still keep its affinity for aromatase. Nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors can be divided into three classes: aminoglutethimide-like molecules, imidazole/triazole derivatives, and flavonoid analogs. Mechanism-based aromatase inhibitors are inhibitors that mimic the substrate, are converted by the enzyme to a reactive intermediate, and result in the inactivation of aromatase. Aromatase inhibitors, both steroidal and nonsteroidal, have shown clinical efficacy for the treatment of breast cancer. The initial nonselective nature of nonsteroidal inhibitors such as aminoglutethimide has been greatly reduced in the later generations of inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole. Mechanism-based steroidal inhibitors such as 4-hydroxyandrostenedione and exemestane produce prolonged aromatase inhibition in patients. The potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane are approved for clinical use as second-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients failing antiestrogen therapy alone or multiple hormonal therapies.

Aromatase inhibition in JAr choriocarcinoma cells by 7alpha-arylaliphatic androgens

The JAr choriocarcinoma cell cultures have demonstrated high levels of aromatase activity and have been useful for assaying a wide variety of aromatase inhibitors for aromatase inhibition in intact cells. Recently, several 7alpha-arylaliphatic androgens have shown effective inhibition of human placental microsomal aromatase in vitro, with apparent Ki values ranging from 10 to 20 nM. A series of 7alpha-arylaliphatic androst-4-ene-3,17-dione compounds demonstrated potent competitive inhibition, and 7alpha-arylaliphatic androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-diones were enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitors. Both series of these potent inhibitors were investigated for the ability to inhibit aromatase activity in JAr cells by measuring the conversion of [1beta-3H]-androstenedione to 3H2O and unlabelled estrone. JAr cell cultures were incubated for 2 h at 37 degrees C with the aromatase inhibitors at concentrations of 10 pM to 10 microM, the percentage of enzyme inhibition was determined, and IC50 values for inhibitors were calculated. Both series of synthetic compounds demonstrated good to excellent aromatase inhibition, and the most effective inhibitors in both series were those compounds with a phenylpropyl substituent at the 7alpha-position of the steroid nucleus. The 7alpha-arylaliphatic androst-4-ene-3,17-diones exhibited inhibition of JAr aromatase activity with IC50 values from 300 to 434 nM. More potent aromatase inhibition was observed with the 7alpha-arylaliphatic androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-diones, which exhibited IC50 values from 64 to 232 nM. Enhanced efficacy of steroidal enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitors compared to competitive inhibitors was observed in these studies and is consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that JAr choriocarcinoma cells with high levels of aromatase activity may be useful in differentiating steroidal aromatase inhibitors exhibiting different mechanisms of enzyme inhibition. In summary, the 7alpha-phenylpropyl androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione analogs, which are enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitors, demonstrated the most effective inhibition of aromatase activity present in the JAr cell cultures among the various 7alpha-arylaliphatic androgens.