RU 38486 inhibits intracellular calcium mobilization and PGI2 release from human myometrium: mechanisms of action

Dexamethasone Treatment Increases the Intracellular Calcium Level Through TRPV6 in A549 Cells

This study investigated the effect of dexamethasone (DEX) on intracellular calcium levels and the expressions of transient receptor potential cation channel subcomponent V member 6 (TRPV6), sodium-calcium exchanger 1 (NCX1), and plasma membrane calcium ATPase 1 (PMCA1) in A549 cells. The intracellular calcium level, by using the calcium indicator pGP-CMV-GCaMP6f, increased following DEX treatment for 6, 12, and 24 h in A549 cells. In addition, Rhod-4 assay after DEX treatment for 24 h showed that DEX increased the level of intracellular calcium. The expression of the calcium influx TRPV6 gene significantly increased, whereas the expressions of the calcium outflow NCX1 and PMCA1 genes significantly decreased with DEX treatment. The mRNA levels of surfactant protein genes SFTPA1, SFTPB, SFTPC, and SFTPD and the secreted airway mucin genes MUC1 and MUC5AC were investigated by treating cells with DEX. The DEX treatment decreased the mRNA levels of SFTPA1 and SFTPB but increased the mRNA levels of SFTPC and SFTPD. The MUC1 mRNA level was increased by DEX treatment, whereas MUC5AC mRNA was significantly decreased. These results indicate that DEX influences the intracellular calcium level through TRPV6, and affects pulmonary surfactant genes and secreted airway mucin genes in A549 cells.

Exploring Flexibility of Progesterone Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Using Molecular Dynamics

Progesterone receptor (PR), a member of nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily, plays a vital role for female reproductive tissue development, differentiation and maintenance. PR ligand, such as progesterone, induces conformation changes in PR ligand binding domain (LBD), thus mediates subsequent gene regulation cascades. PR LBD may adopt different conformations upon an agonist or an antagonist binding. These different conformations would trigger distinct transcription events. Therefore, the dynamics of PR LBD would be of general interest to biologists for a deep understanding of its structure-function relationship. However, no apo-form (non-ligand bound) of PR LBD model has been proposed either by experiments or computational methods so far. In this study, we explored the structural dynamics of PR LBD using molecular dynamics simulations and advanced sampling tools in both ligand-bound and the apo-forms. Resolved by the simulation study, helix 11, helix 12 and loop 895–908 (the loop between these two helices) are quite flexible in antagonistic conformation. Several residues, such as Arg899 and Glu723, could form salt-bridging interaction between helix 11 and helix 3, and are important for the PR LBD dynamics. And we also propose that helix 12 in apo-form PR LBD, not like other NR LBDs, such as human estrogen receptor α (ERα) LBD, may not adopt a totally extended conformation. With the aid of umbrella sampling and metadynamics simulations, several stable conformations of apo-form PR LBD have been sampled, which may work as critical structural models for further large scale virtual screening study to discover novel PR ligands for therapeutic application.

Nongenomic uterine relaxing effect of RU 486 (mifepristone) prior to its antiprogesterone activity in the human pregnancy

The antiprogestin mifepristone (RU 486) is used for termination of pregnancy, as RU 486 blocks the quiescent action of progesterone, increases uterine contractility, sensitizes the myometrium to prostaglandins, and elicits cervical ripening. Since RU 486 represents a class of compound that is structurally related to steroid hormones, some of which possess a nongenomic uterine relaxing effect, we investigated the potential nongenomic relaxing action of RU 486 on the human pregnant myometrium. Myometrial tissues were obtained from pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section at term and were isometrically recorded. RU 486 caused relaxation on spontaneous contractility and high potassium-induced contractions with lower relaxing efficacy than progesterone. The progesterone receptor-blocking activity of RU 486 did not antagonize the uterine relaxation of progesterone. Moreover, contractions induced by oxytocin or different prostaglandins (PGF(2alpha), PGE(2), and a prostaglandin analogue, misoprostol) were inhibited rather than increased by RU 486. RU 486 induced a rapid and reversible relaxing effect, which was unaffected by inhibitors of protein synthesis and transcription, implying that RU 486 acts through a nongenomic mechanism. This study reveals that RU 486: (i) reduced high potassium-induced contraction and prevented calcium-induced contraction in depolarized tissue; and (ii) relaxed the oxytocin- and prostaglandin-induced contractions, indicating a blockade of voltage- and receptor-operated calcium channels by RU 486. These data show that this antiprogestin may induce a rapid nongenomic antiuterotonic effect prior to its antiprogesterone action.

Rapid effect of progesterone on transepithelial resistance of human fetal membranes: evidence for non-genomic action

1. The factors that regulate human fetal membrane transport mechanisms are unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of progesterone on transepithelial electrical resistance (R(TE)) in the human amniochorion. 2. Fetal membranes from uncomplicated term pregnancies were obtained immediately after vaginal or Caesarean deliveries. Intact pieces were mounted as planar sheets separating an Ussing chamber. Progesterone (10(-4) to 10(-7) mol/L), mifepristone (10(-4) to 10(-8) mol/L) and combinations of progesterone plus mifepristone were applied to the chambers facing the fetal or maternal sides of the membrane. The R(TE) was measured before and 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 min after each solution was added (at 37 degrees C). The R(TE) was calculated in Omega.cm(2), according to Ohm's law. 3. The mean (+/-SEM) basal value of R(TE) before the application of any substance in all experiments was 29.1 +/- 0.4 Omega.cm(2). The net change in the R(TE) (Delta R(TE)) in relation to the basal value was calculated in each experiment. Progesterone, mifepristone and the combination of progesterone and mifepristone induced a rapid, surge-type increase in R(TE) during the 1st min on both sides of the membrane. The combination of progesterone plus mifepristone exerted a synergistic action. The effect was stronger on the fetal side than on the maternal side for all substances tested (P < 0.05). The highest Delta R(TE) during the 1st min on the fetal side was seen with the combination of progesterone plus mifepristone (4.0 +/- 0.3 Omega.cm(2)) and the lowest Delta R(TE) occurred with mifepristone (1.5 +/- 0.1 Omega.cm(2)). 4. The present results demonstrated that the R(TE) of human fetal membranes increases rapidly in response to progesterone. It is possible that changes in R(TE) play a role in the control of membrane permeability during pregnancy.

Prostanoids regulate proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by arginine vasopressin

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of arginine [Arg(8)]vasopressin (vasopressin) on proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the mechanisms underlying the action of vasopressin. To clarify these issues, we used two different types of vascular smooth muscle cells, cultured adult rat aortic smooth muscle cells and A10 cells, a cell line derived from fetal rat aorta. Vasopressin (10(-8) to 10(-6) M) significantly stimulated the proliferation of rat aortic smooth muscle cells in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, vasopressin significantly inhibited the proliferation of A10 cells. This inhibition was abolished when A10 cells were treated with indomethacin. Vasopressin stimulated the production of prostanoids several-fold in A10 cells but not in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. These effects were completely blocked by the vasopressin V(1) receptor antagonist, 1-¿1-[4-(3-acetylamino-propoxy)benzoyl]4-piperidyl¿-3, 4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (OPC21268), but not by the vasopressin V(2) receptor antagonist, (+/-)-5-dimethylamino-1-[4-(2-methylbenzoylamino)benzol]-2, 3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzazepine hydrochloride (OPC31260). These results indicate that vasopressin has diverse effect on proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells through the vasopressin V(1) receptor, depending on the production of growth regulatory prostanoids.

Adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension: effects of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor antagonism

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the increase of blood pressure in adrenocorticotrophin-treated rats is mediated through mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptors or corticosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation inhibition.

DESIGN

Rats were randomly allocated to 14 treatment groups for 10 days. The treatments included sham injection (n = 35), adrenocorticotrophin (5, 100, 500 micrograms/kg per day, subcutaneously, n = 5, 15 and 15, respectively), spironolactone (100 mg/kg per day, subcutaneously, n = 15), standard-dose or high-dose RU 486 (70 mg/kg every 3 days or 70 mg/kg per day, subcutaneously, n = 5 and 10, respectively), spironolactone + adrenocorticotrophin (100 micrograms/kg per day, n = 5, or 500 micrograms/kg per day, n = 10), standard-dose RU 486 + adrenocorticotrophin (500 micrograms/kg per day, n = 5), high-dose RU 486 + adrenocorticotrophin (100 micrograms/kg per day, n = 10), troleandomycin (40 mg/kg per day, subcutaneously, n = 5) and troleandomycin + adrenocorticotrophin (5 micrograms/kg per day, n = 5). Systolic blood pressure and metabolic parameters were measured every second day.

RESULTS

Adrenocorticotrophin treatment increased systolic blood pressure dose-dependently (5 micrograms/kg per day: +14 +/- 2 mmHg; 100 micrograms/kg per day: +20 +/- 2 mmHg; 500 micrograms/kg per day: +28 +/- 2 mmHg, all P < 0.001). Adrenocorticotrophin at 100 and 500 micrograms/kg per day increased plasma sodium and decreased plasma potassium concentrations. Spironolactone did not block adrenocorticotrophin-induced systolic blood pressure changes but did block changes in plasma sodium and potassium levels. Standard-dose RU 486 did not modify the adrenocorticotrophin-induced (500 micrograms/kg per day) systolic blood pressure rise but blocked the effect of adrenocorticotrophin on body weight. High-dose RU 486 partially blocked the adrenocorticotrophin-induced (100 micrograms/kg per day) systolic blood pressure increase (adrenocorticotrophin at 100 micrograms/kg per day: 143 +/- 3 mmHg; high-dose RU 486 + adrenocorticotrophin at 100 micrograms/kg per day: 128 +/- 5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and body-weight loss. Troleandomycin did not alter the development of adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Spironolactone and standard-dose RU 486 did not modify adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension despite demonstrable antimineralocorticoid and antiglucocorticoid actions. High-dose RU 486 partially blocked adrenocorticotrophin-induced (100 micrograms/kg per day) hypertension, suggesting either a permissive effect of glucocorticoid on blood pressure or other antihypertensive actions of RU 486. Inhibition of glucocorticoid 6 beta-hydroxylation by troleandomycin did not modify adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension, suggesting that effects of corticosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation in adrenocorticotrophin-induced hypertension are negligible.